With Love, Meghan on Netflix

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The whole HRH and duchess thing really is over the top and inappropriate. I noticed that now if I try to search for Meghan markle in news, it autocorrects it to duchess Meghan, even if I put her actual name in quotes. She must have pushed hard legally to get that to happen.
She left that life then threw mud at it. She has absolutely no claim to duchess, Sussex, or hrh. And the kids shouldn’t be using the titles if they aren’t going to step foot in UK.


Not legally.

Meghan Markle’s entire life seems to be governed by SEO, not by being a jam-maker or a podcaster or a philanthropist. There’s a reason there’s always ‘news’ about her in places like People.

The idea that her dim husband had to ‘slay dragons’ for her is hilarious, given how much she and the dope cling to titles in a country where the Constitution forbids recognition of same, and who despite all of his whining and how little he’s done in his life with all of that money and opportunity and fleeing to ‘freedom,’ it is very evident that they named their kids in a sketch way and pouted about titles because those silly things mean everything to them.


I’m surprised at how important the titles are to them, and that she would privately use the HRH title with her friends. But then again they are not the most self aware people to realize how ridiculous holding on to British royal titles sounds when you live in the US. It’s very important for her that everyone thinks she’s happy, and she very well may be as she pursues her “creativity.” But there is no way Harry, who spends his time fighting for security to spend extended periods of time in the U.K., is happy in Montecito.


There was a paparazzi video at a movie premiere where Meghan and Harry are saying goodbye to their friends and one curtesys to Harry, he bows to say thank you and they both laugh. I get the feeling that their friends tease them about it, and this was her playing along. But I’m of the opinion that MM isn’t an evil psychopath.




Their friends might tease them about it, but it is clearly very serious to Meghan as a status indicator. Her most important accomplishment is to be "Duchess of Sussex" (in Montecito which makes no sense). She knows she will be completely shut our once William is king so she's trying to make the most of being Duchess of Montecito while she can.


Huh? The titles were given by the Queen of England. She didn’t take them away, and she could have. And the King can, anytime.

That’s an accomplishment! Have you any titles given by a monarch?

I’m not her biggest fan. I think they should have stayed. But I see now it was good they went away to get a lot of space. He’s 5th in line at this point, just let him and his family figure out what they want. If you’ve watched any of The Crown, you’ll see parts of why it’s hard to be second, why it’s hard to be in the next 10 after the monarch. The test of loyalty is greatest at the top.


Yes, and William will probably strip the titles when he is king. So she has to make the most of the title while she can. That's my point.


I honestly doubt William will do anything about it. Stripping the titles would bring so much attention to them. It would be a win for the royal superfans but to most of the world, it would just seem petty. Harry will always be connected to them as the King’s son and future king’s only sibling. No letters patent could change that.

Any positive story about Harry (like Invictus Games) would then have a negative spin for the BRF as it’ll say “formerly known as” and go into how/why. William seems to just ignore Harry’s existence and that’s probably the best strategy. Harry’s biggest sin here is whining about being treated poorly as spare. If Andrew hasn’t crossed the line to have his titles stripped, Harry sure hasn’t.


The brother of the future king is not a title or position. And they won't be connected in any way because they are not going to be invited to any events in England, except maybe Charles' funeral. Even then they will be isolated from others because Meghan cannot be trusted not to film the family for personal gain.


I love the hidden camera/microphone conspiracy theories!






Let's put it this way. They don't even want a Netflix camera to film them all together from a distance because then she can claim they all reconciled. That's not a conspiracy and has nothing to do with hidden cameras.
Anonymous
I have always suspected she was a honey pot spy set up with this dope by Mossad.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The whole HRH and duchess thing really is over the top and inappropriate. I noticed that now if I try to search for Meghan markle in news, it autocorrects it to duchess Meghan, even if I put her actual name in quotes. She must have pushed hard legally to get that to happen.
She left that life then threw mud at it. She has absolutely no claim to duchess, Sussex, or hrh. And the kids shouldn’t be using the titles if they aren’t going to step foot in UK.


Not legally.

Meghan Markle’s entire life seems to be governed by SEO, not by being a jam-maker or a podcaster or a philanthropist. There’s a reason there’s always ‘news’ about her in places like People.

The idea that her dim husband had to ‘slay dragons’ for her is hilarious, given how much she and the dope cling to titles in a country where the Constitution forbids recognition of same, and who despite all of his whining and how little he’s done in his life with all of that money and opportunity and fleeing to ‘freedom,’ it is very evident that they named their kids in a sketch way and pouted about titles because those silly things mean everything to them.


I’m surprised at how important the titles are to them, and that she would privately use the HRH title with her friends. But then again they are not the most self aware people to realize how ridiculous holding on to British royal titles sounds when you live in the US. It’s very important for her that everyone thinks she’s happy, and she very well may be as she pursues her “creativity.” But there is no way Harry, who spends his time fighting for security to spend extended periods of time in the U.K., is happy in Montecito.


There was a paparazzi video at a movie premiere where Meghan and Harry are saying goodbye to their friends and one curtesys to Harry, he bows to say thank you and they both laugh. I get the feeling that their friends tease them about it, and this was her playing along. But I’m of the opinion that MM isn’t an evil psychopath.




Their friends might tease them about it, but it is clearly very serious to Meghan as a status indicator. Her most important accomplishment is to be "Duchess of Sussex" (in Montecito which makes no sense). She knows she will be completely shut our once William is king so she's trying to make the most of being Duchess of Montecito while she can.


Huh? The titles were given by the Queen of England. She didn’t take them away, and she could have. And the King can, anytime.

That’s an accomplishment! Have you any titles given by a monarch?

I’m not her biggest fan. I think they should have stayed. But I see now it was good they went away to get a lot of space. He’s 5th in line at this point, just let him and his family figure out what they want. If you’ve watched any of The Crown, you’ll see parts of why it’s hard to be second, why it’s hard to be in the next 10 after the monarch. The test of loyalty is greatest at the top.


Yes, and William will probably strip the titles when he is king. So she has to make the most of the title while she can. That's my point.


I honestly doubt William will do anything about it. Stripping the titles would bring so much attention to them. It would be a win for the royal superfans but to most of the world, it would just seem petty. Harry will always be connected to them as the King’s son and future king’s only sibling. No letters patent could change that.

Any positive story about Harry (like Invictus Games) would then have a negative spin for the BRF as it’ll say “formerly known as” and go into how/why. William seems to just ignore Harry’s existence and that’s probably the best strategy. Harry’s biggest sin here is whining about being treated poorly as spare. If Andrew hasn’t crossed the line to have his titles stripped, Harry sure hasn’t.


The brother of the future king is not a title or position. And they won't be connected in any way because they are not going to be invited to any events in England, except maybe Charles' funeral. Even then they will be isolated from others because Meghan cannot be trusted not to film the family for personal gain.


+1 she has already threatened them. In the Cut interview she said she “didn’t sign an NDA.” That is a direct threat to her in laws and is just another reason for them to continue shunning her.


Well Harry just lost his final appeal in the security case. So they won’t be going back to the uk without 28 days notice if they want security.


You really think Harry was suing for security? It was obviously his status obsessed tyrant wife. She wanted security to feel important; a D list actress who wants to feel like a global elite. Harry clearly couldn't give a damn.
Anonymous
So I am not a fan of Meghan but it occurred to me today that the reason she gets so much hate is because she appears out of touch and aloof and her mannerisms are rehearsed and fake. She also rehashes platitudes that are not relevant to or accessible to many ordinary people. However, she seems to ingratiate herself easily to other high status, rich people like Oprah Winfrey, Gwyneth Paltrow, Prince Harry, Justin Trudeu's circle of friends etc.

It is because...they relate to her and they understand her. She is not being fake...when you are so rich and privileged and sheltered...you really do spiral over not being asked if you are ok and do tend to think flower sprinkles bring joy. She is so effervescent because she is beautiful, in a happy marriage with a Prince, lives on a gorgeous estate and is rich! That isn't performative!

She has lived in the 1% since her Suits days and is now part of the world elite. Of course she is out of touch and unrelatable!
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:So I am not a fan of Meghan but it occurred to me today that the reason she gets so much hate is because she appears out of touch and aloof and her mannerisms are rehearsed and fake. She also rehashes platitudes that are not relevant to or accessible to many ordinary people. However, she seems to ingratiate herself easily to other high status, rich people like Oprah Winfrey, Gwyneth Paltrow, Prince Harry, Justin Trudeu's circle of friends etc.

It is because...they relate to her and they understand her. She is not being fake...when you are so rich and privileged and sheltered...you really do spiral over not being asked if you are ok and do tend to think flower sprinkles bring joy. She is so effervescent because she is beautiful, in a happy marriage with a Prince, lives on a gorgeous estate and is rich! That isn't performative!

She has lived in the 1% since her Suits days and is now part of the world elite. Of course she is out of touch and unrelatable!


I don't think this is correct. If this was the reason all rich and beautiful celebrities would be hated. The reason people don't like her is because she reached the status of a working member of the royal family, and all she did was complain. Then she left the royal family and claimed to want privacy but has continued to claim royal ties and try to make American status of being a Duchess when we don't have royal titles iinfluences.

The problem with that is that no one cares about members of the royal family who are not actually in the institution. The magic is in how the work together and present themselves to the public on special occasions. They do not shill on Instagram and do interviews with influencers. That is low level social media influencer behavior unworthy of the royal family.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:It’s sad Harry’s kids are being completely isolated and stripped of their British culture. They are growing up without any extended family and without growing up with the kids of Harry’s childhood friends. They are being raised completely American. They will never be able to go back and fit in.

That is the reason they might lose their titles. If something were to happen to William and his kids, Harry and his kids would not be popular enough to rule and the British monarchy in all probability would end.


I am so whatever about the adults, it's the kids I wonder about. Will they be raised to hate their entire family overseas or will they eventually see pictures like this and resent their parents for completely isolating them from an entire family and culture that their other family members get to have? It is my understanding that even though he lost the case, he is able to submit his travel plans to the Home Office 28 days before a trip to the UK and they will make a decision on a case by case basis on what, if any, security he will be afforded based on the risk level at that time. I'm not understanding this new BBC interview where he says he will never be able to take his kids to the UK.

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:It’s sad Harry’s kids are being completely isolated and stripped of their British culture. They are growing up without any extended family and without growing up with the kids of Harry’s childhood friends. They are being raised completely American. They will never be able to go back and fit in.

That is the reason they might lose their titles. If something were to happen to William and his kids, Harry and his kids would not be popular enough to rule and the British monarchy in all probability would end.


I agree, when the kids become aware of what they’ve lost, it will be devastating. I don’t know how one could ever be at peace with that.
Maybe he leaves her and returns to the U.K. so they can be raised in their heritage, away from her and with limitations for him.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:It’s sad Harry’s kids are being completely isolated and stripped of their British culture. They are growing up without any extended family and without growing up with the kids of Harry’s childhood friends. They are being raised completely American. They will never be able to go back and fit in.

That is the reason they might lose their titles. If something were to happen to William and his kids, Harry and his kids would not be popular enough to rule and the British monarchy in all probability would end.


I agree, when the kids become aware of what they’ve lost, it will be devastating. I don’t know how one could ever be at peace with that.
Maybe he leaves her and returns to the U.K. so they can be raised in their heritage, away from her and with limitations for him.


Kids become aware of this at a young age. They will realize something is off when kids at school talk about their family and they realize they never see their grandfathers, uncle, or cousins.
Anonymous
I think she invented the whole threat scenario so she could say “it’s not safe” and blame someone else for her refusal to return to the U.K. with the children. There may be many reasons of deception, but once in U.K. the kids may refuse to leave. So she can’t let that happen.
Anonymous
She will raise the children to believe that their family said racist things about them before they were born. These are things she has said to the world, so of course she would say to her kids when they ask why they didn’t grow up in the U.K. as royals. I think she is a good mother, and that they will believe her—until they are much older and realize how much their parents messed up.

Of course, Harry is now telling the bbc that he “forgives” his family and wants to reconcile. He should have thought of that before going on Oprah and sitting there like a fool while his trashed his family.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:She will raise the children to believe that their family said racist things about them before they were born. These are things she has said to the world, so of course she would say to her kids when they ask why they didn’t grow up in the U.K. as royals. I think she is a good mother, and that they will believe her—until they are much older and realize how much their parents messed up.

Of course, Harry is now telling the bbc that he “forgives” his family and wants to reconcile. He should have thought of that before going on Oprah and sitting there like a fool while his trashed his family.


Don't forget the previous interview where he said they never said that the family was racist, the media said that. They meant that they simply had unconscious bias.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:She will raise the children to believe that their family said racist things about them before they were born. These are things she has said to the world, so of course she would say to her kids when they ask why they didn’t grow up in the U.K. as royals. I think she is a good mother, and that they will believe her—until they are much older and realize how much their parents messed up.

Of course, Harry is now telling the bbc that he “forgives” his family and wants to reconcile. He should have thought of that before going on Oprah and sitting there like a fool while his trashed his family.


So interesting how they can never get over the victim mentality. Aside from a vague mention of how some may be upset because he wrote a book, Harry places all the blame on his family. We forgive them, don't they care about our safety, my dad could easily have made sure we have security - wow, nothing has changed.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:She will raise the children to believe that their family said racist things about them before they were born. These are things she has said to the world, so of course she would say to her kids when they ask why they didn’t grow up in the U.K. as royals. I think she is a good mother, and that they will believe her—until they are much older and realize how much their parents messed up.

Of course, Harry is now telling the bbc that he “forgives” his family and wants to reconcile. He should have thought of that before going on Oprah and sitting there like a fool while his trashed his family.


So interesting how they can never get over the victim mentality. Aside from a vague mention of how some may be upset because he wrote a book, Harry places all the blame on his family. We forgive them, don't they care about our safety, my dad could easily have made sure we have security - wow, nothing has changed.


I just watched it. It really is interesting because he genuinely believes he’s a major victim—I understand he’s born royal, but through his work with disadvantaged people you would think he would have gained some perspective. It’s also striking how miserable he is over the prospect of not coming to the UK as often. I thought he wanted “freedom”
Anonymous
That BBC interview is really bad. He can't say he "has forgiven" his family and then keep blaming them for the court decision. It's so odd how he doesn't see HE is the one preventing all reconciliation with these constant statements.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:I have always suspected she was a honey pot spy set up with this dope by Mossad.

There we go.
Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture
Go to: