Reply to About time the New York Times exposed the sham marriage [GREAT piece today]

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "About time the New York Times exposed the sham marriage [GREAT piece today]"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I'm lol'ing at the hundreds of hypocrite lefties in the nytimes.com comment section saying "This is old news! This is 20 years old! Any woman would do the same to protect their family!"[/quote]

The majority of women would have dumped him.[/quote]

I agree - especially women who shared similar credentials.

Can you imagine some of our "best" DCUM female attorneys making excuses for their high-profile husbands?

wouldn't happen unless they were completely insecure or so into appearances that they'd be willing to share their husband's penis with the world

I do wonder about the women who support Hillary with these excuses that she "did it for the family" or that it was "their personal business."  makes me think they married a Bill, too[/quote]
Actually, I can seem many dcum high powered attorneys staying in the marriage for outside appearances.[/quote]

When I was in Biglaw, I knew of partners who slept around and/or treated the staff inappropriately.  Their wives either didn't know or, more likely, looked the other way.  [/quote]

I've never been cheated on (knock wood), but I have friends who have and have stayed in the marriage. Not for appearances.  For the family. It was hard for them, and the separated temporarily, but when you have that much history and a child, there are a lot of reasons to stay.  People are complicated.  I don't judge other peoples' marriages. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics