What is sad is how the “reformers” are following the Trumpian approach to make their majoritarian argument. Mexicans are rapists and Asians are one-dimensional cheaters. Stereotypes and name calling is the way to go. George Floyd was an isolated tragedy - how uncouth of you to use a tragedy to trigger a discussion on systemic racism. Deny the problem. Ignore leading indicators that point to anti-minority sentiment. There is clearly reform needed on TJ admissions but the current approach is how poll taxes were used to bypass the fifteenth amendment. The new method gets the outcome the School Board needs and in the larger scheme of things equity vis-a-vis Asians is affordable collateral damage. |
Taking race out of admissions is not the same as hate. It's looking for equality in admissions decisions as opposed to affirmative action. |
This is nonsense on about ten different levels. The only reason this conversation is even tangentially about Asians is because they are over represented in the TJ community by a factor of about 3.5-4. You don’t get to cry “equity” when the likely upshot of all of this is that you become a slightly less dominant majority. Kids at TJ (of all races) graduate with significant deficiencies in cultural fluency because they exist in a homogeneous space. That was the case when TJ was 60% white, and it remains the case now that TJ is 70+% Asian. What you’re upset about is that the new process makes it more difficult to exert parental influence and resources on the process, and you believe you’re entitled to that advantage because you care more about TJ from an earlier age than other parents. But the reality is, both the kids who get in to TJ with this new process and the kids who DON’T get in because of this new process will exist in spaces that are far more likely to produce positive educational environments and outcomes for the respective students. |
Equality based on what? Some misguided notion of “merit” as narrowly and conveniently defined by an ability to study for a high-stakes exam? |
I, and many others, disagree with pretty much everything you just said. You are also disparaging TJ graduates and could not be more wrong about their cultural fluency. This forum is packed full of complainers that know nothing about the school other than the fact that their little Larlo couldn't get in because he isn't as bright as mommy and daddy thought he was. |
The other problem is the discrimination from Asians. It’s like “who came first, the egg or the chicken?” |
When you start thinking that changing TJ admissions standards to include a broader cross-section of FCPS students is equivalent to police brutality, it's time to reassess your world view. You do know that there are Asian kids who attend, for example, Luther Jackson middle school who could benefit from the change? There are Asian kids who attend Glasgow MS whose parents can't afford test prep centers for $4,000? If your kid doesn't get into TJ and is a standout at the base school, MIT or another good STEM school is still in the cards. In fact, I know Asian siblings where the standout base school kid got into a better college than the TJ sibling. Once you're shot dead or suffocated to death by the police, that's it. Making TJ more accessible to kids who aren't in the top one percent of test takers or who don't have the resources for STEM extra curriculars/enrichment/prep isn't antiAsian. One of DD's Asian friends whose parents only have a high school education and zero ability to shell out for expensive test prep is applied this year. I hope she gets in because she has a strong interest in STEM. I'm not AntiAsian and I support the change because I think there needs to be more socioeconomic diversity in access to STEM. |
Yes. Equality based on the OUTCOME of a high stakes exam that anyone can prepare for and take and be graded on the same scale despite their race, religion, gender, or ethnicity. That's as equal as life gets. |
EEOC members and Civil Rights division lawyers appointed by Biden are very left-wing and support the idea that disparity in outcome between races means discrimination. Look at the Oracle lawsuit that has been running for many years. |
This. FCPS has been failing the minority groups for decades. Instead of addressing the problems, this is a weak attempt to shift the blame to someone else. |
Undoubtedly but two wrongs never made a right. |
The staggering lack of cultural fluency displayed by the folks claiming to be TJ parents on this form kinda proves my point. The apple, as it were, doesn’t fall too far from the tree. But unless you’ve had dozens of conversations with TJ graduates centering around how different it is to be around kids who don’t look like them in college, kindly have a seat. They know they’re sheltered. And they know they’re brought up with racist attitudes - white kids too, big time, btw. They suffer from the lack of representation as well. Lord help me if I ever name any kids I have Larlo. I’ll admit that’s amusing. |
No.... no it’s not. Access to prep is wildly different based on your resources, your geography, your cultural connections, and maybe most importantly, your parents’ ambitions. And it works, or else folks wouldn’t invest in it. |
“Lack of cultural fluency”... that’s a new way othering Asian Americans. Good job, PP, keep the hate alive. |
Ain’t all of them, and it ain’t just them. It is a natural outgrowth of existing in homogeneous spaces. It’s not TJ kids’ fault, and the problem - as referenced - isn’t at all limited to the Asian American population. So no, they’re not being “othered” here. Good try though! |