Supreme Court Sides With Wrongly Deported Migrant

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Isn't he back home

No, cutie, he isn't.

DP. Yes he is. He is a citizen of El Salvador, currently residing in…… wait for it…. El Salvador.

I wish more of you understood the constitution. Maybe read 20 minutes a night. Understand what a group of immigrants wrote in 1787, one of the most stable constitutions in modern history. This administration has shown how important it is.

I do understand the constitution. If he was a US Citizen, he’d have rights under it. He’s not, his bid for asylum was denied.

How would this be any different if he were a citizen? Trump could still say he’s in a foreign prison and he can’t be forced to do anything to get him out.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Isn't he back home

No, cutie, he isn't.

DP. Yes he is. He is a citizen of El Salvador, currently residing in…… wait for it…. El Salvador.

He is in a prison (he has never been charged or convicted of anything, here or there) for terrorists in a country that persecuted him so much that he was granted withholding from removal there and the only reason that he did not receive asylum here was because he filed too late. He had a credible fear then of gangs, which maybe now has been resolved. Now he has a new credible fear.

He is not home.

His government can simply release him from jail then. Wonder why they haven’t?

Because trump is paying them to keep him in jail

At this point, I think the most likely scenario is that he is dead. This would explain why the US is refusing to bring him back and hiding information. The political fallout of this information would be enormous and they are trying to avoid accountability.

Yes, I would have to assume they have killed him already if they won't return him. I blame Trump for this death, if he is dead.

They will say he died of natural causes and his body was cremated.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Trump is making a mockery of the Supreme Court

No, he is making a mockery of himself.

He cannot effectuate the return of one person. He is ineffectual. Totally ineffective.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Isn't he back home

No, cutie, he isn't.

DP. Yes he is. He is a citizen of El Salvador, currently residing in…… wait for it…. El Salvador.

He is in a prison (he has never been charged or convicted of anything, here or there) for terrorists in a country that persecuted him so much that he was granted withholding from removal there and the only reason that he did not receive asylum here was because he filed too late. He had a credible fear then of gangs, which maybe now has been resolved. Now he has a new credible fear.

He is not home.

His government can simply release him from jail then. Wonder why they haven’t?

Because trump is paying them to keep him in jail

Trump is paying them to keep their own citizen in jail? We have that power? Under what authority?

None at all. Yet that is exactly what he’s doing.

If El Salvador wanted their citizen out of a jail in…. El Salvador, they can simply release him.

El Salvador didn't put him or the Venezuelans in prison. They just took whoever we gave them and locked them up.

Y'all think you're cute but you're not.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Isn't he back home

No, cutie, he isn't.

DP. Yes he is. He is a citizen of El Salvador, currently residing in…… wait for it…. El Salvador.

I wish more of you understood the constitution. Maybe read 20 minutes a night. Understand what a group of immigrants wrote in 1787, one of the most stable constitutions in modern history. This administration has shown how important it is.

I do understand the constitution. If he was a US Citizen, he’d have rights under it. He’s not, his bid for asylum was denied.

What rights do you think us citizens have in Salvadoran prisons?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Isn't he back home

No, cutie, he isn't.

DP. Yes he is. He is a citizen of El Salvador, currently residing in…… wait for it…. El Salvador.

I wish more of you understood the constitution. Maybe read 20 minutes a night. Understand what a group of immigrants wrote in 1787, one of the most stable constitutions in modern history. This administration has shown how important it is.

I do understand the constitution. If he was a US Citizen, he’d have rights under it. He’s not, his bid for asylum was denied.

What rights do you think us citizens have in Salvadoran prisons?

You know he’s not a US Citizen right?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Isn't he back home

No, cutie, he isn't.

DP. Yes he is. He is a citizen of El Salvador, currently residing in…… wait for it…. El Salvador.

I wish more of you understood the constitution. Maybe read 20 minutes a night. Understand what a group of immigrants wrote in 1787, one of the most stable constitutions in modern history. This administration has shown how important it is.

I do understand the constitution. If he was a US Citizen, he’d have rights under it. He’s not, his bid for asylum was denied.

How would this be any different if he were a citizen? Trump could still say he’s in a foreign prison and he can’t be forced to do anything to get him out.

Because we could demand OUR citizen back. We have zero right to demand THEIR citizen come here.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Isn't he back home

No, cutie, he isn't.

DP. Yes he is. He is a citizen of El Salvador, currently residing in…… wait for it…. El Salvador.

I wish more of you understood the constitution. Maybe read 20 minutes a night. Understand what a group of immigrants wrote in 1787, one of the most stable constitutions in modern history. This administration has shown how important it is.

I do understand the constitution. If he was a US Citizen, he’d have rights under it. He’s not, his bid for asylum was denied.

How would this be any different if he were a citizen? Trump could still say he’s in a foreign prison and he can’t be forced to do anything to get him out.

Correct.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Isn't he back home

No, cutie, he isn't.

DP. Yes he is. He is a citizen of El Salvador, currently residing in…… wait for it…. El Salvador.

I wish more of you understood the constitution. Maybe read 20 minutes a night. Understand what a group of immigrants wrote in 1787, one of the most stable constitutions in modern history. This administration has shown how important it is.

I do understand the constitution. If he was a US Citizen, he’d have rights under it. He’s not, his bid for asylum was denied.

How would this be any different if he were a citizen? Trump could still say he’s in a foreign prison and he can’t be forced to do anything to get him out.

Because we could demand OUR citizen back. We have zero right to demand THEIR citizen come here.

What law says that?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Isn't he back home

No, cutie, he isn't.

DP. Yes he is. He is a citizen of El Salvador, currently residing in…… wait for it…. El Salvador.

I wish more of you understood the constitution. Maybe read 20 minutes a night. Understand what a group of immigrants wrote in 1787, one of the most stable constitutions in modern history. This administration has shown how important it is.

I do understand the constitution. If he was a US Citizen, he’d have rights under it. He’s not, his bid for asylum was denied.

Stop parroting bullshit.

It’s not difficult to read the Bill of Rights to see which rights are for citizens, and which rights are for everyone on US soil. If you’re having trouble understanding the definition of “person,” you could also read the Supreme Court decision on this from last week. 9-0 said these non citizens have due process rights.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Isn't he back home

No, cutie, he isn't.

DP. Yes he is. He is a citizen of El Salvador, currently residing in…… wait for it…. El Salvador.

He is in a prison (he has never been charged or convicted of anything, here or there) for terrorists in a country that persecuted him so much that he was granted withholding from removal there and the only reason that he did not receive asylum here was because he filed too late. He had a credible fear then of gangs, which maybe now has been resolved. Now he has a new credible fear.

He is not home.

His government can simply release him from jail then. Wonder why they haven’t?

Because trump is paying them to keep him in jail

Trump is paying them to keep their own citizen in jail? We have that power? Under what authority?

None at all. Yet that is exactly what he’s doing.

If El Salvador wanted their citizen out of a jail in…. El Salvador, they can simply release him.

El Salvador didn't put him or the Venezuelans in prison. They just took whoever we gave them and locked them up.

Y'all think you're cute but you're not.

As triggered as I have by with the sophomoric comebacks (my favorite: we can't just "grab" someone in another country, how would you like it someone came and "grabbed your mother?), we need to ignore the trolls who are trying to distract us and just talk about the facts:

Trump has a deal, for which he is paying dearly:

*$6 million dollars per year for imprisoning whomever we want without due process. Many of the recently deported Venezuelans have no criminal record, were here legally, and were awaiting asylum. They have tattoos - that is it.

*The US has handed back a couple dozen actual MS-13 members, including one of the tippety top leaders (César Humberto López Larios), waiving his indictment in the US to send him back. This is a man the US has worked to capture, build a case against, and have extradited to the US for years. Make no mistake about this: Sending Lopez Larios to El Salvador benefits Bukele and Bukele only. Why? It is widely known, though categorically denied by Bukele, that Bukele cut deals with the Salvadoran gangs. In US custody these MS-13 leaders were likely or at least able to talk and destroy his narrative. No longer.

Trump made a deal with Bukele. We should all assume that part of the deal was being able to get anyone he wants back. If he didn't include any such provision in the deal, then he is a really pathetic deal maker. I mean, really??

[Anonymous]

And here comes Erik Prince (of Blackwater or whatever name it’s acquired now, mercenaries for hire, and Betsy Devos fame) with a plan straight out of a YA dystopian novel.
“ Former Blackwater CEO Erik Prince and a team of defense contractors are pitching the White House on a plan to vastly expand deportations to El Salvador — transporting thousands of immigrants from U.S. holding facilities to a sprawling maximum security prison in Central America.

The proposal, exclusively obtained by POLITICO, says it would target “criminal illegal aliens” and would attempt to avoid legal challenges by designating part of the prison — which has drawn accusations of violence and overcrowding from human rights groups — as American territory.
https://www.politico.com/news/2025/04/11/military-contractors-prison-plan-detained-immigrants-erik-prince-00287208

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Isn't he back home

No, cutie, he isn't.

DP. Yes he is. He is a citizen of El Salvador, currently residing in…… wait for it…. El Salvador.

I wish more of you understood the constitution. Maybe read 20 minutes a night. Understand what a group of immigrants wrote in 1787, one of the most stable constitutions in modern history. This administration has shown how important it is.

I do understand the constitution. If he was a US Citizen, he’d have rights under it. He’s not, his bid for asylum was denied.

You obviously dod not understand the US Constitution. This may be what you want, but it isn't what the document says.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Isn't he back home

No, cutie, he isn't.

DP. Yes he is. He is a citizen of El Salvador, currently residing in…… wait for it…. El Salvador.

I wish more of you understood the constitution. Maybe read 20 minutes a night. Understand what a group of immigrants wrote in 1787, one of the most stable constitutions in modern history. This administration has shown how important it is.

I do understand the constitution. If he was a US Citizen, he’d have rights under it. He’s not, his bid for asylum was denied.

Stop parroting bullshit.

It’s not difficult to read the Bill of Rights to see which rights are for citizens, and which rights are for everyone on US soil. If you’re having trouble understanding the definition of “person,” you could also read the Supreme Court decision on this from last week. 9-0 said these non citizens have due process rights.

Not really full rights are for citizens the other people are subjective, however this man is not on us soil so there are no US rights for him even if illegals have any

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Isn't he back home

No, cutie, he isn't.

DP. Yes he is. He is a citizen of El Salvador, currently residing in…… wait for it…. El Salvador.

I wish more of you understood the constitution. Maybe read 20 minutes a night. Understand what a group of immigrants wrote in 1787, one of the most stable constitutions in modern history. This administration has shown how important it is.

I do understand the constitution. If he was a US Citizen, he’d have rights under it. He’s not, his bid for asylum was denied.

Stop parroting bullshit.

It’s not difficult to read the Bill of Rights to see which rights are for citizens, and which rights are for everyone on US soil. If you’re having trouble understanding the definition of “person,” you could also read the Supreme Court decision on this from last week. 9-0 said these non citizens have due process rights.

Not really full rights are for citizens the other people are subjective, however this man is not on us soil so there are no US rights for him even if illegals have any

He was erroneously removed from US soil. Let's bring him here to US soil and then we can debate which rights he gets and which he doesn't.