Girl Raped at Rockville HS

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What's the maximum punishment scar face and his rapist friend are looking at? One assumes they'll both be tried as adults--because one clearly is, but the 17 year old maybe not?

Life in prison is max sentence in MD for these crimes.

[Anonymous]

The 17 YO defendant has now dispensed with his public defender and hired a high-profile criminal attorney.

Wonder how they are paying for this.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The 17 YO defendant has now dispensed with his public defender and hired a high-profile criminal attorney.

Wonder how they are paying for this.

Who is his attorney? Same firm as Jezic?

(as an aside, my autocorrect keeps changing Jezic to Jesus. Maybe that anti-Christian poster is right).

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The 17 YO defendant has now dispensed with his public defender and hired a high-profile criminal attorney.

Wonder how they are paying for this.

Who is his attorney? Same firm as Jezic?

(as an aside, my autocorrect keeps changing Jezic to Jesus. Maybe that anti-Christian poster is right).

I don’t think so. Just saw a story about it. Didn’t catch the attorney’s name. I’ll do a search and see if I can find it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The 17 YO defendant has now dispensed with his public defender and hired a high-profile criminal attorney.

Wonder how they are paying for this.

At this point I think it's pretty obvious both attorneys are being paid by pro illegal immigration advocacy groups.

In the interview I just saw, the attorney was complaining that the public focus of the case is the immigration status of the accused.

Connect the dots.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The 17 YO defendant has now dispensed with his public defender and hired a high-profile criminal attorney.

Wonder how they are paying for this.

At this point I think it's pretty obvious both attorneys are being paid by pro illegal immigration advocacy groups.

In the interview I just saw, the attorney was complaining that the public focus of the case is the immigration status of the accused.

Connect the dots.

PP here.
Yep. My question was more rhetorical than inquisitive.
Hope the money is as well spent as that of the Clinton campaign.

[Anonymous]

They BOTH have private counsel?

Conviction in these cases is VERY difficult to achieve. Many jurisdictions avoid bringing non-stranger cases. Do NOT assume a slam dunk conviction - a plea bargain downwards is typical.

MD is NOT paying for private counsel, to correct a prior poster. A public defender had been provided for one.

[Anonymous]

The lawyer's round of local media may help create conditions for moving the trial.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The lawyer's round of local media may help create conditions for moving the trial.

Change of venue to Baltimore city or county or PG is almost guaranteed at this point. The rest of the counties in MD except maybe also Howard and AA are too conservative for the defense.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:They BOTH have private counsel?

Conviction in these cases is VERY difficult to achieve. Many jurisdictions avoid bringing non-stranger cases. Do NOT assume a slam dunk conviction - a plea bargain downwards is typical.

MD is NOT paying for private counsel, to correct a prior poster. A public defender had been provided for one.

The father supposedly paying for the private lawyer... what does he do for a living?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They BOTH have private counsel?

Conviction in these cases is VERY difficult to achieve. Many jurisdictions avoid bringing non-stranger cases. Do NOT assume a slam dunk conviction - a plea bargain downwards is typical.

MD is NOT paying for private counsel, to correct a prior poster. A public defender had been provided for one.

The father supposedly paying for the private lawyer... what does he do for a living? Not true. In an interview with Tucker Carlson, the firm representing would NOT say who was paying them. He said the father retained him, but when asked if the father was paying, the attorney refused to answer.

[Anonymous]

School administration is hiding other incidents from parents

[Anonymous]

Now on FOX News....

[Anonymous]

Here is the interview with the attorneys hired by the family of Jose Montano, the 17 year old accused rapist.

http://www.foxnews.com/on-air/first-100-days/index.html#/v/5372032730001

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They BOTH have private counsel?

Conviction in these cases is VERY difficult to achieve. Many jurisdictions avoid bringing non-stranger cases. Do NOT assume a slam dunk conviction - a plea bargain downwards is typical.

MD is NOT paying for private counsel, to correct a prior poster. A public defender had been provided for one.

The father supposedly paying for the private lawyer... what does he do for a living? Not true. In an interview with Tucker Carlson, the firm representing would NOT say who was paying them. He said the father retained him, but when asked if the father was paying, the attorney refused to answer.

Thank you. How hard is it to find out what the father does for a living? Just curious.