Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
Another way to protect their kids is just not to show them at all. |
I don’t see her being photoshopped in. I zoomed in and her arm / hand isn’t even touching George. She is holding her own leg and I can easily replicate that position. |
| I am fine with Harry and Meghan not showing their kids faces. But the picture is a strange one. |
I agree. |
| Meghan needs to dress appropriately for pictures. And Harry needs a belt. The kids are fine. |
And the monarchy loyalists heard the dog whistle loud and clear. Whatever the heir is accused of, blame the spare. It was that way with Charles, it was that way with William and Harry, and the press is already priming the British public to view Louis as the “cheeky one.” |
Lol you have it backwards. When you don't like the critique then bring up the couple in England. Whataboutism every time. |
White dress with black shoes--is this in style? |
Right. Sure. Okay. Nothing to see here, didn’t Harry’s card use a fake photo? Now that’s the REAL story 😂 |
No whataboutism. William and Kate released their card FIRST and they immediately received photoshop criticism in the press. When Harry and Meghan released their card a few days later, their loyalists didn’t even need to see it to know what to say. The playbook has been the same for decades. |
K. Start a thread about it. Has nothing to do with the topic. |
Kate Stans accusing Meghan of doing whatever Kate got bad press for has everything to do with this thread. Kate and William released a card that was bashed for being photoshopped. Days later, when Harry and Meghan release their own card, the monarchy stans try to change the narrative. Kate didn’t use photoshop, Meghan’s card was AI and Lilibet is wearing a wig. |
Exactly. Thank you. |
| I like the breakdown of all the inconsistencies. The more you look at it the more you see them. |
It’s see through. I can see her underwear. Not stylish. |