Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
Harry and Meghan’s Christmas card
![[Post New]](/jforum/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif){kind=icon}
Anonymous
You can kind of see the hair illusion here:
His head is turned down more in the Christmas pic, but the normal curved head shape kind of looks more extreme with his hair loss and the way he styles it to look good (er, better) facing forward. |
Anonymous
OMGOMG a Wales scandal???? Girl. Girl!!!! Hook us UP! I need, nay I DEMAND, some stinky links to allllllllllll this coverage by the capital p Press over stupid racist eeeeeeeevilll Waity’s latest crime against all angels of color! Let’s see those links. Don’t go crybabying about it. Produce. |
Anonymous
| I think the kids should be in or out. This sort of dangling them out there is not a good idea. It makes the curious more curious than if it was just something they did not do at all. |
Anonymous
+100 "Monarchy loyalists"?  Didn't realize that simply liking Kate, Will, and their family made me a "monarchy loyalist". Who's the bizarrely rabid PPP?
|
Anonymous
Wypipo, amirite, girlfriend? Let’s celebrate these genuine African heroes and sheroes against scurrilous claims by the stringy and the British. How very dare straight stringy salty Tina Brown who is a mere royal blogger and never published a got damn thing report that antiracist Harry say something as stupid as you? https://people.com/prince-harry-slams-claim-called-prince-archie-my-little-african-child-11872706 Haters everywhere. |
Anonymous
The Queen called Will and Kate “Won’t and Can’t”. They all seem to be over the “work” part, whatever that was. |
Anonymous
Source for the Queen saying that, please. |
Anonymous
They’re all backlit by the bit of sun coming through the trees. That’s called “hair light”. |
Anonymous
No, they aren't all backlit. Only the girls are backlit. Loot at Harry's white shirt. He is lit from the front of his shoulder, from the left front corner of the photo. The little bit around the boys' heads is not backlighting. It is a photoshop edging you can put around cropped images when you stick them on top of the background. |
Anonymous
Look at the back of Harry's neck. His sunshine is definitely coming from the front side. |
Anonymous
|
Eh. I edit photos about 10 hours a day and the lighting doesn’t strike me as odd. But I’m also
not invested in the royals at all. |
Anonymous
They are out doing Royal things every week and living by Royal rules and all of that. Fine. So they can have the titles and pomp and represent the country. Meghan and Harry aren't doing any of the Royal things or living by Royal rules. Yet they want the royal titles and apparently are upset they don't have the security. I think people would have more respect for them, or at least the respect they seem to want, if they would stop trying to be royal Americans, a la Countess Luann, and just be normal people. |
Anonymous
The reason she called the Won’t and Can’t is because that was their response to her requests for them to “do royal work”. So, no. They are not “out there every week”. For years they’ve done as little as possible only increasing slightly when dad was sick and it looked like becoming King might be close. To people who don’t look at them with rose colored glasses or think they’re superior humans, it’s pretty obvious they’re slackers too. And not providing them with security was a giant flag of the narcissistic abuse within that family. They’re seriously dysfunctional and nothing to admire. |
Anonymous
|
The card is just tacky. Beautiful setting. It almost seems like the book cover for a horror theme with all the awkward juxtapositioning. The daughter's tangled hair. Boy with awkward embrace. Meghan deliberately showing off her body with a see-through dress. Children's faces carefully hidden.
Why bother? |
Anonymous
Good catch. |