Verdict Wednesday!

[Anonymous]

Oh noes dcum, the jury is going on 9 hours of deliberation and no verdict. Are the heads ready to explode?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hung jury-they'll announce before the weekend. The jury doesn't want to spend another weekend dealing with this.

If they come back today or tomorrow and say they are hung, the judge will send them back to keep trying into next week. So that won't help them.

every day the jury deliberates means a day where Trump is holed up in a courtroom, waiting on the good people of NYC to decide his fate. Every day that this goes on means Trump’s has no control over his predicament. That must be so hard for a narcissist like him. Gotta love it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hung jury-they'll announce before the weekend. The jury doesn't want to spend another weekend dealing with this.

If they come back today or tomorrow and say they are hung, the judge will send them back to keep trying into next week. So that won't help them.

every day the jury deliberates means a day where Trump is holed up in a courtroom, waiting on the good people of NYC to decide his fate. Every day that this goes on means Trump’s has no control over his predicament. That must be so hard for a narcissist like him. Gotta love it.

.... But it also probably helps him politically, because he can't say things that hurt him.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:LAW FARE: Acting Justice Merchan is requiring Trump to remain in the courthouse while the jury deliberates. There is no reason he couldn’t wait at his home - no reason other than to punish him.

This is standard NY state practice, your know, states rights and all. He’s currently sitting in the courtroom nodding off and farting. I’m sure everyone would like for him to go home but this is the law, at least in NY.

The anti-Trump jurors should arrange to deliberate thru early November.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I actually hope he gets nailed only for the business document and tax law violations, which are state-only issues.

If they also find him guilty of the election interference it will give the federal courts the opportunity to weigh in.

He was not charged with violating tax law. Election interference must be found by the jury to convict on business documents. That the false documents were done with intent to interfere with the election by unlawful means.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:LAW FARE: Acting Justice Merchan is requiring Trump to remain in the courthouse while the jury deliberates. There is no reason he couldn’t wait at his home - no reason other than to punish him.

This is standard NY state practice, your know, states rights and all. He’s currently sitting in the courtroom nodding off and farting. I’m sure everyone would like for him to go home but this is the law, at least in NY.

The anti-Trump jurors should arrange to deliberate thru early November.

Again, this would probably help him. Trump not being able to say stupid s--t all the time is going to be way more appealing to average voters.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How does filing false business records have intent to be a part of a conspiracy to influence an election by illegal means, when the bookkeeping records were in 2017, and the election was in 2016?

They kept the payment off the books until after the election. The timing was part of the scheme.

Then they should have charged for false records in 2016. The records in 2017 whether accurate or false cannot change the results of an election in 2016.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Hung jury-they'll announce before the weekend. The jury doesn't want to spend another weekend dealing with this.

That's when the bullies the one or two holdouts to switch sides and get it over with.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Oh noes dcum, the jury is going on 9 hours of deliberation and no verdict. Are the heads ready to explode?

I don't know that anyone expects this to be a quick verdict? Is that what they're telling you on OAN - that we thought this would be quick?

Is YOUR head exploding that they didn't instantly deliver an innocent verdict?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How does filing false business records have intent to be a part of a conspiracy to influence an election by illegal means, when the bookkeeping records were in 2017, and the election was in 2016?

They kept the payment off the books until after the election. The timing was part of the scheme.

Then they should have charged for false records in 2016. The records in 2017 whether accurate or false cannot change the results of an election in 2016.

Just stop. This is an idiotic comment.

[Anonymous]

People have jumped onto Schad because the language supposedly supports the desired outcome.

"The issue in Schad was that First Degree murder could be committed by either Premeditated Murder or Felony Murder. Two methods of proving same crime.

The Jury was instructed on both, but told they did not have to agree 12-0 as to one or the other, so long all agreed that defendant was guilty on the charge by one or the other."
Source @shipwreckedcrew

Look at Richardson case that cites Schad.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Oh noes dcum, the jury is going on 9 hours of deliberation and no verdict. Are the heads ready to explode?

I don't know that anyone expects this to be a quick verdict? Is that what they're telling you on OAN - that we thought this would be quick?

Is YOUR head exploding that they didn't instantly deliver an innocent verdict?

+1 maga told me it would be less than an hour to an innocent verdict.

[Anonymous]

Well, if he’s found innocent then just have the jury vote again. Why not?

Or re try him again on the same charges!

[Anonymous]

The title of this thread presumed a quick verdict... it's not happening and the Judge sent the jury home for the day.

Poor DCUM, another night of waiting...

[Anonymous]

Verdict is in!