
And the H&M defenders wonder why more of their victims do not come out on the record. They tried their usual machinations with the Sentabale chair and tried to get her to defend Meghan's uncouth behavior as part of their PR, but she refused. For her reward, she is now subject to Prince Harry's ire and a slew of intrusive, negative harassment from their deranged fanbase. These two are the worst. |
So you think most of the board resigned bc….of nothing to do with the chair? |
The bird is a few of Harry’s friends. If Harry wasn’t happy, then the bird will fall into line with him. |
Board! Not bird. Weird autocorrect |
Give it up, hater. The ENTIRE board, which included blacks, resigned because they didn't want to work with her. Harry and the Lesotho prince only resigned out of sympathy. She alienated a top donor and apparently spent £600k on consultants without asking or informing the board. Chandauka is clearly trying to get the Murdoch press, and vile haters, on her side with these accusations. A charity monitor is looking into it and the truth will out. Meanwhile, she's talking about the charity's "climate change" mission, which is not Sentabale's mission at all, so this looks to have William's fingerprints all over it. |
You should look into this a little more critically rather than just drinking the Sussex koolaid. |
So what's wrong about the post? Did the entire board not resign first? Did Harry and the other prince not resign in support of the board? Are there not open questions about what Chandauka (she says Dr., but that's an honorary degree) did with £600k? Did Chandauka not alienate a major donor? Why did Chandauka fly straight to London to talk to the Murdoch press instead of, you know, staying at the charity in Lesotho? Did William not once say "Africa is mine"? Does Sentebale's mission really include William's pet issue, climate change? |
You sound so irrational and immature. Please grow up, my god. |
This is all of what the Harry and Meghan fanbase is like. It’s so disgusting and deeply immoral. For anyone with sense - here is the person they are attacking. Please just watch for 2 minutes - you’ll see what’s up, and who is a grown-up, and who is decent and honest. Deranged people like this Sussex fan are attacking her because she didn’t want a fundraiser to be filmed as part of their Netflix polo series. Which party is more credible? Please use your brain, for those with a conscience. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=3lF_Wcm-cqA&pp=ygUPU29waGllIHNreSBuZXdz |
For disgusting and deeply immoral, check out the Daily Mail Online and their daily clickbait of multiple anti-Meghan articles they throw to the racist wolves in their comments section. Here's a hit piece from today, just one of many. Don't check out the comments unless you have a strong stomach. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14549253/Prince-Harry-dad-hospital-cancer-battle.html |
You haven't been able to debunk a single thing I said. Instead you're aiming ad hominems at me. What's irrational and immature is ignoring actual facts so you can wage a hate campaign against a woman who left the royal family five years ago. Find a more appropriate outlet for your pent-up rage and/or get a real hobby. |
SkyNews, owned by Murdoch, who also owns the Daily Mail, which has been waging a vicious hate campaign against Harry and Meghan with documented help from BP and KP, and which is basically a mouthpiece for the royal family. Are you kidding us? Of course Sky News is going to give Chandauka a platform to try to shift her own mistakes onto their bandwagon of hatred against Meghan and Harry. Unfortunately for her, Britain's charity regulators and investigating exactly the issues noted above. |
The issue is with her allegations not the goddamned platform. Again: grow UP. |
Ok we get it- you have no admiration for a 90-something-year-old working up to the final 72 hours of her life. You're so hard-core. |
What's this have to do with her Netflix series? |