Jussie Smollett attacked

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't think *his* story is changing, I think it's the media putting out all these versions of the story and sites are running with them.

It's unbelievable the amount of victim blaming going on in this thread.

and you're so ready to believe his story because of his demographics.

just like so many are quick to doubt because of his description of the attackers....

Oh please! who are you trying to kid! His description of the alleged attackers are the exact kind of people DCUM loves to chastise, so spare me.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't think *his* story is changing, I think it's the media putting out all these versions of the story and sites are running with them.

It's unbelievable the amount of victim blaming going on in this thread.

and you're so ready to believe his story because of his demographics.

just like so many are quick to doubt because of his description of the attackers....

Oh please! who are you trying to kid! His description of the alleged attackers are the exact kind of people DCUM loves to chastise, so spare me.

wait I don't love to chastise crazy randos, I love to chastise country club republicans who think racism is bad but not as bad as the estate tax

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't think *his* story is changing, I think it's the media putting out all these versions of the story and sites are running with them.

It's unbelievable the amount of victim blaming going on in this thread.

and you're so ready to believe his story because of his demographics.

just like so many are quick to doubt because of his description of the attackers....

Oh please! who are you trying to kid! His description of the alleged attackers are the exact kind of people DCUM loves to chastise, so spare me.

+1
The description could have come straight out of a casting call. Have they found the two completely undistinguishable blobs captured on camera yet?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't think *his* story is changing, I think it's the media putting out all these versions of the story and sites are running with them.

It's unbelievable the amount of victim blaming going on in this thread.

and you're so ready to believe his story because of his demographics.

just like so many are quick to doubt because of his description of the attackers....

Oh please! who are you trying to kid! His description of the alleged attackers are the exact kind of people DCUM loves to chastise, so spare me.

+1
The description could have come straight out of a casting call. Have they found the two completely undistinguishable blobs captured on camera yet?

Strange thing is, Smollett is preventing the police from checking out his phone data.

Looks worse by the day.

[Anonymous]

Taraji P Henson was on Today show this am and she sounded dubious. (she plays his mom on Empire)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't think *his* story is changing, I think it's the media putting out all these versions of the story and sites are running with them.

It's unbelievable the amount of victim blaming going on in this thread.

and you're so ready to believe his story because of his demographics.

just like so many are quick to doubt because of his description of the attackers....

Oh please! who are you trying to kid! His description of the alleged attackers are the exact kind of people DCUM loves to chastise, so spare me.

wait I don't love to chastise crazy randos, I love to chastise country club republicans who think racism is bad but not as bad as the estate tax

Do you also chastise all the countless rich liberals who think racism is bad, but brown kids in their schools are worse?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't think *his* story is changing, I think it's the media putting out all these versions of the story and sites are running with them.

It's unbelievable the amount of victim blaming going on in this thread.

and you're so ready to believe his story because of his demographics.

just like so many are quick to doubt because of his description of the attackers....

Oh please! who are you trying to kid! His description of the alleged attackers are the exact kind of people DCUM loves to chastise, so spare me.

+1
The description could have come straight out of a casting call. Have they found the two completely undistinguishable blobs captured on camera yet?

And it is very liberal Chicago.

No MAGA person is walking around Chicago at night telling people Chicago is Trump country.

Heck, no Romney republicans are walking around Chicago telling people it is a place where moderate republicans are welcome.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Taraji P Henson was on Today show this am and she sounded dubious. (she plays his mom on Empire)

no she doesn't.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I agree the media may not be accurately reporting the facts. They are usually better at reporting facts when they are clear and straightforward.

I saw an article saying he could be seen on camera walking around outside his apartment / hotel, then he went out of sight of the camera for 60 seconds and when he came back into the frame he had the rope around his neck.

I also read on a gossip site - so potentially completely untrue - that he had been at a gay bar and hit on a married guy. Confrontation took place and two guys followed him out of the bar and there was a brief physical altercation and potentially a drink was thrown on him at some point.

interesting, re: gossip site

would explain a lot - the liquid that didn't damage his clothes or skin
But was the married dude married to a woman and attending gay bars on the DL? And while stereotypical, I have a hard time seeing two gay men as "thugs" threatening anyone.

The rope thing is very confusing.

Omg you people. Link to the “gossip site” please? Link to the other article also? Thank you.
FYI, if you though TMZ reported it wrong then why are you continuing to rely on gossip sites??
You’re just coming on to spread misinformation. Names sources, provide links and if it’s a solid source we will believe you.

[Anonymous]

Damn people, it isn’t racist, sexist or victim shaming to say someone’s story sounds off. That’s called critical thinking.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Damn people, it isn’t racist, sexist or victim shaming to say someone’s story sounds off. That’s called critical thinking.

That’s so bizarre bc whenever I hear a horrific story, I always be believe it. I don’t sit there and look for clues that they are lying. If they are, then so be it. But to spend my time reading gossip sites and finding “evidence” the victim has made it up is like going not “critical thinking” sorry!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Damn people, it isn’t racist, sexist or victim shaming to say someone’s story sounds off. That’s called critical thinking.

That’s so bizarre bc whenever I hear a horrific story, I always be believe it. I don’t sit there and look for clues that they are lying. If they are, then so be it. But to spend my time reading gossip sites and finding “evidence” the victim has made it up is like going not “critical thinking” sorry!

No one had to look for clues. They were right there in his version of events and subsequent alterations of the story.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Taraji P Henson was on Today show this am and she sounded dubious. (she plays his mom on Empire)

no she doesn't.

I agree, he did not.

Here is the clip of her speaking about him. She starts talking about him at the 1 minute mark.

https://www.today.com/video/taraji-p-henson-talks-jussie-smollett-attack-hate-won-t-win-1436878403570

[Anonymous]

^^ That should say "she did not" not "he"

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Damn people, it isn’t racist, sexist or victim shaming to say someone’s story sounds off. That’s called critical thinking.

That’s so bizarre bc whenever I hear a horrific story, I always be believe it. I don’t sit there and look for clues that they are lying. If they are, then so be it. But to spend my time reading gossip sites and finding “evidence” the victim has made it up is like going not “critical thinking” sorry!

You always believe it? In this day and age? Ok. But it sounds like you’re the sucker.