Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
Reply to "Lively/Baldoni Lawsuit Part 2"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Which exhibit number is Taylor Swift's texts? [/quote] I don’t know. I’m on a Reddit forum called it ends with lawsuits where they post screenshots of the documents. But they also have a full list of all the exhibits and docket numbers if you want to go through them like that.[/quote] Please don’t use that Reddit forum for information. It’s known to be filled with MAGA trolls and manosphere types. It’s warped and horrifyingly misogynistic (while pretending to act like JB is some hero for the feminist cause). There are much better ways to access information on the case. [/quote] Stop with your nonsense, it’s a great resource for docket links. [/quote] There are others that aren’t filled with pro-MAGA and manosphere bots. Sorry if the truth hurts but those are the people Baldoni surrounds himself with (both those he pays and his family/religious affiliation). I get that may be an uncomfortable truth for some of his supporters. [/quote] That’s just not true, but I know that you are allergic to facts that demonstrate that Blake has no case, and is generally an awful person to boot. Her texts are so bad, I would try to discourage people from seeing them as a Blake bot as well.[/quote] Which part isn’t true? That Baldoni’s family/friends aren’t maga? Sorry it is. That everyone he hired doesn’t have some connection to Trump/maga? Sorry that’s also wrong. That the people he hired aren’t using maga/manosphere podcasts/new outlets for interviews/statements/PR? Also wrong. That spinning up those crowds doesn’t result in the blatant misogyny across that form? Also wrong. Plus we know they use certain Reddit forums to promote their narrative. Gee, which one could that be? But keep rambling about Blake bots and ignoring the obvious. [/quote] More and more attempts to distract from the Blake release, never too desperate to lie.[/quote] If you left your bubble you would realize the unsealing of exhibits today did not favor the WP. But I don’t think you are going to do that. [/quote] Yes, it's funny that people are acting like Blake wants to "hide" the exhibits from her own filings, which demonstrate in great detail how many people other than her also found Baldoni awful and give their in person accounts of him being inappropriate.[/quote] Yea, the documents for her are so good she spent the last month fighting to have them sealed and only unsealed after being ordered to do so by the judge. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics