I think they get away with it by keeping it all a secret. The parents of the bad kids complain about their privacy and threaten legal action if the teacher talks to the other parents about what’s really happening in the classrooms. It’s just like what happened during Covid - if parents could truly see how bad things are, they’d care and things would change. But during Covid the parents could only get a glimpse of the low academic standards and poor quality of instruction - they didn’t get to see how some kids terrorize other kids in the classrooms. |
They shouldn't, but schools don't want to spend the necessary amount of money on special education programs to deal with it. It's much cheaper to send kids to a gen ed classroom with minimal supports than to send them to a specialized program with the resources to handle those behaviors. They don't even want to bring more paraeducators to the classrooms, which would often be much cheaper. |
|
It’s not the teachers. It is the school’s admin. Gatekeepers to accessing appropriate placements for students.
School systems have also reduced placement opportunities (specialized separate schools and tailored prgms) in favor of the cheaper “home school model.” This benefits no one. No one. We need smaller localized school districts where you know all of your BOE members & importantly, THEIR kids attend school WITH YOUR kids in the same school, experiencing the same things first hand. Only then when there are shared experiences will there be meaningful change. If I had it to do all over, I’d never raise a family here in these mega school districts. |
School admin isn't the gatekeeper. Capacity is. You can't place students in special programs when those special programs don't have seats. You could increase the size of the programs, but that's significantly more expensive than the home school model. |
|
Not the teachers, but school administration. Schools should have a room turned into a cell. Poor behaving kids placed inside, paddy-wagon comes by and picks them up and off to juvenile detention.
Oh wait that’s not equitable, never mind. |
Spoken like someone who has never lived in a small district where they know the BOE. Where THEIR kids can beat the crap out of YOUR kid on a daily basis, but nothing will happen because they run the town. It's just choosing nepotism over bureaucracy. Also, the BOE has zero to do with this. These placements are handled by principals in the counties, with no involvement from anyone else. |
I just want to point out that that is completely false. This fact is commonly thrown around, mostly by conservatives, but it's not true. The US spend per student is around 5th or 6th in the world, but about the same as the other top 20 countries in spending. In fact, of just developed countries, the US is close to average in spending on education. Moreover, even that is not a fair comparison, because the US provides more services than those countries. Big expenditures that many of those other countries don't have include bussing, for example. We also provide significant special education services - something many other developed countries don't provide at all. We also provide food for children who have food insufficiency (35% of American households), whereas most of those other countries have less than half that in terms of the number of children who actually don't have enough to eat. So the US is not really spending more money on kids' education than others in real dollars. It's attempting to take care of problems like mental health and food insecurity through the school system rather than address those things head on, and it is otherwise spending about the same or less as other developed nations. What can't be argued is that our educational outcomes are worse than that of similar countries. Perhaps if we didn't have so many children living in poverty we'd do better. Or maybe if we paid teachers like professionals? Lots of possibilities. |
Yes, that certainly sounds like a thoughtful plan and helpful rhetoric. It's incredible there isn't more trust, confidence, and support for reform with great ideas like that getting flung around. |
Please read the post of this kind of mom^^ - from the locked thread linked to below. Anonymous wrote: OP’s kid is a snitch. Give me a chair thrower any day. As it happens one of ours was very intense in pre-K and ES. No chair throwing necessarily, but he had a lot of challenges, outbursts, and beat the hell out of a few kids over the years. (Normal ES fights, no permanent damage… for those of you scandalized by a little boys being boys.) Anyway, we’re very rich, and dedicated, got him all the right doctors and meds and therapists (took a ton of effort). And now he’s absolutely THRIVING… has always been 99th percentile academically and is now harnessing that even more, he’s well-liked, happy, works hard, has a lot of friends. Top of his class and has a great life ahead of him. The point? Reducing a 6 or 7 year old child to “a chair thrower” is a pathetic, weak ass, limp noodle, bullying tactic… suggests to me a parent with no integrity, likely just looking for space to feel better about the mediocre bag of milk you’ve raised. https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/735/1154228.page Many parents with significant means - not just parents in hardscrabble circumstances - truly in their hearts do not give a fk on any level about the damage their kids do to other kids. They are sociopaths raising sociopaths, and different laws like IDEA preclude schools from setting consequences that can be construed as penalizing kids who attack and ‘beat the hell out of’ others. I’m in a similar economic stratum and I see this all the time. People with all the power in the world - according to them! - who twist words and life beyond coherence, where parents objecting to things that hurt their kids are ‘bullying’ abusive kids and their selfish parents. Parents of violent kids do not see themselves as living in a community, at all. They have no concerns for the victims of their kids, including the teachers. It is what it is. |
There are no powerful teachers unions. They barely have unions. |
OK, but with that attitude, you must realize you're going to pick up a lot of enemies and detractors. And that that will ultimately limit your ability to successfully lobby for change. |
Corrupt parents and administrators g could be the answer. $$$ in exchange of special treatment. Disgusting |
How cinematic, concerned mamabear. I’m not worried about ‘enemies,’ I’m worried about kids who are, to keep this on topic, horribly behaved per the OP, impacted kids who are appropriately mainstreamed with GenEd and who have parents who actually parent. Why don’t you work on that and give your monitoring of these threads a little break, sweetheart? Kids with SN is that way. |
The weird thing is that we should have the same goal- making things better for all students. But you're obviously more interested in hurting kids with special needs. And your hatred of them has blinded you from looking at anything else. |
Oh gosh. That IS weird! It is absolutely the primary goal, to harm poor Mason and violate his IEP, is that what you think I wrote? Would you mind directly quoting that? The issue at hand is how to deal with instances of physical violence and sustained periods of interruption to classroom instruction for the majority - how to keep parents aware, how to support teachers, and how to support learning for all. I’ve become interested and invested after my child’s inclusion room was tasked with integrating a child who has repeated grades and lives a portion of his young life in the principals office because he physically attacks students, and there is no ISS. Neither I nor anyone else to my knowledge has inquired about any SNs or asserted that those are our right to know — so what in the actual fk are you on about, lady? When I’ve searched for this topic on DCUM your responses come up over years. This is how you support your child? By insisting that other parents are at fault? How telling. |