With Love, Meghan on Netflix

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Sentebale controversy does tie into this show as part of the pair’s Netflix deal. The head of the charity alleges that their fleeing for their very lives wound up diminishing the fundraising efforts. She alleges that Harry wanted to bring Netflix cameras for “Polo” to a charity polo event, and that the event space - realizing that a charitable event was now a commercial endeavor - required a higher fee that the charity would not be able to front, and that everyone had to scramble to fix that. She alleges that Markle was a last minute show to the event, which was a mess with photo ops — in short, the way the pair has tried to blend Netflix commercial deliverables with their saintly charitable endeavors is shady AF. They aren’t Médecins Sans Frontières FFS, they wanted to be paid for glam shots “doing charity” to pad out their prior failed Netflix project.

It’s all a shitshow.

“Oh no! The Sussexes brought Netflix and Serena Williams to my charity’s event, which will massively increase publicity for and donations to my charity!” Said no head of a charity ever. Sophie’s whole story is so shady.

This whole thing reads like William “Africa is mine, Harry” Wales is trying to take over Harry’s Africa charity. Why else would Iain Rowanson, who is William’s long-time aide, be at Sophie’s side this entire week? Why else would Sophie keep talking about pivoting her little children’s aid charity into a climate change charity, unless climate change is William’s signature issue? Sophie claimed on TV that AIDS is no longer a threat, but that’s only if you have access to the meds and support … (checks notes) that Sentabale provides. Especially now that USAID is pulling out of AIDS in Africa work. The whole thing is shady as sh!t and has William’s fingerprints all over it.

I early wait the results of the investigations.

DP. But Just Harry isn't a prince anymore, or at least isn't useful as a prince anymore. He no longer has the connections that he had or the influence. If Sentabale wants to switch brothers, that sounds like a smart decision for them. Why shouldn't they?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OK, I'll play because I've always been curious. What goes on in the mind of somebody who feels they have to spend hours every day hating on Meghan and Harry, who after all left Britain five years ago? Is it racism? Is it Americans who idolize the British royal family to the point where they willingly ignore common sense and facts like the ones at 16:29? What on earth gives?

I’m sorry it takes you hours to write a 3 line post. That is sad.
😔

Are all Meghan haters trolls who never answer direct question and instead spew insults? Or is that just you?

“Somebody who feels they have to spend hours every day hating on Meghan and Harry”. Are you saying you meant that as an insult and you can just spew insults?

I wrote maybe 4 posts here and each one took me less than 5 minutes, so I assumed your posts must take you a long long time and you judge everyone else’s time based upon how long it takes you.
Just as you assume everyone is racist if they don’t trust one particular mixed race person named Meghan Markle.

PS- you sound more than curious, you sound angry.

Reread the part about not responding to serious questions and just relying on more insults. Describes you to a T.

Yes, racism makes me angry. I’m white btw.

I read an article in defector yesterday and in it, it mentioned:

One of the most important lessons of adult life is understanding people like this for what they are and learning to identify them as quickly as possible; keeping people like this away from those you care about is, in no small part, the work of being an adult. Not being able to do that—putting your trust in people like this, or letting yourself believe that there is any kind of fair and mutually advantageous deal to be made with them—means that you will get victimized a lot.

Now this was levied at Donald Trump, but Meghan Markle has a lot of the same flags to me: SHe looks for attention (Marrying a prince, having a blog, becoming an actress, tell all interviews on Oprah) and she doesn’t take responsibility for much (Finally someone asked if I”m okay, Netflix deals falling through, an archtype podcast against stereotypes while trying to be an imperialist princess and now this Senebal (no clue how to spell and not looking it up) thing). There is a pattern. And as the guy in the article said, part of being an adult is running away from these types of people.

If she is your type of person, fine, but to continue to denigrate those of us who see this pattern in her, makes you exactly what you are claiming you dislike.

Racism may make you angry, but bad behavior crosses all racial lines.

[Anonymous]

PP, I love Defector. And I also see Markle for what she is.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Sentebale controversy does tie into this show as part of the pair’s Netflix deal. The head of the charity alleges that their fleeing for their very lives wound up diminishing the fundraising efforts. She alleges that Harry wanted to bring Netflix cameras for “Polo” to a charity polo event, and that the event space - realizing that a charitable event was now a commercial endeavor - required a higher fee that the charity would not be able to front, and that everyone had to scramble to fix that. She alleges that Markle was a last minute show to the event, which was a mess with photo ops — in short, the way the pair has tried to blend Netflix commercial deliverables with their saintly charitable endeavors is shady AF. They aren’t Médecins Sans Frontières FFS, they wanted to be paid for glam shots “doing charity” to pad out their prior failed Netflix project.

It’s all a shitshow.

“Oh no! The Sussexes brought Netflix and Serena Williams to my charity’s event, which will massively increase publicity for and donations to my charity!” Said no head of a charity ever. Sophie’s whole story is so shady.

This whole thing reads like William “Africa is mine, Harry” Wales is trying to take over Harry’s Africa charity. Why else would Iain Rowanson, who is William’s long-time aide, be at Sophie’s side this entire week? Why else would Sophie keep talking about pivoting her little children’s aid charity into a climate change charity, unless climate change is William’s signature issue? Sophie claimed on TV that AIDS is no longer a threat, but that’s only if you have access to the meds and support … (checks notes) that Sentabale provides. Especially now that USAID is pulling out of AIDS in Africa work. The whole thing is shady as sh!t and has William’s fingerprints all over it.

I early wait the results of the investigations.

DP. But Just Harry isn't a prince anymore, or at least isn't useful as a prince anymore. He no longer has the connections that he had or the influence. If Sentabale wants to switch brothers, that sounds like a smart decision for them. Why shouldn't they?

Harry and Meghan still have amazing pull. Just look at how many tuned into With Love, Meghan, love it or hate it. Also, it's not true at all that "Sentabale wants to switch brothers" to do climate change because the entire board of trustees disagreed with her, and they're more Sentabale than she is (they approve what she does).

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OK, I'll play because I've always been curious. What goes on in the mind of somebody who feels they have to spend hours every day hating on Meghan and Harry, who after all left Britain five years ago? Is it racism? Is it Americans who idolize the British royal family to the point where they willingly ignore common sense and facts like the ones at 16:29? What on earth gives?

I’m sorry it takes you hours to write a 3 line post. That is sad.
😔

Are all Meghan haters trolls who never answer direct question and instead spew insults? Or is that just you?

“Somebody who feels they have to spend hours every day hating on Meghan and Harry”. Are you saying you meant that as an insult and you can just spew insults?

I wrote maybe 4 posts here and each one took me less than 5 minutes, so I assumed your posts must take you a long long time and you judge everyone else’s time based upon how long it takes you.
Just as you assume everyone is racist if they don’t trust one particular mixed race person named Meghan Markle.

PS- you sound more than curious, you sound angry.

Reread the part about not responding to serious questions and just relying on more insults. Describes you to a T.

Yes, racism makes me angry. I’m white btw.

I read an article in defector yesterday and in it, it mentioned:

One of the most important lessons of adult life is understanding people like this for what they are and learning to identify them as quickly as possible; keeping people like this away from those you care about is, in no small part, the work of being an adult. Not being able to do that—putting your trust in people like this, or letting yourself believe that there is any kind of fair and mutually advantageous deal to be made with them—means that you will get victimized a lot.

Now this was levied at Donald Trump, but Meghan Markle has a lot of the same flags to me: SHe looks for attention (Marrying a prince, having a blog, becoming an actress, tell all interviews on Oprah) and she doesn’t take responsibility for much (Finally someone asked if I”m okay, Netflix deals falling through, an archtype podcast against stereotypes while trying to be an imperialist princess and now this Senebal (no clue how to spell and not looking it up) thing). There is a pattern. And as the guy in the article said, part of being an adult is running away from these types of people.

If she is your type of person, fine, but to continue to denigrate those of us who see this pattern in her, makes you exactly what you are claiming you dislike.

Racism may make you angry, but bad behavior crosses all racial lines.

So you believe all the tabloid nonsense about how the Oprah interview was for attention instead of what Harry and Meghan said, which was, you know, that they needed to set the record straight about the tabloid lies. And how some of these tabloid lies were directly traceable to the palaces. But you still believe the tabloid lies, OK. So tell us, since when is having a blog or being an actress a "red flag"?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OK, I'll play because I've always been curious. What goes on in the mind of somebody who feels they have to spend hours every day hating on Meghan and Harry, who after all left Britain five years ago? Is it racism? Is it Americans who idolize the British royal family to the point where they willingly ignore common sense and facts like the ones at 16:29? What on earth gives?

I’m sorry it takes you hours to write a 3 line post. That is sad.
😔

Are all Meghan haters trolls who never answer direct question and instead spew insults? Or is that just you?

“Somebody who feels they have to spend hours every day hating on Meghan and Harry”. Are you saying you meant that as an insult and you can just spew insults?

I wrote maybe 4 posts here and each one took me less than 5 minutes, so I assumed your posts must take you a long long time and you judge everyone else’s time based upon how long it takes you.
Just as you assume everyone is racist if they don’t trust one particular mixed race person named Meghan Markle.

PS- you sound more than curious, you sound angry.

Reread the part about not responding to serious questions and just relying on more insults. Describes you to a T.

Yes, racism makes me angry. I’m white btw.

I read an article in defector yesterday and in it, it mentioned:

One of the most important lessons of adult life is understanding people like this for what they are and learning to identify them as quickly as possible; keeping people like this away from those you care about is, in no small part, the work of being an adult. Not being able to do that—putting your trust in people like this, or letting yourself believe that there is any kind of fair and mutually advantageous deal to be made with them—means that you will get victimized a lot.

Now this was levied at Donald Trump, but Meghan Markle has a lot of the same flags to me: SHe looks for attention (Marrying a prince, having a blog, becoming an actress, tell all interviews on Oprah) and she doesn’t take responsibility for much (Finally someone asked if I”m okay, Netflix deals falling through, an archtype podcast against stereotypes while trying to be an imperialist princess and now this Senebal (no clue how to spell and not looking it up) thing). There is a pattern. And as the guy in the article said, part of being an adult is running away from these types of people.

If she is your type of person, fine, but to continue to denigrate those of us who see this pattern in her, makes you exactly what you are claiming you dislike.

Racism may make you angry, but bad behavior crosses all racial lines.

So you believe all the tabloid nonsense about how the Oprah interview was for attention instead of what Harry and Meghan said, which was, you know, that they needed to set the record straight about the tabloid lies. And how some of these tabloid lies were directly traceable to the palaces. But you still believe the tabloid lies, OK. So tell us, since when is having a blog or being an actress a "red flag"?

That seems to be it. PP and their buddy haven't responded to a single question raised about Chandauka or William's activities. Instead they repeat ad nauseum everything the tabloids tell them to say.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OK, I'll play because I've always been curious. What goes on in the mind of somebody who feels they have to spend hours every day hating on Meghan and Harry, who after all left Britain five years ago? Is it racism? Is it Americans who idolize the British royal family to the point where they willingly ignore common sense and facts like the ones at 16:29? What on earth gives?

I’m sorry it takes you hours to write a 3 line post. That is sad.
😔

Are all Meghan haters trolls who never answer direct question and instead spew insults? Or is that just you?

“Somebody who feels they have to spend hours every day hating on Meghan and Harry”. Are you saying you meant that as an insult and you can just spew insults?

I wrote maybe 4 posts here and each one took me less than 5 minutes, so I assumed your posts must take you a long long time and you judge everyone else’s time based upon how long it takes you.
Just as you assume everyone is racist if they don’t trust one particular mixed race person named Meghan Markle.

PS- you sound more than curious, you sound angry.

Reread the part about not responding to serious questions and just relying on more insults. Describes you to a T.

Yes, racism makes me angry. I’m white btw.

I read an article in defector yesterday and in it, it mentioned:

One of the most important lessons of adult life is understanding people like this for what they are and learning to identify them as quickly as possible; keeping people like this away from those you care about is, in no small part, the work of being an adult. Not being able to do that—putting your trust in people like this, or letting yourself believe that there is any kind of fair and mutually advantageous deal to be made with them—means that you will get victimized a lot.

Now this was levied at Donald Trump, but Meghan Markle has a lot of the same flags to me: SHe looks for attention (Marrying a prince, having a blog, becoming an actress, tell all interviews on Oprah) and she doesn’t take responsibility for much (Finally someone asked if I”m okay, Netflix deals falling through, an archtype podcast against stereotypes while trying to be an imperialist princess and now this Senebal (no clue how to spell and not looking it up) thing). There is a pattern. And as the guy in the article said, part of being an adult is running away from these types of people.

If she is your type of person, fine, but to continue to denigrate those of us who see this pattern in her, makes you exactly what you are claiming you dislike.

Racism may make you angry, but bad behavior crosses all racial lines.

So you believe all the tabloid nonsense about how the Oprah interview was for attention instead of what Harry and Meghan said, which was, you know, that they needed to set the record straight about the tabloid lies. And how some of these tabloid lies were directly traceable to the palaces. But you still believe the tabloid lies, OK. So tell us, since when is having a blog or being an actress

Meghan just had to tell her side of her story to Oprah.. There was no other choice but to go on national television and air her grievances. And guess what, Oprah tossed her aside after she got the interview she wanted. So if was all for nothing and made them look like spoiled brats. Hint: You don't get the "privacy" you allegedly crave by doing interviews with Oprah Winfrey.

[Anonymous]

I just checked into this thread after a couple of weeks and my GOD you anti-fans are crazy. This isn't even about the show anymore.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I just checked into this thread after a couple of weeks and my GOD you anti-fans are crazy. This isn't even about the show anymore.

The show is a "reality"show so it totally is about Meghan and the show.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I just checked into this thread after a couple of weeks and my GOD you anti-fans are crazy. This isn't even about the show anymore.

Did you get computer access again in your asylum?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The issue is with her allegations not the goddamned platform. Again: grow UP.

More ad hominems from you. Again you're ignoring the serious allegations against Chandauka and instead pretending that right-wing Sky News giving her a platform to jump on the hate bandwagon is worth a bucket of spit. Once again, for those of you in the back seats:

Did Sentebale's entire board not resign first, before Harry did? The board included multiple black people, but somehow not a single one of them wanted to continue working with her.

Did Harry and the other (black) prince not resign in support of the board?

Are there not open questions about what Chandauka (she says Dr., but that's an honorary degree) did with £600k? She didn't ask the board's permission, nor did she even tell them she was using £600k. This is per People magazine.

Did Chandauka not alienate a major donor?

What about Chandauka's other statements to Sky News, which raise lots of questions about her credibility? For example, she claimed Harry was trying to run Sentebale, an organization he personally had given $1.5m to, into the ground. Do you think she's right about that?

Why is she talking about climate change, when it's in no way part of Sentebale's mission? Did Earthshot William not say "Africa is mine"?

Still waiting for answers to ANY of these questions.

There are no serious allegations against her. You can all-caps and give your credentials (“I’m white by the way”) and hissyfit to your heart’s content - it doesn’t give you more heft. But thanks for posting. I need these periodic reminders that her fans just aren’t capable thinkers.

These are serious allegations against Chandauka, and you apparently have no answers, just even more insults.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I just checked into this thread after a couple of weeks and my GOD you anti-fans are crazy. This isn't even about the show anymore.

Did you get computer access again in your asylum?

DO. More insults. The anti-Meghans are so hateful to everyone. It must be so hard to have little real content to torque all their hate off.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The issue is with her allegations not the goddamned platform. Again: grow UP.

More ad hominems from you. Again you're ignoring the serious allegations against Chandauka and instead pretending that right-wing Sky News giving her a platform to jump on the hate bandwagon is worth a bucket of spit. Once again, for those of you in the back seats:

Did Sentebale's entire board not resign first, before Harry did? The board included multiple black people, but somehow not a single one of them wanted to continue working with her.

Did Harry and the other (black) prince not resign in support of the board?

Are there not open questions about what Chandauka (she says Dr., but that's an honorary degree) did with £600k? She didn't ask the board's permission, nor did she even tell them she was using £600k. This is per People magazine.

Did Chandauka not alienate a major donor?

What about Chandauka's other statements to Sky News, which raise lots of questions about her credibility? For example, she claimed Harry was trying to run Sentebale, an organization he personally had given $1.5m to, into the ground. Do you think she's right about that?

Why is she talking about climate change, when it's in no way part of Sentebale's mission? Did Earthshot William not say "Africa is mine"?

Still waiting for answers to ANY of these questions.

There are no serious allegations against her. You can all-caps and give your credentials (“I’m white by the way”) and hissyfit to your heart’s content - it doesn’t give you more heft. But thanks for posting. I need these periodic reminders that her fans just aren’t capable thinkers.

These are serious allegations against Chandauka, and you apparently have no answers, just even more insults.

There are zero serious allegations against Chandauka. That’s why you’re not citing them. If there were sourced believable allegations, you’d cite that. If those were non-message board or non-Daily Mail allegations, your beloved hated tabloid, you’d cite that. If there were a thing you were capable of saying besides “uhhh William tried to conquer Africa,” you’d say it and cite something.

You in fact scuttle in and try to fling insults while covering yourself in your own excrement, my beloved. So if and when you can actually build an argument about anything, feel free to pop on in.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The issue is with her allegations not the goddamned platform. Again: grow UP.

More ad hominems from you. Again you're ignoring the serious allegations against Chandauka and instead pretending that right-wing Sky News giving her a platform to jump on the hate bandwagon is worth a bucket of spit. Once again, for those of you in the back seats:

Did Sentebale's entire board not resign first, before Harry did? The board included multiple black people, but somehow not a single one of them wanted to continue working with her.

Did Harry and the other (black) prince not resign in support of the board?

Are there not open questions about what Chandauka (she says Dr., but that's an honorary degree) did with £600k? She didn't ask the board's permission, nor did she even tell them she was using £600k. This is per People magazine.

Did Chandauka not alienate a major donor?

What about Chandauka's other statements to Sky News, which raise lots of questions about her credibility? For example, she claimed Harry was trying to run Sentebale, an organization he personally had given $1.5m to, into the ground. Do you think she's right about that?

Why is she talking about climate change, when it's in no way part of Sentebale's mission? Did Earthshot William not say "Africa is mine"?

Still waiting for answers to ANY of these questions.

There are no serious allegations against her. You can all-caps and give your credentials (“I’m white by the way”) and hissyfit to your heart’s content - it doesn’t give you more heft. But thanks for posting. I need these periodic reminders that her fans just aren’t capable thinkers.

These are serious allegations against Chandauka, and you apparently have no answers, just even more insults.

There are zero serious allegations against Chandauka. That’s why you’re not citing them. If there were sourced believable allegations, you’d cite that. If those were non-message board or non-Daily Mail allegations, your beloved hated tabloid, you’d cite that. If there were a thing you were capable of saying besides “uhhh William tried to conquer Africa,” you’d say it and cite something.

You in fact scuttle in and try to fling insults while covering yourself in your own excrement, my beloved. So if and when you can actually build an argument about anything, feel free to pop on in.

It was pointed out above—and you refused to answer—that Sophie Chandauka spent £600k without asking or telling her board. Well now it’s coming out that she gave the money to her brother and a firm she invested in.

But sure, this isn’t serious in your mind. Nor is the role of William’s longtime ally and TUSK director Iain Rawlinson, who has been by Sophie’s side all week. Nor is the fact that Chandauka’s resume is on X and people there are pointing out discrepancies and also that every firm she’s been involved with failed and one owes £2m in back taxes but is massively in debt and can’t pay. Sure, nothing to see here, move along, keep trashing Meghan and other posters.

[Anonymous]

Cite your sources facts, babe. “William’s ally” is certainly a look! I adore the proper symbol for pounds to show hey no big deal you’re an international serious intellect - are you wearing dark-framed glasses and frowning with an attractive yet determined expression as you type?