Conservatives of DCUM - where do you draw the line?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Putting aside the two specifics OP mentioned: is there a line?

NP

Oh, there’s a line—they just redraw it every time their guy crosses it.

Sexual assault? “Gray area.”
Child trafficking? “Complicated.”
Bribery, blackmail, obstruction? “Fake news.”

As long as the system is being “disrupted” in their favor, suddenly everything becomes negotiable. You could find Epstein’s name tattooed on someone’s ledger in blood and they’d still ask, “But did you see the plane logs?”

And when cornered? The attitude is dismissive or defensive as they fall back on The First “Lady” (Skank) Melania’s infamous shrug. “Boys will be boys.” “I dont really care, do you?” while bringing up political grievances harbored from past administrations. They are bitter.

Here’s the problem: Bad parenting isn’t illegal. Being a skanky escort isn’t illegal. Rape is. Sexual exploitation is. Human trafficking is.

What we’re witnessing isn’t a lack of evidence—it’s a lack of will. A.LACK.OF.WILL. When your tribe controls the files, the framing, and the fallout, accountability becomes optional.

That’s not a justice system. That’s a protection racket wrapped in a flag and baptized in selective outrage.

You as a democrat are going to lecture anyone on human trafficking?

That's like a pillar of your party, FFS. Cartels, Coyotes, Rape Trees, Alejandro Mayorkas, Smuggling with a wink and a nod?

https://www.nbcnewyork.com/news/national-international/dozens-found-dead-san-antonio-texas-truck-tractor-trailer/3751980/

I’m not a Democrat. Nor a dimwit. I’m an Independent—strategically so. I’ve been registered with both major parties at different points, but I vote based on policy, not personality. My allegiance is to whichever candidate or party is best equipped to address domestic and global challenges during their term.

If human trafficking is a “pillar” of any political party, then tear it down—forcefully and responsibly. But let’s not be lazy about it. Dismantle the system with a plan so we’re not just setting fire to institutions and expecting justice to rise from the ashes.

I support the deportation of undocumented immigrants who commit violent or predatory crimes. I also support sanctuary cities and vetted asylum policies for those fleeing legitimate danger. It’s called nuance—something cable news and partisan echo chambers have long abandoned.

You don’t get to cherry-pick your outrage. Either you care about justice or you don’t. The rest is tribal noise.

Love,
An American Independent 🇺🇸

Narrator: the person you are responding to doesn't actually care about justice and doesn't know the meaning of the word "nuance"

Thank you. My sincere hope is that the person I was responding to doesn’t reflect the reasoning process of most Americans.

It would be refreshing if more people not only recognized nuance—but also knew what to do with it.

That’s how real solutions begin.

Screw your nuance. It's a mask for pushing your one-world, no borders, and soft on crime agenda.

Been there, done that.

You are free to meet me outside, you mealy-mouthed, gaslighting, trolling, fake-ass keyboard thug.

Some things are cut and dry—like how to deal with bullies like you.

“Screw your nuance” is exactly the kind of anti-intellectual tantrum that shows what you’re really mad about: the conversation left your talking points behind.

You’re not here to dialogue—you’re here to bark, not think.

But don’t confuse calm reasoning with weakness.

Some things are cut and dry—like recognizing when someone’s just a loud, empty chair trying to intimidate from behind a screen.

I won’t play on your team, but I’m not walking away from the game either.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Putting aside the two specifics OP mentioned: is there a line?

NP

Oh, there’s a line—they just redraw it every time their guy crosses it.

Sexual assault? “Gray area.”
Child trafficking? “Complicated.”
Bribery, blackmail, obstruction? “Fake news.”

As long as the system is being “disrupted” in their favor, suddenly everything becomes negotiable. You could find Epstein’s name tattooed on someone’s ledger in blood and they’d still ask, “But did you see the plane logs?”

And when cornered? The attitude is dismissive or defensive as they fall back on The First “Lady” (Skank) Melania’s infamous shrug. “Boys will be boys.” “I dont really care, do you?” while bringing up political grievances harbored from past administrations. They are bitter.

Here’s the problem: Bad parenting isn’t illegal. Being a skanky escort isn’t illegal. Rape is. Sexual exploitation is. Human trafficking is.

What we’re witnessing isn’t a lack of evidence—it’s a lack of will. A.LACK.OF.WILL. When your tribe controls the files, the framing, and the fallout, accountability becomes optional.

That’s not a justice system. That’s a protection racket wrapped in a flag and baptized in selective outrage.

You as a democrat are going to lecture anyone on human trafficking?

That's like a pillar of your party, FFS. Cartels, Coyotes, Rape Trees, Alejandro Mayorkas, Smuggling with a wink and a nod?

https://www.nbcnewyork.com/news/national-international/dozens-found-dead-san-antonio-texas-truck-tractor-trailer/3751980/

I’m not a Democrat. Nor a dimwit. I’m an Independent—strategically so. I’ve been registered with both major parties at different points, but I vote based on policy, not personality. My allegiance is to whichever candidate or party is best equipped to address domestic and global challenges during their term.

If human trafficking is a “pillar” of any political party, then tear it down—forcefully and responsibly. But let’s not be lazy about it. Dismantle the system with a plan so we’re not just setting fire to institutions and expecting justice to rise from the ashes.

I support the deportation of undocumented immigrants who commit violent or predatory crimes. I also support sanctuary cities and vetted asylum policies for those fleeing legitimate danger. It’s called nuance—something cable news and partisan echo chambers have long abandoned.

You don’t get to cherry-pick your outrage. Either you care about justice or you don’t. The rest is tribal noise.

Love,
An American Independent 🇺🇸

Narrator: the person you are responding to doesn't actually care about justice and doesn't know the meaning of the word "nuance"

Thank you. My sincere hope is that the person I was responding to doesn’t reflect the reasoning process of most Americans.

It would be refreshing if more people not only recognized nuance—but also knew what to do with it.

That’s how real solutions begin.

Screw your nuance. It's a mask for pushing your one-world, no borders, and soft on crime agenda.

Been there, done that.

You gave a BS statement. This is what you want to believe about Dems, but it isn't true. What is a one world, no borders, soft on crime? No borders? Just like Trump is not all Rs, Biden was not all Ds. One world? Soft on crime? Where is that legislation?

Economy - dems favored every single time. The economy is not growing. People are not spending. Houses are sitting. College grads can't find jobs. Is that what you signed up for?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Putting aside the two specifics OP mentioned: is there a line?

NP

Oh, there’s a line—they just redraw it every time their guy crosses it.

Sexual assault? “Gray area.”
Child trafficking? “Complicated.”
Bribery, blackmail, obstruction? “Fake news.”

As long as the system is being “disrupted” in their favor, suddenly everything becomes negotiable. You could find Epstein’s name tattooed on someone’s ledger in blood and they’d still ask, “But did you see the plane logs?”

And when cornered? The attitude is dismissive or defensive as they fall back on The First “Lady” (Skank) Melania’s infamous shrug. “Boys will be boys.” “I dont really care, do you?” while bringing up political grievances harbored from past administrations. They are bitter.

Here’s the problem: Bad parenting isn’t illegal. Being a skanky escort isn’t illegal. Rape is. Sexual exploitation is. Human trafficking is.

What we’re witnessing isn’t a lack of evidence—it’s a lack of will. A.LACK.OF.WILL. When your tribe controls the files, the framing, and the fallout, accountability becomes optional.

That’s not a justice system. That’s a protection racket wrapped in a flag and baptized in selective outrage.

You as a democrat are going to lecture anyone on human trafficking?

That's like a pillar of your party, FFS. Cartels, Coyotes, Rape Trees, Alejandro Mayorkas, Smuggling with a wink and a nod?

https://www.nbcnewyork.com/news/national-international/dozens-found-dead-san-antonio-texas-truck-tractor-trailer/3751980/

I’m not a Democrat. Nor a dimwit. I’m an Independent—strategically so. I’ve been registered with both major parties at different points, but I vote based on policy, not personality. My allegiance is to whichever candidate or party is best equipped to address domestic and global challenges during their term.

If human trafficking is a “pillar” of any political party, then tear it down—forcefully and responsibly. But let’s not be lazy about it. Dismantle the system with a plan so we’re not just setting fire to institutions and expecting justice to rise from the ashes.

I support the deportation of undocumented immigrants who commit violent or predatory crimes. I also support sanctuary cities and vetted asylum policies for those fleeing legitimate danger. It’s called nuance—something cable news and partisan echo chambers have long abandoned.

You don’t get to cherry-pick your outrage. Either you care about justice or you don’t. The rest is tribal noise.

Love,
An American Independent 🇺🇸

Narrator: the person you are responding to doesn't actually care about justice and doesn't know the meaning of the word "nuance"

Thank you. My sincere hope is that the person I was responding to doesn’t reflect the reasoning process of most Americans.

It would be refreshing if more people not only recognized nuance—but also knew what to do with it.

That’s how real solutions begin.

Screw your nuance. It's a mask for pushing your one-world, no borders, and soft on crime agenda.

Been there, done that.

You gave a BS statement. This is what you want to believe about Dems, but it isn't true. What is a one world, no borders, soft on crime? No borders? Just like Trump is not all Rs, Biden was not all Ds. One world? Soft on crime? Where is that legislation?

Economy - dems favored every single time. The economy is not growing. People are not spending. Houses are sitting. College grads can't find jobs. Is that what you signed up for?

Most voters “support removing soft-on-crime prosecutors” and oppose specific policies of big-city district attorneys like Alvin Bragg in New York, Chesa Boudin in San Francisco, Kim Foxx in Chicago, George Gascon in Los Angeles, and Kim Gardner in St. Louis.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't personally understand how people don't have a problem with Trump's behavior and still support him, however, it seems like his handling of the government is horrifying.

-cutting off money for cancer research
-cutting kids off of medicaid and school lunch
-EPA closing research office that researches chemicals
-cutting national parks and clean energy
-re-opening coal plants
-cutting money for people with black lung
-tariffs every other day
-gaza
-terrible and dumb cabinet officials
-Hegseth as Sec of Defense????
-cutting funding at USDA can't be good
-cutting funding for maternal health
-slashing the government without knowing what they are cutting
-sending the marines to CA - what a waste of money
ICE officials deporting american citizens

The list goes on and on.

It's not him, it's Project 2025

The types of things

Because democrats implement open borders and expand legal immigration

They want to replace all US workers with cheap foreign guest workers

Last time I checked, Obama deported more than Trump ever could. How do you explain that with your narrative?

Last I checked, you don't get through the border on Trump's watch. Why is that? You democrats told us it would take new legislation for that to happen. What changed?

Dems had a deal with the Rs and Trump killed it. You can't have it both ways.

Narcissists don’t care that you can’t have it both ways. They know it, they just don’t care. They want it all their way which includes a bunch of bull sh*t others are supposed to eat. “Screw nuance.”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Putting aside the two specifics OP mentioned: is there a line?

NP

Oh, there’s a line—they just redraw it every time their guy crosses it.

Sexual assault? “Gray area.”
Child trafficking? “Complicated.”
Bribery, blackmail, obstruction? “Fake news.”

As long as the system is being “disrupted” in their favor, suddenly everything becomes negotiable. You could find Epstein’s name tattooed on someone’s ledger in blood and they’d still ask, “But did you see the plane logs?”

And when cornered? The attitude is dismissive or defensive as they fall back on The First “Lady” (Skank) Melania’s infamous shrug. “Boys will be boys.” “I dont really care, do you?” while bringing up political grievances harbored from past administrations. They are bitter.

Here’s the problem: Bad parenting isn’t illegal. Being a skanky escort isn’t illegal. Rape is. Sexual exploitation is. Human trafficking is.

What we’re witnessing isn’t a lack of evidence—it’s a lack of will. A.LACK.OF.WILL. When your tribe controls the files, the framing, and the fallout, accountability becomes optional.

That’s not a justice system. That’s a protection racket wrapped in a flag and baptized in selective outrage.

You as a democrat are going to lecture anyone on human trafficking?

That's like a pillar of your party, FFS. Cartels, Coyotes, Rape Trees, Alejandro Mayorkas, Smuggling with a wink and a nod?

https://www.nbcnewyork.com/news/national-international/dozens-found-dead-san-antonio-texas-truck-tractor-trailer/3751980/

I’m not a Democrat. Nor a dimwit. I’m an Independent—strategically so. I’ve been registered with both major parties at different points, but I vote based on policy, not personality. My allegiance is to whichever candidate or party is best equipped to address domestic and global challenges during their term.

If human trafficking is a “pillar” of any political party, then tear it down—forcefully and responsibly. But let’s not be lazy about it. Dismantle the system with a plan so we’re not just setting fire to institutions and expecting justice to rise from the ashes.

I support the deportation of undocumented immigrants who commit violent or predatory crimes. I also support sanctuary cities and vetted asylum policies for those fleeing legitimate danger. It’s called nuance—something cable news and partisan echo chambers have long abandoned.

You don’t get to cherry-pick your outrage. Either you care about justice or you don’t. The rest is tribal noise.

Love,
An American Independent 🇺🇸

Narrator: the person you are responding to doesn't actually care about justice and doesn't know the meaning of the word "nuance"

Thank you. My sincere hope is that the person I was responding to doesn’t reflect the reasoning process of most Americans.

It would be refreshing if more people not only recognized nuance—but also knew what to do with it.

That’s how real solutions begin.

Screw your nuance. It's a mask for pushing your one-world, no borders, and soft on crime agenda.

Been there, done that.

You gave a BS statement. This is what you want to believe about Dems, but it isn't true. What is a one world, no borders, soft on crime? No borders? Just like Trump is not all Rs, Biden was not all Ds. One world? Soft on crime? Where is that legislation?

Economy - dems favored every single time. The economy is not growing. People are not spending. Houses are sitting. College grads can't find jobs. Is that what you signed up for?

I know. You signed up for endless Quantitative Easing, money creation and a systematic devaluing of our currency to keep the music going. I didn't.

People shouldn't be spending. They're far in debt. You didn't get the memo?

The days of massive spending to buy wind turbines, solar panels and batteries from China have come to an end. You want green energy, pay for it yourselves without massive government subsidies.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Putting aside the two specifics OP mentioned: is there a line?

NP

Oh, there’s a line—they just redraw it every time their guy crosses it.

Sexual assault? “Gray area.”
Child trafficking? “Complicated.”
Bribery, blackmail, obstruction? “Fake news.”

As long as the system is being “disrupted” in their favor, suddenly everything becomes negotiable. You could find Epstein’s name tattooed on someone’s ledger in blood and they’d still ask, “But did you see the plane logs?”

And when cornered? The attitude is dismissive or defensive as they fall back on The First “Lady” (Skank) Melania’s infamous shrug. “Boys will be boys.” “I dont really care, do you?” while bringing up political grievances harbored from past administrations. They are bitter.

Here’s the problem: Bad parenting isn’t illegal. Being a skanky escort isn’t illegal. Rape is. Sexual exploitation is. Human trafficking is.

What we’re witnessing isn’t a lack of evidence—it’s a lack of will. A.LACK.OF.WILL. When your tribe controls the files, the framing, and the fallout, accountability becomes optional.

That’s not a justice system. That’s a protection racket wrapped in a flag and baptized in selective outrage.

You as a democrat are going to lecture anyone on human trafficking?

That's like a pillar of your party, FFS. Cartels, Coyotes, Rape Trees, Alejandro Mayorkas, Smuggling with a wink and a nod?

https://www.nbcnewyork.com/news/national-international/dozens-found-dead-san-antonio-texas-truck-tractor-trailer/3751980/

I’m not a Democrat. Nor a dimwit. I’m an Independent—strategically so. I’ve been registered with both major parties at different points, but I vote based on policy, not personality. My allegiance is to whichever candidate or party is best equipped to address domestic and global challenges during their term.

If human trafficking is a “pillar” of any political party, then tear it down—forcefully and responsibly. But let’s not be lazy about it. Dismantle the system with a plan so we’re not just setting fire to institutions and expecting justice to rise from the ashes.

I support the deportation of undocumented immigrants who commit violent or predatory crimes. I also support sanctuary cities and vetted asylum policies for those fleeing legitimate danger. It’s called nuance—something cable news and partisan echo chambers have long abandoned.

You don’t get to cherry-pick your outrage. Either you care about justice or you don’t. The rest is tribal noise.

Love,
An American Independent 🇺🇸

Narrator: the person you are responding to doesn't actually care about justice and doesn't know the meaning of the word "nuance"

Thank you. My sincere hope is that the person I was responding to doesn’t reflect the reasoning process of most Americans.

It would be refreshing if more people not only recognized nuance—but also knew what to do with it.

That’s how real solutions begin.

Screw your nuance. It's a mask for pushing your one-world, no borders, and soft on crime agenda.

Been there, done that.

You are free to meet me outside, you mealy-mouthed, gaslighting, trolling, fake-ass keyboard thug.

Some things are cut and dry—like how to deal with bullies like you.

“Screw your nuance” is exactly the kind of anti-intellectual tantrum that shows what you’re really mad about: the conversation left your talking points behind.

You’re not here to dialogue—you’re here to bark, not think.

But don’t confuse calm reasoning with weakness.

Some things are cut and dry—like recognizing when someone’s just a loud, empty chair trying to intimidate from behind a screen.

I won’t play on your team, but I’m not walking away from the game either.

You aren't intellectual. You're f'n stupid. I don't care about your supposed (but completely anonymous) "education".

Maybe you have advanced degrees. Maybe you don't. But you are an educated fool. That seems to be a recurring theme at DCUM.

Yes, I'm not here to "dialogue". I'm here to discuss. I do not accept your DNC approved politically correct language.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Putting aside the two specifics OP mentioned: is there a line?

NP

Oh, there’s a line—they just redraw it every time their guy crosses it.

Sexual assault? “Gray area.”
Child trafficking? “Complicated.”
Bribery, blackmail, obstruction? “Fake news.”

As long as the system is being “disrupted” in their favor, suddenly everything becomes negotiable. You could find Epstein’s name tattooed on someone’s ledger in blood and they’d still ask, “But did you see the plane logs?”

And when cornered? The attitude is dismissive or defensive as they fall back on The First “Lady” (Skank) Melania’s infamous shrug. “Boys will be boys.” “I dont really care, do you?” while bringing up political grievances harbored from past administrations. They are bitter.

Here’s the problem: Bad parenting isn’t illegal. Being a skanky escort isn’t illegal. Rape is. Sexual exploitation is. Human trafficking is.

What we’re witnessing isn’t a lack of evidence—it’s a lack of will. A.LACK.OF.WILL. When your tribe controls the files, the framing, and the fallout, accountability becomes optional.

That’s not a justice system. That’s a protection racket wrapped in a flag and baptized in selective outrage.

You as a democrat are going to lecture anyone on human trafficking?

That's like a pillar of your party, FFS. Cartels, Coyotes, Rape Trees, Alejandro Mayorkas, Smuggling with a wink and a nod?

https://www.nbcnewyork.com/news/national-international/dozens-found-dead-san-antonio-texas-truck-tractor-trailer/3751980/

I’m not a Democrat. Nor a dimwit. I’m an Independent—strategically so. I’ve been registered with both major parties at different points, but I vote based on policy, not personality. My allegiance is to whichever candidate or party is best equipped to address domestic and global challenges during their term.

If human trafficking is a “pillar” of any political party, then tear it down—forcefully and responsibly. But let’s not be lazy about it. Dismantle the system with a plan so we’re not just setting fire to institutions and expecting justice to rise from the ashes.

I support the deportation of undocumented immigrants who commit violent or predatory crimes. I also support sanctuary cities and vetted asylum policies for those fleeing legitimate danger. It’s called nuance—something cable news and partisan echo chambers have long abandoned.

You don’t get to cherry-pick your outrage. Either you care about justice or you don’t. The rest is tribal noise.

Love,
An American Independent 🇺🇸

Narrator: the person you are responding to doesn't actually care about justice and doesn't know the meaning of the word "nuance"

Thank you. My sincere hope is that the person I was responding to doesn’t reflect the reasoning process of most Americans.

It would be refreshing if more people not only recognized nuance—but also knew what to do with it.

That’s how real solutions begin.

Screw your nuance. It's a mask for pushing your one-world, no borders, and soft on crime agenda.

Been there, done that.

You gave a BS statement. This is what you want to believe about Dems, but it isn't true. What is a one world, no borders, soft on crime? No borders? Just like Trump is not all Rs, Biden was not all Ds. One world? Soft on crime? Where is that legislation?

Economy - dems favored every single time. The economy is not growing. People are not spending. Houses are sitting. College grads can't find jobs. Is that what you signed up for?

Most voters “support removing soft-on-crime prosecutors” and oppose specific policies of big-city district attorneys like Alvin Bragg in New York, Chesa Boudin in San Francisco, Kim Foxx in Chicago, George Gascon in Los Angeles, and Kim Gardner in St. Louis.

Ironic that crime in cities have been falling significantly since 2022 (the COVID spike) and per capita crime in red states is significantly higher than in blue cities or states. facts do, in fact, matter.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Putting aside the two specifics OP mentioned: is there a line?

NP

Oh, there’s a line—they just redraw it every time their guy crosses it.

Sexual assault? “Gray area.”
Child trafficking? “Complicated.”
Bribery, blackmail, obstruction? “Fake news.”

As long as the system is being “disrupted” in their favor, suddenly everything becomes negotiable. You could find Epstein’s name tattooed on someone’s ledger in blood and they’d still ask, “But did you see the plane logs?”

And when cornered? The attitude is dismissive or defensive as they fall back on The First “Lady” (Skank) Melania’s infamous shrug. “Boys will be boys.” “I dont really care, do you?” while bringing up political grievances harbored from past administrations. They are bitter.

Here’s the problem: Bad parenting isn’t illegal. Being a skanky escort isn’t illegal. Rape is. Sexual exploitation is. Human trafficking is.

What we’re witnessing isn’t a lack of evidence—it’s a lack of will. A.LACK.OF.WILL. When your tribe controls the files, the framing, and the fallout, accountability becomes optional.

That’s not a justice system. That’s a protection racket wrapped in a flag and baptized in selective outrage.

You as a democrat are going to lecture anyone on human trafficking?

That's like a pillar of your party, FFS. Cartels, Coyotes, Rape Trees, Alejandro Mayorkas, Smuggling with a wink and a nod?

https://www.nbcnewyork.com/news/national-international/dozens-found-dead-san-antonio-texas-truck-tractor-trailer/3751980/

I’m not a Democrat. Nor a dimwit. I’m an Independent—strategically so. I’ve been registered with both major parties at different points, but I vote based on policy, not personality. My allegiance is to whichever candidate or party is best equipped to address domestic and global challenges during their term.

If human trafficking is a “pillar” of any political party, then tear it down—forcefully and responsibly. But let’s not be lazy about it. Dismantle the system with a plan so we’re not just setting fire to institutions and expecting justice to rise from the ashes.

I support the deportation of undocumented immigrants who commit violent or predatory crimes. I also support sanctuary cities and vetted asylum policies for those fleeing legitimate danger. It’s called nuance—something cable news and partisan echo chambers have long abandoned.

You don’t get to cherry-pick your outrage. Either you care about justice or you don’t. The rest is tribal noise.

Love,
An American Independent 🇺🇸

Narrator: the person you are responding to doesn't actually care about justice and doesn't know the meaning of the word "nuance"

Thank you. My sincere hope is that the person I was responding to doesn’t reflect the reasoning process of most Americans.

It would be refreshing if more people not only recognized nuance—but also knew what to do with it.

That’s how real solutions begin.

Screw your nuance. It's a mask for pushing your one-world, no borders, and soft on crime agenda.

Been there, done that.

You gave a BS statement. This is what you want to believe about Dems, but it isn't true. What is a one world, no borders, soft on crime? No borders? Just like Trump is not all Rs, Biden was not all Ds. One world? Soft on crime? Where is that legislation?

Economy - dems favored every single time. The economy is not growing. People are not spending. Houses are sitting. College grads can't find jobs. Is that what you signed up for?

I know. You signed up for endless Quantitative Easing, money creation and a systematic devaluing of our currency to keep the music going. I didn't.

People shouldn't be spending. They're far in debt. You didn't get the memo?

The days of massive spending to buy wind turbines, solar panels and batteries from China have come to an end. You want green energy, pay for it yourselves without massive government subsidies.

Then remove the significant subsidies on oil and fossil fuels as well and charge for the damage to the air we breathe.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Putting aside the two specifics OP mentioned: is there a line?

NP

Oh, there’s a line—they just redraw it every time their guy crosses it.

Sexual assault? “Gray area.”
Child trafficking? “Complicated.”
Bribery, blackmail, obstruction? “Fake news.”

As long as the system is being “disrupted” in their favor, suddenly everything becomes negotiable. You could find Epstein’s name tattooed on someone’s ledger in blood and they’d still ask, “But did you see the plane logs?”

And when cornered? The attitude is dismissive or defensive as they fall back on The First “Lady” (Skank) Melania’s infamous shrug. “Boys will be boys.” “I dont really care, do you?” while bringing up political grievances harbored from past administrations. They are bitter.

Here’s the problem: Bad parenting isn’t illegal. Being a skanky escort isn’t illegal. Rape is. Sexual exploitation is. Human trafficking is.

What we’re witnessing isn’t a lack of evidence—it’s a lack of will. A.LACK.OF.WILL. When your tribe controls the files, the framing, and the fallout, accountability becomes optional.

That’s not a justice system. That’s a protection racket wrapped in a flag and baptized in selective outrage.

You as a democrat are going to lecture anyone on human trafficking?

That's like a pillar of your party, FFS. Cartels, Coyotes, Rape Trees, Alejandro Mayorkas, Smuggling with a wink and a nod?

https://www.nbcnewyork.com/news/national-international/dozens-found-dead-san-antonio-texas-truck-tractor-trailer/3751980/

I’m not a Democrat. Nor a dimwit. I’m an Independent—strategically so. I’ve been registered with both major parties at different points, but I vote based on policy, not personality. My allegiance is to whichever candidate or party is best equipped to address domestic and global challenges during their term.

If human trafficking is a “pillar” of any political party, then tear it down—forcefully and responsibly. But let’s not be lazy about it. Dismantle the system with a plan so we’re not just setting fire to institutions and expecting justice to rise from the ashes.

I support the deportation of undocumented immigrants who commit violent or predatory crimes. I also support sanctuary cities and vetted asylum policies for those fleeing legitimate danger. It’s called nuance—something cable news and partisan echo chambers have long abandoned.

You don’t get to cherry-pick your outrage. Either you care about justice or you don’t. The rest is tribal noise.

Love,
An American Independent 🇺🇸

Narrator: the person you are responding to doesn't actually care about justice and doesn't know the meaning of the word "nuance"

Thank you. My sincere hope is that the person I was responding to doesn’t reflect the reasoning process of most Americans.

It would be refreshing if more people not only recognized nuance—but also knew what to do with it.

That’s how real solutions begin.

Screw your nuance. It's a mask for pushing your one-world, no borders, and soft on crime agenda.

Been there, done that.

You gave a BS statement. This is what you want to believe about Dems, but it isn't true. What is a one world, no borders, soft on crime? No borders? Just like Trump is not all Rs, Biden was not all Ds. One world? Soft on crime? Where is that legislation?

Economy - dems favored every single time. The economy is not growing. People are not spending. Houses are sitting. College grads can't find jobs. Is that what you signed up for?

Most voters “support removing soft-on-crime prosecutors” and oppose specific policies of big-city district attorneys like Alvin Bragg in New York, Chesa Boudin in San Francisco, Kim Foxx in Chicago, George Gascon in Los Angeles, and Kim Gardner in St. Louis.

Ironic that crime in cities have been falling significantly since 2022 (the COVID spike) and per capita crime in red states is significantly higher than in blue cities or states. facts do, in fact, matter.

Ironically, when you have an administration that makes sure certain crime stats (FBI dropping UCR and SRS) are not reported at all, stats change. Yes, we know how you social justice warriors attempt to change the landscape with "dialogue".

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

If Trump is a pedophile - Will that deter your support for him?

My opinion of Trump does not matter because it has no power to seat/unseat a president. Just because Trump acts like a Democrat does not mean I will stop supporting the Republican party. If Trump is removed, it will be president Vance. If Trump stays, more Liberals implode, some by self-immolation, some to live in a mental asylum which is what the Democratic party looks like to me: a loony bin full of weird-haired circus freaks screaming about pronouns.

Win-Win.

On immigration - are you ok with ICE rounding up all brown people and holding them/deporting them with no due process?

It is not about brown people—way to go supporting that stupid narrative, it is about waves of lawless invaders crossing our borders which is illegal to do regardless of skin color.

The equivalent of due process is served if a person is in this country without a visa or proper authorization. Not being able to speak English along with no identification means Uncle Sam’s big boot goes right into your butt and out the door you go. Good-bye and good riddance!

From my view republicans are pretty much fine with anything Trump does as long as the economy is humming along and they are getting richer. He could actually murder someone in broad daylight or sexually assault someone and they probably wouldn’t care.

Anything Trump does is 10,000 times better than anything the Democrats would do. In some cases, Trump is the lesser of two evils.

The Democratic party is the party of murder, sexual deviance, and perversion. It is soft on crime, giving light sentences or none at all for those who do evil.

Calling Democrats the “party of perversion and crime” is projection at best and propaganda at worst. Let’s unpack the irony:

- 34-time FELON Donald Trump has been found liable for sexual abuse and defamation by a jury in the E. Jean Carroll case, and ordered to pay over $88 million in damages. That’s not hearsay or fake news, it’s a legal verdict.

- More than 25 women have publicly accused Trump of sexual misconduct, including rape, groping, and walking in on underage pageant contestants.

- Republican leaders defended Roy Moore, a Senate candidate accused of pursuing teenage girls when he was in his 30s.

- Dennis Hastert, the longest-serving Republican Speaker of the House, admitted to sexually abusing teenage boys and paid hush money to cover it up.

- Matt Gaetz, a sitting Republican congressman, is under investigation for sex trafficking of a minor.

If you want to talk about “perversion,” start with the party that keeps elevating men with credible sexual abuse allegations and covering them up, as Republicans are currently doing with the Epstein files.

As for crime? Democratic-led cities have seen drops in violent crime, and Democratic lawmakers have passed bipartisan legislation to fund police and reform sentencing. Meanwhile, Republicans push fear-based narratives while opposing gun safety laws that could actually reduce crime.

And on immigration: ICE under Trump has violated due process repeatedly, detaining migrants without hearings, deporting them to third countries with as little as six hours’ notice, and even arresting people inside courthouses without warrants. That’s not law and order—it’s authoritarianism.

So no, Democrats aren’t the party of crime or perversion. They’re the party trying to fix broken systems while Republicans defend abusers, ignore court rulings, and weaponize cruelty for political gain.

No one thinks a NY jury is capable of applying the law correctly any more than people are persuaded by so-called "credible" allegations of sexual assault. Those words no longer have meaning because Democrats have corrupted our systems.

Karma can be a biatch for you and all the females in your life. How could you be so dismissive and disgusting of all those women who finally came out of the shadows to testify under oath against predator trump.

This type of stuff doesn't happen to the women in my life, and I don't find the gang-piling to make their allegations more credible.

If you want to convince me you can tell credible accusations apart from bad ones, please tell me the best reasons why Christine Ford's allegations likely lacked merit?

You are utterly delusional. One in three women in the United States have been sexually assaulted or raped at some point in their life, and that statistic is based on the girls/women who report the assaults. I don’t care to convince you of anything because I cannot continue to engage with someone who chooses to be willfully ignorant.

More than one in three statistics is not well-supported. I don't know which study you're citing, but my strong hunch, is that among many other problems with that study, the authors used an absurdly broad definition of sexual assault so people who lack critical thinking skills would regurgitate it instead of determining it is actually true.

You're welcome to call me ignorant, but if you show me the study, I'll dig in and report back. One of us is interested in debate. You seem more interested in diagnosing me to avoid debate.

You literally won't even bother to do a basic Google search to find a study and tell us how it supports your implication that sexual assault doesn't happen or only happens to "those" women? I don't think you fully understand how ignorant and ridiculous you sound to those of us whose friends have trusted us enough to tell us about being assaulted.

I know what the studies say. They're not scientific. I know you trust the authority because the authors have credentials, but the truth is unless one is smart enough, she has a hard time seeing the systemic issues affecting social sciences today. University degrees for folks with 115 IQs has been an abject disaster.

But I'll give you a study: Look at the WHO study that says 1/4 women and says sex where the woman has been "manipulated" counts. Uh huh, that's not sexual assault. That's regret.

I really really really hope you do not have a daughter.

This. Or if you do have daughters, please report back to us on the status of your relationship with them a year or so after you say this to them after some sort of incident.

And some parents wonder why their kids no longer engage with them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

If Trump is a pedophile - Will that deter your support for him?

My opinion of Trump does not matter because it has no power to seat/unseat a president. Just because Trump acts like a Democrat does not mean I will stop supporting the Republican party. If Trump is removed, it will be president Vance. If Trump stays, more Liberals implode, some by self-immolation, some to live in a mental asylum which is what the Democratic party looks like to me: a loony bin full of weird-haired circus freaks screaming about pronouns.

Win-Win.

On immigration - are you ok with ICE rounding up all brown people and holding them/deporting them with no due process?

It is not about brown people—way to go supporting that stupid narrative, it is about waves of lawless invaders crossing our borders which is illegal to do regardless of skin color.

The equivalent of due process is served if a person is in this country without a visa or proper authorization. Not being able to speak English along with no identification means Uncle Sam’s big boot goes right into your butt and out the door you go. Good-bye and good riddance!

From my view republicans are pretty much fine with anything Trump does as long as the economy is humming along and they are getting richer. He could actually murder someone in broad daylight or sexually assault someone and they probably wouldn’t care.

Anything Trump does is 10,000 times better than anything the Democrats would do. In some cases, Trump is the lesser of two evils.

The Democratic party is the party of murder, sexual deviance, and perversion. It is soft on crime, giving light sentences or none at all for those who do evil.

Calling Democrats the “party of perversion and crime” is projection at best and propaganda at worst. Let’s unpack the irony:

- 34-time FELON Donald Trump has been found liable for sexual abuse and defamation by a jury in the E. Jean Carroll case, and ordered to pay over $88 million in damages. That’s not hearsay or fake news, it’s a legal verdict.

- More than 25 women have publicly accused Trump of sexual misconduct, including rape, groping, and walking in on underage pageant contestants.

- Republican leaders defended Roy Moore, a Senate candidate accused of pursuing teenage girls when he was in his 30s.

- Dennis Hastert, the longest-serving Republican Speaker of the House, admitted to sexually abusing teenage boys and paid hush money to cover it up.

- Matt Gaetz, a sitting Republican congressman, is under investigation for sex trafficking of a minor.

If you want to talk about “perversion,” start with the party that keeps elevating men with credible sexual abuse allegations and covering them up, as Republicans are currently doing with the Epstein files.

As for crime? Democratic-led cities have seen drops in violent crime, and Democratic lawmakers have passed bipartisan legislation to fund police and reform sentencing. Meanwhile, Republicans push fear-based narratives while opposing gun safety laws that could actually reduce crime.

And on immigration: ICE under Trump has violated due process repeatedly, detaining migrants without hearings, deporting them to third countries with as little as six hours’ notice, and even arresting people inside courthouses without warrants. That’s not law and order—it’s authoritarianism.

So no, Democrats aren’t the party of crime or perversion. They’re the party trying to fix broken systems while Republicans defend abusers, ignore court rulings, and weaponize cruelty for political gain.

No one thinks a NY jury is capable of applying the law correctly any more than people are persuaded by so-called "credible" allegations of sexual assault. Those words no longer have meaning because Democrats have corrupted our systems.

Karma can be a biatch for you and all the females in your life. How could you be so dismissive and disgusting of all those women who finally came out of the shadows to testify under oath against predator trump.

This type of stuff doesn't happen to the women in my life, and I don't find the gang-piling to make their allegations more credible.

If you want to convince me you can tell credible accusations apart from bad ones, please tell me the best reasons why Christine Ford's allegations likely lacked merit?

You are utterly delusional. One in three women in the United States have been sexually assaulted or raped at some point in their life, and that statistic is based on the girls/women who report the assaults. I don’t care to convince you of anything because I cannot continue to engage with someone who chooses to be willfully ignorant.

More than one in three statistics is not well-supported. I don't know which study you're citing, but my strong hunch, is that among many other problems with that study, the authors used an absurdly broad definition of sexual assault so people who lack critical thinking skills would regurgitate it instead of determining it is actually true.

You're welcome to call me ignorant, but if you show me the study, I'll dig in and report back. One of us is interested in debate. You seem more interested in diagnosing me to avoid debate.

You literally won't even bother to do a basic Google search to find a study and tell us how it supports your implication that sexual assault doesn't happen or only happens to "those" women? I don't think you fully understand how ignorant and ridiculous you sound to those of us whose friends have trusted us enough to tell us about being assaulted.

I know what the studies say. They're not scientific. I know you trust the authority because the authors have credentials, but the truth is unless one is smart enough, she has a hard time seeing the systemic issues affecting social sciences today. University degrees for folks with 115 IQs has been an abject disaster.

But I'll give you a study: Look at the WHO study that says 1/4 women and says sex where the woman has been "manipulated" counts. Uh huh, that's not sexual assault. That's regret.

I really really really hope you do not have a daughter.

Or a son. We don’t need another abuser.

Excellent point!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Putting aside the two specifics OP mentioned: is there a line?

NP

Oh, there’s a line—they just redraw it every time their guy crosses it.

Sexual assault? “Gray area.”
Child trafficking? “Complicated.”
Bribery, blackmail, obstruction? “Fake news.”

As long as the system is being “disrupted” in their favor, suddenly everything becomes negotiable. You could find Epstein’s name tattooed on someone’s ledger in blood and they’d still ask, “But did you see the plane logs?”

And when cornered? The attitude is dismissive or defensive as they fall back on The First “Lady” (Skank) Melania’s infamous shrug. “Boys will be boys.” “I dont really care, do you?” while bringing up political grievances harbored from past administrations. They are bitter.

Here’s the problem: Bad parenting isn’t illegal. Being a skanky escort isn’t illegal. Rape is. Sexual exploitation is. Human trafficking is.

What we’re witnessing isn’t a lack of evidence—it’s a lack of will. A.LACK.OF.WILL. When your tribe controls the files, the framing, and the fallout, accountability becomes optional.

That’s not a justice system. That’s a protection racket wrapped in a flag and baptized in selective outrage.

You as a democrat are going to lecture anyone on human trafficking?

That's like a pillar of your party, FFS. Cartels, Coyotes, Rape Trees, Alejandro Mayorkas, Smuggling with a wink and a nod?

https://www.nbcnewyork.com/news/national-international/dozens-found-dead-san-antonio-texas-truck-tractor-trailer/3751980/

I’m not a Democrat. Nor a dimwit. I’m an Independent—strategically so. I’ve been registered with both major parties at different points, but I vote based on policy, not personality. My allegiance is to whichever candidate or party is best equipped to address domestic and global challenges during their term.

If human trafficking is a “pillar” of any political party, then tear it down—forcefully and responsibly. But let’s not be lazy about it. Dismantle the system with a plan so we’re not just setting fire to institutions and expecting justice to rise from the ashes.

I support the deportation of undocumented immigrants who commit violent or predatory crimes. I also support sanctuary cities and vetted asylum policies for those fleeing legitimate danger. It’s called nuance—something cable news and partisan echo chambers have long abandoned.

You don’t get to cherry-pick your outrage. Either you care about justice or you don’t. The rest is tribal noise.

Love,
An American Independent 🇺🇸

Narrator: the person you are responding to doesn't actually care about justice and doesn't know the meaning of the word "nuance"

Thank you. My sincere hope is that the person I was responding to doesn’t reflect the reasoning process of most Americans.

It would be refreshing if more people not only recognized nuance—but also knew what to do with it.

That’s how real solutions begin.

Screw your nuance. It's a mask for pushing your one-world, no borders, and soft on crime agenda.

Been there, done that.

You gave a BS statement. This is what you want to believe about Dems, but it isn't true. What is a one world, no borders, soft on crime? No borders? Just like Trump is not all Rs, Biden was not all Ds. One world? Soft on crime? Where is that legislation?

Economy - dems favored every single time. The economy is not growing. People are not spending. Houses are sitting. College grads can't find jobs. Is that what you signed up for?

Most voters “support removing soft-on-crime prosecutors” and oppose specific policies of big-city district attorneys like Alvin Bragg in New York, Chesa Boudin in San Francisco, Kim Foxx in Chicago, George Gascon in Los Angeles, and Kim Gardner in St. Louis.

Yes, most voters. I think most voters mean Dems too.

[Anonymous]

Has a line been identified yet?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Putting aside the two specifics OP mentioned: is there a line?

NP

Oh, there’s a line—they just redraw it every time their guy crosses it.

Sexual assault? “Gray area.”
Child trafficking? “Complicated.”
Bribery, blackmail, obstruction? “Fake news.”

As long as the system is being “disrupted” in their favor, suddenly everything becomes negotiable. You could find Epstein’s name tattooed on someone’s ledger in blood and they’d still ask, “But did you see the plane logs?”

And when cornered? The attitude is dismissive or defensive as they fall back on The First “Lady” (Skank) Melania’s infamous shrug. “Boys will be boys.” “I dont really care, do you?” while bringing up political grievances harbored from past administrations. They are bitter.

Here’s the problem: Bad parenting isn’t illegal. Being a skanky escort isn’t illegal. Rape is. Sexual exploitation is. Human trafficking is.

What we’re witnessing isn’t a lack of evidence—it’s a lack of will. A.LACK.OF.WILL. When your tribe controls the files, the framing, and the fallout, accountability becomes optional.

That’s not a justice system. That’s a protection racket wrapped in a flag and baptized in selective outrage.

You as a democrat are going to lecture anyone on human trafficking?

That's like a pillar of your party, FFS. Cartels, Coyotes, Rape Trees, Alejandro Mayorkas, Smuggling with a wink and a nod?

https://www.nbcnewyork.com/news/national-international/dozens-found-dead-san-antonio-texas-truck-tractor-trailer/3751980/

I’m not a Democrat. Nor a dimwit. I’m an Independent—strategically so. I’ve been registered with both major parties at different points, but I vote based on policy, not personality. My allegiance is to whichever candidate or party is best equipped to address domestic and global challenges during their term.

If human trafficking is a “pillar” of any political party, then tear it down—forcefully and responsibly. But let’s not be lazy about it. Dismantle the system with a plan so we’re not just setting fire to institutions and expecting justice to rise from the ashes.

I support the deportation of undocumented immigrants who commit violent or predatory crimes. I also support sanctuary cities and vetted asylum policies for those fleeing legitimate danger. It’s called nuance—something cable news and partisan echo chambers have long abandoned.

You don’t get to cherry-pick your outrage. Either you care about justice or you don’t. The rest is tribal noise.

Love,
An American Independent 🇺🇸

Narrator: the person you are responding to doesn't actually care about justice and doesn't know the meaning of the word "nuance"

Thank you. My sincere hope is that the person I was responding to doesn’t reflect the reasoning process of most Americans.

It would be refreshing if more people not only recognized nuance—but also knew what to do with it.

That’s how real solutions begin.

Screw your nuance. It's a mask for pushing your one-world, no borders, and soft on crime agenda.

Been there, done that.

You are free to meet me outside, you mealy-mouthed, gaslighting, trolling, fake-ass keyboard thug.

Some things are cut and dry—like how to deal with bullies like you.

“Screw your nuance” is exactly the kind of anti-intellectual tantrum that shows what you’re really mad about: the conversation left your talking points behind.

You’re not here to dialogue—you’re here to bark, not think.

But don’t confuse calm reasoning with weakness.

Some things are cut and dry—like recognizing when someone’s just a loud, empty chair trying to intimidate from behind a screen.

I won’t play on your team, but I’m not walking away from the game either.

You aren't intellectual. You're f'n stupid. I don't care about your supposed (but completely anonymous) "education".

Maybe you have advanced degrees. Maybe you don't. But you are an educated fool. That seems to be a recurring theme at DCUM.

Yes, I'm not here to "dialogue". I'm here to discuss. I do not accept your DNC approved politically correct language.

Again, I’m an Independent. Clearly, you are the unteachable.

Some people resist correction. Others prove why they needed it.

Dialogue is discussion. But arguing with a fool only makes one look foolish.

So… touché. I’ll pass.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Putting aside the two specifics OP mentioned: is there a line?

NP

Oh, there’s a line—they just redraw it every time their guy crosses it.

Sexual assault? “Gray area.”
Child trafficking? “Complicated.”
Bribery, blackmail, obstruction? “Fake news.”

As long as the system is being “disrupted” in their favor, suddenly everything becomes negotiable. You could find Epstein’s name tattooed on someone’s ledger in blood and they’d still ask, “But did you see the plane logs?”

And when cornered? The attitude is dismissive or defensive as they fall back on The First “Lady” (Skank) Melania’s infamous shrug. “Boys will be boys.” “I dont really care, do you?” while bringing up political grievances harbored from past administrations. They are bitter.

Here’s the problem: Bad parenting isn’t illegal. Being a skanky escort isn’t illegal. Rape is. Sexual exploitation is. Human trafficking is.

What we’re witnessing isn’t a lack of evidence—it’s a lack of will. A.LACK.OF.WILL. When your tribe controls the files, the framing, and the fallout, accountability becomes optional.

That’s not a justice system. That’s a protection racket wrapped in a flag and baptized in selective outrage.

You as a democrat are going to lecture anyone on human trafficking?

That's like a pillar of your party, FFS. Cartels, Coyotes, Rape Trees, Alejandro Mayorkas, Smuggling with a wink and a nod?

https://www.nbcnewyork.com/news/national-international/dozens-found-dead-san-antonio-texas-truck-tractor-trailer/3751980/

I’m not a Democrat. Nor a dimwit. I’m an Independent—strategically so. I’ve been registered with both major parties at different points, but I vote based on policy, not personality. My allegiance is to whichever candidate or party is best equipped to address domestic and global challenges during their term.

If human trafficking is a “pillar” of any political party, then tear it down—forcefully and responsibly. But let’s not be lazy about it. Dismantle the system with a plan so we’re not just setting fire to institutions and expecting justice to rise from the ashes.

I support the deportation of undocumented immigrants who commit violent or predatory crimes. I also support sanctuary cities and vetted asylum policies for those fleeing legitimate danger. It’s called nuance—something cable news and partisan echo chambers have long abandoned.

You don’t get to cherry-pick your outrage. Either you care about justice or you don’t. The rest is tribal noise.

Love,
An American Independent 🇺🇸

Narrator: the person you are responding to doesn't actually care about justice and doesn't know the meaning of the word "nuance"

Thank you. My sincere hope is that the person I was responding to doesn’t reflect the reasoning process of most Americans.

It would be refreshing if more people not only recognized nuance—but also knew what to do with it.

That’s how real solutions begin.

Screw your nuance. It's a mask for pushing your one-world, no borders, and soft on crime agenda.

Been there, done that.

You gave a BS statement. This is what you want to believe about Dems, but it isn't true. What is a one world, no borders, soft on crime? No borders? Just like Trump is not all Rs, Biden was not all Ds. One world? Soft on crime? Where is that legislation?

Economy - dems favored every single time. The economy is not growing. People are not spending. Houses are sitting. College grads can't find jobs. Is that what you signed up for?

I know. You signed up for endless Quantitative Easing, money creation and a systematic devaluing of our currency to keep the music going. I didn't.

People shouldn't be spending. They're far in debt. You didn't get the memo?

The days of massive spending to buy wind turbines, solar panels and batteries from China have come to an end. You want green energy, pay for it yourselves without massive government subsidies.

You really are clueless. Clean energy companies opened 46 manufacturing plants in the US last year. Another 160 were either permitted or starting construction. That was all the IRA. We were the only industry bringing jobs back. So subsidies for coal and oil and gas are fine, but not clean energy? Clean energy is the fastest to deploy. Your bills are going up. The truth is, when Rs complained about Solyndra going bankrupt under Obama, what they didn't realize was that China bought their assets and improved upon them. They bought many US companies on the brink of creating the best technology. We ceded the industry to China. That's why they have the best technology. We were getting it back until Trump. Yay! We get to go back to the 50s and the rest of the world is looking to the future.