No “people” are not saying that. WTU tanked the plan because they don’t want to go back, at all. And their supporters here agree- no school until the pandemic ends. |
I'm not "misrepresenting" any argument. I am not talking about or referring to the specific situation in DC at this moment, but to the longer term question of how long kids can reasonably be kept out of school because of this kind of pandemic (not only in DC, but in surrounding counties as well), which is what this thread is about. |
+1. It's disgusting that teachers are now trying to spin their actions as being in support of the most vulnerable students. You teachers f$%^ed it up for the vulnerable kids who had spots. Now they have nothing. You won. Just don't try to rewrite history and cast yourselves as the saviors. |
|
The principals were against the plan, too, because it did not serve the neediest well. And plenty parents were clearly against it.
But, sure, be hoodwinked by Bowser/Ferebee and blame it all on the WTU. |
I’m a parent that you are responding to - not a teacher. Just someone who is capable of more higher order thinking than you apparently |
Yes but you see, this is the problem. WTU does not want to go back under any circumstances. They are not willing to be creative, and at the end of the day, they can say all they want about "caring for the kids" but this is ALL on them. I suggest if you are a DCPS teacher and don't want to teach, get out of the profession. The sick out was the last straw for so many parents - you shredded whatever good will you all have left. |
| I’m a parent, and I sure trust my school’s teachers more the rabid “WTU is the devil!” posters. |
|
I'm fine with it because I'm moving all my kids to private in January. It took a lot of time to find spaces and my oldest is going to boarding school that's fully open but WTU can keep the schools closed forever as far as I'm concerned. Maybe then someone will notice how outdated our public school education is and we'll get vouchers which will help me with these private tuitions.
Go ahead, keep the schools closed. Make my day. |
I'm impressed by this argument. Truly impressed. You managed to string together SO MANY bad arguments into so few sentences! Like, just look at this list! 1. I knew someone who turned out okay with fewer years of schooling 80 years ago, ergo all students today will be fine. 2. Saying you care about at-risk students is evidence you don't care about at-risk students. 3. The achievement gap has always existed, and therefore we should not care whether it is increasing 4. Going back in person, won't fix the achievement gap, so we should just not do it. 5. We should do something else. I don't know what. But not this. I really have to hand it to you. That was a truly efficient way to make many bad arguments all at the same time. |
Ah, this is so true. These countries that have kept schools open ARE shutting down their countries to contain the spread, which is evidence that keeping the schools open was responsible. Not the the US where schools were the first thing to close and the last thing to open, and we have definitely managed to control the spread. Do you guys ever like...think about the things you're saying? |
Do you ever like....read the research and the evidence that shows what you are saying isn't true? |
Oh dear. That was sarcasm. I was restating the above person's clueless argument which seems to suggest that schools being open is a major driver of community spread. |
+1 Teachers are constantly suggesting that plans should be discarded if they are not perfect solutions to all educational problems, which is just another way of ensuring that no progress can be made. |
This! They're pointing at anything and everything and saying all of society's ills must be cured before they go back to work! |
Translation: "I've got mine, screw all others, especially if it helps me get even more!" Are you part of the Trump family? |