Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
With Love, Meghan on Netflix
![[Post New]](/jforum/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif){kind=icon}
Anonymous
More ad hominems from you. Again you're ignoring the serious allegations against Chandauka and instead pretending that right-wing Sky News giving her a platform to jump on the hate bandwagon is worth a bucket of spit. Once again, for those of you in the back seats: Did Sentebale's entire board not resign first, before Harry did? The board included multiple black people, but somehow not a single one of them wanted to continue working with her. Did Harry and the other (black) prince not resign in support of the board? Are there not open questions about what Chandauka (she says Dr., but that's an honorary degree) did with £600k? She didn't ask the board's permission, nor did she even tell them she was using £600k. This is per People magazine. Did Chandauka not alienate a major donor? What about Chandauka's other statements to Sky News, which raise lots of questions about her credibility? For example, she claimed Harry was trying to run Sentebale, an organization he personally had given $1.5m to, into the ground. Do you think she's right about that? Why is she talking about climate change, when it's in no way part of Sentebale's mission? Did Earthshot William not say "Africa is mine"? |
Anonymous
The Sentabale allegations pertain to fixing her PR image, by trying to force the head of a charity to defend Meghan against credible claims that she’s difficult and acted an ass at polo - where dear bestie Delfina (who appeared on this show) posed for photos with Markle. Since Markle’s whole thing currently at least is branding accessible but posh elegance under “kindness” and “special touches for others,” she needs to not seem like an out of touch jerk shoving people around at the polo, especially if she’s leaning on said polo guests to try and prove she has any friends for this show. |
Anonymous
At the polo match, Harry had his arm around Meghan's waist and Chadauka tried to get in between them. So Meghan asked her in a perfectly normal voice if she didn't want to stand to Meghan's left. This is all about Chadauka trying to fix her own image by using Murdoch's Sky News to deflect onto the Sussexes. |
Anonymous
| OK, I'll play because I've always been curious. What goes on in the mind of somebody who feels they have to spend hours every day hating on Meghan and Harry, who after all left Britain five years ago? Is it racism? Is it Americans who idolize the British royal family to the point where they willingly ignore common sense and facts like the ones at 16:29? What on earth gives? |
Anonymous
Yes that’s exactly it. The head of the charity tried to rub up on a bald moron and glared at his gorgeous superior better educated better bodied wife in the doing of it. But #lovewon so Harry is setting this charity on fire, did I get each detail right? |
Anonymous
It’s this. It’s racism. I have to attack Meghan to protect the white goddess alleging malfeasance at sentabale. |
Anonymous
No one gives a crap about Chaduks |
Anonymous
I’m sorry it takes you hours to write a 3 line post. That is sad. 😔 |
Anonymous
+1 there's something shady going one and we don't have all the information right now to successfully point it in one direction. Sounds like they were all trying to out do each other in the shady department. Chadauka is Meghan because it's an easy deflection |
Anonymous
| I don’t know anything about the sentebale issue- it seems nuanced. But it is not a good look for Harry no matter how it went down for him to step down amidst vague allegations of misogyny and other misconduct. It just feels like he can’t do anything right. And whether it’s his fault or not the stain is on him |
Anonymous
She made no allegations of misconduct until the board resigned. This is a ploy to throw Blake on him, using the massive power of Murdoch’s media machine. Looks like it’s working. |
Anonymous
Are all Meghan haters trolls who never answer direct question and instead spew insults? Or is that just you? |
Anonymous
“Somebody who feels they have to spend hours every day hating on Meghan and Harry”. Are you saying you meant that as an insult and you can just spew insults? I wrote maybe 4 posts here and each one took me less than 5 minutes, so I assumed your posts must take you a long long time and you judge everyone else’s time based upon how long it takes you. Just as you assume everyone is racist if they don’t trust one particular mixed race person named Meghan Markle. PS- you sound more than curious, you sound angry. |
Anonymous
|
The Sentebale controversy does tie into this show as part of the pair’s Netflix deal. The head of the charity alleges that their fleeing for their very lives wound up diminishing the fundraising efforts. She alleges that Harry wanted to bring Netflix cameras for “Polo” to a charity polo event, and that the event space - realizing that a charitable event was now a commercial endeavor - required a higher fee that the charity would not be able to front, and that everyone had to scramble to fix that. She alleges that Markle was a last minute show to the event, which was a mess with photo ops — in short, the way the pair has tried to blend Netflix commercial deliverables with their saintly charitable endeavors is shady AF. They aren’t Médecins Sans Frontières FFS, they wanted to be paid for glam shots “doing charity” to pad out their prior failed Netflix project.
It’s all a shitshow. |
Anonymous
Great explanation of how Harry and Meghan are for-thenselves-profit. They want glamour, money and fame without real work. Should’ve stayed royal! The fact that she has a ShopMe, and that GOOP apparently had never made a profit, does not bode well for them being able to maintain their lifestyle much longer. |