Lively/Baldoni Lawsuit Part 2

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Which exhibit number is Taylor Swift's texts?

I don’t know. I’m on a Reddit forum called it ends with lawsuits where they post screenshots of the documents. But they also have a full list of all the exhibits and docket numbers if you want to go through them like that.

Please don’t use that Reddit forum for information. It’s known to be filled with MAGA trolls and manosphere types. It’s warped and horrifyingly misogynistic (while pretending to act like JB is some hero for the feminist cause). There are much better ways to access information on the case.

It’s actually a neutral forum which is why the Blake Bots hate it. They are constantly outnumbered by logical people.

No anyone who is neutral or pro-Lively avoids it like a plague. Surely you understand that right? That’s why those folks are now desperately spamming other forum populated by poster who don’t make this their life and screech about Blake bots all day.

Also there is a 100% chance that someone dumb enough to screech about Blake bots is a maga nut. Same trolling level of behavior.

I can’t even follow your nonsense, but want to make clear I’ve never voted for anyone but a Democrat in my three decades of voting. Yet another one of your delusions.

[Anonymous]

I thought the Blake haters on reddit were woke SJW, not MAGA. The way they go on about "she told a BLACK man not to look at her, she's so racist" (as if you should allow one of your bosses to look at your naked breasts, because he happens to be black).

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Because it’s been much debated here, Blake met with the intimacy coordinator exactly one time and it was to discuss her nudity rider.

Bumping again, the bot is trying to distract by making bizarre MAGA claims.

[Anonymous]

Also worth reading is Blake’s PGA letter where she sets out how she controlled nearly every aspect of the film.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Which exhibit number is Taylor Swift's texts?

I don’t know. I’m on a Reddit forum called it ends with lawsuits where they post screenshots of the documents. But they also have a full list of all the exhibits and docket numbers if you want to go through them like that.

Please don’t use that Reddit forum for information. It’s known to be filled with MAGA trolls and manosphere types. It’s warped and horrifyingly misogynistic (while pretending to act like JB is some hero for the feminist cause). There are much better ways to access information on the case.

Stop with your nonsense, it’s a great resource for docket links.

There are others that aren’t filled with pro-MAGA and manosphere bots. Sorry if the truth hurts but those are the people Baldoni surrounds himself with (both those he pays and his family/religious affiliation). I get that may be an uncomfortable truth for some of his supporters.

That’s just not true, but I know that you are allergic to facts that demonstrate that Blake has no case, and is generally an awful person to boot. Her texts are so bad, I would try to discourage people from seeing them as a Blake bot as well.

Which part isn’t true? That Baldoni’s family/friends aren’t maga? Sorry it is.

That everyone he hired doesn’t have some connection to Trump/maga? Sorry that’s also wrong.

That the people he hired aren’t using maga/manosphere podcasts/new outlets for interviews/statements/PR? Also wrong.

That spinning up those crowds doesn’t result in the blatant misogyny across that form? Also wrong.

Plus we know they use certain Reddit forums to promote their narrative. Gee, which one could that be?

But keep rambling about Blake bots and ignoring the obvious.

[Anonymous]

Here”s a lovely ditty Blake texted to her male castmate, Brendon Skelner, “I’m becoming pimp adjacent, put on a short little skirt, and get in the corner, Skelner.” But did she sink her teeth into it?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Which exhibit number is Taylor Swift's texts?

I don’t know. I’m on a Reddit forum called it ends with lawsuits where they post screenshots of the documents. But they also have a full list of all the exhibits and docket numbers if you want to go through them like that.

Please don’t use that Reddit forum for information. It’s known to be filled with MAGA trolls and manosphere types. It’s warped and horrifyingly misogynistic (while pretending to act like JB is some hero for the feminist cause). There are much better ways to access information on the case.

Stop with your nonsense, it’s a great resource for docket links.

There are others that aren’t filled with pro-MAGA and manosphere bots. Sorry if the truth hurts but those are the people Baldoni surrounds himself with (both those he pays and his family/religious affiliation). I get that may be an uncomfortable truth for some of his supporters.

That’s just not true, but I know that you are allergic to facts that demonstrate that Blake has no case, and is generally an awful person to boot. Her texts are so bad, I would try to discourage people from seeing them as a Blake bot as well.

Which part isn’t true? That Baldoni’s family/friends aren’t maga? Sorry it is.

That everyone he hired doesn’t have some connection to Trump/maga? Sorry that’s also wrong.

That the people he hired aren’t using maga/manosphere podcasts/new outlets for interviews/statements/PR? Also wrong.

That spinning up those crowds doesn’t result in the blatant misogyny across that form? Also wrong.

Plus we know they use certain Reddit forums to promote their narrative. Gee, which one could that be?

But keep rambling about Blake bots and ignoring the obvious.

More and more attempts to distract from the Blake release, never too desperate to lie.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Which exhibit number is Taylor Swift's texts?

I don’t know. I’m on a Reddit forum called it ends with lawsuits where they post screenshots of the documents. But they also have a full list of all the exhibits and docket numbers if you want to go through them like that.

Please don’t use that Reddit forum for information. It’s known to be filled with MAGA trolls and manosphere types. It’s warped and horrifyingly misogynistic (while pretending to act like JB is some hero for the feminist cause). There are much better ways to access information on the case.

It’s actually a neutral forum which is why the Blake Bots hate it. They are constantly outnumbered by logical people.

No anyone who is neutral or pro-Lively avoids it like a plague. Surely you understand that right? That’s why those folks are now desperately spamming other forum populated by poster who don’t make this their life and screech about Blake bots all day.

Also there is a 100% chance that someone dumb enough to screech about Blake bots is a maga nut. Same trolling level of behavior.

I can’t even follow your nonsense, but want to make clear I’ve never voted for anyone but a Democrat in my three decades of voting. Yet another one of your delusions.

Well then do more research into the people you are supporting and stop calling everyone who disagrees with you a bot. It’s pathetic and low effort. You keep regurgitating the same crap over and over.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Here”s a lovely ditty Blake texted to her male castmate, Brendon Skelner, “I’m becoming pimp adjacent, put on a short little skirt, and get in the corner, Skelner.” But did she sink her teeth into it?

Meant to add, who does this in a professional setting exactly.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Which exhibit number is Taylor Swift's texts?

I don’t know. I’m on a Reddit forum called it ends with lawsuits where they post screenshots of the documents. But they also have a full list of all the exhibits and docket numbers if you want to go through them like that.

Please don’t use that Reddit forum for information. It’s known to be filled with MAGA trolls and manosphere types. It’s warped and horrifyingly misogynistic (while pretending to act like JB is some hero for the feminist cause). There are much better ways to access information on the case.

It’s actually a neutral forum which is why the Blake Bots hate it. They are constantly outnumbered by logical people.

No anyone who is neutral or pro-Lively avoids it like a plague. Surely you understand that right? That’s why those folks are now desperately spamming other forum populated by poster who don’t make this their life and screech about Blake bots all day.

Also there is a 100% chance that someone dumb enough to screech about Blake bots is a maga nut. Same trolling level of behavior.

I can’t even follow your nonsense, but want to make clear I’ve never voted for anyone but a Democrat in my three decades of voting. Yet another one of your delusions.

Well then do more research into the people you are supporting and stop calling everyone who disagrees with you a bot. It’s pathetic and low effort. You keep regurgitating the same crap over and over.

That would be you, I’m posting about Blake’s texts.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Which exhibit number is Taylor Swift's texts?

I don’t know. I’m on a Reddit forum called it ends with lawsuits where they post screenshots of the documents. But they also have a full list of all the exhibits and docket numbers if you want to go through them like that.

Please don’t use that Reddit forum for information. It’s known to be filled with MAGA trolls and manosphere types. It’s warped and horrifyingly misogynistic (while pretending to act like JB is some hero for the feminist cause). There are much better ways to access information on the case.

Stop with your nonsense, it’s a great resource for docket links.

There are others that aren’t filled with pro-MAGA and manosphere bots. Sorry if the truth hurts but those are the people Baldoni surrounds himself with (both those he pays and his family/religious affiliation). I get that may be an uncomfortable truth for some of his supporters.

That’s just not true, but I know that you are allergic to facts that demonstrate that Blake has no case, and is generally an awful person to boot. Her texts are so bad, I would try to discourage people from seeing them as a Blake bot as well.

Which part isn’t true? That Baldoni’s family/friends aren’t maga? Sorry it is.

That everyone he hired doesn’t have some connection to Trump/maga? Sorry that’s also wrong.

That the people he hired aren’t using maga/manosphere podcasts/new outlets for interviews/statements/PR? Also wrong.

That spinning up those crowds doesn’t result in the blatant misogyny across that form? Also wrong.

Plus we know they use certain Reddit forums to promote their narrative. Gee, which one could that be?

But keep rambling about Blake bots and ignoring the obvious.

More and more attempts to distract from the Blake release, never too desperate to lie.

If you left your bubble you would realize the unsealing of exhibits today did not favor the WP. But I don’t think you are going to do that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Which exhibit number is Taylor Swift's texts?

I don’t know. I’m on a Reddit forum called it ends with lawsuits where they post screenshots of the documents. But they also have a full list of all the exhibits and docket numbers if you want to go through them like that.

Please don’t use that Reddit forum for information. It’s known to be filled with MAGA trolls and manosphere types. It’s warped and horrifyingly misogynistic (while pretending to act like JB is some hero for the feminist cause). There are much better ways to access information on the case.

It’s actually a neutral forum which is why the Blake Bots hate it. They are constantly outnumbered by logical people.

No anyone who is neutral or pro-Lively avoids it like a plague. Surely you understand that right? That’s why those folks are now desperately spamming other forum populated by poster who don’t make this their life and screech about Blake bots all day.

Also there is a 100% chance that someone dumb enough to screech about Blake bots is a maga nut. Same trolling level of behavior.

I can’t even follow your nonsense, but want to make clear I’ve never voted for anyone but a Democrat in my three decades of voting. Yet another one of your delusions.

Well then do more research into the people you are supporting and stop calling everyone who disagrees with you a bot. It’s pathetic and low effort. You keep regurgitating the same crap over and over.

That would be you, I’m posting about Blake’s texts.

No you are predominantly screaming she has not case and everyone who disagrees you is a bot. Unless you are also post every other post of late, in which case, get a life. Anyway I am done. Go scream that the next person who disagrees with you is a bot.

[Anonymous]

Pictures released today reveal that Blake was wearing black briefs, prosthetic belly, and hospital gown in the birthing scene just as Baldoni claimed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Which exhibit number is Taylor Swift's texts?

I don’t know. I’m on a Reddit forum called it ends with lawsuits where they post screenshots of the documents. But they also have a full list of all the exhibits and docket numbers if you want to go through them like that.

Please don’t use that Reddit forum for information. It’s known to be filled with MAGA trolls and manosphere types. It’s warped and horrifyingly misogynistic (while pretending to act like JB is some hero for the feminist cause). There are much better ways to access information on the case.

Stop with your nonsense, it’s a great resource for docket links.

There are others that aren’t filled with pro-MAGA and manosphere bots. Sorry if the truth hurts but those are the people Baldoni surrounds himself with (both those he pays and his family/religious affiliation). I get that may be an uncomfortable truth for some of his supporters.

That’s just not true, but I know that you are allergic to facts that demonstrate that Blake has no case, and is generally an awful person to boot. Her texts are so bad, I would try to discourage people from seeing them as a Blake bot as well.

Which part isn’t true? That Baldoni’s family/friends aren’t maga? Sorry it is.

That everyone he hired doesn’t have some connection to Trump/maga? Sorry that’s also wrong.

That the people he hired aren’t using maga/manosphere podcasts/new outlets for interviews/statements/PR? Also wrong.

That spinning up those crowds doesn’t result in the blatant misogyny across that form? Also wrong.

Plus we know they use certain Reddit forums to promote their narrative. Gee, which one could that be?

But keep rambling about Blake bots and ignoring the obvious.

More and more attempts to distract from the Blake release, never too desperate to lie.

If you left your bubble you would realize the unsealing of exhibits today did not favor the WP. But I don’t think you are going to do that.

Yes, it's funny that people are acting like Blake wants to "hide" the exhibits from her own filings, which demonstrate in great detail how many people other than her also found Baldoni awful and give their in person accounts of him being inappropriate.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Which exhibit number is Taylor Swift's texts?

I don’t know. I’m on a Reddit forum called it ends with lawsuits where they post screenshots of the documents. But they also have a full list of all the exhibits and docket numbers if you want to go through them like that.

Please don’t use that Reddit forum for information. It’s known to be filled with MAGA trolls and manosphere types. It’s warped and horrifyingly misogynistic (while pretending to act like JB is some hero for the feminist cause). There are much better ways to access information on the case.

Stop with your nonsense, it’s a great resource for docket links.

There are others that aren’t filled with pro-MAGA and manosphere bots. Sorry if the truth hurts but those are the people Baldoni surrounds himself with (both those he pays and his family/religious affiliation). I get that may be an uncomfortable truth for some of his supporters.

That’s just not true, but I know that you are allergic to facts that demonstrate that Blake has no case, and is generally an awful person to boot. Her texts are so bad, I would try to discourage people from seeing them as a Blake bot as well.

Which part isn’t true? That Baldoni’s family/friends aren’t maga? Sorry it is.

That everyone he hired doesn’t have some connection to Trump/maga? Sorry that’s also wrong.

That the people he hired aren’t using maga/manosphere podcasts/new outlets for interviews/statements/PR? Also wrong.

That spinning up those crowds doesn’t result in the blatant misogyny across that form? Also wrong.

Plus we know they use certain Reddit forums to promote their narrative. Gee, which one could that be?

But keep rambling about Blake bots and ignoring the obvious.

More and more attempts to distract from the Blake release, never too desperate to lie.

If you left your bubble you would realize the unsealing of exhibits today did not favor the WP. But I don’t think you are going to do that.

Yes, it's funny that people are acting like Blake wants to "hide" the exhibits from her own filings, which demonstrate in great detail how many people other than her also found Baldoni awful and give their in person accounts of him being inappropriate.

Yea, the documents for her are so good she spent the last month fighting to have them sealed and only unsealed after being ordered to do so by the judge.