With Love, Meghan on Netflix

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Look she may have her issues but you can't deny Meghan is really living her best life. she secured the bag, got out of freezing miserable England and is living in beautiful sunny California, happily married with kids she gets to spend unlimited time with, rich AF. Doesn't have to deal with her miserable in laws anymore and make nice with a pedo. And no matter your opinion of her it's hard to argue she's afraid of hard work. Unlike her in laws...


This is hilarious. She barely worked when she was in the RF and she's had 5 years and practically nothing to show for it after except... finally... some jam. What is this "hard work" you speak of?

And they literally do not care about the pedo. The only things they've ever said about the Yorks are how nice and welcoming to Meghan they were, lol.


I think she would prefer the prestige of being BRF in cold England than having to earn a living in Montecito. For literally anyone else, of course freedom and nice weather and wealth is better. But for a certain kind of person, fame and status (why she keeps using HRH and Duchess of Sussex here in the USA where no one GaF) are more important.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Eh.. whatever. She reminds me of Fergie or Wallis Simpson. High drama, falling out with the royal family, goes on to live a happy life capitalizing on her marriage. Glad she’s happy, hopefully she can stay low drama and just quietly drift off into influencer land


You're using Fergie and Wallis Simpson as examples of people who "go on to live a happy life?" Really? I'd say you don't know much about either.


I mean I don’t know Wallis and Fergie were happy after their respective scandals (can anyone know this for certain?) but ultimately they seemed to both fare well. Wallis lived a life of parties, jewels and a chateau in France. Fergie wrote kids books, was a spokesperson for weight watchers and is still “with” the love of her life Andrew with all the money that brings.


Simpson struggled with finances and loss of status due to the scandal. Fergie had to sell herself as a chubby person for WW because she was bankrupt and in a number of financial scandals, plus her ex and tie to the BRF is a lying pedo.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The whole HRH and duchess thing really is over the top and inappropriate. I noticed that now if I try to search for Meghan markle in news, it autocorrects it to duchess Meghan, even if I put her actual name in quotes. She must have pushed hard legally to get that to happen.
She left that life then threw mud at it. She has absolutely no claim to duchess, Sussex, or hrh. And the kids shouldn’t be using the titles if they aren’t going to step foot in UK.


Not legally.

Meghan Markle’s entire life seems to be governed by SEO, not by being a jam-maker or a podcaster or a philanthropist. There’s a reason there’s always ‘news’ about her in places like People.

The idea that her dim husband had to ‘slay dragons’ for her is hilarious, given how much she and the dope cling to titles in a country where the Constitution forbids recognition of same, and who despite all of his whining and how little he’s done in his life with all of that money and opportunity and fleeing to ‘freedom,’ it is very evident that they named their kids in a sketch way and pouted about titles because those silly things mean everything to them.


I’m surprised at how important the titles are to them, and that she would privately use the HRH title with her friends. But then again they are not the most self aware people to realize how ridiculous holding on to British royal titles sounds when you live in the US. It’s very important for her that everyone thinks she’s happy, and she very well may be as she pursues her “creativity.” But there is no way Harry, who spends his time fighting for security to spend extended periods of time in the U.K., is happy in Montecito.


There was a paparazzi video at a movie premiere where Meghan and Harry are saying goodbye to their friends and one curtesys to Harry, he bows to say thank you and they both laugh. I get the feeling that their friends tease them about it, and this was her playing along. But I’m of the opinion that MM isn’t an evil psychopath.




Their friends might tease them about it, but it is clearly very serious to Meghan as a status indicator. Her most important accomplishment is to be "Duchess of Sussex" (in Montecito which makes no sense). She knows she will be completely shut our once William is king so she's trying to make the most of being Duchess of Montecito while she can.


Huh? The titles were given by the Queen of England. She didn’t take them away, and she could have. And the King can, anytime.

That’s an accomplishment! Have you any titles given by a monarch?

I’m not her biggest fan. I think they should have stayed. But I see now it was good they went away to get a lot of space. He’s 5th in line at this point, just let him and his family figure out what they want. If you’ve watched any of The Crown, you’ll see parts of why it’s hard to be second, why it’s hard to be in the next 10 after the monarch. The test of loyalty is greatest at the top.


Yes, and William will probably strip the titles when he is king. So she has to make the most of the title while she can. That's my point.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Eh.. whatever. She reminds me of Fergie or Wallis Simpson. High drama, falling out with the royal family, goes on to live a happy life capitalizing on her marriage. Glad she’s happy, hopefully she can stay low drama and just quietly drift off into influencer land


You're using Fergie and Wallis Simpson as examples of people who "go on to live a happy life?" Really? I'd say you don't know much about either.


I mean I don’t know Wallis and Fergie were happy after their respective scandals (can anyone know this for certain?) but ultimately they seemed to both fare well. Wallis lived a life of parties, jewels and a chateau in France. Fergie wrote kids books, was a spokesperson for weight watchers and is still “with” the love of her life Andrew with all the money that brings.


Fergie and Andrew have essentially no income and are both broke. Their “scandals” have been mostly generated by their attempts to use their connections to make money. By all accounts, Andrew treats her terribly, but allows her to stay because she’s the mother of his children and has nowhere else to go, and they are both squatting at Royal Lodge and praying that Prince Charles won’t have the nerve to have them physically hauled out kicking and screaming.

Even Wallis Simpson didn’t think her story had a fairytale ending. They lived in France because the French gave them a house to live in for free, and they socialized with a motley group that included other disgraced people like Oswald Mosley.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The whole HRH and duchess thing really is over the top and inappropriate. I noticed that now if I try to search for Meghan markle in news, it autocorrects it to duchess Meghan, even if I put her actual name in quotes. She must have pushed hard legally to get that to happen.
She left that life then threw mud at it. She has absolutely no claim to duchess, Sussex, or hrh. And the kids shouldn’t be using the titles if they aren’t going to step foot in UK.


Not legally.

Meghan Markle’s entire life seems to be governed by SEO, not by being a jam-maker or a podcaster or a philanthropist. There’s a reason there’s always ‘news’ about her in places like People.

The idea that her dim husband had to ‘slay dragons’ for her is hilarious, given how much she and the dope cling to titles in a country where the Constitution forbids recognition of same, and who despite all of his whining and how little he’s done in his life with all of that money and opportunity and fleeing to ‘freedom,’ it is very evident that they named their kids in a sketch way and pouted about titles because those silly things mean everything to them.


I’m surprised at how important the titles are to them, and that she would privately use the HRH title with her friends. But then again they are not the most self aware people to realize how ridiculous holding on to British royal titles sounds when you live in the US. It’s very important for her that everyone thinks she’s happy, and she very well may be as she pursues her “creativity.” But there is no way Harry, who spends his time fighting for security to spend extended periods of time in the U.K., is happy in Montecito.


There was a paparazzi video at a movie premiere where Meghan and Harry are saying goodbye to their friends and one curtesys to Harry, he bows to say thank you and they both laugh. I get the feeling that their friends tease them about it, and this was her playing along. But I’m of the opinion that MM isn’t an evil psychopath.




Their friends might tease them about it, but it is clearly very serious to Meghan as a status indicator. Her most important accomplishment is to be "Duchess of Sussex" (in Montecito which makes no sense). She knows she will be completely shut our once William is king so she's trying to make the most of being Duchess of Montecito while she can.


Huh? The titles were given by the Queen of England. She didn’t take them away, and she could have. And the King can, anytime.

That’s an accomplishment! Have you any titles given by a monarch?

I’m not her biggest fan. I think they should have stayed. But I see now it was good they went away to get a lot of space. He’s 5th in line at this point, just let him and his family figure out what they want. If you’ve watched any of The Crown, you’ll see parts of why it’s hard to be second, why it’s hard to be in the next 10 after the monarch. The test of loyalty is greatest at the top.


“Let him and his family figure out what they want.” That’s funny. The royal family has moved on from him and his wife. They dont want them back.


You are talking past me. You’re a lost cause. You only hate these people.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The whole HRH and duchess thing really is over the top and inappropriate. I noticed that now if I try to search for Meghan markle in news, it autocorrects it to duchess Meghan, even if I put her actual name in quotes. She must have pushed hard legally to get that to happen.
She left that life then threw mud at it. She has absolutely no claim to duchess, Sussex, or hrh. And the kids shouldn’t be using the titles if they aren’t going to step foot in UK.


Not legally.

Meghan Markle’s entire life seems to be governed by SEO, not by being a jam-maker or a podcaster or a philanthropist. There’s a reason there’s always ‘news’ about her in places like People.

The idea that her dim husband had to ‘slay dragons’ for her is hilarious, given how much she and the dope cling to titles in a country where the Constitution forbids recognition of same, and who despite all of his whining and how little he’s done in his life with all of that money and opportunity and fleeing to ‘freedom,’ it is very evident that they named their kids in a sketch way and pouted about titles because those silly things mean everything to them.


I’m surprised at how important the titles are to them, and that she would privately use the HRH title with her friends. But then again they are not the most self aware people to realize how ridiculous holding on to British royal titles sounds when you live in the US. It’s very important for her that everyone thinks she’s happy, and she very well may be as she pursues her “creativity.” But there is no way Harry, who spends his time fighting for security to spend extended periods of time in the U.K., is happy in Montecito.


There was a paparazzi video at a movie premiere where Meghan and Harry are saying goodbye to their friends and one curtesys to Harry, he bows to say thank you and they both laugh. I get the feeling that their friends tease them about it, and this was her playing along. But I’m of the opinion that MM isn’t an evil psychopath.




Their friends might tease them about it, but it is clearly very serious to Meghan as a status indicator. Her most important accomplishment is to be "Duchess of Sussex" (in Montecito which makes no sense). She knows she will be completely shut our once William is king so she's trying to make the most of being Duchess of Montecito while she can.


Huh? The titles were given by the Queen of England. She didn’t take them away, and she could have. And the King can, anytime.

That’s an accomplishment! Have you any titles given by a monarch?

I’m not her biggest fan. I think they should have stayed. But I see now it was good they went away to get a lot of space. He’s 5th in line at this point, just let him and his family figure out what they want. If you’ve watched any of The Crown, you’ll see parts of why it’s hard to be second, why it’s hard to be in the next 10 after the monarch. The test of loyalty is greatest at the top.


Yes, and William will probably strip the titles when he is king. So she has to make the most of the title while she can. That's my point.


I honestly doubt William will do anything about it. Stripping the titles would bring so much attention to them. It would be a win for the royal superfans but to most of the world, it would just seem petty. Harry will always be connected to them as the King’s son and future king’s only sibling. No letters patent could change that.

Any positive story about Harry (like Invictus Games) would then have a negative spin for the BRF as it’ll say “formerly known as” and go into how/why. William seems to just ignore Harry’s existence and that’s probably the best strategy. Harry’s biggest sin here is whining about being treated poorly as spare. If Andrew hasn’t crossed the line to have his titles stripped, Harry sure hasn’t.
Anonymous
The title thing will never happen but it gives gossipers something to talk about that’s in the future. Last year a presidential candidate said he’d consider deporting Harry. When it came time to actually do it, he said lol nah. When William doesn’t, maybe George will.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The whole HRH and duchess thing really is over the top and inappropriate. I noticed that now if I try to search for Meghan markle in news, it autocorrects it to duchess Meghan, even if I put her actual name in quotes. She must have pushed hard legally to get that to happen.
She left that life then threw mud at it. She has absolutely no claim to duchess, Sussex, or hrh. And the kids shouldn’t be using the titles if they aren’t going to step foot in UK.


Not legally.

Meghan Markle’s entire life seems to be governed by SEO, not by being a jam-maker or a podcaster or a philanthropist. There’s a reason there’s always ‘news’ about her in places like People.

The idea that her dim husband had to ‘slay dragons’ for her is hilarious, given how much she and the dope cling to titles in a country where the Constitution forbids recognition of same, and who despite all of his whining and how little he’s done in his life with all of that money and opportunity and fleeing to ‘freedom,’ it is very evident that they named their kids in a sketch way and pouted about titles because those silly things mean everything to them.


I’m surprised at how important the titles are to them, and that she would privately use the HRH title with her friends. But then again they are not the most self aware people to realize how ridiculous holding on to British royal titles sounds when you live in the US. It’s very important for her that everyone thinks she’s happy, and she very well may be as she pursues her “creativity.” But there is no way Harry, who spends his time fighting for security to spend extended periods of time in the U.K., is happy in Montecito.


There was a paparazzi video at a movie premiere where Meghan and Harry are saying goodbye to their friends and one curtesys to Harry, he bows to say thank you and they both laugh. I get the feeling that their friends tease them about it, and this was her playing along. But I’m of the opinion that MM isn’t an evil psychopath.




Their friends might tease them about it, but it is clearly very serious to Meghan as a status indicator. Her most important accomplishment is to be "Duchess of Sussex" (in Montecito which makes no sense). She knows she will be completely shut our once William is king so she's trying to make the most of being Duchess of Montecito while she can.


Huh? The titles were given by the Queen of England. She didn’t take them away, and she could have. And the King can, anytime.

That’s an accomplishment! Have you any titles given by a monarch?

I’m not her biggest fan. I think they should have stayed. But I see now it was good they went away to get a lot of space. He’s 5th in line at this point, just let him and his family figure out what they want. If you’ve watched any of The Crown, you’ll see parts of why it’s hard to be second, why it’s hard to be in the next 10 after the monarch. The test of loyalty is greatest at the top.


Yes, and William will probably strip the titles when he is king. So she has to make the most of the title while she can. That's my point.


I honestly doubt William will do anything about it. Stripping the titles would bring so much attention to them. It would be a win for the royal superfans but to most of the world, it would just seem petty. Harry will always be connected to them as the King’s son and future king’s only sibling. No letters patent could change that.

Any positive story about Harry (like Invictus Games) would then have a negative spin for the BRF as it’ll say “formerly known as” and go into how/why. William seems to just ignore Harry’s existence and that’s probably the best strategy. Harry’s biggest sin here is whining about being treated poorly as spare. If Andrew hasn’t crossed the line to have his titles stripped, Harry sure hasn’t.


The brother of the future king is not a title or position. And they won't be connected in any way because they are not going to be invited to any events in England, except maybe Charles' funeral. Even then they will be isolated from others because Meghan cannot be trusted not to film the family for personal gain.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The whole HRH and duchess thing really is over the top and inappropriate. I noticed that now if I try to search for Meghan markle in news, it autocorrects it to duchess Meghan, even if I put her actual name in quotes. She must have pushed hard legally to get that to happen.
She left that life then threw mud at it. She has absolutely no claim to duchess, Sussex, or hrh. And the kids shouldn’t be using the titles if they aren’t going to step foot in UK.


Not legally.

Meghan Markle’s entire life seems to be governed by SEO, not by being a jam-maker or a podcaster or a philanthropist. There’s a reason there’s always ‘news’ about her in places like People.

The idea that her dim husband had to ‘slay dragons’ for her is hilarious, given how much she and the dope cling to titles in a country where the Constitution forbids recognition of same, and who despite all of his whining and how little he’s done in his life with all of that money and opportunity and fleeing to ‘freedom,’ it is very evident that they named their kids in a sketch way and pouted about titles because those silly things mean everything to them.


I’m surprised at how important the titles are to them, and that she would privately use the HRH title with her friends. But then again they are not the most self aware people to realize how ridiculous holding on to British royal titles sounds when you live in the US. It’s very important for her that everyone thinks she’s happy, and she very well may be as she pursues her “creativity.” But there is no way Harry, who spends his time fighting for security to spend extended periods of time in the U.K., is happy in Montecito.


There was a paparazzi video at a movie premiere where Meghan and Harry are saying goodbye to their friends and one curtesys to Harry, he bows to say thank you and they both laugh. I get the feeling that their friends tease them about it, and this was her playing along. But I’m of the opinion that MM isn’t an evil psychopath.




Their friends might tease them about it, but it is clearly very serious to Meghan as a status indicator. Her most important accomplishment is to be "Duchess of Sussex" (in Montecito which makes no sense). She knows she will be completely shut our once William is king so she's trying to make the most of being Duchess of Montecito while she can.


Huh? The titles were given by the Queen of England. She didn’t take them away, and she could have. And the King can, anytime.

That’s an accomplishment! Have you any titles given by a monarch?

I’m not her biggest fan. I think they should have stayed. But I see now it was good they went away to get a lot of space. He’s 5th in line at this point, just let him and his family figure out what they want. If you’ve watched any of The Crown, you’ll see parts of why it’s hard to be second, why it’s hard to be in the next 10 after the monarch. The test of loyalty is greatest at the top.


Yes, and William will probably strip the titles when he is king. So she has to make the most of the title while she can. That's my point.


I honestly doubt William will do anything about it. Stripping the titles would bring so much attention to them. It would be a win for the royal superfans but to most of the world, it would just seem petty. Harry will always be connected to them as the King’s son and future king’s only sibling. No letters patent could change that.

Any positive story about Harry (like Invictus Games) would then have a negative spin for the BRF as it’ll say “formerly known as” and go into how/why. William seems to just ignore Harry’s existence and that’s probably the best strategy. Harry’s biggest sin here is whining about being treated poorly as spare. If Andrew hasn’t crossed the line to have his titles stripped, Harry sure hasn’t.


The brother of the future king is not a title or position. And they won't be connected in any way because they are not going to be invited to any events in England, except maybe Charles' funeral. Even then they will be isolated from others because Meghan cannot be trusted not to film the family for personal gain.


+1 she has already threatened them. In the Cut interview she said she “didn’t sign an NDA.” That is a direct threat to her in laws and is just another reason for them to continue shunning her.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The whole HRH and duchess thing really is over the top and inappropriate. I noticed that now if I try to search for Meghan markle in news, it autocorrects it to duchess Meghan, even if I put her actual name in quotes. She must have pushed hard legally to get that to happen.
She left that life then threw mud at it. She has absolutely no claim to duchess, Sussex, or hrh. And the kids shouldn’t be using the titles if they aren’t going to step foot in UK.


Not legally.

Meghan Markle’s entire life seems to be governed by SEO, not by being a jam-maker or a podcaster or a philanthropist. There’s a reason there’s always ‘news’ about her in places like People.

The idea that her dim husband had to ‘slay dragons’ for her is hilarious, given how much she and the dope cling to titles in a country where the Constitution forbids recognition of same, and who despite all of his whining and how little he’s done in his life with all of that money and opportunity and fleeing to ‘freedom,’ it is very evident that they named their kids in a sketch way and pouted about titles because those silly things mean everything to them.


I’m surprised at how important the titles are to them, and that she would privately use the HRH title with her friends. But then again they are not the most self aware people to realize how ridiculous holding on to British royal titles sounds when you live in the US. It’s very important for her that everyone thinks she’s happy, and she very well may be as she pursues her “creativity.” But there is no way Harry, who spends his time fighting for security to spend extended periods of time in the U.K., is happy in Montecito.


There was a paparazzi video at a movie premiere where Meghan and Harry are saying goodbye to their friends and one curtesys to Harry, he bows to say thank you and they both laugh. I get the feeling that their friends tease them about it, and this was her playing along. But I’m of the opinion that MM isn’t an evil psychopath.




Their friends might tease them about it, but it is clearly very serious to Meghan as a status indicator. Her most important accomplishment is to be "Duchess of Sussex" (in Montecito which makes no sense). She knows she will be completely shut our once William is king so she's trying to make the most of being Duchess of Montecito while she can.


Huh? The titles were given by the Queen of England. She didn’t take them away, and she could have. And the King can, anytime.

That’s an accomplishment! Have you any titles given by a monarch?

I’m not her biggest fan. I think they should have stayed. But I see now it was good they went away to get a lot of space. He’s 5th in line at this point, just let him and his family figure out what they want. If you’ve watched any of The Crown, you’ll see parts of why it’s hard to be second, why it’s hard to be in the next 10 after the monarch. The test of loyalty is greatest at the top.


Yes, and William will probably strip the titles when he is king. So she has to make the most of the title while she can. That's my point.


I honestly doubt William will do anything about it. Stripping the titles would bring so much attention to them. It would be a win for the royal superfans but to most of the world, it would just seem petty. Harry will always be connected to them as the King’s son and future king’s only sibling. No letters patent could change that.

Any positive story about Harry (like Invictus Games) would then have a negative spin for the BRF as it’ll say “formerly known as” and go into how/why. William seems to just ignore Harry’s existence and that’s probably the best strategy. Harry’s biggest sin here is whining about being treated poorly as spare. If Andrew hasn’t crossed the line to have his titles stripped, Harry sure hasn’t.


The brother of the future king is not a title or position. And they won't be connected in any way because they are not going to be invited to any events in England, except maybe Charles' funeral. Even then they will be isolated from others because Meghan cannot be trusted not to film the family for personal gain.


+1 she has already threatened them. In the Cut interview she said she “didn’t sign an NDA.” That is a direct threat to her in laws and is just another reason for them to continue shunning her.


Well Harry just lost his final appeal in the security case. So they won’t be going back to the uk without 28 days notice if they want security.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The whole HRH and duchess thing really is over the top and inappropriate. I noticed that now if I try to search for Meghan markle in news, it autocorrects it to duchess Meghan, even if I put her actual name in quotes. She must have pushed hard legally to get that to happen.
She left that life then threw mud at it. She has absolutely no claim to duchess, Sussex, or hrh. And the kids shouldn’t be using the titles if they aren’t going to step foot in UK.


Not legally.

Meghan Markle’s entire life seems to be governed by SEO, not by being a jam-maker or a podcaster or a philanthropist. There’s a reason there’s always ‘news’ about her in places like People.

The idea that her dim husband had to ‘slay dragons’ for her is hilarious, given how much she and the dope cling to titles in a country where the Constitution forbids recognition of same, and who despite all of his whining and how little he’s done in his life with all of that money and opportunity and fleeing to ‘freedom,’ it is very evident that they named their kids in a sketch way and pouted about titles because those silly things mean everything to them.


I’m surprised at how important the titles are to them, and that she would privately use the HRH title with her friends. But then again they are not the most self aware people to realize how ridiculous holding on to British royal titles sounds when you live in the US. It’s very important for her that everyone thinks she’s happy, and she very well may be as she pursues her “creativity.” But there is no way Harry, who spends his time fighting for security to spend extended periods of time in the U.K., is happy in Montecito.


There was a paparazzi video at a movie premiere where Meghan and Harry are saying goodbye to their friends and one curtesys to Harry, he bows to say thank you and they both laugh. I get the feeling that their friends tease them about it, and this was her playing along. But I’m of the opinion that MM isn’t an evil psychopath.




Their friends might tease them about it, but it is clearly very serious to Meghan as a status indicator. Her most important accomplishment is to be "Duchess of Sussex" (in Montecito which makes no sense). She knows she will be completely shut our once William is king so she's trying to make the most of being Duchess of Montecito while she can.


Huh? The titles were given by the Queen of England. She didn’t take them away, and she could have. And the King can, anytime.

That’s an accomplishment! Have you any titles given by a monarch?

I’m not her biggest fan. I think they should have stayed. But I see now it was good they went away to get a lot of space. He’s 5th in line at this point, just let him and his family figure out what they want. If you’ve watched any of The Crown, you’ll see parts of why it’s hard to be second, why it’s hard to be in the next 10 after the monarch. The test of loyalty is greatest at the top.


Yes, and William will probably strip the titles when he is king. So she has to make the most of the title while she can. That's my point.


I honestly doubt William will do anything about it. Stripping the titles would bring so much attention to them. It would be a win for the royal superfans but to most of the world, it would just seem petty. Harry will always be connected to them as the King’s son and future king’s only sibling. No letters patent could change that.

Any positive story about Harry (like Invictus Games) would then have a negative spin for the BRF as it’ll say “formerly known as” and go into how/why. William seems to just ignore Harry’s existence and that’s probably the best strategy. Harry’s biggest sin here is whining about being treated poorly as spare. If Andrew hasn’t crossed the line to have his titles stripped, Harry sure hasn’t.


The brother of the future king is not a title or position. And they won't be connected in any way because they are not going to be invited to any events in England, except maybe Charles' funeral. Even then they will be isolated from others because Meghan cannot be trusted not to film the family for personal gain.


Duke or not, we all still know they’re related. That’s the connection.

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The whole HRH and duchess thing really is over the top and inappropriate. I noticed that now if I try to search for Meghan markle in news, it autocorrects it to duchess Meghan, even if I put her actual name in quotes. She must have pushed hard legally to get that to happen.
She left that life then threw mud at it. She has absolutely no claim to duchess, Sussex, or hrh. And the kids shouldn’t be using the titles if they aren’t going to step foot in UK.


Not legally.

Meghan Markle’s entire life seems to be governed by SEO, not by being a jam-maker or a podcaster or a philanthropist. There’s a reason there’s always ‘news’ about her in places like People.

The idea that her dim husband had to ‘slay dragons’ for her is hilarious, given how much she and the dope cling to titles in a country where the Constitution forbids recognition of same, and who despite all of his whining and how little he’s done in his life with all of that money and opportunity and fleeing to ‘freedom,’ it is very evident that they named their kids in a sketch way and pouted about titles because those silly things mean everything to them.


I’m surprised at how important the titles are to them, and that she would privately use the HRH title with her friends. But then again they are not the most self aware people to realize how ridiculous holding on to British royal titles sounds when you live in the US. It’s very important for her that everyone thinks she’s happy, and she very well may be as she pursues her “creativity.” But there is no way Harry, who spends his time fighting for security to spend extended periods of time in the U.K., is happy in Montecito.


There was a paparazzi video at a movie premiere where Meghan and Harry are saying goodbye to their friends and one curtesys to Harry, he bows to say thank you and they both laugh. I get the feeling that their friends tease them about it, and this was her playing along. But I’m of the opinion that MM isn’t an evil psychopath.




Their friends might tease them about it, but it is clearly very serious to Meghan as a status indicator. Her most important accomplishment is to be "Duchess of Sussex" (in Montecito which makes no sense). She knows she will be completely shut our once William is king so she's trying to make the most of being Duchess of Montecito while she can.


Huh? The titles were given by the Queen of England. She didn’t take them away, and she could have. And the King can, anytime.

That’s an accomplishment! Have you any titles given by a monarch?

I’m not her biggest fan. I think they should have stayed. But I see now it was good they went away to get a lot of space. He’s 5th in line at this point, just let him and his family figure out what they want. If you’ve watched any of The Crown, you’ll see parts of why it’s hard to be second, why it’s hard to be in the next 10 after the monarch. The test of loyalty is greatest at the top.


Yes, and William will probably strip the titles when he is king. So she has to make the most of the title while she can. That's my point.


I honestly doubt William will do anything about it. Stripping the titles would bring so much attention to them. It would be a win for the royal superfans but to most of the world, it would just seem petty. Harry will always be connected to them as the King’s son and future king’s only sibling. No letters patent could change that.

Any positive story about Harry (like Invictus Games) would then have a negative spin for the BRF as it’ll say “formerly known as” and go into how/why. William seems to just ignore Harry’s existence and that’s probably the best strategy. Harry’s biggest sin here is whining about being treated poorly as spare. If Andrew hasn’t crossed the line to have his titles stripped, Harry sure hasn’t.


The brother of the future king is not a title or position. And they won't be connected in any way because they are not going to be invited to any events in England, except maybe Charles' funeral. Even then they will be isolated from others because Meghan cannot be trusted not to film the family for personal gain.


I love the hidden camera/microphone conspiracy theories!




Anonymous
It’s sad Harry’s kids are being completely isolated and stripped of their British culture. They are growing up without any extended family and without growing up with the kids of Harry’s childhood friends. They are being raised completely American. They will never be able to go back and fit in.

That is the reason they might lose their titles. If something were to happen to William and his kids, Harry and his kids would not be popular enough to rule and the British monarchy in all probability would end.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:It’s sad Harry’s kids are being completely isolated and stripped of their British culture. They are growing up without any extended family and without growing up with the kids of Harry’s childhood friends. They are being raised completely American. They will never be able to go back and fit in.

That is the reason they might lose their titles. If something were to happen to William and his kids, Harry and his kids would not be popular enough to rule and the British monarchy in all probability would end.


William and George aren’t allowed to travel together anymore in order to keep the direct line intact. Anything that would disrupt the LOS all the way down to Harry would be a much bigger problem for them than just “Harry is unpopular.”
Anonymous
I had not thought about the situation with their kids as they get older.

If I were them I would be worried about my kids resenting me for keeping them from knowing my cousins and family or even experiencing royal life. I guess it would take some serious bad-mouthing from my parents about them from the beginning to prevent that.
Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture
Go to: