Harris vs Trump poll numbers

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m a white woman voting against Kamala.

Abortion is nowhere near top of priority list for me.

I hope you or your DD or sister never needs one. But, if they do, I'm sure you'll just go to a blue state. Thank goodness for blue states, right?

#selfish

So you’re voting for an issue that only affects women? Talk about #selfish

My healthcare affects my whole family.

Why didn’t you abort them then?

What the fu&@? What is wrong with you?

Well, the PP seems to post nonstop that abortion is the answer to everything and we should all be voting for her access to abortions.

Huh?

We had the protections of roe for 50 years. The earth continued to spin and in fact, there were less abortions with roe in place then there are now that it is destroyed.

Eventually the protections of roe will be back in place as they should be.

You can't have an adult conversation about abortion law with people who just want to scream "baby-killer" or "forced-birther" to everyone they presume to be on the other side of the issue. They're all idiots.

This is not an issue with a lot of middle ground. Pro choice voters need to get our in great force to fight hard for the laws to reflect women's rights. This is the current intense battle in a long war and yes, abortion bans do try to force women to give birth.

Fight hard for what specific laws? Are you just a rabble rouser with no specific knowledge of what abortion laws are now relative to what they were under Roe or are you capable of having an adult conversation about what those laws should be?

Control the presidency to control SCOTUS appointments for as long as it takes and try to codify the protections of Roe.

+1

Right now, millions of American women have had their rights stripped away.


https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2024/us/abortion-laws-roe-v-wade.html

We will not stop until it's codified.

Clinton, Obama, Biden….. what stopped them?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:When is Trump going to release his tax returns?

He does not pay taxes. That is for losers and suckers along with serving in the military.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m a white woman voting against Kamala.

Abortion is nowhere near top of priority list for me.

I hope you or your DD or sister never needs one. But, if they do, I'm sure you'll just go to a blue state. Thank goodness for blue states, right?

#selfish

So you’re voting for an issue that only affects women? Talk about #selfish

My healthcare affects my whole family.

Why didn’t you abort them then?

What the fu&@? What is wrong with you?

Well, the PP seems to post nonstop that abortion is the answer to everything and we should all be voting for her access to abortions.

Huh?

We had the protections of roe for 50 years. The earth continued to spin and in fact, there were less abortions with roe in place then there are now that it is destroyed.

Eventually the protections of roe will be back in place as they should be.

You can't have an adult conversation about abortion law with people who just want to scream "baby-killer" or "forced-birther" to everyone they presume to be on the other side of the issue. They're all idiots.

This is not an issue with a lot of middle ground. Pro choice voters need to get our in great force to fight hard for the laws to reflect women's rights. This is the current intense battle in a long war and yes, abortion bans do try to force women to give birth.

Fight hard for what specific laws? Are you just a rabble rouser with no specific knowledge of what abortion laws are now relative to what they were under Roe or are you capable of having an adult conversation about what those laws should be?

Control the presidency to control SCOTUS appointments for as long as it takes and try to codify the protections of Roe.

So you're saying you believe abortion should be legal and accessible up until the point of fetal viability (23 to 25 weeks) with exceptions granted for late term abortions in special cases? If this is the case, I agree with you and I believe we can both be considered pro-choice.

Exceptions defined by the medical community. Not religious zeolots who don't understand basic biology.
DP.

I believe the general exceptions that were protected under Roe were reasonable and not defined by religious zealots. See there! People can discuss abortion law in an adult-like manner! yay

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m a white woman voting against Kamala.

Abortion is nowhere near top of priority list for me.

I hope you or your DD or sister never needs one. But, if they do, I'm sure you'll just go to a blue state. Thank goodness for blue states, right?

#selfish

So you’re voting for an issue that only affects women? Talk about #selfish

My healthcare affects my whole family.

Why didn’t you abort them then?

What the fu&@? What is wrong with you?

Well, the PP seems to post nonstop that abortion is the answer to everything and we should all be voting for her access to abortions.

Huh?

We had the protections of roe for 50 years. The earth continued to spin and in fact, there were less abortions with roe in place then there are now that it is destroyed.

Eventually the protections of roe will be back in place as they should be.

You can't have an adult conversation about abortion law with people who just want to scream "baby-killer" or "forced-birther" to everyone they presume to be on the other side of the issue. They're all idiots.

This is not an issue with a lot of middle ground. Pro choice voters need to get our in great force to fight hard for the laws to reflect women's rights. This is the current intense battle in a long war and yes, abortion bans do try to force women to give birth.

Fight hard for what specific laws? Are you just a rabble rouser with no specific knowledge of what abortion laws are now relative to what they were under Roe or are you capable of having an adult conversation about what those laws should be?

Control the presidency to control SCOTUS appointments for as long as it takes and try to codify the protections of Roe.

So you're saying you believe abortion should be legal and accessible up until the point of fetal viability (23 to 25 weeks) with exceptions granted for late term abortions in special cases? If this is the case, I agree with you and I believe we can both be considered pro-choice.

Trump is not going to help protect your scenario. He blew up roe in the first place. Vote for Harris and Walz to try to achieve it.

Not voting for late term abortions, sorry.

ok well the mother of a fight is here and it will continue until our daughters have their rights back.

How abortions do your daughters need?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m a white woman voting against Kamala.

Abortion is nowhere near top of priority list for me.

I hope you or your DD or sister never needs one. But, if they do, I'm sure you'll just go to a blue state. Thank goodness for blue states, right?

#selfish

So you’re voting for an issue that only affects women? Talk about #selfish

My healthcare affects my whole family.

Why didn’t you abort them then?

What the fu&@? What is wrong with you?

Well, the PP seems to post nonstop that abortion is the answer to everything and we should all be voting for her access to abortions.

Huh?

We had the protections of roe for 50 years. The earth continued to spin and in fact, there were less abortions with roe in place then there are now that it is destroyed.

Eventually the protections of roe will be back in place as they should be.

You can't have an adult conversation about abortion law with people who just want to scream "baby-killer" or "forced-birther" to everyone they presume to be on the other side of the issue. They're all idiots.

This is not an issue with a lot of middle ground. Pro choice voters need to get our in great force to fight hard for the laws to reflect women's rights. This is the current intense battle in a long war and yes, abortion bans do try to force women to give birth.

Fight hard for what specific laws? Are you just a rabble rouser with no specific knowledge of what abortion laws are now relative to what they were under Roe or are you capable of having an adult conversation about what those laws should be?

Control the presidency to control SCOTUS appointments for as long as it takes and try to codify the protections of Roe.

So you're saying you believe abortion should be legal and accessible up until the point of fetal viability (23 to 25 weeks) with exceptions granted for late term abortions in special cases? If this is the case, I agree with you and I believe we can both be considered pro-choice.

Trump is not going to help protect your scenario. He blew up roe in the first place. Vote for Harris and Walz to try to achieve it.

Not voting for late term abortions, sorry.

ok well the mother of a fight is here and it will continue until our daughters have their rights back.

How abortions do your daughters need?

What specific abortion laws/restrictions do you feel should be in place?

[Anonymous]

Should there be a limit on the number of abortions paid for by taxpayers? How many should be allowed?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m a white woman voting against Kamala.

Abortion is nowhere near top of priority list for me.

I hope you or your DD or sister never needs one. But, if they do, I'm sure you'll just go to a blue state. Thank goodness for blue states, right?

#selfish

So you’re voting for an issue that only affects women? Talk about #selfish

My healthcare affects my whole family.

Why didn’t you abort them then?

What the fu&@? What is wrong with you?

Well, the PP seems to post nonstop that abortion is the answer to everything and we should all be voting for her access to abortions.

Huh?

We had the protections of roe for 50 years. The earth continued to spin and in fact, there were less abortions with roe in place then there are now that it is destroyed.

Eventually the protections of roe will be back in place as they should be.

You can't have an adult conversation about abortion law with people who just want to scream "baby-killer" or "forced-birther" to everyone they presume to be on the other side of the issue. They're all idiots.

This is not an issue with a lot of middle ground. Pro choice voters need to get our in great force to fight hard for the laws to reflect women's rights. This is the current intense battle in a long war and yes, abortion bans do try to force women to give birth.

Fight hard for what specific laws? Are you just a rabble rouser with no specific knowledge of what abortion laws are now relative to what they were under Roe or are you capable of having an adult conversation about what those laws should be?

Control the presidency to control SCOTUS appointments for as long as it takes and try to codify the protections of Roe.

So you're saying you believe abortion should be legal and accessible up until the point of fetal viability (23 to 25 weeks) with exceptions granted for late term abortions in special cases? If this is the case, I agree with you and I believe we can both be considered pro-choice.

Trump is not going to help protect your scenario. He blew up roe in the first place. Vote for Harris and Walz to try to achieve it.

Not voting for late term abortions, sorry.

You clearly don't understand the circumstances of late term abortions. They are tragic situations. They are not your business to decide on. They are a woman, her family, and her doctor's business.

I'm so tired of you idiots acting like people are aborting healthy babies in the second half of pregnancy. They aren't. They are dealing with a horrible medical situation.

Honestly, you suck.

[Anonymous]

My two daughters have had three (so far). They are early and mid 20s.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m a white woman voting against Kamala.

Abortion is nowhere near top of priority list for me.

I hope you or your DD or sister never needs one. But, if they do, I'm sure you'll just go to a blue state. Thank goodness for blue states, right?

#selfish

So you’re voting for an issue that only affects women? Talk about #selfish

My healthcare affects my whole family.

Why didn’t you abort them then?

What the fu&@? What is wrong with you?

Well, the PP seems to post nonstop that abortion is the answer to everything and we should all be voting for her access to abortions.

Huh?

We had the protections of roe for 50 years. The earth continued to spin and in fact, there were less abortions with roe in place then there are now that it is destroyed.

Eventually the protections of roe will be back in place as they should be.

You can't have an adult conversation about abortion law with people who just want to scream "baby-killer" or "forced-birther" to everyone they presume to be on the other side of the issue. They're all idiots.

This is not an issue with a lot of middle ground. Pro choice voters need to get our in great force to fight hard for the laws to reflect women's rights. This is the current intense battle in a long war and yes, abortion bans do try to force women to give birth.

Fight hard for what specific laws? Are you just a rabble rouser with no specific knowledge of what abortion laws are now relative to what they were under Roe or are you capable of having an adult conversation about what those laws should be?

Control the presidency to control SCOTUS appointments for as long as it takes and try to codify the protections of Roe.

So you're saying you believe abortion should be legal and accessible up until the point of fetal viability (23 to 25 weeks) with exceptions granted for late term abortions in special cases? If this is the case, I agree with you and I believe we can both be considered pro-choice.

Trump is not going to help protect your scenario. He blew up roe in the first place. Vote for Harris and Walz to try to achieve it.

Not voting for late term abortions, sorry.

You clearly don't understand the circumstances of late term abortions. They are tragic situations. They are not your business to decide on. They are a woman, her family, and her doctor's business.

I'm so tired of you idiots acting like people are aborting healthy babies in the second half of pregnancy. They aren't. They are dealing with a horrible medical situation.

Honestly, you suck.

Actually, there are women who abort near end of pregnancies.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m a white woman voting against Kamala.

Abortion is nowhere near top of priority list for me.

I hope you or your DD or sister never needs one. But, if they do, I'm sure you'll just go to a blue state. Thank goodness for blue states, right?

#selfish

So you’re voting for an issue that only affects women? Talk about #selfish

My healthcare affects my whole family.

Why didn’t you abort them then?

What the fu&@? What is wrong with you?

Well, the PP seems to post nonstop that abortion is the answer to everything and we should all be voting for her access to abortions.

Huh?

We had the protections of roe for 50 years. The earth continued to spin and in fact, there were less abortions with roe in place then there are now that it is destroyed.

Eventually the protections of roe will be back in place as they should be.

You can't have an adult conversation about abortion law with people who just want to scream "baby-killer" or "forced-birther" to everyone they presume to be on the other side of the issue. They're all idiots.

This is not an issue with a lot of middle ground. Pro choice voters need to get our in great force to fight hard for the laws to reflect women's rights. This is the current intense battle in a long war and yes, abortion bans do try to force women to give birth.

Fight hard for what specific laws? Are you just a rabble rouser with no specific knowledge of what abortion laws are now relative to what they were under Roe or are you capable of having an adult conversation about what those laws should be?

Control the presidency to control SCOTUS appointments for as long as it takes and try to codify the protections of Roe.

Democrat presidents last 12 of 16 years.

And?

Do you know what codify means? Do you know how legislation works? Start with this:

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m a white woman voting against Kamala.

Abortion is nowhere near top of priority list for me.

I hope you or your DD or sister never needs one. But, if they do, I'm sure you'll just go to a blue state. Thank goodness for blue states, right?

#selfish

So you’re voting for an issue that only affects women? Talk about #selfish

My healthcare affects my whole family.

Why didn’t you abort them then?

What the fu&@? What is wrong with you?

Well, the PP seems to post nonstop that abortion is the answer to everything and we should all be voting for her access to abortions.

Huh?

We had the protections of roe for 50 years. The earth continued to spin and in fact, there were less abortions with roe in place then there are now that it is destroyed.

Eventually the protections of roe will be back in place as they should be.

You can't have an adult conversation about abortion law with people who just want to scream "baby-killer" or "forced-birther" to everyone they presume to be on the other side of the issue. They're all idiots.

This is not an issue with a lot of middle ground. Pro choice voters need to get our in great force to fight hard for the laws to reflect women's rights. This is the current intense battle in a long war and yes, abortion bans do try to force women to give birth.

Fight hard for what specific laws? Are you just a rabble rouser with no specific knowledge of what abortion laws are now relative to what they were under Roe or are you capable of having an adult conversation about what those laws should be?

Control the presidency to control SCOTUS appointments for as long as it takes and try to codify the protections of Roe.

So you're saying you believe abortion should be legal and accessible up until the point of fetal viability (23 to 25 weeks) with exceptions granted for late term abortions in special cases? If this is the case, I agree with you and I believe we can both be considered pro-choice.

Trump is not going to help protect your scenario. He blew up roe in the first place. Vote for Harris and Walz to try to achieve it.

Not voting for late term abortions, sorry.

ok well the mother of a fight is here and it will continue until our daughters have their rights back.

How abortions do your daughters need?

Ignorant. Abortion bans erode standard maternal healthcare practices, fertility treatments, attracting quality professionals to abortion ban states, etc. they are anti pregnancy in fact and can drive up infant mortality rates. Get a clue.

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m a white woman voting against Kamala.

Abortion is nowhere near top of priority list for me.

I hope you or your DD or sister never needs one. But, if they do, I'm sure you'll just go to a blue state. Thank goodness for blue states, right?

#selfish

So you’re voting for an issue that only affects women? Talk about #selfish

My healthcare affects my whole family.

Why didn’t you abort them then?

What the fu&@? What is wrong with you?

Well, the PP seems to post nonstop that abortion is the answer to everything and we should all be voting for her access to abortions.

Huh?

We had the protections of roe for 50 years. The earth continued to spin and in fact, there were less abortions with roe in place then there are now that it is destroyed.

Eventually the protections of roe will be back in place as they should be.

You can't have an adult conversation about abortion law with people who just want to scream "baby-killer" or "forced-birther" to everyone they presume to be on the other side of the issue. They're all idiots.

This is not an issue with a lot of middle ground. Pro choice voters need to get our in great force to fight hard for the laws to reflect women's rights. This is the current intense battle in a long war and yes, abortion bans do try to force women to give birth.

Fight hard for what specific laws? Are you just a rabble rouser with no specific knowledge of what abortion laws are now relative to what they were under Roe or are you capable of having an adult conversation about what those laws should be?

Control the presidency to control SCOTUS appointments for as long as it takes and try to codify the protections of Roe.

So you're saying you believe abortion should be legal and accessible up until the point of fetal viability (23 to 25 weeks) with exceptions granted for late term abortions in special cases? If this is the case, I agree with you and I believe we can both be considered pro-choice.

Trump is not going to help protect your scenario. He blew up roe in the first place. Vote for Harris and Walz to try to achieve it.

Not voting for late term abortions, sorry.

You clearly don't understand the circumstances of late term abortions. They are tragic situations. They are not your business to decide on. They are a woman, her family, and her doctor's business.

I'm so tired of you idiots acting like people are aborting healthy babies in the second half of pregnancy. They aren't. They are dealing with a horrible medical situation.

Honestly, you suck.

Actually, there are women who abort near end of pregnancies.

Actually this does not happen. Can't wait till trump starts spouting this nonsense in the debate and Harris destroys him.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m at SAH wife/mom here in northern VA. My husband is kind, but controlling. He is a Republican. He is not the biggest fan of Trumo but plan on voting for him because he won’t vote for a democrat. My husband bought us pro Republican gear and bumper stickers. I’ll be wearing my GOP hat to the polls but casting my vote for Harris.

I’m not sure if this is your first time voting for Democrats, but welcome.

No. I vote for Hillary and Biden. I was a senior consultant and very independent in 2016. But never spoke about politics with husband—outside of some stuff here and there. I voted before work. But once I became stay at home, my husband wants to know every move. He’s very protective and overbearing even though it’s done with the best intent.

Girl, I am sending you all kinds of virtual hugs. Be safe and take care of yourself.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Should there be a limit on the number of abortions paid for by taxpayers? How many should be allowed?

Taxpayers don't pay for them.
https://www.congress.gov/bill/113th-congress/senate-bill/142