The Republican Party of Virginia mails out nude photos of a candidate

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Lol, the party of legalize marijuana, shrooms, virtually all drugs, sex work, prostitution, and unfettered crime all of the sudden is mad someone mails what everyone can easily Google and find online in about 29 seconds?

Hypocrisy is astounding.


You are OK with Republicans mailing EXPLICIT materials to thousands of people, many with young kids, straight to their home?



Your kids already look at porn behind your back. Don’t be dumb. Porn is everywhere.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Seems a little inconsistent with Youngkin's messaging around porn:


"DoN't ExPoSE kiDs To eXPliCiT cOntEnt!!"

Proceeds to send explicit content to families with young kids.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Lol, the party of legalize marijuana, shrooms, virtually all drugs, sex work, prostitution, and unfettered crime all of the sudden is mad someone mails what everyone can easily Google and find online in about 29 seconds?

Hypocrisy is astounding.


You are OK with Republicans mailing EXPLICIT materials to thousands of people, many with young kids, straight to their home?



Your kids already look at porn behind your back. Don’t be dumb. Porn is everywhere.


So that's a yes, you are OK with Republicans mailing explicit content to families with young kids?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Lol, the party of legalize marijuana, shrooms, virtually all drugs, sex work, prostitution, and unfettered crime all of the sudden is mad someone mails what everyone can easily Google and find online in about 29 seconds?

Hypocrisy is astounding.


You are OK with Republicans mailing EXPLICIT materials to thousands of people, many with young kids, straight to their home?


Your kids already look at porn behind your back. Don’t be dumb. Porn is everywhere.


Says republicans who accuse teachers and librarians of being "groomers." Sounds like they are projecting to me. Mailing porn to people's houses is something groomers would do.
Anonymous
Republicans consider it "explicit material" and then proceed to send it to families with young kids.


Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Lol, the party of legalize marijuana, shrooms, virtually all drugs, sex work, prostitution, and unfettered crime all of the sudden is mad someone mails what everyone can easily Google and find online in about 29 seconds?

Hypocrisy is astounding.


You are OK with Republicans mailing EXPLICIT materials to thousands of people, many with young kids, straight to their home?


Your kids already look at porn behind your back. Don’t be dumb. Porn is everywhere.


Says republicans who accuse teachers and librarians of being "groomers." Sounds like they are projecting to me. Mailing porn to people's houses is something groomers would do.


Every accusation is a confession. Every single one.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:I have mixed feelings about whether being a porn actress should preclude her from office. I think the answer is probably no, but also that she should have disclosed it early in the process. I'm not sure.

What I am sure about this is no one is being honest and fair who thinks she should be disqualified for doing porn could turn around and still support the VA GOP for doing this mailing. The mailing is unequivocally indefensible. It's bad. It's bad! There's no good reason for doing it.

I'm a moderate but Glen Younkin ducking this really removes any respect for him I had left. The teacher tip line, and this, I'm not open to him any more. Sorry. You can't play reasonable on TV and then whiff on something this easy.



Did you even read what she posts? She talks to her audience about having sex 3 times in one day, with her husband being the last *man* of the day. She constantly talks about giving BJs and all sorts of bedroom Olympics and will do requests for sex acts for money.

It is a problem for a politician because they can easily be blackmailed for such behavior. I don’t care if she’s a sex addict or has an open relationship. Do whatever you want. But if you choose that kind of lifestyle, open it to the public, and then try to run for public office, don’t be surprised when it can be weaponized against you. The potential for being Blackmailed is the biggest concern.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Lol, the party of legalize marijuana, shrooms, virtually all drugs, sex work, prostitution, and unfettered crime all of the sudden is mad someone mails what everyone can easily Google and find online in about 29 seconds?

Hypocrisy is astounding.


You are OK with Republicans mailing EXPLICIT materials to thousands of people, many with young kids, straight to their home?



Your kids already look at porn behind your back. Don’t be dumb. Porn is everywhere.


So that's a yes, you are OK with Republicans mailing explicit content to families with young kids?



She’s the one generating explicit content that your kids can access online. You’re mad that someone is providing the same results as a 10 second google search. Your kids already watched her porn videos on pornhub or some other site their friends told them about.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Lol, the party of legalize marijuana, shrooms, virtually all drugs, sex work, prostitution, and unfettered crime all of the sudden is mad someone mails what everyone can easily Google and find online in about 29 seconds?

Hypocrisy is astounding.


You are OK with Republicans mailing EXPLICIT materials to thousands of people, many with young kids, straight to their home?


Your kids already look at porn behind your back. Don’t be dumb. Porn is everywhere.


Says republicans who accuse teachers and librarians of being "groomers." Sounds like they are projecting to me. Mailing porn to people's houses is something groomers would do.



Meanwhile Dems like you are drug pushers and want to saturate the country with weed, shrooms, and even prostitution.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I have mixed feelings about whether being a porn actress should preclude her from office. I think the answer is probably no, but also that she should have disclosed it early in the process. I'm not sure.

What I am sure about this is no one is being honest and fair who thinks she should be disqualified for doing porn could turn around and still support the VA GOP for doing this mailing. The mailing is unequivocally indefensible. It's bad. It's bad! There's no good reason for doing it.

I'm a moderate but Glen Younkin ducking this really removes any respect for him I had left. The teacher tip line, and this, I'm not open to him any more. Sorry. You can't play reasonable on TV and then whiff on something this easy.



Did you even read what she posts? She talks to her audience about having sex 3 times in one day, with her husband being the last *man* of the day. She constantly talks about giving BJs and all sorts of bedroom Olympics and will do requests for sex acts for money.

It is a problem for a politician because they can easily be blackmailed for such behavior. I don’t care if she’s a sex addict or has an open relationship. Do whatever you want. But if you choose that kind of lifestyle, open it to the public, and then try to run for public office, don’t be surprised when it can be weaponized against you. The potential for being Blackmailed is the biggest concern.


Well I guess that concern is solved because she can’t be blackmailed for it now.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Lol, the party of legalize marijuana, shrooms, virtually all drugs, sex work, prostitution, and unfettered crime all of the sudden is mad someone mails what everyone can easily Google and find online in about 29 seconds?

Hypocrisy is astounding.


You are OK with Republicans mailing EXPLICIT materials to thousands of people, many with young kids, straight to their home?



Your kids already look at porn behind your back. Don’t be dumb. Porn is everywhere.


So that's a yes, you are OK with Republicans mailing explicit content to families with young kids?



She’s the one generating explicit content that your kids can access online. You’re mad that someone is providing the same results as a 10 second google search. Your kids already watched her porn videos on pornhub or some other site their friends told them about.


Parents know that they have options to control access to screens/porn. Parents weren't expecting explicit content to come in the mail from the Republicans.

My kids love halloween and dig through the mail this time of year looking for various halloween costume catalogs.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I have mixed feelings about whether being a porn actress should preclude her from office. I think the answer is probably no, but also that she should have disclosed it early in the process. I'm not sure.

What I am sure about this is no one is being honest and fair who thinks she should be disqualified for doing porn could turn around and still support the VA GOP for doing this mailing. The mailing is unequivocally indefensible. It's bad. It's bad! There's no good reason for doing it.

I'm a moderate but Glen Younkin ducking this really removes any respect for him I had left. The teacher tip line, and this, I'm not open to him any more. Sorry. You can't play reasonable on TV and then whiff on something this easy.



Did you even read what she posts? She talks to her audience about having sex 3 times in one day, with her husband being the last *man* of the day. She constantly talks about giving BJs and all sorts of bedroom Olympics and will do requests for sex acts for money.

It is a problem for a politician because they can easily be blackmailed for such behavior. I don’t care if she’s a sex addict or has an open relationship. Do whatever you want. But if you choose that kind of lifestyle, open it to the public, and then try to run for public office, don’t be surprised when it can be weaponized against you. The potential for being Blackmailed is the biggest concern.


Well I guess that concern is solved because she can’t be blackmailed for it now.



Wrong. It depends who she sleeps with, what they do, and what she says during any one of her 100000 promiscuous encounters.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I have mixed feelings about whether being a porn actress should preclude her from office. I think the answer is probably no, but also that she should have disclosed it early in the process. I'm not sure.

What I am sure about this is no one is being honest and fair who thinks she should be disqualified for doing porn could turn around and still support the VA GOP for doing this mailing. The mailing is unequivocally indefensible. It's bad. It's bad! There's no good reason for doing it.

I'm a moderate but Glen Younkin ducking this really removes any respect for him I had left. The teacher tip line, and this, I'm not open to him any more. Sorry. You can't play reasonable on TV and then whiff on something this easy.



Did you even read what she posts? She talks to her audience about having sex 3 times in one day, with her husband being the last *man* of the day. She constantly talks about giving BJs and all sorts of bedroom Olympics and will do requests for sex acts for money.

It is a problem for a politician because they can easily be blackmailed for such behavior. I don’t care if she’s a sex addict or has an open relationship. Do whatever you want. But if you choose that kind of lifestyle, open it to the public, and then try to run for public office, don’t be surprised when it can be weaponized against you. The potential for being Blackmailed is the biggest concern.


How can she be blackmailed if she is so open about it. If no one knew, then she cold be blackmailed. This is the opposite.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Lol, the party of legalize marijuana, shrooms, virtually all drugs, sex work, prostitution, and unfettered crime all of the sudden is mad someone mails what everyone can easily Google and find online in about 29 seconds?

Hypocrisy is astounding.


You are OK with Republicans mailing EXPLICIT materials to thousands of people, many with young kids, straight to their home?


Your kids already look at porn behind your back. Don’t be dumb. Porn is everywhere.


Says republicans who accuse teachers and librarians of being "groomers." Sounds like they are projecting to me. Mailing porn to people's houses is something groomers would do.



Meanwhile Dems like you are drug pushers and want to saturate the country with weed, shrooms, and even prostitution.


The country is already saturated with weed, shrooms and prostitution. I think most left leaning people think these things should be legalixed, regulated and taxed.

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:It's nice for the GOP to admit they are the party of porn.


Their party leader has a documented history of sleeping with porn stars and paying them hush money, so yeah, they are.

Forum Index » Metropolitan DC Local Politics
Go to: