The essential truths about God (who is truth itself, and unchangeable) are eternal. I don’t know how anyone would get all that trust, relationship, hope and spiritual food you mention if they are not in a group environment as opposed to sitting at home and worshiping alone. The Eucharist IS the spiritual food you claim to want. Your comprehension of these matters seems extremely superficial. |
Is there any way that people can post here without you trying to tear them down? It's specifically a thread for lapsed Catholics. Start your own thread for what did you parents do to help you with your religion and get off this one. |
Well isn't that special. I have a great relationship with God and Jesus. Do you think Jesus needs everyone to be Catholic? He accepts, welcomes and lifts up everyone regardless of where they are on their journey. People like you who gatekeep and are obsessed with the ridiculous secret handshakes of a man-made institution that was designed to control are why I and many others are "lapsed". Judge on, no one cares and you will do so alone. |
I think God wants people to find the fullness of truth, which ultimately is God himself. Catholics believe, and with good reason, that the Catholic Church was founded by Christ himself on the Apostles, whose successors today are the bishops in apostolic succession. You are correct that all salvation comes through Christ; this is fundamental Catholic teaching. You are incorrect that the Catholic Church is any more “man made” than any of the multitude of Protestant denominations, the origin of which can readily be traced to human decisions, often political, to leave the Catholic Church. I don’t judge the state of anyone’s soul or relationship with God, who meets people where they are and who wants all to be saved. I do hope that people who criticize, malign and reject Catholic teachings would stop claiming they are motivated by some substantial disagreement on matters of doctrine. The fact is that most “lapsed” Catholics have never educated themselves about the foundations of what they claim to reject, couldn’t begin to explain why they claim it is “wrong,” and are “leaving” an imposter Catholic Church that exists primarily in their own mind. Read some St. Paul. Catholic doctrine and practice are not “designed to control.” They are aimed at making available true freedom, as compared to the slavery of sin. Even Presbyterians recognize this as the goal of Faith. Indeed, their doctrine of “absolute depravity” would call into question even more than Catholic doctrine the reliability of unguided human decision and understanding as they relate to divine matters. |
I’m not “tearing down” anyone. I simply object to people blaming the Church and its doctrines for their own choices to “lapse” in their Catholic practice. It seems you would prefer an echo chamber. |
In my experience as an old Catholic coot, it's more common to lapse due to "people issues" than doctrinal ones. (There are exceptions, of course). Keep in mind that Jesus had both a "cleansing the Temple" mode and a "woman caught in adultery" mode. We should, too. Sometimes people may need a good kick in the pants, it's true, but other times they need a hug. Administering the former when they need the latter will drive them away from Jesus and His Church, not bring them closer. |
|
My parents were very devout and not at all hypocritical about it. As was my grandmother. It's part of why it has been really really hard for me to leave the Church. I used to teach CCD with my mom.
I do have some general crisis of faith issues generally that go beyond the church, but then I have specific issues with the church. I have a bi daughter. She does not feel welcome, so that's part of my issue. My larger issue is that I feel like the church has largely ignored its social justice calling, and totally sold itself out to the anti-abortion right wing activists. The fact that over half of American catholics voted for Trump, and the fact that we have a majority Supreme Court that is entirely hostile to the interests of the poor and disenfranchised tells me that the Church has totally lost its way as far as guiding its flock. That's focused on the American church, but I also just cannot wrap my head around the Vatican still not accepting birth control, which is so fundamental to keeping families out of poverty and allowing women to lead lives of some independence and significance. The birth control thing is really fundamental for me. So, to answer your question -- there is nothing my parents could have done better to keep me in the church. There's some stuff the Pope(s) could have done differently, and the USCCB. It makes me really, really, really sad, but this is where I am. |
These are superb observations. They embody precisely the “accompaniment” Pope Francis writes about of meeting people where they are and helping them to a better life and a greater appreciation of religious truth. It is a shame (even a scandal) that at least in some places it’s not easy to find somebody who will deal charitably with questions and challenges. One of the best people I ever knew was turned away when she wanted to become Catholic, by a self-described “pastoral” priest who simply didn’t want to be bothered trying to sort out her marital issues. At the same time, it can be tough to make people feel welcome to keep coming while they work out their issues when what they really want is to have the Church abolish for their convenience what it believes is divine dogma supplemented by thousands of years of debate, analysis and prayer by brilliant minds and holy souls. |
Have you studied Humanae Vitae? The Declaration on Sexual Ethics? Looked into the enormous charity work the Church does? One of the greatest spiritual traps for the unwary is to become confused between religious practice and the virtue of religion on one hand and what largely are intellectual and socio-political matters on the other. If the Supreme Court is, as you propose, “entirely hostile to the interests of the poor and disenfranchised,” that would not accord in any way with the Church’s teaching on charity or its vast body of social teachings going back at least to Pope Leo XIII. Insisting that artificial birth control is the only way to keep “ families out of poverty and allowing women to lead lives of some independence and significance” seems disingenuous. People aren’t barnyard animals devoid of reason, and it is quite apparent that an anti-life culture (the USSR for example) is more than willing to profess putative “reproductive freedom” to more fully exploit women (and men) for its own purposes. I feel this great disappointment in your post, and I wonder if there is more to your dissatisfaction with your personal religious experience than the issues you cite. While you seem motivated by charitable feelings, the people you mention are not you. Their relationship with God and with the Church is not yours. Cutting yourself off from what seems to have been a source of life and hope seems ill-conceived and based more on intellectual, social and emotional matters than on spiritual discernment. I’m not a giant booster of the current edition of the Jesuits, but some of them are quite skilled at helping people work through such things. |
The issue with the woman caught in adultery was that she was going to be killed and so it wasn't a correct atonement not to mention who knows what those people did themselves. He didn't say adultery is ok. Just that stoning was a bit much for it. The issue with the temple was that he told them they needed to leave the church space. No one got killed. He merely didn't like that bad behavior was taking place on church ground and got angry at them. That seemed a suitable response to people knowingly behaving badly at a sacred space. Just go somewhere else. He didn't stop them. If Jesus can cleanse the outside of the temple, why can't other people want to cleanse the inside of the temple? |
In fact isn't that what Jesus and his followers did? Basically start a new religion? Mocking current jewish leaders as being corrupt? Why can't currrent christians do the same? |
Yes, I would. I didn't take this post to be a discussion or debate. It was merely a question whether people's parents had an effect on their decision to leave the church. Not a discussion about whether or not it was a good decision. So when someone poses why do you love your religion and you answer correctly about your own life, do you like it when people chime in to tell you how stupid that decision is that's yours and not theirs? The question didn't start out Why do you love your religion and think other people's decisions about religions are stupid or lets discuss the pros and cons about following religion. It's merely a question asking you about our own lives. This original post wasn't an invitation to debate. You just can't stand having people list why they left and don't want them to have free choice so you can't leave it alone. This post wasn't for you. |
You would do well listening to people and asking questions in order to understand more deeply where they’re coming from. Instead, you’re ready to pounce on people with Catechism in hand telling them how you think they should feel and think. It’s people like you, both in clerical and lay roles, driving other people out of the Church. |
I hunk very few people are “driven” from the Church except in a vehicle constructed of self-justification and blame projection. Folks are free to think and feel what they want. They shouldn’t misrepresent Church teaching when the cause of their separation is their refusal even to attempt to abide by it, because they’d rather do things they know they shouldn’t. |
Sadly, you know nothing. People are far more complex than you realize or want to accept, and the decision to leave the Church is often made after a lengthy and painful process. Life is not as black and white as you want it to be. |