Lively/Baldoni Lawsuit Part 2

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Pictures released today reveal that Blake was wearing black briefs, prosthetic belly, and hospital gown in the birthing scene just as Baldoni claimed.

So sad that people spent pages defending Blake’s birth scene allegations only to have them go the way f the dancing scene, contradicted by photo evidence.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Which exhibit number is Taylor Swift's texts?

I don’t know. I’m on a Reddit forum called it ends with lawsuits where they post screenshots of the documents. But they also have a full list of all the exhibits and docket numbers if you want to go through them like that.

Please don’t use that Reddit forum for information. It’s known to be filled with MAGA trolls and manosphere types. It’s warped and horrifyingly misogynistic (while pretending to act like JB is some hero for the feminist cause). There are much better ways to access information on the case.

Stop with your nonsense, it’s a great resource for docket links.

There are others that aren’t filled with pro-MAGA and manosphere bots. Sorry if the truth hurts but those are the people Baldoni surrounds himself with (both those he pays and his family/religious affiliation). I get that may be an uncomfortable truth for some of his supporters.

That’s just not true, but I know that you are allergic to facts that demonstrate that Blake has no case, and is generally an awful person to boot. Her texts are so bad, I would try to discourage people from seeing them as a Blake bot as well.

Which part isn’t true? That Baldoni’s family/friends aren’t maga? Sorry it is.

That everyone he hired doesn’t have some connection to Trump/maga? Sorry that’s also wrong.

That the people he hired aren’t using maga/manosphere podcasts/new outlets for interviews/statements/PR? Also wrong.

That spinning up those crowds doesn’t result in the blatant misogyny across that form? Also wrong.

Plus we know they use certain Reddit forums to promote their narrative. Gee, which one could that be?

But keep rambling about Blake bots and ignoring the obvious.

More and more attempts to distract from the Blake release, never too desperate to lie.

If you left your bubble you would realize the unsealing of exhibits today did not favor the WP. But I don’t think you are going to do that.

Yes, it's funny that people are acting like Blake wants to "hide" the exhibits from her own filings, which demonstrate in great detail how many people other than her also found Baldoni awful and give their in person accounts of him being inappropriate.

Yea, the documents for her are so good she spent the last month fighting to have them sealed and only unsealed after being ordered to do so by the judge.

breastfeeding,

Many of the sealing requests were from third parties like Ferrer and Sony, not Lively.

[Anonymous]

Here’s a link to Blake Lively’s PGA letter. https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.634304/gov.uscourts.nysd.634304.1233.14.pdf

Worth reading.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Which exhibit number is Taylor Swift's texts?

I don’t know. I’m on a Reddit forum called it ends with lawsuits where they post screenshots of the documents. But they also have a full list of all the exhibits and docket numbers if you want to go through them like that.

Please don’t use that Reddit forum for information. It’s known to be filled with MAGA trolls and manosphere types. It’s warped and horrifyingly misogynistic (while pretending to act like JB is some hero for the feminist cause). There are much better ways to access information on the case.

Stop with your nonsense, it’s a great resource for docket links.

There are others that aren’t filled with pro-MAGA and manosphere bots. Sorry if the truth hurts but those are the people Baldoni surrounds himself with (both those he pays and his family/religious affiliation). I get that may be an uncomfortable truth for some of his supporters.

That’s just not true, but I know that you are allergic to facts that demonstrate that Blake has no case, and is generally an awful person to boot. Her texts are so bad, I would try to discourage people from seeing them as a Blake bot as well.

Which part isn’t true? That Baldoni’s family/friends aren’t maga? Sorry it is.

That everyone he hired doesn’t have some connection to Trump/maga? Sorry that’s also wrong.

That the people he hired aren’t using maga/manosphere podcasts/new outlets for interviews/statements/PR? Also wrong.

That spinning up those crowds doesn’t result in the blatant misogyny across that form? Also wrong.

Plus we know they use certain Reddit forums to promote their narrative. Gee, which one could that be?

But keep rambling about Blake bots and ignoring the obvious.

More and more attempts to distract from the Blake release, never too desperate to lie.

If you left your bubble you would realize the unsealing of exhibits today did not favor the WP. But I don’t think you are going to do that.

Yes, it's funny that people are acting like Blake wants to "hide" the exhibits from her own filings, which demonstrate in great detail how many people other than her also found Baldoni awful and give their in person accounts of him being inappropriate.

Yea, the documents for her are so good she spent the last month fighting to have them sealed and only unsealed after being ordered to do so by the judge.

breastfeeding,

Many of the sealing requests were from third parties like Ferrer and Sony, not Lively.

Also many of the documents unsealed came from the WP. Jed Wallace is unsealing a bunch of stuff today too. I think the last time I looked, both sides had about equal the number of sealing requests so I've never understood the narrative that Lively was trying to hide things and not the other side. They obviously both had documents they were trying to keep out of the public eye for various reasons (genuine privacy concerns about irrelevant info, embarrassment, and damage to their respective cases).

I have noticed that a lot of people seemed to think Lively's deposition would be hugely embarrassing and bad for her and so far that hasn't been the c case. I haven't read the whole thing but it seems like she did a good job under adverse questioning and I haven't really seen anything that undermines her case. I expected worse based on how I've seen her in interviews.

Some of her emails coming out are pretty embarrassing for her or paint her in a negative light. Though I think the Taylor Swift stuff is just tabloid fodder and ultimately not particularly relevant to the case, especially since Baldoni's complaint was dismissed and never refiled (was his complaint still in play, the TS stuff would be more relevant). I doubt any of that will wind up being admissible in court except maybe one or two texts from Lively (not Swift) that might be used to try and impeach.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Here’s a link to Blake Lively’s PGA letter. https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.634304/gov.uscourts.nysd.634304.1233.14.pdf

Worth reading.

Reminiscent of trying to write a USA Jobs resume lol.

[Anonymous]

If they only read the book (at least the lawyers, by this point). Isabella complains that Justin “inappropriately” added her licking cookie dough off a spoon to a scene. The actual reason for this addition, that’s how it was written by Coleen Hoover.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Here”s a lovely ditty Blake texted to her male castmate, Brendon Skelner, “I’m becoming pimp adjacent, put on a short little skirt, and get in the corner, Skelner.” But did she sink her teeth into it?

Don’t want this to get lost on the shuffle.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Here”s a lovely ditty Blake texted to her male castmate, Brendon Skelner, “I’m becoming pimp adjacent, put on a short little skirt, and get in the corner, Skelner.” But did she sink her teeth into it?

Don’t want this to get lost on the shuffle.

Blake has always had an extremely crass and not particularly funny sense of humor.

[Anonymous]

The ever elusive VanZan subpoena finally released. https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.634304/gov.uscourts.nysd.634304.1245.164.pdf

Quite clearly is directed at IEWU. Gonna be hard to explain how this was the appropriate procedure to get these documents.

[Anonymous]

Blake’s texts reveal she told Justin to call her trainer to find it how much she weighed given his bad back and need to lift her for sex scene. Did her lawyers not explain to her how discovery worked before filing the complaint?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The ever elusive VanZan subpoena finally released. https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.634304/gov.uscourts.nysd.634304.1245.164.pdf

Quite clearly is directed at IEWU. Gonna be hard to explain how this was the appropriate procedure to get these documents.

Yes, I usually defend Lively here, but rather a headscratcher why an all doe lawsuit, if they are seeking documents relating to sexual harassment on the set of IEWU. Surely, at a minimum IEWU movie LLC and Wayfarer would be defendants then, and probably Baldoni and Heath, and then additional does for whoever conducted the smear campaign. Not ok to do it that way just to avoid tipping off WF so they could assert their confidentiality. Should have gone through proper channels.

[Anonymous]

I had asked earlier for the TS texts. Here's a link to some of them, not sure if all. So apparently TS is way into the Dragons thing. This is so cringe, lol.
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.634304/gov.uscourts.nysd.634304.1245.79.pdf

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Here’s a link to Blake Lively’s PGA letter. https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.634304/gov.uscourts.nysd.634304.1233.14.pdf

Worth reading.

Reminiscent of trying to write a USA Jobs resume lol.

Here’s the 50 ways in which I, Blake Lively, controlled every aspect of this film since pre-production. It destroys her case.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I had asked earlier for the TS texts. Here's a link to some of them, not sure if all. So apparently TS is way into the Dragons thing. This is so cringe, lol.
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.634304/gov.uscourts.nysd.634304.1245.79.pdf

I don’t think someone could have scripted texts that make Taylor Swift and Blake Lively look more mean spirited or juvenile.

[Anonymous]

So, the real reason that Swift pulled back was not that she didn't believe Lively, as speculated, but because it all makes her look bad because she was actually way into it, lmao. It makes me feel kind of sorry for Lively... Swift should have been like "yes, he's a jerk and I stand by my friend" but she has no balls.