FCPS is hiring an executive protection agent

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I think they are preparing to refuse to comply with the demands of the feds. .

This may be true. Reid thinks having security will protect her from the feds.

[Anonymous]

Insane. People should demand her resignation. It sounds like we’d be doing her a favor anyway, since she hates this unsafe job so much!

I can’t believe that any voters anywhere would think this is a responsible or acceptable use of taxpayer funds that are supposed to be going towards educating our kids.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Dr. Reid, read the room:

90+% of constituents against boundary changes

90+% of constituents against boys in girls sports

Majority of constituents against DEI as implemented at FCPS

99+% of constituents against bodyguard for superintendent

Where are you getting these numbers from? Trump?

[Anonymous]

Have any school board members commented on this? How about the two running for BOS? Hopefully they don’t spout the official FCPS comms response that was in the WJLA piece. That didn’t make any sense with the language of the job posting making it clear that the position was for Reid’s personal security.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think they are preparing to refuse to comply with the demands of the feds. .

This may be true. Reid thinks having security will protect her from the feds.

Give me a break. The question is can a FOIA request get this info? Do we have the right to know? Is there a threat to the whole school system, but she is only protecting herself?

This is serious and we need answers. Many of us face vague threats-needing to reprimand or fire the employee who sees like he/she might be the type to go postal, the solicitor who shows up at your door and you politely decline services and they start cursing at you, etc. I know teachers who have been directly threatened by students. Getting actual security is a big deal. This is not about boundary changes. Something is up. You think superintendents around the country don't face vague threats? It would take a credible threat at the very least to make this happen. Also, why can't she just ask local police to be at an event? How does this work?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think they are preparing to refuse to comply with the demands of the feds. .

This may be true. Reid thinks having security will protect her from the feds.

Give me a break. The question is can a FOIA request get this info? Do we have the right to know? Is there a threat to the whole school system, but she is only protecting herself?

This is serious and we need answers. Many of us face vague threats-needing to reprimand or fire the employee who sees like he/she might be the type to go postal, the solicitor who shows up at your door and you politely decline services and they start cursing at you, etc. I know teachers who have been directly threatened by students. Getting actual security is a big deal. This is not about boundary changes. Something is up. You think superintendents around the country don't face vague threats? It would take a credible threat at the very least to make this happen. Also, why can't she just ask local police to be at an event? How does this work?

If credible threat would hope FCPS would act to get immediate security and not go through a weeks long hiring process- that would be a bizarre handling and exhibit a in any trial of negligence if anything did happen.

[Anonymous]

I'm not sure why the other thread got deleted, but for anyone wondering about the timing of this additional security may have their answer. The topic was deleted from DCUM but it is blowing up on Twitter. Buckle up.

[Anonymous]

Post twitter link

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I'm not sure why the other thread got deleted, but for anyone wondering about the timing of this additional security may have their answer. The topic was deleted from DCUM but it is blowing up on Twitter. Buckle up.

Ok, now I'm really curious.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Post twitter link

I don't vouch for this guy, never heard of him, but his report is getting amplified very quickly. His user name is @WCdispatch_

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Post twitter link

I don't vouch for this guy, never heard of him, but his report is getting amplified very quickly. His user name is @WCdispatch_

Are you referring to his allegation about what happened at Centreville high school? If that is true it's wild and potentially illegal not to inform parents, right?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Post twitter link

I don't vouch for this guy, never heard of him, but his report is getting amplified very quickly. His user name is @WCdispatch_

This has nothing to do with Reid’s unjustifiable security position. Start a separate thread!

[Anonymous]

The job includes protection at home. WTF is going on and how could you hire one person for that? You hire a company and give people shifts, but this is fishy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Post twitter link

I don't vouch for this guy, never heard of him, but his report is getting amplified very quickly. His user name is @WCdispatch_

This has nothing to do with Reid’s unjustifiable security position. Start a separate thread!

It does if it is true.

Boundary study
Feds
Centreville issue
Football

All are very divisive topics.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Post twitter link

I don't vouch for this guy, never heard of him, but his report is getting amplified very quickly. His user name is @WCdispatch_

This has nothing to do with Reid’s unjustifiable security position. Start a separate thread!

It does if it is true.

Boundary study
Feds
Centreville issue
Football

All are very divisive topics.

There are divisive topics at every school system and I am not aware of any of superintendent who has security, are you?