Forum Index
»
Metropolitan DC Local Politics
If your kids are old enough to dig through the mail “looking for Halloween costume catalogs” (if that’s still a thing, since the internet exists ) then they’re also old enough to NOT confuse things like Halloween costume catalogs from political mailers in blank white envelopes. Because the two pieces of mail look exactly nothing alike. And it would be a very … inattentive…. child to confuse the two.
Is your child prone to such confusion? Is that the issue here? Or are you just making up ridiculous hypotheticals that would never ever occur in real life? |
Again, mailing election porn to people's house is apparently ok for the GOP. Randomly coming across on book on a shelf in a public library, that you have to drive to, is horrifying for republicans. |
You have kids? And you don’t receive these catalogs? Be thankful - some are crazy expensive.
If Republicans don’t want kids exposed to “explicit” material then maybe they should stop sending to their homes. |
| The GOP is a hot mess full of crazy people. I said what I said. |
The troll continues to troll. Yawn. |
|
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]It was obvious it would be something like this. Thank you for posting. I'm sure everyone will ignore this though. [/quote]
It was pretty clear that something was up when we kept seeing picture of the outside of the envelope, but no one was showing pictures of the actual mailer at all. The only reason why you would show pictures of the envelope and then only give a description about the mailer is because you're trying to lie to people about the contents of the mailer. The original title here - "Glenn Youngkin mails out nude photos of a candidate" was a complete lie. Turns out it's "The Republican party mails out photos of a candidate's face with zero nudity." 8 pages of outrage where everyone trusted a Twitter post and never bothered to check what the actual mailer looked like. This is why misinformation spreads.[/quote] +1 And still, the thread title has not been changed. |
DP. Let's all imagine for a second this woman was running as a Republican. There would be hundreds and hundreds of pages of LWNJs calling her a whore and worse. You know it, we all know it. Democrats are utter hypocrites. |
DP. Then you agree, Gibson's own children have no doubt seen their parents' porn escapades. That is just so pathetically sad, I can't even imagine it. |
EXACTLY. And don't forget, they have insisted that kids have access to graphically sexual images in school libraries. Dems and their faux outrage... so predictable. |
FIFY. And I agree. |
Kids didn’t have explicit material sent directly to their homes until the Republicans sent it. |
You sound really believable. And Glenn Youngkin (one of these days maybe you'll spell his name right) had nothing to do with this. |
Instead they can just go to their school library and check out explicit material. Thanks to Democrats. |
Not my 10 year old. |
And the goalposts have moved all the way back from Youngkin sent nude pictures, to the GOP sent nude pictures, to the GOP mailed explicit material. If those goalposts didn't have wheels, you wouldn't have an argument. |