Meghan Markle and Prince Harry News and Updates Part 2

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Harry is going to be unhappy until he reconciles with his family which may be out of the question now. It’s going to be ugly. I’m not sure I can make sense out of Meghan’s claims that she had no idea what the royal family was like. It’s pretty unbelievable.

it's a family that harbors a pedophile. Maybe Harry and his family are better off without them

This. The fact that the villains of this family and Meg and Harry not a disgusting pedo tells you everything you need to know.

Exactly. Don't forget that the abdicator/literal Hitler collaborator (Edward VIII) lived a long and comfortable life. There are literally video reels of him and his wife being wined and dined by the Reich.

And photos of Harry in a Nazi uniform too. As well as naked with strippers in Vegas.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Harry is going to be unhappy until he reconciles with his family which may be out of the question now. It’s going to be ugly. I’m not sure I can make sense out of Meghan’s claims that she had no idea what the royal family was like. It’s pretty unbelievable.

You thought she should know that they would confiscate her passport and drivers license and not let her go to lunch without permission?

I thought she should know that yes you curtsy to the queen and that you give up a lot of personal freedoms, absolutely.

She also talked in the interview about how no one tried to prep or train her on anything and she would stay up all night learning anthems and songs and the right way to do things and the right way to say things to try to make them proud.

This. They set her up to fail. When she dazzled everyone, they started feeding false and awful stories to the tabloids to district from Pedo Andrew and Will's affairs.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:One of the biggest questions coming out of this interview is whether it was Charles or William who expressed concern about Archie's skin color. I'm curious to see how they react/defend themselves. Really curious to see if staff loyal to one or the other will leak to the press in defense of their person. IOW, will we see some kind of jockeying between the two houses to not get pegged with the single most damaging revelation of the interview. (Meghan said revealing the identity would be very damaging, so I think that pretty much limits the possibilities to Charles or William, as no one would be surprised if Phillip said it.)

Agreed, it has to be one of those three, but most likely Charles or William.

I did find it interesting how they defended the Queen and seem to still have a relatively positive relationship with her, despite her really doing nothing to help.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I’m half Italian and her skin is lighter than mine.

My preteen and teen boys watched with me and they both said “wait- she’s black?”

Archie is very fair and ginger. Not even as dark as “black Irish”. Welsh born Catherine Zeta Jones looks more exotic.

My kid is convinced some of the kardashians are black or mixed. He thought Meghan was mixed Latina (not black).

In his defense, some kardashians can be heavy handed with the bronzer.

Switching gears: Oprah looked great! I really like her hair. Interesting how Oprah and Whoopi both wear round glasses.

[Anonymous]

Trying to get the timeline straight. Seems Queen and Charles were very welcoming to Meg, but William was a problem. When did Harry make that statement about his family being the one M never had?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Harry is going to be unhappy until he reconciles with his family which may be out of the question now. It’s going to be ugly. I’m not sure I can make sense out of Meghan’s claims that she had no idea what the royal family was like. It’s pretty unbelievable.

She lost me at "I didn't Google him" when they started dating, and "I don't read the tabloids". Please!
If you start out on such a false note, made the rest of what she said dodgy. He seemed desperate to believe the narrative; honestly, at this point what option does he have?

She's such a liar. She's stated over and over again that her friends warned her about all the pressure, about the racism, about the press, she knew exactly what she was getting into.

And it was awful and they left.

+1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm convinced not only did the Royals not want the biracial/black one to have a child in the first place (they were itching to write 'she's barren' articles but she got pregnant too quickly) but they wanted to punish Meghan for duping them - so they tried to take the only thing they could - the baby's security and HRH.

If he was old enough to school they would have refused to pay for it.

This is bullshit. Archie is the great grandchild of the Monarch. No great grandchildren have princely titles. That is how it is. When they become grandchildren of the monarch - when Charles ascends to the throne - they will get security.

Right.....but this thinking is completely outdated. We live in an age of social media radicalization and extremism. Where radicals plot violence on apps and can act on it in a matter of days.

That child has very real security needs TODAY. Not when Charles ascends to the throne. Now.

This is just one instance where the BRF as an institution refuses to face reality.

And anyone who can afford to buy a $20 Million house can afford private security guards instead of mooching off of granny.

They are paying for security. I dont know much a bout security but are privately hired firlms as ggod as what can be provided to the BRF?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I’m half Italian and her skin is lighter than mine.

My preteen and teen boys watched with me and they both said “wait- she’s black?”

Archie is very fair and ginger. Not even as dark as “black Irish”. Welsh born Catherine Zeta Jones looks more exotic.

NEITHER HERE NOR THERE


There was no way of knowing Archie would be fair, or if he will continue to be fair into the future. It shouldn't be a discussion point. PERIOD.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm convinced not only did the Royals not want the biracial/black one to have a child in the first place (they were itching to write 'she's barren' articles but she got pregnant too quickly) but they wanted to punish Meghan for duping them - so they tried to take the only thing they could - the baby's security and HRH.

If he was old enough to school they would have refused to pay for it.

This is bullshit. Archie is the great grandchild of the Monarch. No great grandchildren have princely titles. That is how it is. When they become grandchildren of the monarch - when Charles ascends to the throne - they will get security.

Right.....but this thinking is completely outdated. We live in an age of social media radicalization and extremism. Where radicals plot violence on apps and can act on it in a matter of days.

That child has very real security needs TODAY. Not when Charles ascends to the throne. Now.

This is just one instance where the BRF as an institution refuses to face reality.

And anyone who can afford to buy a $20 Million house can afford private security guards instead of mooching off of granny.

They certainly could have "settled" for a perfectly lovely $5 million house, with ample left for security etc., but they really do want to have their cake.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm convinced not only did the Royals not want the biracial/black one to have a child in the first place (they were itching to write 'she's barren' articles but she got pregnant too quickly) but they wanted to punish Meghan for duping them - so they tried to take the only thing they could - the baby's security and HRH.

If he was old enough to school they would have refused to pay for it.

This is bullshit. Archie is the great grandchild of the Monarch. No great grandchildren have princely titles. That is how it is. When they become grandchildren of the monarch - when Charles ascends to the throne - they will get security.

Right.....but this thinking is completely outdated. We live in an age of social media radicalization and extremism. Where radicals plot violence on apps and can act on it in a matter of days.

That child has very real security needs TODAY. Not when Charles ascends to the throne. Now.

This is just one instance where the BRF as an institution refuses to face reality.

And anyone who can afford to buy a $20 Million house can afford private security guards instead of mooching off of granny.

Right- I also found it curious that they thought they'd be safer in the U.S. than Canada. Are there a lot of rabid tabloid press and royal family ubers in Canada?

[Anonymous]

Well, well, well. I didn't know this. Did anyone else know this?

[Anonymous]

I find people like her completely exhausting. Always looking for reasons to be offended. Such a victim.

Also, doesn’t it seem clear to anyone else she was taking innocuous stuff and running with it?

Oprah: Who told you they weren’t providing security
Meghan: Well they told Harry
Oprah: What was the explanation?
Meghan: How do you explain something like that?

Word salad. She comes off like a brat who didn’t get what she wanted so did the whole scorched earth thing. She didn’t like where she fell in the family hiarchy period. She didn’t want “the work” of a royal but wanted her son to be a prince and all the perks of the life.

She clearly has BPD. It’s kind of sad how many people don’t see through her.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I'm thinking when she says she didnt Google Harry she doesnt mean it in the way we think of googling someone. She knew as much as probably any American would know about the Royals. Yes those Americans that care have watched Di/Charles wedding we have heard the stories throughout the years. But to actually be there in the midst is a whole other situation.

Yup. And if she had Googled him extensively, the haters here would've called her an obsessed gold-digging stalker. Well, they already call her a gold diggger.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:One of the biggest questions coming out of this interview is whether it was Charles or William who expressed concern about Archie's skin color. I'm curious to see how they react/defend themselves. Really curious to see if staff loyal to one or the other will leak to the press in defense of their person. IOW, will we see some kind of jockeying between the two houses to not get pegged with the single most damaging revelation of the interview. (Meghan said revealing the identity would be very damaging, so I think that pretty much limits the possibilities to Charles or William, as no one would be surprised if Phillip said it.)

Had to have been. Oprah was on CBS this morning and said that Harry emphatically said it WAS NOT the queen or Prince Philip.

[Anonymous]

Still pretty sure she’s the narcissist and he’s the codependent. Her lying and pretending to be a victim just reinforces it.