O.k. then he was a POOR guy who was taking his POOR daughter to the fair and supervising her. What is your point?
That now this working class family has a $10000++ bill on their hands when they were just out having fun. Sorry that needs to be explained to you.
He was a dad who cared enough to take his kid to the fair. That family's loss is overwhelming. My heart breaks for that kid no matter what their income level was.
I work for DJS. I would bet a lot of money - because I see it DAILY - they will be charged as adults, given some long sentencing term that's announced to the media, and then the judge will 'waive them down' to one of the DJS schools, and they'll only have to do 6-9 months. I work in one of the schools and it's DISGUSTING how many of our kids have been 'charged as an adult' but the judges waive them down to juvenile to serve.
Anonymous wrote:There's a video - it looks like there was some kind of confrontation. The teens knocked him and he quickly feel to the ground, probably hit his head very hard. It was short, not a prolonged attack. But awful, nevertheless.
For the life of me, I do not understand what compels people with the Y chromosome to do this sort of thing. Yes of course "not all men" but violence (random or otherwise) is an overwhelmingly male phenomenon. And it's a problem.
But you do understand why women drown their children or drive them strapped into a car into a lake. Because you're a woman.
Pregnancy hormones can be severe and can royally F with a woman's head.
What major life event do men experience, that's comparable? That they... just exist?
OK, if hormones are the excuse, men have testosterone, and not just a few times per lifetime as with pregnancy, but all the time after puberty. And believe me, testosterone really Fs with your head (see: teenagers, male, frequent misbehavior of). You could even call this crime a case in point!
Translation: Yes, just by existing and not going through a major hormonal health event, males are violent. Yeah... you're not really helping making the terrible point you're trying to make.
Women who kill their children do not all have postpartum psychosis. Plenty of them are just bad. Bad people. Whatever their hormones or chromosomes.
How many women just kill and randomly attack people without postpartum psychosis, compared to the men who just kill (and assault, and molest, and rape, etc) people because they're bad people... what's that ratio? How do those numbers stack up?
Men and women, we're all human. The problem isn't men, it's us.
These boys were raised by mothers, there was a girl behind the camera involved in this incident. This wasn't testosterone, it was people.
OMG so it's the girls/womens fault that men do this sort of thing??? Hahahahahahahahahahaha
That awful girl was egging those boys on. So, yep, she is also responsible for this!
She sounds like a horrible human being who should be charged with something, and who never deserves another happy day in her life. But- she didn't murder the guy. The teenage boy did. In the eyes of the law, the two crimes are not the same.
O.k.....that doesn't mean that she's innocent. She should be held accountable and charged accordingly.
Of course. She is awful. But- let's not forget who the actual murderer here is. The teenage MALES. As usual. You can try, but you can't ACTUALLY pin all of the blame on women for everything.
She is just as mentally warped as those boys are. I'm sorry you can't see that.
And I'm sorry you can't see that 1) watching a murder taking place and laughing, and 2) actually being the murderer, are different crimes in the eyes of the law.
They are both psychologically twisted. That is the point. The young woman who videotaped that murder and laughed about it is not right in the head.
Yes, she is mentally warped. No, she is not JUST AS mentally warped. Same reason why CONSUMING child porn on the computer, and RAPING A CHILD, carry different jail terms. It takes something even more awful in your brain to go that one step further, from enjoying watching a crime to COMMITTING the crime.
No, it is one in the same thing. The gang member that videotaped the rape and murder of a teenage girl at Accotink Lake was about the same mentality as the girl who taped this murder.
These are scary, messed up human beings.
Yes, they are scary. messed up human beings.
No, watching a crime is not the same as committing the crime. Maybe you think it should be, but it's not. No one is on death row for watching a murder. Plenty of people are on death row for being the one to commit the murder. And I agree with the PP that therein lies a main difference between males and females (SOMETIMES- obviously not ALWAYS so spare me the whataboutism)- the males murder, and the women watch and laugh. One is DEFINITELY WORSE, sorry
She wasn't a spectator, part of the audience. She was in the game too.
OMG she didn’t kill the dude. She is not just as responsible. Give it up.
Anonymous wrote:To me the question is -- is death an expected result of 'knocking someone out'?
Umm, yeah. It happens to professional and amateur boxer all the time.
First of all, very few people are knocked out by a single punch. And death is rarely the result, even during a boxing match that lasts 30 minutes.
Exactly. That's a pretty clear indication that this man must've had some underlying medical condition that contributed to his falling down after he was allegedly punched. And I'd say that they medical condition is at least as contributory, if not even more so, to him falling down as the punch might've been, if it's confirmed that the blow was even landed with any effect. And even if it was, people -normal healthy people- don't fall down unconscious after being hit ONE time. That's Hollywood stuff. Maybe a trained heavyweight boxer could knock a normal person out with one punch. Does that child look like a trained heavyweight boxer to you?
Because the simple reality is, he probably had a underlying medical condition, and he likely would've fallen down at some point anyway from this condition, and perhaps hit his head then too. And he still would've died from that.
But then we wouldn't have two black children to call murderers, and that's what this is really all about, right trumpers?
that's ... not how the law works. this argument would excuse all kinds of homicides on vulnerable people. once you intend to do serious bodily harm to someone, you're responsible for whatever results from that.
Anonymous wrote:There's a video - it looks like there was some kind of confrontation. The teens knocked him and he quickly feel to the ground, probably hit his head very hard. It was short, not a prolonged attack. But awful, nevertheless.
For the life of me, I do not understand what compels people with the Y chromosome to do this sort of thing. Yes of course "not all men" but violence (random or otherwise) is an overwhelmingly male phenomenon. And it's a problem.
But you do understand why women drown their children or drive them strapped into a car into a lake. Because you're a woman.
Pregnancy hormones can be severe and can royally F with a woman's head.
What major life event do men experience, that's comparable? That they... just exist?
OK, if hormones are the excuse, men have testosterone, and not just a few times per lifetime as with pregnancy, but all the time after puberty. And believe me, testosterone really Fs with your head (see: teenagers, male, frequent misbehavior of). You could even call this crime a case in point!
Translation: Yes, just by existing and not going through a major hormonal health event, males are violent. Yeah... you're not really helping making the terrible point you're trying to make.
Women who kill their children do not all have postpartum psychosis. Plenty of them are just bad. Bad people. Whatever their hormones or chromosomes.
How many women just kill and randomly attack people without postpartum psychosis, compared to the men who just kill (and assault, and molest, and rape, etc) people because they're bad people... what's that ratio? How do those numbers stack up?
Men and women, we're all human. The problem isn't men, it's us.
These boys were raised by mothers, there was a girl behind the camera involved in this incident. This wasn't testosterone, it was people.
OMG so it's the girls/womens fault that men do this sort of thing??? Hahahahahahahahahahaha
That awful girl was egging those boys on. So, yep, she is also responsible for this!
She sounds like a horrible human being who should be charged with something, and who never deserves another happy day in her life. But- she didn't murder the guy. The teenage boy did. In the eyes of the law, the two crimes are not the same.
O.k.....that doesn't mean that she's innocent. She should be held accountable and charged accordingly.
Of course. She is awful. But- let's not forget who the actual murderer here is. The teenage MALES. As usual. You can try, but you can't ACTUALLY pin all of the blame on women for everything.
She is just as mentally warped as those boys are. I'm sorry you can't see that.
And I'm sorry you can't see that 1) watching a murder taking place and laughing, and 2) actually being the murderer, are different crimes in the eyes of the law.
They are both psychologically twisted. That is the point. The young woman who videotaped that murder and laughed about it is not right in the head.
Yes, she is mentally warped. No, she is not JUST AS mentally warped. Same reason why CONSUMING child porn on the computer, and RAPING A CHILD, carry different jail terms. It takes something even more awful in your brain to go that one step further, from enjoying watching a crime to COMMITTING the crime.
No, it is one in the same thing. The gang member that videotaped the rape and murder of a teenage girl at Accotink Lake was about the same mentality as the girl who taped this murder.
These are scary, messed up human beings.
Yes, they are scary. messed up human beings.
No, watching a crime is not the same as committing the crime. Maybe you think it should be, but it's not. No one is on death row for watching a murder. Plenty of people are on death row for being the one to commit the murder. And I agree with the PP that therein lies a main difference between males and females (SOMETIMES- obviously not ALWAYS so spare me the whataboutism)- the males murder, and the women watch and laugh. One is DEFINITELY WORSE, sorry
She wasn't a spectator, part of the audience. She was in the game too.
OMG she didn’t kill the dude. She is not just as responsible. Give it up.
there have definitely been "aiding and abetting" cases on similar facts. encouragement can be aiding and abetting, and that could make her as liable as the principal. These facts may also uphold a conspiracy charge, where the same liability imputes to all the co-conspirators. She clearly appears to be a knowing participant in the plan to attack the victim.
Anonymous wrote:I work for DJS. I would bet a lot of money - because I see it DAILY - they will be charged as adults, given some long sentencing term that's announced to the media, and then the judge will 'waive them down' to one of the DJS schools, and they'll only have to do 6-9 months. I work in one of the schools and it's DISGUSTING how many of our kids have been 'charged as an adult' but the judges waive them down to juvenile to serve.
Oh, and I suppose these precious tots are then right back in the public school raising hell, scaring their teachers and other fun stuff.
Anonymous wrote:There's a video - it looks like there was some kind of confrontation. The teens knocked him and he quickly feel to the ground, probably hit his head very hard. It was short, not a prolonged attack. But awful, nevertheless.
For the life of me, I do not understand what compels people with the Y chromosome to do this sort of thing. Yes of course "not all men" but violence (random or otherwise) is an overwhelmingly male phenomenon. And it's a problem.
But you do understand why women drown their children or drive them strapped into a car into a lake. Because you're a woman.
Pregnancy hormones can be severe and can royally F with a woman's head.
What major life event do men experience, that's comparable? That they... just exist?
OK, if hormones are the excuse, men have testosterone, and not just a few times per lifetime as with pregnancy, but all the time after puberty. And believe me, testosterone really Fs with your head (see: teenagers, male, frequent misbehavior of). You could even call this crime a case in point!
Translation: Yes, just by existing and not going through a major hormonal health event, males are violent. Yeah... you're not really helping making the terrible point you're trying to make.
Women who kill their children do not all have postpartum psychosis. Plenty of them are just bad. Bad people. Whatever their hormones or chromosomes.
How many women just kill and randomly attack people without postpartum psychosis, compared to the men who just kill (and assault, and molest, and rape, etc) people because they're bad people... what's that ratio? How do those numbers stack up?
Men and women, we're all human. The problem isn't men, it's us.
These boys were raised by mothers, there was a girl behind the camera involved in this incident. This wasn't testosterone, it was people.
OMG so it's the girls/womens fault that men do this sort of thing??? Hahahahahahahahahahaha
That awful girl was egging those boys on. So, yep, she is also responsible for this!
She sounds like a horrible human being who should be charged with something, and who never deserves another happy day in her life. But- she didn't murder the guy. The teenage boy did. In the eyes of the law, the two crimes are not the same.
O.k.....that doesn't mean that she's innocent. She should be held accountable and charged accordingly.
Of course. She is awful. But- let's not forget who the actual murderer here is. The teenage MALES. As usual. You can try, but you can't ACTUALLY pin all of the blame on women for everything.
She is just as mentally warped as those boys are. I'm sorry you can't see that.
And I'm sorry you can't see that 1) watching a murder taking place and laughing, and 2) actually being the murderer, are different crimes in the eyes of the law.
They are both psychologically twisted. That is the point. The young woman who videotaped that murder and laughed about it is not right in the head.
Yes, she is mentally warped. No, she is not JUST AS mentally warped. Same reason why CONSUMING child porn on the computer, and RAPING A CHILD, carry different jail terms. It takes something even more awful in your brain to go that one step further, from enjoying watching a crime to COMMITTING the crime.
No, it is one in the same thing. The gang member that videotaped the rape and murder of a teenage girl at Accotink Lake was about the same mentality as the girl who taped this murder.
These are scary, messed up human beings.
Yes, they are scary. messed up human beings.
No, watching a crime is not the same as committing the crime. Maybe you think it should be, but it's not. No one is on death row for watching a murder. Plenty of people are on death row for being the one to commit the murder. And I agree with the PP that therein lies a main difference between males and females (SOMETIMES- obviously not ALWAYS so spare me the whataboutism)- the males murder, and the women watch and laugh. One is DEFINITELY WORSE, sorry
She wasn't a spectator, part of the audience. She was in the game too.
OMG she didn’t kill the dude. She is not just as responsible. Give it up.
there have definitely been "aiding and abetting" cases on similar facts. encouragement can be aiding and abetting, and that could make her as liable as the principal. These facts may also uphold a conspiracy charge, where the same liability imputes to all the co-conspirators. She clearly appears to be a knowing participant in the plan to attack the victim.
She's like the getaway driver in a bank robbery. If someone gets shot and killed in the process of a bank robbery, the person driving the getaway car has blood on their hands, too.
Anonymous wrote:There's a video - it looks like there was some kind of confrontation. The teens knocked him and he quickly feel to the ground, probably hit his head very hard. It was short, not a prolonged attack. But awful, nevertheless.
For the life of me, I do not understand what compels people with the Y chromosome to do this sort of thing. Yes of course "not all men" but violence (random or otherwise) is an overwhelmingly male phenomenon. And it's a problem.
But you do understand why women drown their children or drive them strapped into a car into a lake. Because you're a woman.
Pregnancy hormones can be severe and can royally F with a woman's head.
What major life event do men experience, that's comparable? That they... just exist?
OK, if hormones are the excuse, men have testosterone, and not just a few times per lifetime as with pregnancy, but all the time after puberty. And believe me, testosterone really Fs with your head (see: teenagers, male, frequent misbehavior of). You could even call this crime a case in point!
Translation: Yes, just by existing and not going through a major hormonal health event, males are violent. Yeah... you're not really helping making the terrible point you're trying to make.
Women who kill their children do not all have postpartum psychosis. Plenty of them are just bad. Bad people. Whatever their hormones or chromosomes.
How many women just kill and randomly attack people without postpartum psychosis, compared to the men who just kill (and assault, and molest, and rape, etc) people because they're bad people... what's that ratio? How do those numbers stack up?
Men and women, we're all human. The problem isn't men, it's us.
These boys were raised by mothers, there was a girl behind the camera involved in this incident. This wasn't testosterone, it was people.
OMG so it's the girls/womens fault that men do this sort of thing??? Hahahahahahahahahahaha
That awful girl was egging those boys on. So, yep, she is also responsible for this!
She sounds like a horrible human being who should be charged with something, and who never deserves another happy day in her life. But- she didn't murder the guy. The teenage boy did. In the eyes of the law, the two crimes are not the same.
O.k.....that doesn't mean that she's innocent. She should be held accountable and charged accordingly.
Of course. She is awful. But- let's not forget who the actual murderer here is. The teenage MALES. As usual. You can try, but you can't ACTUALLY pin all of the blame on women for everything.
She is just as mentally warped as those boys are. I'm sorry you can't see that.
And I'm sorry you can't see that 1) watching a murder taking place and laughing, and 2) actually being the murderer, are different crimes in the eyes of the law.
They are both psychologically twisted. That is the point. The young woman who videotaped that murder and laughed about it is not right in the head.
Yes, she is mentally warped. No, she is not JUST AS mentally warped. Same reason why CONSUMING child porn on the computer, and RAPING A CHILD, carry different jail terms. It takes something even more awful in your brain to go that one step further, from enjoying watching a crime to COMMITTING the crime.
No, it is one in the same thing. The gang member that videotaped the rape and murder of a teenage girl at Accotink Lake was about the same mentality as the girl who taped this murder.
These are scary, messed up human beings.
Yes, they are scary. messed up human beings.
No, watching a crime is not the same as committing the crime. Maybe you think it should be, but it's not. No one is on death row for watching a murder. Plenty of people are on death row for being the one to commit the murder. And I agree with the PP that therein lies a main difference between males and females (SOMETIMES- obviously not ALWAYS so spare me the whataboutism)- the males murder, and the women watch and laugh. One is DEFINITELY WORSE, sorry
She wasn't a spectator, part of the audience. She was in the game too.
OMG she didn’t kill the dude. She is not just as responsible. Give it up.
there have definitely been "aiding and abetting" cases on similar facts. encouragement can be aiding and abetting, and that could make her as liable as the principal. These facts may also uphold a conspiracy charge, where the same liability imputes to all the co-conspirators. She clearly appears to be a knowing participant in the plan to attack the victim.
She's like the getaway driver in a bank robbery. If someone gets shot and killed in the process of a bank robbery, the person driving the getaway car has blood on their hands, too.
If it can be shown that she was part of the plan to distract the victim, and then create cover for the aggressor to run away ... definitely.
Anonymous wrote:There's a video - it looks like there was some kind of confrontation. The teens knocked him and he quickly feel to the ground, probably hit his head very hard. It was short, not a prolonged attack. But awful, nevertheless.
For the life of me, I do not understand what compels people with the Y chromosome to do this sort of thing. Yes of course "not all men" but violence (random or otherwise) is an overwhelmingly male phenomenon. And it's a problem.
But you do understand why women drown their children or drive them strapped into a car into a lake. Because you're a woman.
Pregnancy hormones can be severe and can royally F with a woman's head.
What major life event do men experience, that's comparable? That they... just exist?
OK, if hormones are the excuse, men have testosterone, and not just a few times per lifetime as with pregnancy, but all the time after puberty. And believe me, testosterone really Fs with your head (see: teenagers, male, frequent misbehavior of). You could even call this crime a case in point!
Translation: Yes, just by existing and not going through a major hormonal health event, males are violent. Yeah... you're not really helping making the terrible point you're trying to make.
Women who kill their children do not all have postpartum psychosis. Plenty of them are just bad. Bad people. Whatever their hormones or chromosomes.
How many women just kill and randomly attack people without postpartum psychosis, compared to the men who just kill (and assault, and molest, and rape, etc) people because they're bad people... what's that ratio? How do those numbers stack up?
Men and women, we're all human. The problem isn't men, it's us.
These boys were raised by mothers, there was a girl behind the camera involved in this incident. This wasn't testosterone, it was people.
OMG so it's the girls/womens fault that men do this sort of thing??? Hahahahahahahahahahaha
That awful girl was egging those boys on. So, yep, she is also responsible for this!
She sounds like a horrible human being who should be charged with something, and who never deserves another happy day in her life. But- she didn't murder the guy. The teenage boy did. In the eyes of the law, the two crimes are not the same.
O.k.....that doesn't mean that she's innocent. She should be held accountable and charged accordingly.
Of course. She is awful. But- let's not forget who the actual murderer here is. The teenage MALES. As usual. You can try, but you can't ACTUALLY pin all of the blame on women for everything.
She is just as mentally warped as those boys are. I'm sorry you can't see that.
And I'm sorry you can't see that 1) watching a murder taking place and laughing, and 2) actually being the murderer, are different crimes in the eyes of the law.
They are both psychologically twisted. That is the point. The young woman who videotaped that murder and laughed about it is not right in the head.
Yes, she is mentally warped. No, she is not JUST AS mentally warped. Same reason why CONSUMING child porn on the computer, and RAPING A CHILD, carry different jail terms. It takes something even more awful in your brain to go that one step further, from enjoying watching a crime to COMMITTING the crime.
No, it is one in the same thing. The gang member that videotaped the rape and murder of a teenage girl at Accotink Lake was about the same mentality as the girl who taped this murder.
These are scary, messed up human beings.
Yes, they are scary. messed up human beings.
No, watching a crime is not the same as committing the crime. Maybe you think it should be, but it's not. No one is on death row for watching a murder. Plenty of people are on death row for being the one to commit the murder. And I agree with the PP that therein lies a main difference between males and females (SOMETIMES- obviously not ALWAYS so spare me the whataboutism)- the males murder, and the women watch and laugh. One is DEFINITELY WORSE, sorry
She wasn't a spectator, part of the audience. She was in the game too.
OMG she didn’t kill the dude. She is not just as responsible. Give it up.
there have definitely been "aiding and abetting" cases on similar facts. encouragement can be aiding and abetting, and that could make her as liable as the principal. These facts may also uphold a conspiracy charge, where the same liability imputes to all the co-conspirators. She clearly appears to be a knowing participant in the plan to attack the victim.
She's like the getaway driver in a bank robbery. If someone gets shot and killed in the process of a bank robbery, the person driving the getaway car has blood on their hands, too.
If it can be shown that she was part of the plan to distract the victim, and then create cover for the aggressor to run away ... definitely.
They were doing this to impress an audience. This girl laughed and videotaped the attack. She was a part of it.
Can you two PLEASE stop replyling to that thread, or else highlight it and delete everything but the most recent? You are making this impossibly to read and just OBNOXIOUS