Baltimore man wanted for murdering a tech CEO

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote: The man worked in her apartment building. That’s how he got in, why there is no forced entry.

Where did you see that? I'm not doubting you; just wondering.

I think the PP is confused. I believe he worked in the apartment on Edmondson Ave where the first victims lived. Apparently he and the 9/19 victims knew each other, so the police did not immediately think he was a danger to the public. Apparently they thought they understood the motive for that rape/torture/arson.

I saw that too in one article, but the WaPo article says he worked at LaPeres apartment and that he knew her. Who knows.

I read he worked in maintenance. Why in the world would this apartment hire a violent felon and give him access to a building full of innocent people. I see some liability in their future for negligent hiring if this is true.

That was true of the prior victim. LE is investigating any connection with Lapere. He did NOT work in her building. This is discussed upthread. The WP seems to have conflated details of 2 crimes a week apart. That is NOT what the charging documents say.

Yes, as Jeff pointed out in his blog, our earlier examination of the details of the case revealed that WaPo had made an error in its reporting.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote: The man worked in her apartment building. That’s how he got in, why there is no forced entry.

Where did you see that? I'm not doubting you; just wondering.

I think the PP is confused. I believe he worked in the apartment on Edmondson Ave where the first victims lived. Apparently he and the 9/19 victims knew each other, so the police did not immediately think he was a danger to the public. Apparently they thought they understood the motive for that rape/torture/arson.

I saw that too in one article, but the WaPo article says he worked at LaPeres apartment and that he knew her. Who knows.

I read he worked in maintenance. Why in the world would this apartment hire a violent felon and give him access to a building full of innocent people. I see some liability in their future for negligent hiring if this is true.

He was not employed by this building and had never done maintenance for them. He was a random dude who asked to be let in (possibly SAYING he was a maintenance worker bht who knows). Stop spreading lies

He HAD done maintenance at the rooming house where he raped, stabbed and set people on fire. Read the thread. The WP article is incorrect in conflating the details of 2 different crime scenes.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just be honest liberals, if the man were filming a video of him not being let into the building as a white woman walked by you'd blast her for being a racist Karen. Yet look at what she should have done. Not let in a strange man who happened to have brown skin into the building. She would have still been alive.

But in this day in age, being progressive takes over all common sense for self preservation and safety.

You don't let anybody in without their own key. What "liberals" get mad about is when a black person has a key, gets in with a key but people call the cops on him because they think he stole the key.

You never let someone in just because.

People visiting other apartments certainly do act offended when I decline to let them into our building. Women are socialized to prevent this reaction and remain pleasing to all people at all times. We are not supposed to say no to anyone, because that can draw censure. Young women care about approval a whole lot more than older ones... that's why you feel you have cause to try to "karen" us into submission.

We need to get back to normalizing the idea that no one gets in without a key/fob/escort and women aren't bad or rude or racist when they very rightly say no.

I agree, women are socialized to be polite.

I just disagree that there are viral videos of "Karens" not letting someone in who DOES NOT HAVE A KEY. It doesn't exist.

There may not be a video but at the moment of denial of entry, there's a grimace or an offended protest. I just turned 50 so I don't care anymore, but our daughters crumple and vow never to say no to anyone ever again.

Not my daughters

I hope not but recognize that you won't be the sole influence that informs her actions forever. We do need the larger public to stop shaming women for standing up for their needs because the teen and young woman years are mostly peer-and popular culture-influenced.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just be honest liberals, if the man were filming a video of him not being let into the building as a white woman walked by you'd blast her for being a racist Karen. Yet look at what she should have done. Not let in a strange man who happened to have brown skin into the building. She would have still been alive.

But in this day in age, being progressive takes over all common sense for self preservation and safety.

You don't let anybody in without their own key. What "liberals" get mad about is when a black person has a key, gets in with a key but people call the cops on him because they think he stole the key.

You never let someone in just because.

People visiting other apartments certainly do act offended when I decline to let them into our building. Women are socialized to prevent this reaction and remain pleasing to all people at all times. We are not supposed to say no to anyone, because that can draw censure. Young women care about approval a whole lot more than older ones... that's why you feel you have cause to try to "karen" us into submission.

We need to get back to normalizing the idea that no one gets in without a key/fob/escort and women aren't bad or rude or racist when they very rightly say no.

I agree, women are socialized to be polite.

I just disagree that there are viral videos of "Karens" not letting someone in who DOES NOT HAVE A KEY. It doesn't exist.

There may not be a video but at the moment of denial of entry, there's a grimace or an offended protest. I just turned 50 so I don't care anymore, but our daughters crumple and vow never to say no to anyone ever again.

Not my daughters

I hope not but recognize that you won't be the sole influence that informs her actions forever. We do need the larger public to stop shaming women for standing up for their needs because the teen and young woman years are mostly peer-and popular culture-influenced.

I agree but you said “crumple and vow never to say no” to that I disagree.

Also, we can’t expect anyone men or woman to always, every day of their life assess every.single.risk and always be right.

Sometime people are just in a hurry, or they don’t notice someone slip in behind them, or someone watching their fire.

We can’t put it all on girls making the right decision every.single.solitary.time. It’s untenable.

[Anonymous]

Code not fire

[Anonymous]

He was denied bail in a hearing today.

https://www.cbsnews.com/baltimore/news/jason-billingsley-no-bail-murder-of-tech-ceo-pava-lapere-baltimore-rape-and-arson/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Code not fire

???

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Code not fire

???

It was for the post 2 up

[Anonymous]

I can’t imagine what it is like to be held at gunpoint, but she was better off screaming before he took her to the roof. Something to try to remember, although it must go against every instinct one has.

[Anonymous]

I’m confused did he also kill and elderly couple?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:USA is unsafe for women.

Did you just decide to make that up? Men are far more likely to be murdered than women.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:He was denied bail in a hearing today.

https://www.cbsnews.com/baltimore/news/jason-billingsley-no-bail-murder-of-tech-ceo-pava-lapere-baltimore-rape-and-arson/

Too little too late.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I’m confused did he also kill and elderly couple?

No

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Code not fire

???

It was for the post 2 up

What does "Code not fire" mean? He set 2 people on fire?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Code not fire

???

It was for the post 2 up

What does "Code not fire" mean? He set 2 people on fire?

I’m still confused.

He killed the tech woman and set 2 other people on fire?