But the percentages of AA students aren't in the 90's unlike the other schools you guys mentioned. |
Are they that deplorable that it would be a deal breaker? How much worse are they than say, Walls or Wilson? Where can I find SAT scores for DCPS high schools? |
I'm pp, I just found it on DCPS website. Yes, Walls students on average score higher but Banneker and Wilson have pretty much the same scores with Banneker coming out slightly ahead of Wilson. So again, why not Banneker? http://dcps.dc.gov/publication/dcps-data-set-sat |
There's been several threads on this on DCUM. If I remember correctly, it's not that they are "deplorable" but certainly much lower than other selective schools like Walls. |
|
Differences between Banneker, WIlson, SWW.
Size -- number of students per grade Facilities -- Banneker has not been renovated; other schools are larger Extracurriculars/sports -- Wilson stronger than either SWW or Banneker But I agree that familiarity and racism is a huge factor. There is a strong tradition among AA families to send their children to Banneker and there's a growing Latino presence. White families haven't jumped in yet but I suspect they may, eventually. Remember that Wash Latin, which is now very popular among white families, graduated few white families who were leery of its high school (it was seem as ok for middle but then they went private/Wilson/SWW). |
| Being that Banneker is a title 1 school it would be interesting to know how many kids are taking SAT prep courses as compared to Walls. |
Good start. More differences... -- Location/ commute -- Alumni network -- Attrition rate -- Diversity (not only in terms of race, but also SES and interests/ skills) -- Level of academic pressure |
All DCPS schools, and some charter high schools, offer electives on how to prepare for college. These include test prep / practice as well as coaching on essays, financial aid, and so forth. |
Their A-Levels, or Leaving Certs tests are what get them into Universities. They don't then go on to take an SAT or ACT. |
Not true. It depends per country -- in many you do need to take a full, 1-2 day exam covering all topics, and the grade you get there is more important than your HS grades to get into University. |
great logical fallacy there! the question is why no white families consider Banneker, not why they chose Wilson etc. |
I honestly think race and privilege are a huge factor. At Banneker, a white kid does not get to benefit in any way from his race. The standards are so high that he can't even depend on the whole "my white kid will do fine anyway" mantra that some people believe. That must be just plain scary to many folks -- not only to be a very small white minority, but also to compete on even footing with black students, without being able to rely on any comparative advantages of race or class. |
Sure, but I wonder if Walls parents are more likely to supplement with expensive SAT prep classes. No idea if this is true, just throwing out a thought for consideration. |
Are you affiliated with Banneker in any way? If you are, here is a thought. Perhaps it's your own racist and not-very-smart words that make people with other HS options think, "why the heck would i ever go there" |
|
White parent of which high school student (enrolled in a charter).
We didn't consider Banneker for our child who has an IEP simply because only 2.4% of students at Banneker have IEPs; (btw we didn't apply to SWW for the same reason, their IEP numbers are only .4%) When SN numbers are that low, it sends a signal. Maybe they would have been great at inclusion (what my DC needs) but that was not something I was willing to risk at the high school level. |