US blows up boat said to be carrying drugs

[Anonymous]

If there are no repercussions for America then I am fine with it. Maybe a bad guy or two died! I’ll take my chances

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Did Trump have concrete, 100% proof that this boat was smuggling drugs?

It's amazing how US citizens just believe everything they hear and are OK with killings when it's done to foreigners.

This. I guess everyone is okay with summary executions and war crimes now. It starts with brown people. Eventually they will come for you too.

Drug smuggling is bad. NArcoterrorism is bad. Pretty sure blowing up ships from sovereign countries and imposing the death penalty on them is also pretty, pretty bad.

Democrats don’t like it. Most sane people are fine with it.

Magas are such concrete thinkers. We killed bad guys (which do we have proof? How has proof been established these were drug lords?), therefore ok. Who cares about the means to the end, right? Silly Democrats. Insisting people follow due process, abide by laws. You know what I don’t get though? We use all these resources to blow a ship up that far away, but then cut deals the Mexican cartel peeps by giving them refuse in the US. Or Trump pardoning the Silk Road dude. Do those drug dealers don’t count? How do your little MAGA brains explain away all the inconsistencies?

Don't keep throwing up vague due process and abide by laws claims. The law has been meticuously followed.

You don't know how to attack it, so you keep giving vague catch phrases. The cartels have been designated as a terrorist group. So FAFO.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Did Trump have concrete, 100% proof that this boat was smuggling drugs?

It's amazing how US citizens just believe everything they hear and are OK with killings when it's done to foreigners.

This. I guess everyone is okay with summary executions and war crimes now. It starts with brown people. Eventually they will come for you too.

Drug smuggling is bad. NArcoterrorism is bad. Pretty sure blowing up ships from sovereign countries and imposing the death penalty on them is also pretty, pretty bad.

Democrats don’t like it. Most sane people are fine with it.

Magas are such concrete thinkers. We killed bad guys (which do we have proof? How has proof been established these were drug lords?), therefore ok. Who cares about the means to the end, right? Silly Democrats. Insisting people follow due process, abide by laws. You know what I don’t get though? We use all these resources to blow a ship up that far away, but then cut deals the Mexican cartel peeps by giving them refuse in the US. Or Trump pardoning the Silk Road dude. Do those drug dealers don’t count? How do your little MAGA brains explain away all the inconsistencies?

Don't keep throwing up vague due process and abide by laws claims. The law has been meticuously followed.

You don't know how to attack it, so you keep giving vague catch phrases. The cartels have been designated as a terrorist group. So FAFO.

Couldn’t address the part about the inconsistencies? Let’s say your boy Trump’s goal is to tackle the people bringing drugs into the US. Why the aforementioned inconsistencies?
And yes, I would love for you to teach me about how the law was so meticulously followed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Did Trump have concrete, 100% proof that this boat was smuggling drugs?

It's amazing how US citizens just believe everything they hear and are OK with killings when it's done to foreigners.

This. I guess everyone is okay with summary executions and war crimes now. It starts with brown people. Eventually they will come for you too.

Drug smuggling is bad. NArcoterrorism is bad. Pretty sure blowing up ships from sovereign countries and imposing the death penalty on them is also pretty, pretty bad.

Democrats don’t like it. Most sane people are fine with it.

Magas are such concrete thinkers. We killed bad guys (which do we have proof? How has proof been established these were drug lords?), therefore ok. Who cares about the means to the end, right? Silly Democrats. Insisting people follow due process, abide by laws. You know what I don’t get though? We use all these resources to blow a ship up that far away, but then cut deals the Mexican cartel peeps by giving them refuse in the US. Or Trump pardoning the Silk Road dude. Do those drug dealers don’t count? How do your little MAGA brains explain away all the inconsistencies?

Don't keep throwing up vague due process and abide by laws claims. The law has been meticuously followed.

You don't know how to attack it, so you keep giving vague catch phrases. The cartels have been designated as a terrorist group. So FAFO.

Couldn’t address the part about the inconsistencies? Let’s say your boy Trump’s goal is to tackle the people bringing drugs into the US. Why the aforementioned inconsistencies?
And yes, I would love for you to teach me about how the law was so meticulously followed.

DP. How about you prove that it wasn't before making accusations? Numerous countries have struck terrorist organizations in international waters. This is no different.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Did Trump have concrete, 100% proof that this boat was smuggling drugs?

It's amazing how US citizens just believe everything they hear and are OK with killings when it's done to foreigners.

This. I guess everyone is okay with summary executions and war crimes now. It starts with brown people. Eventually they will come for you too.

Drug smuggling is bad. NArcoterrorism is bad. Pretty sure blowing up ships from sovereign countries and imposing the death penalty on them is also pretty, pretty bad.

Democrats don’t like it. Most sane people are fine with it.

Magas are such concrete thinkers. We killed bad guys (which do we have proof? How has proof been established these were drug lords?), therefore ok. Who cares about the means to the end, right? Silly Democrats. Insisting people follow due process, abide by laws. You know what I don’t get though? We use all these resources to blow a ship up that far away, but then cut deals the Mexican cartel peeps by giving them refuse in the US. Or Trump pardoning the Silk Road dude. Do those drug dealers don’t count? How do your little MAGA brains explain away all the inconsistencies?

That would involve Sources and Methods. Why would I have access to that? Do you have a Need to Know?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Did Trump have concrete, 100% proof that this boat was smuggling drugs?

It's amazing how US citizens just believe everything they hear and are OK with killings when it's done to foreigners.

This. I guess everyone is okay with summary executions and war crimes now. It starts with brown people. Eventually they will come for you too.

Drug smuggling is bad. NArcoterrorism is bad. Pretty sure blowing up ships from sovereign countries and imposing the death penalty on them is also pretty, pretty bad.

Democrats don’t like it. Most sane people are fine with it.

No sane person is ok with murder 11 innocent people.

Citation where they were innocent people? I haven't seen anything to that effect in the media. Lots of speculation, but the circumstantial evidence indicates there were not so innocent. This occurred in international waters, so no U.S. Constitutional rights attached. Venezuela is free to lodge a protest to the UN if it wishes to do so.

So you just assume people in a boat are guilty?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Did Trump have concrete, 100% proof that this boat was smuggling drugs?

It's amazing how US citizens just believe everything they hear and are OK with killings when it's done to foreigners.

This. I guess everyone is okay with summary executions and war crimes now. It starts with brown people. Eventually they will come for you too.

Drug smuggling is bad. NArcoterrorism is bad. Pretty sure blowing up ships from sovereign countries and imposing the death penalty on them is also pretty, pretty bad.

Democrats don’t like it. Most sane people are fine with it.

Magas are such concrete thinkers. We killed bad guys (which do we have proof? How has proof been established these were drug lords?), therefore ok. Who cares about the means to the end, right? Silly Democrats. Insisting people follow due process, abide by laws. You know what I don’t get though? We use all these resources to blow a ship up that far away, but then cut deals the Mexican cartel peeps by giving them refuse in the US. Or Trump pardoning the Silk Road dude. Do those drug dealers don’t count? How do your little MAGA brains explain away all the inconsistencies?

Don't keep throwing up vague due process and abide by laws claims. The law has been meticuously followed.

You don't know how to attack it, so you keep giving vague catch phrases. The cartels have been designated as a terrorist group. So FAFO.

Couldn’t address the part about the inconsistencies? Let’s say your boy Trump’s goal is to tackle the people bringing drugs into the US. Why the aforementioned inconsistencies?
And yes, I would love for you to teach me about how the law was so meticulously followed.

DP. How about you prove that it wasn't before making accusations? Numerous countries have struck terrorist organizations in international waters. This is no different.

We have to first scrutinize the law that empowers the head of State to make these designations with the flimsiest of justifications. At this point, state sponsor and FTO designations are driven entirely by lobbying groups and not by reason.

[Anonymous]

Whoa

[Anonymous]

Unbelievably based. We should absolutely be droning the crap out of ships, trucks, carrying drugs. Trump should have mentioned this in his campaign. It's probably quite a popular approach.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Did Trump have concrete, 100% proof that this boat was smuggling drugs?

It's amazing how US citizens just believe everything they hear and are OK with killings when it's done to foreigners.

This. I guess everyone is okay with summary executions and war crimes now. It starts with brown people. Eventually they will come for you too.

Drug smuggling is bad. NArcoterrorism is bad. Pretty sure blowing up ships from sovereign countries and imposing the death penalty on them is also pretty, pretty bad.

Democrats don’t like it. Most sane people are fine with it.

Magas are such concrete thinkers. We killed bad guys (which do we have proof? How has proof been established these were drug lords?), therefore ok. Who cares about the means to the end, right? Silly Democrats. Insisting people follow due process, abide by laws. You know what I don’t get though? We use all these resources to blow a ship up that far away, but then cut deals the Mexican cartel peeps by giving them refuse in the US. Or Trump pardoning the Silk Road dude. Do those drug dealers don’t count? How do your little MAGA brains explain away all the inconsistencies?

Don't keep throwing up vague due process and abide by laws claims. The law has been meticuously followed.

You don't know how to attack it, so you keep giving vague catch phrases. The cartels have been designated as a terrorist group. So FAFO.

Couldn’t address the part about the inconsistencies? Let’s say your boy Trump’s goal is to tackle the people bringing drugs into the US. Why the aforementioned inconsistencies?
And yes, I would love for you to teach me about how the law was so meticulously followed.

It's a warning. Don't f'n do it or you will die. This was done very publicly.

F you democrats running it up 700 layers of bureaucracy to slow the solution down.

A Federal District Judge says _______________________________________________ .

F your Federal District Judges. International waters. Vesting clause. Done.

Where is there any evidence that they were terrorists?

Where is there any evidence that they were cartel members?

Where is there any evidence that they were drug runners?

Where is there any evidence that they were human traffickers?

REAL evidence, not "bcuz Trump sez so?"

Unless you can answer that you have absolutely NOTHING to say about "the law was followed."

In this magical world of yours, what's to stop people from shooting MAGAs in the head and saying "they were criminals and the law was followed?"

This is none. It was murder. What is the statue of limitation on murder? The drunk should be worried.

Tren de Aragua is a terrorist group. This is no different from when we droned ISIS. And it's actually more justified because the drugs were en route to the US.

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Trump has a history of killing innocent boaters.

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/trump-reported-violent-failed-seal-team-6-mission/story?id=125300720

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Unbelievably based. We should absolutely be droning the crap out of ships, trucks, carrying drugs. Trump should have mentioned this in his campaign. It's probably quite a popular approach.

We should drone the crap out of child trafficking rings based on Epstein Island.

We should drone the crap out of health insurance CEO fraudsters who are killing people and very day.

We should drone the crap you invaded the Capitol to overthrow an election, and their co-conspirators

[Anonymous]

Si, there's no evidence these were supposed drug running cartel terrorists. They just blew some random boat up.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Did Trump have concrete, 100% proof that this boat was smuggling drugs?

It's amazing how US citizens just believe everything they hear and are OK with killings when it's done to foreigners.

This. I guess everyone is okay with summary executions and war crimes now. It starts with brown people. Eventually they will come for you too.

Drug smuggling is bad. NArcoterrorism is bad. Pretty sure blowing up ships from sovereign countries and imposing the death penalty on them is also pretty, pretty bad.

Democrats don’t like it. Most sane people are fine with it.

Magas are such concrete thinkers. We killed bad guys (which do we have proof? How has proof been established these were drug lords?), therefore ok. Who cares about the means to the end, right? Silly Democrats. Insisting people follow due process, abide by laws. You know what I don’t get though? We use all these resources to blow a ship up that far away, but then cut deals the Mexican cartel peeps by giving them refuse in the US. Or Trump pardoning the Silk Road dude. Do those drug dealers don’t count? How do your little MAGA brains explain away all the inconsistencies?

Don't keep throwing up vague due process and abide by laws claims. The law has been meticuously followed.

You don't know how to attack it, so you keep giving vague catch phrases. The cartels have been designated as a terrorist group. So FAFO.

Couldn’t address the part about the inconsistencies? Let’s say your boy Trump’s goal is to tackle the people bringing drugs into the US. Why the aforementioned inconsistencies?
And yes, I would love for you to teach me about how the law was so meticulously followed.

It's a warning. Don't f'n do it or you will die. This was done very publicly.

F you democrats running it up 700 layers of bureaucracy to slow the solution down.

A Federal District Judge says _______________________________________________ .

F your Federal District Judges. International waters. Vesting clause. Done.

Where is there any evidence that they were terrorists?

Where is there any evidence that they were cartel members?

Where is there any evidence that they were drug runners?

Where is there any evidence that they were human traffickers?

REAL evidence, not "bcuz Trump sez so?"

Unless you can answer that you have absolutely NOTHING to say about "the law was followed."

In this magical world of yours, what's to stop people from shooting MAGAs in the head and saying "they were criminals and the law was followed?"

This is none. It was murder. What is the statue of limitation on murder? The drunk should be worried.

Tren de Aragua is a terrorist group. This is no different from when we droned ISIS. And it's actually more justified because the drugs were en route to the US.

But there was no proof of that. This is no different than the Canadians clang in a drone strike on a US craft.