With Love, Meghan on Netflix

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Meghan is always going to be too much or not enough for middle aged women. It's because they envy her. Her husband gave up everything for her, he protects her and their kids, he is a family man, and he supports her independent projects. She is beautiful, educated, well spoken, has her own career and money and ALL of that was before she met Harry. Together they've most made each other better.

If you look at the women who loudly and proudly talk shit about Meghan... you can see why they are mad. Jealousy makes you ugly on the inside and outside... and the outside of these women is NOT pretty.

Giving up everything (your friends and family) is a red flag. This Hollywood drama isn't what makes a healthy happy marriage.

That said, I am sure plenty of people are jealous of her, and I agree she is stunning.

Babe going no contact because your family is toxic towards you and toxic towards your spouse and kids IS NOT a red flag it's actually the healthiest response. If my family turned the toxic British press on my husband to cover their shenanigans, I would absolutely take him, my kid and leave. Period.

Harry and Meghan did the right thing and certain people will never be over it. So sad for those who cannot live in reality and waste their time spewing hate towards a woman they'll never know and who doesn't know they exist.

Some of these women would've done more for their own lives if they had focused on the elections at home (presidential in the US and Brexit in the UK) and voted their interests. Instead they stay stalking a woman who is minding her own business. Sad.

It is NOT normal to cut your whole family and social circle off. Cutting off 1 person (looking at you, Prince Andrew) or going low contact, sure. But losing your entire social circle and family wouldn't be something most therapists would recommend.

Remember Catherine's black sheep uncle who eventually went on a reality show? Even he hasn't been cut off. It is very extreme to cut multiple family members and friends off, and any good therapist will tell you this. Unfortunately today people act like that is "normal."

Also what's with the "Babe" thing?

DP here.

It's healthy to cut off people who refuse to try and understand or communicate with you as an equal. It's healthy to cut people off when they don't respect your spouse or children. I don't think it's "normal" but the dysfunction in both Harry's family and in Meghan's dad's family is also not "normal" and if they feel they need distance in order to protect themselves and their kids, that's healthy.

I'll also note that Harry actually has not cut off his family. He still sees and is friendly with his cousins and multiple of his friends from pre-Meghan. He has also spoken to his dad. It's a very strained relationship. But it's not like Harry has totally cut these people out of his life forever. He's set boundaries. That's all.

This is a very popular opinion: to “cut off” family who don’t communicate with you as a perceived “equal”.

Unpopular opinion: I disagree and think sometimes maintaining contact on your own terms is best. I was the child of an abusive father and when I became an adult, I learned to structure my visits to my parents very carefully. I didn’t stay in their house, and would visit at the house for a quick meal or meet my parents at a restaurant while I stayed with friends or in a hotel.
This was hard because I was poor as a young adult, but we all made it work.

Harry and Meghan are not poor and could easily structure visits with the family on their own time and terms. They have opted to write a tell all book and try to make demands when they visit. Their version of boundaries hurt their families (both my keeping grandkids away from grandparents and cousins) and themselves rather than setting boundaries that help all. It is possible and healthier.

Why would you continuously put yourself both mentally and physically in the environment of someone who abused you. Sounds like some masochism psychosis that not everyone prescribed to or want to endure.

Yes, I do struggle with the DSM recognized diagnosis of “masochism psychosis.’

I don’t think you ever really just “walk away” from your family of origin no matter how hard you try.

I didn’t however, name one of my kids after an abuser.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Some people like Meghan, Hilaria and BL are just very big topics because of their ventures, lawsuits, scandals, their high profile...You could start threads about 95% of actors and actresses here and they would not have traction the way these few do. How many times can you say Nicole Kidman is a great actress who did too much botox, Halle Berry looks stunning, Scarjo was great on the today show? There needs to be "something" to gossip about, and that requires some degree of great exposure + controversy + negative opinions and disagreement.

In Meghan's case it goes beyond idle gossip, though. It's a level of hatred that borders on insanity. I mean, why get so worked up about a woman who married into another country's royal family? The OTT hatred is actually consistent with people knowing deep down that she really was treated horribly by the British royal family and press, but the haters just can't live with that cognitive dissonance so instead they go apesh!t on her. At least that's a psychologically coherent explanation, as opposed to the haters just being losers with too much pent-up rage and too much time on their hands....

Well, they claim it's because she "disrespected" that royal family but that doesn't make sense to me either because guess what! They aren't our royal family! I could give two shits if some C-list actress makes fun of curtsying to a dusty old crone who believed she was ordained by God to be better than other people.

You can have your opinion, but the Queen was a deeply religious person who spent her life in service of her country. She could have walked away and just been a private citizen who was free to enjoy her immense wealth. I think it's important to recognize that.

It's really not. Other than military service, the royals' "service to their country" consists of going to pony shows and cutting ribbons. Even the "hard working" royals like Anne cut one ribbon a day, as opposed to William and Kate who use their kids to get out of shit. (and they were doing that before Kate had cancer.)

Meghan has made some missteps over the years and is far from perfect but the weird loyalty to the royals from (presumably, on a DC-based forum) Americans is so odd.

Word. Meghan isn't perfect, but what is going on in the heads of American detractors who spend their days trashing her here and on the Daily Mail? Liking the Queen (as I do too) doesn't mean you have to believe the proven lie that Meghan "make Kate cry" or that the curtsy video was anything more than Meghan mocking herself. Or that William and Kate were fine to brief the press about how Kate was too frail to ever work egain, you monsters, at the same time that Kate was papped skiing in Switzerland. Or that William and Kate skipping BAFTAs for Mustique was A-OK. At least Charles is working a lot, and through what appears to be continuing cancer treatment, so respect there.

The problem is not that people have opinions of Meghan. The problem is the people who appoint themselves to police the opinions. It is absolutely not needed. If you don't like the opinions find something else to read.

You first.

You are the one who wants to control opinions. I don't have a problem with you thinking that Meghan is the greatest homemaker ever and the most beautiful and accomplished actress who gave up her great career for bipolar Harry, my problem is you telling me what I am supposed to think snd feel.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Some people like Meghan, Hilaria and BL are just very big topics because of their ventures, lawsuits, scandals, their high profile...You could start threads about 95% of actors and actresses here and they would not have traction the way these few do. How many times can you say Nicole Kidman is a great actress who did too much botox, Halle Berry looks stunning, Scarjo was great on the today show? There needs to be "something" to gossip about, and that requires some degree of great exposure + controversy + negative opinions and disagreement.

In Meghan's case it goes beyond idle gossip, though. It's a level of hatred that borders on insanity. I mean, why get so worked up about a woman who married into another country's royal family? The OTT hatred is actually consistent with people knowing deep down that she really was treated horribly by the British royal family and press, but the haters just can't live with that cognitive dissonance so instead they go apesh!t on her. At least that's a psychologically coherent explanation, as opposed to the haters just being losers with too much pent-up rage and too much time on their hands....

Well, they claim it's because she "disrespected" that royal family but that doesn't make sense to me either because guess what! They aren't our royal family! I could give two shits if some C-list actress makes fun of curtsying to a dusty old crone who believed she was ordained by God to be better than other people.

People don’t like that she trashed her husband’s family on TV. I liked her before that, but as someone who is struggling with in law problems (both my brothers wife and my husband’s side) and working hard to preserve the peace, I can’t respect someone who acts like she did (he’s even worse but Harry is such a fool that he’s pathetic and not worth talking about).

Well you’re willing to eat shiit and take shiit to be accepted by your in-laws. Not everyone is cut from your pick-me cloth.

But she still wants the in law family to give her everything and calls her kids who live on California "prince" and "princess. We do not have royalty in the U.S. and the titles have no effect here. Those kids are never going to be working royals and are not even going to school in England. Do you think she forces the kids at Montecito Country School to call her kid "Princess"? Her life is all about living in reflected glory, so it would not surprise me.

She is just as dumb as Luann from Real Housewives calling herself a Countess while living in Manhattan.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Meghan is always going to be too much or not enough for middle aged women. It's because they envy her. Her husband gave up everything for her, he protects her and their kids, he is a family man, and he supports her independent projects. She is beautiful, educated, well spoken, has her own career and money and ALL of that was before she met Harry. Together they've most made each other better.

If you look at the women who loudly and proudly talk shit about Meghan... you can see why they are mad. Jealousy makes you ugly on the inside and outside... and the outside of these women is NOT pretty.

Giving up everything (your friends and family) is a red flag. This Hollywood drama isn't what makes a healthy happy marriage.

That said, I am sure plenty of people are jealous of her, and I agree she is stunning.

Babe going no contact because your family is toxic towards you and toxic towards your spouse and kids IS NOT a red flag it's actually the healthiest response. If my family turned the toxic British press on my husband to cover their shenanigans, I would absolutely take him, my kid and leave. Period.

Harry and Meghan did the right thing and certain people will never be over it. So sad for those who cannot live in reality and waste their time spewing hate towards a woman they'll never know and who doesn't know they exist.

Some of these women would've done more for their own lives if they had focused on the elections at home (presidential in the US and Brexit in the UK) and voted their interests. Instead they stay stalking a woman who is minding her own business. Sad.

It is NOT normal to cut your whole family and social circle off. Cutting off 1 person (looking at you, Prince Andrew) or going low contact, sure. But losing your entire social circle and family wouldn't be something most therapists would recommend.

Remember Catherine's black sheep uncle who eventually went on a reality show? Even he hasn't been cut off. It is very extreme to cut multiple family members and friends off, and any good therapist will tell you this. Unfortunately today people act like that is "normal."

Also what's with the "Babe" thing?

DP here.

It's healthy to cut off people who refuse to try and understand or communicate with you as an equal. It's healthy to cut people off when they don't respect your spouse or children. I don't think it's "normal" but the dysfunction in both Harry's family and in Meghan's dad's family is also not "normal" and if they feel they need distance in order to protect themselves and their kids, that's healthy.

I'll also note that Harry actually has not cut off his family. He still sees and is friendly with his cousins and multiple of his friends from pre-Meghan. He has also spoken to his dad. It's a very strained relationship. But it's not like Harry has totally cut these people out of his life forever. He's set boundaries. That's all.

This is a very popular opinion: to “cut off” family who don’t communicate with you as a perceived “equal”.

Unpopular opinion: I disagree and think sometimes maintaining contact on your own terms is best. I was the child of an abusive father and when I became an adult, I learned to structure my visits to my parents very carefully. I didn’t stay in their house, and would visit at the house for a quick meal or meet my parents at a restaurant while I stayed with friends or in a hotel.
This was hard because I was poor as a young adult, but we all made it work.

Harry and Meghan are not poor and could easily structure visits with the family on their own time and terms. They have opted to write a tell all book and try to make demands when they visit. Their version of boundaries hurt their families (both my keeping grandkids away from grandparents and cousins) and themselves rather than setting boundaries that help all. It is possible and healthier.

Why would you continuously put yourself both mentally and physically in the environment of someone who abused you. Sounds like some masochism psychosis that not everyone prescribed to or want to endure.

Yes, I do struggle with the DSM recognized diagnosis of “masochism psychosis.’

I don’t think you ever really just “walk away” from your family of origin no matter how hard you try.

I didn’t however, name one of my kids after an abuser.

Baby steps. People start where they start.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Some people like Meghan, Hilaria and BL are just very big topics because of their ventures, lawsuits, scandals, their high profile...You could start threads about 95% of actors and actresses here and they would not have traction the way these few do. How many times can you say Nicole Kidman is a great actress who did too much botox, Halle Berry looks stunning, Scarjo was great on the today show? There needs to be "something" to gossip about, and that requires some degree of great exposure + controversy + negative opinions and disagreement.

In Meghan's case it goes beyond idle gossip, though. It's a level of hatred that borders on insanity. I mean, why get so worked up about a woman who married into another country's royal family? The OTT hatred is actually consistent with people knowing deep down that she really was treated horribly by the British royal family and press, but the haters just can't live with that cognitive dissonance so instead they go apesh!t on her. At least that's a psychologically coherent explanation, as opposed to the haters just being losers with too much pent-up rage and too much time on their hands....

Well, they claim it's because she "disrespected" that royal family but that doesn't make sense to me either because guess what! They aren't our royal family! I could give two shits if some C-list actress makes fun of curtsying to a dusty old crone who believed she was ordained by God to be better than other people.

You can have your opinion, but the Queen was a deeply religious person who spent her life in service of her country. She could have walked away and just been a private citizen who was free to enjoy her immense wealth. I think it's important to recognize that.

Bull.

Okay if that is bull, why would Meghan accept a title from the lazy, layabout Queen? She hated her and thought she was lazy but she wanted thar title so she could lord it over the "little people" of Montecito. Meghan is a hypocrite.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Some people like Meghan, Hilaria and BL are just very big topics because of their ventures, lawsuits, scandals, their high profile...You could start threads about 95% of actors and actresses here and they would not have traction the way these few do. How many times can you say Nicole Kidman is a great actress who did too much botox, Halle Berry looks stunning, Scarjo was great on the today show? There needs to be "something" to gossip about, and that requires some degree of great exposure + controversy + negative opinions and disagreement.

In Meghan's case it goes beyond idle gossip, though. It's a level of hatred that borders on insanity. I mean, why get so worked up about a woman who married into another country's royal family? The OTT hatred is actually consistent with people knowing deep down that she really was treated horribly by the British royal family and press, but the haters just can't live with that cognitive dissonance so instead they go apesh!t on her. At least that's a psychologically coherent explanation, as opposed to the haters just being losers with too much pent-up rage and too much time on their hands....

Well, they claim it's because she "disrespected" that royal family but that doesn't make sense to me either because guess what! They aren't our royal family! I could give two shits if some C-list actress makes fun of curtsying to a dusty old crone who believed she was ordained by God to be better than other people.

You can have your opinion, but the Queen was a deeply religious person who spent her life in service of her country. She could have walked away and just been a private citizen who was free to enjoy her immense wealth. I think it's important to recognize that.

Bull.

Okay if that is bull, why would Meghan accept a title from the lazy, layabout Queen? She hated her and thought she was lazy but she wanted thar title so she could lord it over the "little people" of Montecito. Meghan is a hypocrite.

This will sound meaner than it's intended to be, but aren't Meghan and Harry part of the little people of Montecito? I feel like they go unbothered there bc there are many other richer people who could care less about them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Some people like Meghan, Hilaria and BL are just very big topics because of their ventures, lawsuits, scandals, their high profile...You could start threads about 95% of actors and actresses here and they would not have traction the way these few do. How many times can you say Nicole Kidman is a great actress who did too much botox, Halle Berry looks stunning, Scarjo was great on the today show? There needs to be "something" to gossip about, and that requires some degree of great exposure + controversy + negative opinions and disagreement.

In Meghan's case it goes beyond idle gossip, though. It's a level of hatred that borders on insanity. I mean, why get so worked up about a woman who married into another country's royal family? The OTT hatred is actually consistent with people knowing deep down that she really was treated horribly by the British royal family and press, but the haters just can't live with that cognitive dissonance so instead they go apesh!t on her. At least that's a psychologically coherent explanation, as opposed to the haters just being losers with too much pent-up rage and too much time on their hands....

Well, they claim it's because she "disrespected" that royal family but that doesn't make sense to me either because guess what! They aren't our royal family! I could give two shits if some C-list actress makes fun of curtsying to a dusty old crone who believed she was ordained by God to be better than other people.

You can have your opinion, but the Queen was a deeply religious person who spent her life in service of her country. She could have walked away and just been a private citizen who was free to enjoy her immense wealth. I think it's important to recognize that.

It's really not. Other than military service, the royals' "service to their country" consists of going to pony shows and cutting ribbons. Even the "hard working" royals like Anne cut one ribbon a day, as opposed to William and Kate who use their kids to get out of shit. (and they were doing that before Kate had cancer.)

Meghan has made some missteps over the years and is far from perfect but the weird loyalty to the royals from (presumably, on a DC-based forum) Americans is so odd.

Word. Meghan isn't perfect, but what is going on in the heads of American detractors who spend their days trashing her here and on the Daily Mail? Liking the Queen (as I do too) doesn't mean you have to believe the proven lie that Meghan "make Kate cry" or that the curtsy video was anything more than Meghan mocking herself. Or that William and Kate were fine to brief the press about how Kate was too frail to ever work egain, you monsters, at the same time that Kate was papped skiing in Switzerland. Or that William and Kate skipping BAFTAs for Mustique was A-OK. At least Charles is working a lot, and through what appears to be continuing cancer treatment, so respect there.

The problem is not that people have opinions of Meghan. The problem is the people who appoint themselves to police the opinions. It is absolutely not needed. If you don't like the opinions find something else to read.

You first.

You are the one who wants to control opinions. I don't have a problem with you thinking that Meghan is the greatest homemaker ever and the most beautiful and accomplished actress who gave up her great career for bipolar Harry, my problem is you telling me what I am supposed to think snd feel.

Yep.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Some people like Meghan, Hilaria and BL are just very big topics because of their ventures, lawsuits, scandals, their high profile...You could start threads about 95% of actors and actresses here and they would not have traction the way these few do. How many times can you say Nicole Kidman is a great actress who did too much botox, Halle Berry looks stunning, Scarjo was great on the today show? There needs to be "something" to gossip about, and that requires some degree of great exposure + controversy + negative opinions and disagreement.

In Meghan's case it goes beyond idle gossip, though. It's a level of hatred that borders on insanity. I mean, why get so worked up about a woman who married into another country's royal family? The OTT hatred is actually consistent with people knowing deep down that she really was treated horribly by the British royal family and press, but the haters just can't live with that cognitive dissonance so instead they go apesh!t on her. At least that's a psychologically coherent explanation, as opposed to the haters just being losers with too much pent-up rage and too much time on their hands....

Well, they claim it's because she "disrespected" that royal family but that doesn't make sense to me either because guess what! They aren't our royal family! I could give two shits if some C-list actress makes fun of curtsying to a dusty old crone who believed she was ordained by God to be better than other people.

You can have your opinion, but the Queen was a deeply religious person who spent her life in service of her country. She could have walked away and just been a private citizen who was free to enjoy her immense wealth. I think it's important to recognize that.

Bull.

Okay if that is bull, why would Meghan accept a title from the lazy, layabout Queen? She hated her and thought she was lazy but she wanted thar title so she could lord it over the "little people" of Montecito. Meghan is a hypocrite.

Uh- what is Meghan’s daughters name?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Some people like Meghan, Hilaria and BL are just very big topics because of their ventures, lawsuits, scandals, their high profile...You could start threads about 95% of actors and actresses here and they would not have traction the way these few do. How many times can you say Nicole Kidman is a great actress who did too much botox, Halle Berry looks stunning, Scarjo was great on the today show? There needs to be "something" to gossip about, and that requires some degree of great exposure + controversy + negative opinions and disagreement.

In Meghan's case it goes beyond idle gossip, though. It's a level of hatred that borders on insanity. I mean, why get so worked up about a woman who married into another country's royal family? The OTT hatred is actually consistent with people knowing deep down that she really was treated horribly by the British royal family and press, but the haters just can't live with that cognitive dissonance so instead they go apesh!t on her. At least that's a psychologically coherent explanation, as opposed to the haters just being losers with too much pent-up rage and too much time on their hands....

Well, they claim it's because she "disrespected" that royal family but that doesn't make sense to me either because guess what! They aren't our royal family! I could give two shits if some C-list actress makes fun of curtsying to a dusty old crone who believed she was ordained by God to be better than other people.

You can have your opinion, but the Queen was a deeply religious person who spent her life in service of her country. She could have walked away and just been a private citizen who was free to enjoy her immense wealth. I think it's important to recognize that.

Bull.

Okay if that is bull, why would Meghan accept a title from the lazy, layabout Queen? She hated her and thought she was lazy but she wanted thar title so she could lord it over the "little people" of Montecito. Meghan is a hypocrite.

Uh- what is Meghan’s daughters name?

Exactly, if the royals are SO lazy and terrible, why would she name her kid after the allegedly lazy and racist Queen? The answer is so that she can live in reflected glory telling people her kid is named after Queen Elizabeth and Princess Diana. The reflected glory of the royal family is all she has for the fame she desires.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Some people like Meghan, Hilaria and BL are just very big topics because of their ventures, lawsuits, scandals, their high profile...You could start threads about 95% of actors and actresses here and they would not have traction the way these few do. How many times can you say Nicole Kidman is a great actress who did too much botox, Halle Berry looks stunning, Scarjo was great on the today show? There needs to be "something" to gossip about, and that requires some degree of great exposure + controversy + negative opinions and disagreement.

In Meghan's case it goes beyond idle gossip, though. It's a level of hatred that borders on insanity. I mean, why get so worked up about a woman who married into another country's royal family? The OTT hatred is actually consistent with people knowing deep down that she really was treated horribly by the British royal family and press, but the haters just can't live with that cognitive dissonance so instead they go apesh!t on her. At least that's a psychologically coherent explanation, as opposed to the haters just being losers with too much pent-up rage and too much time on their hands....

Well, they claim it's because she "disrespected" that royal family but that doesn't make sense to me either because guess what! They aren't our royal family! I could give two shits if some C-list actress makes fun of curtsying to a dusty old crone who believed she was ordained by God to be better than other people.

You can have your opinion, but the Queen was a deeply religious person who spent her life in service of her country. She could have walked away and just been a private citizen who was free to enjoy her immense wealth. I think it's important to recognize that.

Bull.

Okay if that is bull, why would Meghan accept a title from the lazy, layabout Queen? She hated her and thought she was lazy but she wanted thar title so she could lord it over the "little people" of Montecito. Meghan is a hypocrite.

Uh- what is Meghan’s daughters name?

Exactly, if the royals are SO lazy and terrible, why would she name her kid after the allegedly lazy and racist Queen? The answer is so that she can live in reflected glory telling people her kid is named after Queen Elizabeth and Princess Diana. The reflected glory of the royal family is all she has for the fame she desires.

I honestly think their choice of name is what sealed their fate: Charles and the others will always believe their motivations are self-interested, attention seeking, and money grubbing.

It was a really dumb move that speaks volumes about them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Some people like Meghan, Hilaria and BL are just very big topics because of their ventures, lawsuits, scandals, their high profile...You could start threads about 95% of actors and actresses here and they would not have traction the way these few do. How many times can you say Nicole Kidman is a great actress who did too much botox, Halle Berry looks stunning, Scarjo was great on the today show? There needs to be "something" to gossip about, and that requires some degree of great exposure + controversy + negative opinions and disagreement.

In Meghan's case it goes beyond idle gossip, though. It's a level of hatred that borders on insanity. I mean, why get so worked up about a woman who married into another country's royal family? The OTT hatred is actually consistent with people knowing deep down that she really was treated horribly by the British royal family and press, but the haters just can't live with that cognitive dissonance so instead they go apesh!t on her. At least that's a psychologically coherent explanation, as opposed to the haters just being losers with too much pent-up rage and too much time on their hands....

Well, they claim it's because she "disrespected" that royal family but that doesn't make sense to me either because guess what! They aren't our royal family! I could give two shits if some C-list actress makes fun of curtsying to a dusty old crone who believed she was ordained by God to be better than other people.

You can have your opinion, but the Queen was a deeply religious person who spent her life in service of her country. She could have walked away and just been a private citizen who was free to enjoy her immense wealth. I think it's important to recognize that.

Bull.

Okay if that is bull, why would Meghan accept a title from the lazy, layabout Queen? She hated her and thought she was lazy but she wanted thar title so she could lord it over the "little people" of Montecito. Meghan is a hypocrite.

Uh- what is Meghan’s daughters name?

Exactly, if the royals are SO lazy and terrible, why would she name her kid after the allegedly lazy and racist Queen? The answer is so that she can live in reflected glory telling people her kid is named after Queen Elizabeth and Princess Diana. The reflected glory of the royal family is all she has for the fame she desires.

I honestly think their choice of name is what sealed their fate: Charles and the others will always believe their motivations are self-interested, attention seeking, and money grubbing.

It was a really dumb move that speaks volumes about them.

It’s hard to understand their mentality. They’re dysfunctional and embarrassing as a supposedly happy and free couple here.
There is no chance they are okay parents or that their kids are normal.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
It’s hard to understand their mentality. They’re dysfunctional and embarrassing as a supposedly happy and free couple here.
There is no chance they are okay parents or that their kids are normal.

It's probably a good thing that they seem to mainly be raised by nannies. If it was just M&H raising them, there would be a lot more dysfunction in their daily life. At least nannies keep kids to a stable routine.

[Anonymous]

Apparently they have fallen out with cousin Eugenie now as well.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Apparently they have fallen out with cousin Eugenie now as well.

Probably has more to do with the fact that Charles will dramatically slow down, step back, and sadly pass away sooner rather than later and Andrew’s daughters know there might be an opportunity to get tagged in to help…or at the very least don’t want to be cut off of future guest lists like Harry.

Everyone should be sucking up to William now. He will probably be King within 5 years, and his kids will be far too young to pitch in.

Even the scaled back monarchy Charles promised relies upon lesser nobility for various events.

[Anonymous]

And things have now soured with Sentabale with more accusations of bullying leveled against H and M.