I always thought the law was what mattered. If cops ask for information or ask me to submit in someway, that violates my rights, why should I comply. They should know the law and not distort it to force/intimidate me to give up my rights. |
I'm glad you felt better reading my post, but I don't deserve your thanks. I am a coward. I'm not alone in this, but there it is. I support the BLM movement. I support civil rights. I am vehemently against guns. But I have never attended a rally or protest and it's unlikely I ever will. To be honest, I'm afraid to. I'm afraid of being violently arrested or shot or a bomb going off because some asshole of whatever race or religion has a grievance or mental health issues, plus a weapon, and sees a bunch of easy targets. I might have gone to a rally in my young student days, but now I'm 35 with a husband and a young child and parents to support and I can't see myself doing it. I'm doubly ashamed because I am Jewish and I think, well, what would I have done if I were a gentile during WWII? Would I have put my life on the line to save Jews or would I have looked the other way so as not to jeopardize my life or my family's life? What would I have done if I had been an adult during the 60s in this country? And I can't say with any assurance that I would have done anything. I will vote, I will petition, I will give money to causes I support ... but I'm not out there on the front lines. And I know I have the luxury of choosing not to be. |
PP here - you're right, it's the officer's sworn duty to use his/her authority responsibly and ethically but you don't know when you are being pulled over if the cop you encounter is one of those who is willing or able to do that. If you've got a good cop, cooperating will likely end well for you. If you have a bad cop who is a psychopath with a badge, you still have a better chance for survival if you follow these rules because you aren't antagonizing him/her and challenging his narcissistic ego. If you get a good cop having a really bad day, again, cooperatimg will increase your chances for a positive outcome. If you are confrontational, uncooperative, have an attitude (justified or not) and make his or her job harder, it is illogical to think you have an increased chance for a positive outcome for you. When you are pulled over, it's all about you getting through the encounter. After that, regarding the bigger societal picture, if you want to be heard and respond to bad police behavior and injustice, get through the encounter with the least resistance, then take your story to social media. In the meantime, your good behavior and higher ground is the safest behavior for you and also has the power to potentially erode the bias that that cop brings to his encounter with you. If enough stereotypes are shattered by enough people, there will be fewer reasons for people to protest, shoot and riot. |
Thank you anyway. Money and voting are a lot. Protests are just one facet. Your thoughts remind me of what Hannah Arendt meant when she wrote about the banality of evil. Don't misunderstand me. You are not evil. But people think evil things persist because of evil people. They don't. Being silent and self-interested is most of it. I also wonder what I would have done as a German in the Nazi era. I am not confident I would have stood up for Jews. Let's not minimize how complex and difficult the struggle against entrenched power dynamics is. I consider you an ally. |
No, it's take responsibility for your behavior. That's a big part of the mind set of the AA community today. |
Ugh. Fine. I had an attitude and I got shot. There, I suffered the consequences of my action. Now what about the cop? He shot me because he freaked out at my wild black attitude, not because I was actually pointing a gun at him or immediately threatening his life. I would like him to take responsibility for his action. And go to jail, at least for reckless homicide or voluntary manslaughter. Thank you very much. |
I completely agree, and I know I am not evil. But I am aware of the concept of the banality of evil and of complicity by failure to object. I think when people think of evil or racism they think of Hitler or George Wallace. But really a lot of it is unconscious or ignorance or just standing by silently or averting one's gaze. I consider myself an ally too. I just feel very discouraged, which I'm sure pales beside how you feel. I thought your earlier remark about talking to other whites was interesting because race issues are not something that really come up in my conversation with people of any race. I wouldn't be averse to talking about such issues but I don't bring them up, any more than I talk about religion or politics. I saw a huge Trump sign the other day in my neighborhood (a liberal MD neighborhood). I can't stand Trump or the things he says but it would never occur to me to say anything to the homeowner about it. If I saw a Confederate flag I would be disgusted but again, I wouldn't say anything unless the person tried to put it on my yard or give it to me. Do you discuss race issues a lot with non-African Americans? Do you initiate those conversations or do people bring it up to you?
|
Don't forget 70 year old Ike Leggett of MOCO. Officer came up to his car very aggressively and belligerent. Yelling at the man. He stopped when the backup police officer told him who Leggett was. Imagine what would or could have happened if partner did not recognize the leader of MOCO politics. |
Well, like you, I'm 35 with a kid so I'm not hanging around in coffee shops much or talking with random people. I sometimes bring it up in the vein of -- crazy week of news, huh? But I only really "hang out" on with other moms with kids and it's a little awkward to have super serious conversations and then go need to stop a kid from eating something weird. People always talk about going home to Thanksgiving and dealing with a racist uncle or some such thing so maybe that's when people generally have these types of conversations? I don't know. I post on Facebook. But perhaps my 500 or so friends are really liberal because I rarely see a racist post I want to make an issue of. One "friend" did post something supportive of Trump's Muslim ban and I, gently, gave her a piece of my mind. |
White fellow human being here. Some of us do get it, to the extent that someone without those experiences and personal history can. Watching documentaries about Civil Rights, I notice the whites defending the status quo of Jim Crow (and worse). Some of them were teenagers at that time, so roughly my parents' age. Those people are still largely alive. They walk among us. Some of them have changed their minds, evolved, learned - and some of them are still the knuckle draggers they were back then, asking why black people don't solve every problem in their community first before tackling the disparate numbers of killings of unarmed/functionally unarmed ("I have a conceal permit. I am reaching for my ID."). |
|
Thank you anyway. Money and voting are a lot. Protests are just one facet. Your thoughts remind me of what Hannah Arendt meant when she wrote about the banality of evil. Don't misunderstand me. You are not evil. But people think evil things persist because of evil people. They don't. Being silent and self-interested is most of it. I also wonder what I would have done as a German in the Nazi era. I am not confident I would have stood up for Jews. Let's not minimize how complex and difficult the struggle against entrenched power dynamics is. I consider you an ally.
I completely agree, and I know I am not evil. But I am aware of the concept of the banality of evil and of complicity by failure to object. I think when people think of evil or racism they think of Hitler or George Wallace. But really a lot of it is unconscious or ignorance or just standing by silently or averting one's gaze. I consider myself an ally too. I just feel very discouraged, which I'm sure pales beside how you feel. I thought your earlier remark about talking to other whites was interesting because race issues are not something that really come up in my conversation with people of any race. I wouldn't be averse to talking about such issues but I don't bring them up, any more than I talk about religion or politics. I saw a huge Trump sign the other day in my neighborhood (a liberal MD neighborhood). I can't stand Trump or the things he says but it would never occur to me to say anything to the homeowner about it. If I saw a Confederate flag I would be disgusted but again, I wouldn't say anything unless the person tried to put it on my yard or give it to me. Do you discuss race issues a lot with non-African Americans? Do you initiate those conversations or do people bring it up to you?
Well, like you, I'm 35 with a kid so I'm not hanging around in coffee shops much or talking with random people. I sometimes bring it up in the vein of -- crazy week of news, huh? But I only really "hang out" on with other moms with kids and it's a little awkward to have super serious conversations and then go need to stop a kid from eating something weird. People always talk about going home to Thanksgiving and dealing with a racist uncle or some such thing so maybe that's when people generally have these types of conversations? I don't know. I post on Facebook. But perhaps my 500 or so friends are really liberal because I rarely see a racist post I want to make an issue of. One "friend" did post something supportive of Trump's Muslim ban and I, gently, gave her a piece of my mind. That's pretty much in line with my experience. I don't really do Facebook so I don't have that angle. I don't really have the racist uncle in my family. My 90 year old grandparents are quite anti-Muslim but of the NIMBY variety. As in, they don't want a mosque in their neighborhood, and they talk about being afraid to wear symbols of their Jewish identity in Muslim areas, but they don't think Muslims should be put on a list or excluded from the country. In fact they get quite upset over such ideas because it hearkens back to WWII. We've had discussions about the NIMBY stuff, which bothers me, but honestly they are 90 and they vote Democrat and they're not going to be out doing anti-anything. |
"They call us 'agitators.' You know what an agitator is, don't you? It's that thing in the washing machine that gets out the dirt. That's what we're doing, we're getting out the dirt." --Thurgood Marshall |
FYI, anyone can be an agitator regardless of your skin colour. |
|
I just want to say I love the back and forth between an AA and Jewish PP. We need more of these dialogues--in spaces like this, but also in person. This thread and others like it tend to bring out some views that are not very tolerant or looking for a greater understanding, but then these last few exchanges give me hope.
Oh, and love the Thurgood Marshall quote! |
Why? Because failing to do so could get you charged with obstruction, resisting, or a number of other things. Because the proper place to argue/assert your rights is not with the police, but with the courts. The police merely enforce the law as they understand it and/or have been instructed to enforce it. you certainly don't have an obligation to volunteer information to police officers (except for basic identification in most cases), but you are in most cases legally obligated to comply with an officer's instructions. If you believe that you've been unjustly accused or that your rights are being violated, you address that issue with the courts, whose job is to make such determinations. I never have and never will argue with a police officer about anything--it's pointless, counterproductive and possibly dangerous. "Yes, sir" is my mantra. |