Reply to US blows up boat said to be carrying drugs

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "US blows up boat said to be carrying drugs"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Did Trump have concrete, 100% proof that this boat was smuggling drugs?

It's amazing how US citizens just believe everything they hear and are OK with killings when it's done to foreigners.[/quote]

This. I guess everyone is okay with summary executions and war crimes now. It starts with brown people. Eventually they will come for you too. [/quote]

Drug smuggling is bad. NArcoterrorism is bad. Pretty sure blowing up ships from sovereign countries and imposing the death penalty on them is also pretty, pretty bad.[/quote]

Democrats don’t like it. Most sane people are fine with it. [/quote]
Magas are such concrete thinkers.  We killed bad guys (which do we have proof? How has proof been established these were drug lords?), therefore ok.  Who cares about the means to the end, right? Silly Democrats.  Insisting people follow due process, abide by laws.  You know what I don’t get though? We use all these resources to blow a ship up that far away, but then cut deals the Mexican cartel peeps by giving them refuse in the US.  Or Trump pardoning the Silk Road dude.  Do those drug dealers don’t count?  How do your little MAGA brains explain away all the inconsistencies? [/quote]

Don't keep throwing up vague due process and abide by laws claims.  The law has been meticuously followed.

You don't know how to attack it, so you keep giving vague catch phrases.  The cartels have been designated as a terrorist group.  So FAFO.[/quote]
Couldn’t address the part about the inconsistencies?  Let’s say your boy Trump’s goal is to tackle the people bringing drugs into the US.  Why the aforementioned inconsistencies? 
And yes, I would love for you to teach me about how the law was so meticulously followed.   [/quote]

DP.  How about you prove that it wasn't before making accusations?  Numerous countries have struck terrorist organizations in international waters.  This is no different.[/quote]

We have to first scrutinize the law that empowers the head of State to make these designations with the flimsiest of justifications. At this point, state sponsor and FTO designations are driven entirely by lobbying groups and not by reason.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics