With Love, Meghan on Netflix

[Anonymous]

Deal or No Deal Island and Suits LA did not want her back.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Deal or No Deal Island and Suits LA did not want her back.

Suits LA is totally weird. They don't want anyone from the original show, but even if they did, there are already two or three women doing the slinky office sexpot role that Markle had. They have not had the Donna or Jessica actors either so something tells me no actress over 40 is allowed in any starring capacity.

[Anonymous]

Why do her fans act like she was a key super star actress on Suits? lol. Harvey and Louis are the only reason why that series has any replay value -- the third younger guy (Michael), the red head (Donna), and the black woman (Jessica) were also good. Meghan's character (Rachel) was unmemorable in every way and could have been swapped out with any other random struggling 30 year old actress.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The Sentebale controversy does tie into this show as part of the pair’s Netflix deal. The head of the charity alleges that their fleeing for their very lives wound up diminishing the fundraising efforts. She alleges that Harry wanted to bring Netflix cameras for “Polo” to a charity polo event, and that the event space - realizing that a charitable event was now a commercial endeavor - required a higher fee that the charity would not be able to front, and that everyone had to scramble to fix that. She alleges that Markle was a last minute show to the event, which was a mess with photo ops — in short, the way the pair has tried to blend Netflix commercial deliverables with their saintly charitable endeavors is shady AF. They aren’t Médecins Sans Frontières FFS, they wanted to be paid for glam shots “doing charity” to pad out their prior failed Netflix project.

It’s all a shitshow.

Because they are not serious people. They are long-term unemployed middle aged morons with no skills playing pretend.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The issue is with her allegations not the goddamned platform. Again: grow UP.

More ad hominems from you. Again you're ignoring the serious allegations against Chandauka and instead pretending that right-wing Sky News giving her a platform to jump on the hate bandwagon is worth a bucket of spit. Once again, for those of you in the back seats:

Did Sentebale's entire board not resign first, before Harry did? The board included multiple black people, but somehow not a single one of them wanted to continue working with her.

Did Harry and the other (black) prince not resign in support of the board?

Are there not open questions about what Chandauka (she says Dr., but that's an honorary degree) did with £600k? She didn't ask the board's permission, nor did she even tell them she was using £600k. This is per People magazine.

Did Chandauka not alienate a major donor?

What about Chandauka's other statements to Sky News, which raise lots of questions about her credibility? For example, she claimed Harry was trying to run Sentebale, an organization he personally had given $1.5m to, into the ground. Do you think she's right about that?

Why is she talking about climate change, when it's in no way part of Sentebale's mission? Did Earthshot William not say "Africa is mine"?

Still waiting for answers to ANY of these questions.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Why do her fans act like she was a key super star actress on Suits? lol. Harvey and Louis are the only reason why that series has any replay value -- the third younger guy (Michael), the red head (Donna), and the black woman (Jessica) were also good. Meghan's character (Rachel) was unmemorable in every way and could have been swapped out with any other random struggling 30 year old actress.

I'm a fan and not only do I not act like she was a star actress, I've never seen Suits. She was B-list at best; that still doesn't warrant the hate she gets.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OK, I'll play because I've always been curious. What goes on in the mind of somebody who feels they have to spend hours every day hating on Meghan and Harry, who after all left Britain five years ago? Is it racism? Is it Americans who idolize the British royal family to the point where they willingly ignore common sense and facts like the ones at 16:29? What on earth gives?

I’m sorry it takes you hours to write a 3 line post. That is sad.
😔

Are all Meghan haters trolls who never answer direct question and instead spew insults? Or is that just you?

“Somebody who feels they have to spend hours every day hating on Meghan and Harry”. Are you saying you meant that as an insult and you can just spew insults?

I wrote maybe 4 posts here and each one took me less than 5 minutes, so I assumed your posts must take you a long long time and you judge everyone else’s time based upon how long it takes you.
Just as you assume everyone is racist if they don’t trust one particular mixed race person named Meghan Markle.

PS- you sound more than curious, you sound angry.

Reread the part about not responding to serious questions and just relying on more insults. Describes you to a T.

Yes, racism makes me angry. I’m white btw.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The Sentebale controversy does tie into this show as part of the pair’s Netflix deal. The head of the charity alleges that their fleeing for their very lives wound up diminishing the fundraising efforts. She alleges that Harry wanted to bring Netflix cameras for “Polo” to a charity polo event, and that the event space - realizing that a charitable event was now a commercial endeavor - required a higher fee that the charity would not be able to front, and that everyone had to scramble to fix that. She alleges that Markle was a last minute show to the event, which was a mess with photo ops — in short, the way the pair has tried to blend Netflix commercial deliverables with their saintly charitable endeavors is shady AF. They aren’t Médecins Sans Frontières FFS, they wanted to be paid for glam shots “doing charity” to pad out their prior failed Netflix project.

It’s all a shitshow.

“Oh no! The Sussexes brought Netflix and Serena Williams to my charity’s event, which will massively increase publicity for and donations to my charity!” Said no head of a charity ever. Sophie’s whole story is so shady.

This whole thing reads like William “Africa is mine, Harry” Wales is trying to take over Harry’s Africa charity. Why else would Iain Rowanson, who is William’s long-time aide, be at Sophie’s side this entire week? Why else would Sophie keep talking about pivoting her little children’s aid charity into a climate change charity, unless climate change is William’s signature issue? Sophie claimed on TV that AIDS is no longer a threat, but that’s only if you have access to the meds and support … (checks notes) that Sentabale provides. Especially now that USAID is pulling out of AIDS in Africa work. The whole thing is shady as sh!t and has William’s fingerprints all over it.

I early wait the results of the investigations.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why do her fans act like she was a key super star actress on Suits? lol. Harvey and Louis are the only reason why that series has any replay value -- the third younger guy (Michael), the red head (Donna), and the black woman (Jessica) were also good. Meghan's character (Rachel) was unmemorable in every way and could have been swapped out with any other random struggling 30 year old actress.

I'm a fan and not only do I not act like she was a star actress, I've never seen Suits. She was B-list at best; that still doesn't warrant the hate she gets.

Same. She wasn’t a star. She did get further than many actors waiting tables would love to get, but who’s claiming she was a star? What we’re claiming is that she doesn’t deserve daily hate and bullying from the unhinged here and on the Daily Mail.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The issue is with her allegations not the goddamned platform. Again: grow UP.

More ad hominems from you. Again you're ignoring the serious allegations against Chandauka and instead pretending that right-wing Sky News giving her a platform to jump on the hate bandwagon is worth a bucket of spit. Once again, for those of you in the back seats:

Did Sentebale's entire board not resign first, before Harry did? The board included multiple black people, but somehow not a single one of them wanted to continue working with her.

Did Harry and the other (black) prince not resign in support of the board?

Are there not open questions about what Chandauka (she says Dr., but that's an honorary degree) did with £600k? She didn't ask the board's permission, nor did she even tell them she was using £600k. This is per People magazine.

Did Chandauka not alienate a major donor?

What about Chandauka's other statements to Sky News, which raise lots of questions about her credibility? For example, she claimed Harry was trying to run Sentebale, an organization he personally had given $1.5m to, into the ground. Do you think she's right about that?

Why is she talking about climate change, when it's in no way part of Sentebale's mission? Did Earthshot William not say "Africa is mine"?

Still waiting for answers to ANY of these questions.

There are no serious allegations against her. You can all-caps and give your credentials (“I’m white by the way”) and hissyfit to your heart’s content - it doesn’t give you more heft. But thanks for posting. I need these periodic reminders that her fans just aren’t capable thinkers.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Sentebale controversy does tie into this show as part of the pair’s Netflix deal. The head of the charity alleges that their fleeing for their very lives wound up diminishing the fundraising efforts. She alleges that Harry wanted to bring Netflix cameras for “Polo” to a charity polo event, and that the event space - realizing that a charitable event was now a commercial endeavor - required a higher fee that the charity would not be able to front, and that everyone had to scramble to fix that. She alleges that Markle was a last minute show to the event, which was a mess with photo ops — in short, the way the pair has tried to blend Netflix commercial deliverables with their saintly charitable endeavors is shady AF. They aren’t Médecins Sans Frontières FFS, they wanted to be paid for glam shots “doing charity” to pad out their prior failed Netflix project.

It’s all a shitshow.

“Oh no! The Sussexes brought Netflix and Serena Williams to my charity’s event, which will massively increase publicity for and donations to my charity!” Said no head of a charity ever. Sophie’s whole story is so shady.

This whole thing reads like William “Africa is mine, Harry” Wales is trying to take over Harry’s Africa charity. Why else would Iain Rowanson, who is William’s long-time aide, be at Sophie’s side this entire week? Why else would Sophie keep talking about pivoting her little children’s aid charity into a climate change charity, unless climate change is William’s signature issue? Sophie claimed on TV that AIDS is no longer a threat, but that’s only if you have access to the meds and support … (checks notes) that Sentabale provides. Especially now that USAID is pulling out of AIDS in Africa work. The whole thing is shady as sh!t and has William’s fingerprints all over it.

I early wait the results of the investigations.

I see.

Where is the evidence William decided he was the new Leopold (look it up) taking over Africa? How credible! Do you mean that his pube-haired school-cheat Nazi baby brother brat said that in his memoir so it is true? Ok.

As ever, I am impressed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why do her fans act like she was a key super star actress on Suits? lol. Harvey and Louis are the only reason why that series has any replay value -- the third younger guy (Michael), the red head (Donna), and the black woman (Jessica) were also good. Meghan's character (Rachel) was unmemorable in every way and could have been swapped out with any other random struggling 30 year old actress.

I'm a fan and not only do I not act like she was a star actress, I've never seen Suits. She was B-list at best; that still doesn't warrant the hate she gets.

On what planet is a game show model then middle aged bit role actress on a cable series B-list? Irrelevant D-list is more like it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The issue is with her allegations not the goddamned platform. Again: grow UP.

More ad hominems from you. Again you're ignoring the serious allegations against Chandauka and instead pretending that right-wing Sky News giving her a platform to jump on the hate bandwagon is worth a bucket of spit. Once again, for those of you in the back seats:

Did Sentebale's entire board not resign first, before Harry did? The board included multiple black people, but somehow not a single one of them wanted to continue working with her.

Did Harry and the other (black) prince not resign in support of the board?

Are there not open questions about what Chandauka (she says Dr., but that's an honorary degree) did with £600k? She didn't ask the board's permission, nor did she even tell them she was using £600k. This is per People magazine.

Did Chandauka not alienate a major donor?

What about Chandauka's other statements to Sky News, which raise lots of questions about her credibility? For example, she claimed Harry was trying to run Sentebale, an organization he personally had given $1.5m to, into the ground. Do you think she's right about that?

Why is she talking about climate change, when it's in no way part of Sentebale's mission? Did Earthshot William not say "Africa is mine"?

Still waiting for answers to ANY of these questions.

If Meghan Sussex is reading this maybe she can answer. Or would that be sock puppeting?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The issue is with her allegations not the goddamned platform. Again: grow UP.

More ad hominems from you. Again you're ignoring the serious allegations against Chandauka and instead pretending that right-wing Sky News giving her a platform to jump on the hate bandwagon is worth a bucket of spit. Once again, for those of you in the back seats:

Did Sentebale's entire board not resign first, before Harry did? The board included multiple black people, but somehow not a single one of them wanted to continue working with her.

Did Harry and the other (black) prince not resign in support of the board?

Are there not open questions about what Chandauka (she says Dr., but that's an honorary degree) did with £600k? She didn't ask the board's permission, nor did she even tell them she was using £600k. This is per People magazine.

Did Chandauka not alienate a major donor?

What about Chandauka's other statements to Sky News, which raise lots of questions about her credibility? For example, she claimed Harry was trying to run Sentebale, an organization he personally had given $1.5m to, into the ground. Do you think she's right about that?

Why is she talking about climate change, when it's in no way part of Sentebale's mission? Did Earthshot William not say "Africa is mine"?

Still waiting for answers to ANY of these questions.

So you expect people on here to do research for you? Why don't you formulate some thoughts related to the matter and verbalize a point of view. No one wants to sit here and play 50 questions. I personally don't GAF about "Sentebale.:

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think everyone forgets that when Gwyneth launched GOOP, it was laughed at/hated, and it took her years and years of trial and error before she found her groove/success in the wellness space. I remember her whole GOOP staff turned over at one point. I think Meghan has good instincts, and her pre-Harry Tig brand was cool, so I'm willing to follow along and see how her new brand evolves.

I completely agree with you. She is in this for longish game. She doesn't need to make money right now, she'll make her money when she sells the brand (like Gwyneth did).

Are you kidding?! She lost their Netflix $100 million deal.