Verdict Wednesday!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Trump will be the first felon to win the Presidency. The conviction will only solidify his support.

If that is true, this country is done. No hyperbole.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump will be the first felon to win the Presidency. The conviction will only solidify his support.

If that is true, this country is done. No hyperbole.

rule of law is finished

[Anonymous]

MAGA clowns are ignoring that Trump’s own DOJ prosecuted Cohen for these same facts with Trump given a pass as unindicted coconspirator #1, so there is nothing new or extraordinary here. Cohen got three years even though he cooperated and did not repeatedly commit contempt of court.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump will be the first felon to win the Presidency. The conviction will only solidify his support.

If that is true, this country is done. No hyperbole.

Once a felon, always a felon.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump will be the first felon to win the Presidency. The conviction will only solidify his support.

If that is true, this country is done. No hyperbole.

rule of law is finished

SCOTUS has seem to that. Justices are now for hire.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump was convicted by a jury of his peers in a STATE court.

Learn civics dumb Republicans.

It's a solemn moment for our country. But I'm grateful for justice & the rule of law.

The same way a Black man on trial by an all-white jury with a judge who has Klan family members in the 1950s deep south was considered “fairly convicted by a jury of his peers”.

Imperfect example, but the closest accurate example as to how obviously rigged this trial was.

Judge with family members who donate and support the left, trying the case is one of the most Trump hostile areas in the U.S., with a jury pulled from a voters registry list that was made up of 90%+ of people who voted against Trump.

I too agree with you on this. Another more personal example. There was one time my husband, who leans more left than I, wanted to have sex, I didn’t, he wore me down until I finally conceded. I literally cried as I was exhausted - he was unaware. Very tone deaf on his part. When I told him a few days later how I felt, he was very ashamed and apologized. As we spoke, I told him that the sad part is in the liberal state we live in, that had I wanted to divorce him and take our assets (and there was a LOT), I could have easily had him convicted by a jury of his peers, because of how left-leaning our state was, and the ‘believe all women’ phenomenon. That gave him great pause and he’s been a lot more moderate in his political thinking since then.

Juries sometimes rule due to their own fears (what if someone finds out my identity and comes for me?), their own convictions, etc. Michael Cohen admitted that he stole from the Trump org. Even as a liberal myself, I would have had difficulty with that one - how does one trust a man’s word who embezzled? I don’t know if the jury knew of the judge’s daughter’s ties to Biden, the Judge’s own donation history, and the D.A.’s personal feelings about Trump

OMG, you are a marital rape apologist and this make the Trump trial invalid.

WTF. you need therapy.

You’ve just made my point. He would be convicted and jailed on feelings were you a juror. Trump’s trial is not invalid unless you are stating that the jury could equally be swayed by feelings, not evidence.

[jsteele]

Since someone started a newer thread and it is almost as long as this one, I will lock this thread.