Harris vs Trump poll numbers

[Anonymous]

So, electing Kamala is not the answer. Glad you provided supporting evidence.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Should there be a limit on the number of abortions paid for by taxpayers? How many should be allowed?

Troll. Go research the Hyde Amendment in Russian and try again.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m a white woman voting against Kamala.

Abortion is nowhere near top of priority list for me.

I hope you or your DD or sister never needs one. But, if they do, I'm sure you'll just go to a blue state. Thank goodness for blue states, right?

#selfish

So you’re voting for an issue that only affects women? Talk about #selfish

My healthcare affects my whole family.

Why didn’t you abort them then?

What the fu&@? What is wrong with you?

Well, the PP seems to post nonstop that abortion is the answer to everything and we should all be voting for her access to abortions.

Huh?

We had the protections of roe for 50 years. The earth continued to spin and in fact, there were less abortions with roe in place then there are now that it is destroyed.

Eventually the protections of roe will be back in place as they should be.

You can't have an adult conversation about abortion law with people who just want to scream "baby-killer" or "forced-birther" to everyone they presume to be on the other side of the issue. They're all idiots.

This is not an issue with a lot of middle ground. Pro choice voters need to get our in great force to fight hard for the laws to reflect women's rights. This is the current intense battle in a long war and yes, abortion bans do try to force women to give birth.

Fight hard for what specific laws? Are you just a rabble rouser with no specific knowledge of what abortion laws are now relative to what they were under Roe or are you capable of having an adult conversation about what those laws should be?

Control the presidency to control SCOTUS appointments for as long as it takes and try to codify the protections of Roe.

So you're saying you believe abortion should be legal and accessible up until the point of fetal viability (23 to 25 weeks) with exceptions granted for late term abortions in special cases? If this is the case, I agree with you and I believe we can both be considered pro-choice.

Trump is not going to help protect your scenario. He blew up roe in the first place. Vote for Harris and Walz to try to achieve it.

Not voting for late term abortions, sorry.

ok well the mother of a fight is here and it will continue until our daughters have their rights back.

How abortions do your daughters need?

Ignorant. Abortion bans erode standard maternal healthcare practices, fertility treatments, attracting quality professionals to abortion ban states, etc. they are anti pregnancy in fact and can drive up infant mortality rates. Get a clue.

+1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m a white woman voting against Kamala.

Abortion is nowhere near top of priority list for me.

I hope you or your DD or sister never needs one. But, if they do, I'm sure you'll just go to a blue state. Thank goodness for blue states, right?

#selfish

So you’re voting for an issue that only affects women? Talk about #selfish

My healthcare affects my whole family.

Why didn’t you abort them then?

What the fu&@? What is wrong with you?

Well, the PP seems to post nonstop that abortion is the answer to everything and we should all be voting for her access to abortions.

Huh?

We had the protections of roe for 50 years. The earth continued to spin and in fact, there were less abortions with roe in place then there are now that it is destroyed.

Eventually the protections of roe will be back in place as they should be.

You can't have an adult conversation about abortion law with people who just want to scream "baby-killer" or "forced-birther" to everyone they presume to be on the other side of the issue. They're all idiots.

This is not an issue with a lot of middle ground. Pro choice voters need to get our in great force to fight hard for the laws to reflect women's rights. This is the current intense battle in a long war and yes, abortion bans do try to force women to give birth.

Fight hard for what specific laws? Are you just a rabble rouser with no specific knowledge of what abortion laws are now relative to what they were under Roe or are you capable of having an adult conversation about what those laws should be?

Control the presidency to control SCOTUS appointments for as long as it takes and try to codify the protections of Roe.

So you're saying you believe abortion should be legal and accessible up until the point of fetal viability (23 to 25 weeks) with exceptions granted for late term abortions in special cases? If this is the case, I agree with you and I believe we can both be considered pro-choice.

Trump is not going to help protect your scenario. He blew up roe in the first place. Vote for Harris and Walz to try to achieve it.

Not voting for late term abortions, sorry.

You clearly don't understand the circumstances of late term abortions. They are tragic situations. They are not your business to decide on. They are a woman, her family, and her doctor's business.

I'm so tired of you idiots acting like people are aborting healthy babies in the second half of pregnancy. They aren't. They are dealing with a horrible medical situation.

Honestly, you suck.

These horrible medical situations can be clearly defined within abortion law that includes exceptions for permissible late-term abortions. That's what we are fighting for.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m a white woman voting against Kamala.

Abortion is nowhere near top of priority list for me.

I hope you or your DD or sister never needs one. But, if they do, I'm sure you'll just go to a blue state. Thank goodness for blue states, right?

#selfish

So you’re voting for an issue that only affects women? Talk about #selfish

My healthcare affects my whole family.

Why didn’t you abort them then?

What the fu&@? What is wrong with you?

Well, the PP seems to post nonstop that abortion is the answer to everything and we should all be voting for her access to abortions.

Huh?

We had the protections of roe for 50 years. The earth continued to spin and in fact, there were less abortions with roe in place then there are now that it is destroyed.

Eventually the protections of roe will be back in place as they should be.

You can't have an adult conversation about abortion law with people who just want to scream "baby-killer" or "forced-birther" to everyone they presume to be on the other side of the issue. They're all idiots.

This is not an issue with a lot of middle ground. Pro choice voters need to get our in great force to fight hard for the laws to reflect women's rights. This is the current intense battle in a long war and yes, abortion bans do try to force women to give birth.

Fight hard for what specific laws? Are you just a rabble rouser with no specific knowledge of what abortion laws are now relative to what they were under Roe or are you capable of having an adult conversation about what those laws should be?

Control the presidency to control SCOTUS appointments for as long as it takes and try to codify the protections of Roe.

So you're saying you believe abortion should be legal and accessible up until the point of fetal viability (23 to 25 weeks) with exceptions granted for late term abortions in special cases? If this is the case, I agree with you and I believe we can both be considered pro-choice.

Trump is not going to help protect your scenario. He blew up roe in the first place. Vote for Harris and Walz to try to achieve it.

Not voting for late term abortions, sorry.

You clearly don't understand the circumstances of late term abortions. They are tragic situations. They are not your business to decide on. They are a woman, her family, and her doctor's business.

I'm so tired of you idiots acting like people are aborting healthy babies in the second half of pregnancy. They aren't. They are dealing with a horrible medical situation.

Honestly, you suck.

Actually, there are women who abort near end of pregnancies.

Actually this does not happen. Can't wait till trump starts spouting this nonsense in the debate and Harris destroys him.

Darlin, hate to break it to you. But there are women who have aborted in last trimester.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So, electing Kamala is not the answer. Glad you provided supporting evidence.

She is a big part of the answer.

Balancing out the courts would be helpful too.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m a white woman voting against Kamala.

Abortion is nowhere near top of priority list for me.

I hope you or your DD or sister never needs one. But, if they do, I'm sure you'll just go to a blue state. Thank goodness for blue states, right?

#selfish

So you’re voting for an issue that only affects women? Talk about #selfish

My healthcare affects my whole family.

Why didn’t you abort them then?

What the fu&@? What is wrong with you?

Well, the PP seems to post nonstop that abortion is the answer to everything and we should all be voting for her access to abortions.

Huh?

We had the protections of roe for 50 years. The earth continued to spin and in fact, there were less abortions with roe in place then there are now that it is destroyed.

Eventually the protections of roe will be back in place as they should be.

You can't have an adult conversation about abortion law with people who just want to scream "baby-killer" or "forced-birther" to everyone they presume to be on the other side of the issue. They're all idiots.

This is not an issue with a lot of middle ground. Pro choice voters need to get our in great force to fight hard for the laws to reflect women's rights. This is the current intense battle in a long war and yes, abortion bans do try to force women to give birth.

Fight hard for what specific laws? Are you just a rabble rouser with no specific knowledge of what abortion laws are now relative to what they were under Roe or are you capable of having an adult conversation about what those laws should be?

Control the presidency to control SCOTUS appointments for as long as it takes and try to codify the protections of Roe.

So you're saying you believe abortion should be legal and accessible up until the point of fetal viability (23 to 25 weeks) with exceptions granted for late term abortions in special cases? If this is the case, I agree with you and I believe we can both be considered pro-choice.

Trump is not going to help protect your scenario. He blew up roe in the first place. Vote for Harris and Walz to try to achieve it.

Not voting for late term abortions, sorry.

You clearly don't understand the circumstances of late term abortions. They are tragic situations. They are not your business to decide on. They are a woman, her family, and her doctor's business.

I'm so tired of you idiots acting like people are aborting healthy babies in the second half of pregnancy. They aren't. They are dealing with a horrible medical situation.

Honestly, you suck.

These horrible medical situations can be clearly defined within abortion law that includes exceptions for permissible late-term abortions. That's what we are fighting for.

Not defined in law - let doctors decide what is best for their patient.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m a white woman voting against Kamala.

Abortion is nowhere near top of priority list for me.

I hope you or your DD or sister never needs one. But, if they do, I'm sure you'll just go to a blue state. Thank goodness for blue states, right?

#selfish

So you’re voting for an issue that only affects women? Talk about #selfish

My healthcare affects my whole family.

Why didn’t you abort them then?

What the fu&@? What is wrong with you?

Well, the PP seems to post nonstop that abortion is the answer to everything and we should all be voting for her access to abortions.

Huh?

We had the protections of roe for 50 years. The earth continued to spin and in fact, there were less abortions with roe in place then there are now that it is destroyed.

Eventually the protections of roe will be back in place as they should be.

You can't have an adult conversation about abortion law with people who just want to scream "baby-killer" or "forced-birther" to everyone they presume to be on the other side of the issue. They're all idiots.

This is not an issue with a lot of middle ground. Pro choice voters need to get our in great force to fight hard for the laws to reflect women's rights. This is the current intense battle in a long war and yes, abortion bans do try to force women to give birth.

Fight hard for what specific laws? Are you just a rabble rouser with no specific knowledge of what abortion laws are now relative to what they were under Roe or are you capable of having an adult conversation about what those laws should be?

Control the presidency to control SCOTUS appointments for as long as it takes and try to codify the protections of Roe.

So you're saying you believe abortion should be legal and accessible up until the point of fetal viability (23 to 25 weeks) with exceptions granted for late term abortions in special cases? If this is the case, I agree with you and I believe we can both be considered pro-choice.

Trump is not going to help protect your scenario. He blew up roe in the first place. Vote for Harris and Walz to try to achieve it.

Not voting for late term abortions, sorry.

You clearly don't understand the circumstances of late term abortions. They are tragic situations. They are not your business to decide on. They are a woman, her family, and her doctor's business.

I'm so tired of you idiots acting like people are aborting healthy babies in the second half of pregnancy. They aren't. They are dealing with a horrible medical situation.

Honestly, you suck.

Actually, there are women who abort near end of pregnancies.

Actually this does not happen. Can't wait till trump starts spouting this nonsense in the debate and Harris destroys him.

Darlin, hate to break it to you. But there are women who have aborted in last trimester.

There are like 3 docs in the US who even do this, it costs like 25k, they have waitlists where they prioritize by urgency, and have said they counsel out women for who this would be "elective." So who and where are these women getting these abortions?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m a white woman voting against Kamala.

Abortion is nowhere near top of priority list for me.

I hope you or your DD or sister never needs one. But, if they do, I'm sure you'll just go to a blue state. Thank goodness for blue states, right?

#selfish

So you’re voting for an issue that only affects women? Talk about #selfish

My healthcare affects my whole family.

Why didn’t you abort them then?

What the fu&@? What is wrong with you?

Well, the PP seems to post nonstop that abortion is the answer to everything and we should all be voting for her access to abortions.

Huh?

We had the protections of roe for 50 years. The earth continued to spin and in fact, there were less abortions with roe in place then there are now that it is destroyed.

Eventually the protections of roe will be back in place as they should be.

You can't have an adult conversation about abortion law with people who just want to scream "baby-killer" or "forced-birther" to everyone they presume to be on the other side of the issue. They're all idiots.

This is not an issue with a lot of middle ground. Pro choice voters need to get our in great force to fight hard for the laws to reflect women's rights. This is the current intense battle in a long war and yes, abortion bans do try to force women to give birth.

Fight hard for what specific laws? Are you just a rabble rouser with no specific knowledge of what abortion laws are now relative to what they were under Roe or are you capable of having an adult conversation about what those laws should be?

Control the presidency to control SCOTUS appointments for as long as it takes and try to codify the protections of Roe.

So you're saying you believe abortion should be legal and accessible up until the point of fetal viability (23 to 25 weeks) with exceptions granted for late term abortions in special cases? If this is the case, I agree with you and I believe we can both be considered pro-choice.

Trump is not going to help protect your scenario. He blew up roe in the first place. Vote for Harris and Walz to try to achieve it.

Not voting for late term abortions, sorry.

You clearly don't understand the circumstances of late term abortions. They are tragic situations. They are not your business to decide on. They are a woman, her family, and her doctor's business.

I'm so tired of you idiots acting like people are aborting healthy babies in the second half of pregnancy. They aren't. They are dealing with a horrible medical situation.

Honestly, you suck.

Actually, there are women who abort near end of pregnancies.

Actually this does not happen. Can't wait till trump starts spouting this nonsense in the debate and Harris destroys him.

Darlin, hate to break it to you. But there are women who have aborted in last trimester.

Darlin, women don't carry an unwanted pregnancy until the end and then shrug their shoulders and change their mind. These are wanted pregnancies where something goes terribly wrong.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Dow is over 41,000 today. What is Don’s response to that?

Probably the truth. That only 32% of Americans have 401Ks and that the other 68% of Americans have been gutted by Biden-Harris inflation?

You meant to say only 54% of Americans have retirement accounts, not 32%, right. Anyway, although 54% of Americans have retirement in 401k, IRA, 457, etc, many of them also feel as though they are far behind in their savings. The remaining 46% have not been gutted by inflation. These people were more than likely living from
Paycheck to paycheck well before Biden became President. I very much remember the long line of cars of people seeking food from the food banks during 2020. I also worked at a food bank and had never seen so many people seeking food. People you would least expect. Working people, not the addicts or mentally ill most people associate those seeking free food.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m a white woman voting against Kamala.

Abortion is nowhere near top of priority list for me.

I hope you or your DD or sister never needs one. But, if they do, I'm sure you'll just go to a blue state. Thank goodness for blue states, right?

#selfish

So you’re voting for an issue that only affects women? Talk about #selfish

My healthcare affects my whole family.

Why didn’t you abort them then?

What the fu&@? What is wrong with you?

Well, the PP seems to post nonstop that abortion is the answer to everything and we should all be voting for her access to abortions.

Huh?

We had the protections of roe for 50 years. The earth continued to spin and in fact, there were less abortions with roe in place then there are now that it is destroyed.

Eventually the protections of roe will be back in place as they should be.

You can't have an adult conversation about abortion law with people who just want to scream "baby-killer" or "forced-birther" to everyone they presume to be on the other side of the issue. They're all idiots.

This is not an issue with a lot of middle ground. Pro choice voters need to get our in great force to fight hard for the laws to reflect women's rights. This is the current intense battle in a long war and yes, abortion bans do try to force women to give birth.

Fight hard for what specific laws? Are you just a rabble rouser with no specific knowledge of what abortion laws are now relative to what they were under Roe or are you capable of having an adult conversation about what those laws should be?

Control the presidency to control SCOTUS appointments for as long as it takes and try to codify the protections of Roe.

So you're saying you believe abortion should be legal and accessible up until the point of fetal viability (23 to 25 weeks) with exceptions granted for late term abortions in special cases? If this is the case, I agree with you and I believe we can both be considered pro-choice.

Trump is not going to help protect your scenario. He blew up roe in the first place. Vote for Harris and Walz to try to achieve it.

Not voting for late term abortions, sorry.

You clearly don't understand the circumstances of late term abortions. They are tragic situations. They are not your business to decide on. They are a woman, her family, and her doctor's business.

I'm so tired of you idiots acting like people are aborting healthy babies in the second half of pregnancy. They aren't. They are dealing with a horrible medical situation.

Honestly, you suck.

These horrible medical situations can be clearly defined within abortion law that includes exceptions for permissible late-term abortions. That's what we are fighting for.

Not defined in law - let doctors decide what is best for their patient.

You can't subject a person's rights to the discretion of one doctor in an otherwise lawless circumstance. It's okay to have reasonable laws to protect the rights of individuals.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m a white woman voting against Kamala.

Abortion is nowhere near top of priority list for me.

I hope you or your DD or sister never needs one. But, if they do, I'm sure you'll just go to a blue state. Thank goodness for blue states, right?

#selfish

So you’re voting for an issue that only affects women? Talk about #selfish

My healthcare affects my whole family.

Why didn’t you abort them then?

What the fu&@? What is wrong with you?

Well, the PP seems to post nonstop that abortion is the answer to everything and we should all be voting for her access to abortions.

Huh?

We had the protections of roe for 50 years. The earth continued to spin and in fact, there were less abortions with roe in place then there are now that it is destroyed.

Eventually the protections of roe will be back in place as they should be.

You can't have an adult conversation about abortion law with people who just want to scream "baby-killer" or "forced-birther" to everyone they presume to be on the other side of the issue. They're all idiots.

This is not an issue with a lot of middle ground. Pro choice voters need to get our in great force to fight hard for the laws to reflect women's rights. This is the current intense battle in a long war and yes, abortion bans do try to force women to give birth.

Fight hard for what specific laws? Are you just a rabble rouser with no specific knowledge of what abortion laws are now relative to what they were under Roe or are you capable of having an adult conversation about what those laws should be?

Control the presidency to control SCOTUS appointments for as long as it takes and try to codify the protections of Roe.

So you're saying you believe abortion should be legal and accessible up until the point of fetal viability (23 to 25 weeks) with exceptions granted for late term abortions in special cases? If this is the case, I agree with you and I believe we can both be considered pro-choice.

Trump is not going to help protect your scenario. He blew up roe in the first place. Vote for Harris and Walz to try to achieve it.

Not voting for late term abortions, sorry.

You clearly don't understand the circumstances of late term abortions. They are tragic situations. They are not your business to decide on. They are a woman, her family, and her doctor's business.

I'm so tired of you idiots acting like people are aborting healthy babies in the second half of pregnancy. They aren't. They are dealing with a horrible medical situation.

Honestly, you suck.

Actually, there are women who abort near end of pregnancies.

Actually this does not happen. Can't wait till trump starts spouting this nonsense in the debate and Harris destroys him.

Darlin, hate to break it to you. But there are women who have aborted in last trimester.

There are like 3 docs in the US who even do this, it costs like 25k, they have waitlists where they prioritize by urgency, and have said they counsel out women for who this would be "elective." So who and where are these women getting these abortions?

+1. Last trimester abortions are never elective. The doctors who perform them spend a lot of time with the pregnant mothers. Last trimester abortions are for issues where the mother's life, health or fertility are on the line. Or for babies whose condition is incompatible with life, e.g. the baby is likely to die anywhere from childbirth to a few weeks into life and will suffer horribly if born. Why is it important for a baby to be born to be on machines and in pain for a few weeks rather than abort?

There are no cases of abortions of last trimester births of healthy babies who are not endangering the mother's life, health or fertility.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m a white woman voting against Kamala.

Abortion is nowhere near top of priority list for me.

I hope you or your DD or sister never needs one. But, if they do, I'm sure you'll just go to a blue state. Thank goodness for blue states, right?

#selfish

So you’re voting for an issue that only affects women? Talk about #selfish

My healthcare affects my whole family.

Why didn’t you abort them then?

What the fu&@? What is wrong with you?

Well, the PP seems to post nonstop that abortion is the answer to everything and we should all be voting for her access to abortions.

Huh?

We had the protections of roe for 50 years. The earth continued to spin and in fact, there were less abortions with roe in place then there are now that it is destroyed.

Eventually the protections of roe will be back in place as they should be.

You can't have an adult conversation about abortion law with people who just want to scream "baby-killer" or "forced-birther" to everyone they presume to be on the other side of the issue. They're all idiots.

This is not an issue with a lot of middle ground. Pro choice voters need to get our in great force to fight hard for the laws to reflect women's rights. This is the current intense battle in a long war and yes, abortion bans do try to force women to give birth.

Fight hard for what specific laws? Are you just a rabble rouser with no specific knowledge of what abortion laws are now relative to what they were under Roe or are you capable of having an adult conversation about what those laws should be?

Control the presidency to control SCOTUS appointments for as long as it takes and try to codify the protections of Roe.

So you're saying you believe abortion should be legal and accessible up until the point of fetal viability (23 to 25 weeks) with exceptions granted for late term abortions in special cases? If this is the case, I agree with you and I believe we can both be considered pro-choice.

Trump is not going to help protect your scenario. He blew up roe in the first place. Vote for Harris and Walz to try to achieve it.

Not voting for late term abortions, sorry.

You clearly don't understand the circumstances of late term abortions. They are tragic situations. They are not your business to decide on. They are a woman, her family, and her doctor's business.

I'm so tired of you idiots acting like people are aborting healthy babies in the second half of pregnancy. They aren't. They are dealing with a horrible medical situation.

Honestly, you suck.

Actually, there are women who abort near end of pregnancies.

Actually this does not happen. Can't wait till trump starts spouting this nonsense in the debate and Harris destroys him.

Darlin, hate to break it to you. But there are women who have aborted in last trimester.

There are like 3 docs in the US who even do this, it costs like 25k, they have waitlists where they prioritize by urgency, and have said they counsel out women for who this would be "elective." So who and where are these women getting these abortions?

Thank you for confirming.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Exhibit A of people who are not being polled:

It is interesting that the gender gap in the red states are so much bigger than other states. I wonder why!

I really think that formerly Republican voting women understanding that their vote is secret is going to be a key factor in this election. It’s not like the GOP hasn’t gone out of its way to tell women that they only matter as much as the output of their uterus and to insult women who don’t have children. I met the man I married when we were 18 and we have four beautiful children together but I am not worth more than my friends without children, but that’s how the GOP sees it.

This might be the real silent majority. I wouldn't be surprised if there is a significant unreported number of voters who will support Harris this fall.

I'm. Not going to hold my breath on it.
1. People post anything for attention online
2.
As hard as it it is for some to believe many women agree with Trump and project 25 they aren't abused wives just trying to survive they feel he's the best choice

I just hope that she gets to 270 decisively

I’m not going to hold my breath on it either, and there are women who support Trump and the GOP, and I am free to say the truth about those women: they are voting against their own humanity.

Even worse, in my opinion, women who vote for Trump are voting against the best interests of their own children, especially daughters.

How so? Trump has stated several times that he supports abortion up to a certain number of weeks with exceptions for rape, incest, and health of mother. Of course, listening and reading to only left-wing news, you would never know that.

Before he flip flopped and said that he specifically stated that if a Republican Congress sent him a bill banning abortion, he would sign it. Once he realized that was not a winning position, he changed. Surprised. Nope.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Dow is over 41,000 today. What is Don’s response to that?

Probably the truth. That only 32% of Americans have 401Ks and that the other 68% of Americans have been gutted by Biden-Harris inflation?

They should pull themselves up by the bootstraps.

They would, but the boots are now too expensive. But still much less than the $2500 shoes Mrs. Obama was wearing the other night while lecturing us on what a horrible country we live in.

You can’t have an honest discussion with someone who lies about the small stuff such as shoes. Tell us, what were these imaginary $2500 shoes you thought you saw MO wearing on Tuesday night.