Anyone watching Mare of Easttown?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Do we think Dylan looking guilty af is a red herring, that he's trying to erase paternity evidence so the kid can stay with his family? Even if they didn't do it, would love to see him and his skanky gf go up in flames. But none of this really jibes.

I could see him trying to destroy paternity evidence. I think Mare will test the bottle (or something else) and discover the cousin is related to the baby but not the father. Still think it’s John.

They’ve never said who found Dylan, and the cousins were the only ones out there looking for Kenny. Had to be one of them and they probably saved him because they knew he was innocent.

Of course DNA evidence would say they are related. He is Erin’s cousin (as well as the baby’s cousin) regardless of whether he’s also the baby’s father.

She doesn't need the bottle to test his DNA - they can just ask for his DNA. People you're over-thinking the frickin bottle!

[Anonymous]

No one else seeing a big twist related to the Siobhan film project?

[Anonymous]

So, random question - the police got Erin’s phone records amd knew she talked with the deacon. Wouldn’t they knew who lured her to Brandywine Park?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:No one else seeing a big twist related to the Siobhan film project?

Yes. And something coming from the prowler situation. I like the idea that Mare's son is actually the baby's father.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No one else seeing a big twist related to the Siobhan film project?

Yes. And something coming from the prowler situation. I like the idea that Mare's son is actually the baby's father.

I think the purpose of the documentary is to have a dynamic way for the viewers to learn about the son.
Also if her son were the father, wouldn’t Frank’s DNA results have pointed to this?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No one else seeing a big twist related to the Siobhan film project?

Yes. And something coming from the prowler situation. I like the idea that Mare's son is actually the baby's father.

I think the purpose of the documentary is to have a dynamic way for the viewers to learn about the son.
Also if her son were the father, wouldn’t Frank’s DNA results have pointed to this?

Good point on Frank’s DNA.

On the Siobhan documentary, yes it’s a nice narrative device.
But the show made a point of dropping a clue/red herring: “he wasn’t getting along with Carrie then. Was he alone?” Also dropped the fact that he disappeared a month before he died.

The other open thread that sticks with me is Guy Pierce’s son. Where is he? The show said they have a good relationship now. Implying they are still in touch. So unlikely the son could be anyone we know. Maybe it’s Dylan, whose parents adopted him? His mom and dad seem really really into the baby— maybe they didn’t have that experience with Dylan?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No one else seeing a big twist related to the Siobhan film project?

Yes. And something coming from the prowler situation. I like the idea that Mare's son is actually the baby's father.

I think the purpose of the documentary is to have a dynamic way for the viewers to learn about the son.
Also if her son were the father, wouldn’t Frank’s DNA results have pointed to this?

Good point on Frank’s DNA.

On the Siobhan documentary, yes it’s a nice narrative device.
But the show made a point of dropping a clue/red herring: “he wasn’t getting along with Carrie then. Was he alone?” Also dropped the fact that he disappeared a month before he died.

The other open thread that sticks with me is Guy Pierce’s son. Where is he? The show said they have a good relationship now. Implying they are still in touch. So unlikely the son could be anyone we know. Maybe it’s Dylan, whose parents adopted him? His mom and dad seem really really into the baby— maybe they didn’t have that experience with Dylan?

No. GP's son was born in the mid 90s according to him, that's mid-20s son. Not teen son.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Do we think Dylan looking guilty af is a red herring, that he's trying to erase paternity evidence so the kid can stay with his family? Even if they didn't do it, would love to see him and his skanky gf go up in flames. But none of this really jibes.

I could see him trying to destroy paternity evidence. I think Mare will test the bottle (or something else) and discover the cousin is related to the baby but not the father. Still think it’s John.

They’ve never said who found Dylan, and the cousins were the only ones out there looking for Kenny. Had to be one of them and they probably saved him because they knew he was innocent.

Of course DNA evidence would say they are related. He is Erin’s cousin (as well as the baby’s cousin) regardless of whether he’s also the baby’s father.

She doesn't need the bottle to test his DNA - they can just ask for his DNA. People you're over-thinking the frickin bottle!

Not really- bc

1. That means he knows he’s a suspect. He could move evidence.

2. He can say no. She doesn’t have enough even for a search warrant at this point.

[Anonymous]

Was that the last episode. (5)?

[Anonymous]

How old is Zabel?

Guy Pierce’s son has got to reappear in the plot. And we’ve only heard from Zabel’s mom.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:We started late and bunged the first three episodes. Our plan was to wait and then binge the last three together. But we quickly realized it would be impossible to avoid spoilers. Why do people suck?

Yes, the fault of others.

Ps - I watched episodes 2-5 in the last few days and knew nothing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No one else seeing a big twist related to the Siobhan film project?

Yes. And something coming from the prowler situation. I like the idea that Mare's son is actually the baby's father.

I think the purpose of the documentary is to have a dynamic way for the viewers to learn about the son.
Also if her son were the father, wouldn’t Frank’s DNA results have pointed to this?

Good point on Frank’s DNA.

On the Siobhan documentary, yes it’s a nice narrative device.
But the show made a point of dropping a clue/red herring: “he wasn’t getting along with Carrie then. Was he alone?” Also dropped the fact that he disappeared a month before he died.

The other open thread that sticks with me is Guy Pierce’s son. Where is he? The show said they have a good relationship now. Implying they are still in touch. So unlikely the son could be anyone we know. Maybe it’s Dylan, whose parents adopted him? His mom and dad seem really really into the baby— maybe they didn’t have that experience with Dylan?

I totally missed that Dylan is adopted--interesting theory! I assumed GP is there because of the dreadful academic job market and he has to take what he can get...but maybe it's to reconnect with his estranged son?

[Anonymous]

Dylan being adopted is a theory about future twists not something the show said.

[Anonymous]

This thread is off the rails now, boring theories people, very boring.

[Anonymous]

It needs to be 10pm.