Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
With Love, Meghan on Netflix
![[Post New]](/jforum/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif){kind=icon}
Anonymous
| It seems like he wants to reconcile and misses his heritage and family and friends, and knows this pain will also pass to his children, who will long for what they’ve missed. Meghan fills his head with nonsense, you can almost hear the two sides as he talks, his voice changes slightly and his eyes change. There are his statements, then he parrots her arguments. It’s chilling. I know he’s a broken man, but it’s borderline exploitation. I feel like the older the kids get, the more he realizes what is being done to them that cannot be undone. |
Anonymous
I think they would like tape it. Or take a photo of it and post is on her new Instagram. Also what a hypocrite now poster her kids every single day on her Instagram after all her “social justice warrioring” about the dangers of kids and social media. They can afford their lifestyle, don’t want to downsize/downgrade, and that is why they want a reconciliation. They have a mortgage on the Monticito home, and are paying maybe a 1mm on security per year, plus flying private etc. All their endeavors have been flops or like mediocre successes. As Ever was #1 in Lithuania for more than 1 week. These “wins” aren’t going to pay for the lifestyle they want. They either need support from bank of dad or they need the royal affiliation to sell and make money off of and the royals refuse to be sold, that’s why they have nothing to do with them. I bet living in 5mm newly renovated frogmore cottage in Windsor park with security and other perks like no bills or gardeners, private schools paid for, rich life long friends whose planes you can jump on with regularity, and a second home in the Cotswolds (which they would’ve gotten if they had played nice), while having like 50-100 partial day ribbon cutting ceremonies per year and zero stress about money as everything is taken care of and they had a million pound allowance. But they had to have billions! But those billions never materialized and now Harry is realizing that 60milliom dollars can run out really quickly when you spend 3million or more per year. |
Anonymous
It doesn't even make any sense. Before Charles became King, Queen Elizabeth's Private Secretary Sir Edward Young wrote a letter on her and the BRF's behalf to RAVEC telling them it was the family's wish that Harry and Meghan kept their security. This letter was revealed in court documents. Even then, it didn't matter. RAVEC did their review and decided they weren't going to take that under advisement and that the threat level did not rise to the amount that would be needed for this type of security. Since the UK is a constitutional monarchy and not an absolute monarchy, the Queen did not have the power to influence the government's decision. I'm not quite sure why Harry expects Charles to be any different. |
Anonymous
| At least we’re in agreement that the kids exist. That’s progress. |
Anonymous
Son of the monarch >>> grandson of monarch. |
Anonymous
William lost the same mother. William did the same walk. |
Anonymous
This is the only argument any adult needs to hear. But Harry and Meghan’s fans are incredibly stupid and dishonest. Unlike Ms Runny Spread, I don’t like monarchs and their kids, but if I had to save one, it would be the individual who had enough dignity to not sit for repeated printed and televised whinefests about how hard his life is. I also have the intelligence to see a woman claiming she disdains titles and the practices surrounding them, while behaving as Meghan does, as the fake tacky drip she is. Regarding finances - I would suspect the Markles’s outlay is far higher than 3 million/yr, and that because they are both spoiled silly middle-aged asses who can’t change, neither has ever lived within a real budget. Meghan’s heart-attack struck abused father supported her financially essentially entirely until marriage, just like Harry’s cancer-struck father; she was single relatively briefly after divorce. Meghan repeatedly put up paeans to her daddy as an adult for financial and other support - just as Harry repeatedly and publicly said William and Catherine encouraged him to get therapy well before he met Meghan. Real talk, Meghan has drafted off of men her entire waking life, and Harry was the individual most benefited by the press his whole life. Harry has had multiple documented incidents of racism, of academic fraud, of stolen valor in terms of service (“bunker Harry.”) Harry is an angry intellectually damaged drug-addled shithead, less useful than an abandoned pile of dog crap on a sidewalk. Royal assistants devised Invictus, and he has drained every charity for personal travel and hotel costs since his brave freedom flight. He and his darling are the biggest fakes on the public stage, and they’re a perfect match. Harry pissing himself before cameras and trying again to take from UK taxpayers while giving absolute nothing in return is beneath everyone’s dignity excepting him and his absurd helpmeet. Their marriage would be hell for any thinking person. The UK can always dump the monarchy by referendum or revolution. For now, the population is somewhat supportive. Were it Harry sitting on a throne, things would not be so, let’s get real. Oh on money and With Love - I will always assert that she didn’t have the show there because her kitchen isn’t as updated as Goop’s. No, it would not take a crew of 80 to watch her struggle to fill a jar with skin-burning bath salts. Come on. Meghan is the exact kind of fake who would rather online shop for Hermes tat than spend on a contractor or test a recipe or parent her kids. |
Anonymous
|
Phew, let it all out, PP!
But you have a Balcony Event to look forward to! They’ll be out there waving for VE Day! They, of course, being the good, true, proper royals. Then we can come back here and again talk about how it’s a shame that Harry can’t be part of the balcony waving! |
Anonymous
Unlike your fellow twits, I don’t support monarchy. How modern and revolutionary did you think it was when the current king walked your bridge-burning shero down the aisle, sweetie? Why do the pube-haired Harry and his lying wife object only to the privilege they don’t have, rather than the privilege they enjoy? |
Anonymous
|
This is a good distillation IMO of the dynamic. Explains the use of ciphers and other sad attachment to royal stuff —
“His father and William do not want to see him because they cannot let down their guard with him--he blabs everything they say to him, and of course he would do so again. He is addicted to the attention. He loves his privileges, but like Andrew and Margaret before him he has trouble accepting he benefits from being in a system based on primogeniture when he was not the first-born. No one is going to advance him to the throne even if he thinks he is smarter and more deserving than William--that's not how his system works. If he wants to be judged on his merits entirely, then he needs to leave the royal system entirely. He and Meghan are still unwilling to do that--they still want to be called "Your Royal Highness" and be bowed before. If he wants any chance of reconciliation with his brother and father, he's got to shut his big mouth. And he does not get special protection for doing "service" from the UK establishment because he does not get to decide on his own what his "service" is--if he wants them to consider his service, he has to do what the Palace asks him to do. He never seems willing to accept the plain fact that insofar as he matters to anyone it is because he is the son of the king and the brother of the Prince of Wales. He gets money and benefits from that position, but he does not get to be more important than they are.“ |
Anonymous
No. Not at all. When Queen Elizabeth was monarch, her children, excluding the heir, did not receive 24/7 security. |
Anonymous
No most immigrants do not cut off their families. That's a very American thing. In the age of free video calls etc most families are pretty close and many travel (especially if they are affluent and doesn't need to be anywhere close to MM level). Feeling like you're part of a bigger fabric is very important to many people. |
Anonymous
William has also been coddled very differently because he was the heir. Read Harry’s book. While I rolled my eyes through a lot of it, Harry was younger, emotionally fragile, and basically left to his own devices with a father who himself isn’t really good at the parenting thing or making emotional connections. Charles was still living through his own mommy and daddy issues. None of these people are emotionally healthy. Also, i genuinely believe that it is about security. On this issue, Harry will never be anything other than that 12 year old whose life was turned upside down in an instant. He will never have anything other than a knee jerk reaction to this issue. Harry has a lot of similarities to his mother who was not the smartest or emotionally stable herself. She didn’t make it in the BRF, and neither is Harry. It’s not about grift and money. |
Anonymous
|
The fact he did this interview right after he lost and clearly was pissed says it all. He has no self control and will never ever change. Everyone knows to sleep on anger and then respond. Even my teenager.
And it shows he will throw his brother and father under the bus at a moments notice if he doesn’t get his way. He is beyond hope. Good riddance |
Anonymous
| Everyone knows Diana turned down security provided by the Monarch and chose her private security. Right? |