2025 Girls Lax WCAC + ISL Outlook

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I can only imagine how insufferable MH’s yelling was during tonight’s game, one he surely expected to dominate on home soil. Shows GC is vulnerable. This gives SJC a huge tailwind going into the post season. HF is a legit coach and she stared down her haters tonight - in a debut match v GC with inherited talent. WCAC playoffs are gonna be awesome.

Well he was not there. He’s very sick.

It was also senior night so some senior night lineups were out there.

ok, just stop with the senior night BS excuse. OLGC has 12 seniors listed on the roster; 10 of the 12 were club players, and 9 of those 12 are committed to play in college. 7 are going D1 they have 1 going D2 and one D3... 1 of the senior commits is injured and did not play.

This is not just for GC but for all HS teams. Just because players play club does not mean they are good. A lot of club players can’t catch or throw cause they play on b level teams. Or an “A” team that isn’t even in the top 100.

Ok did you say that to yourself first? No? Maybe you should have. Do you really want any of us to believe that GC would have a club player who can’t catch or throw seriously. MH has been known to cut club players from his own club teams because they couldn’t hack that level of play…

Exactly my point. Girls can play club but that doesn’t mean they are any good. So saying a HS team is made up of club players doesn’t make that team great. MH’s Rebels skills overall aren’t even close to a M&D Black/Cap Blue/Heros Green. Such different level of players. All club. That’s all.

At GC girls that play club and who according to you may not be any good get cut they don’t get the chance to see the field on senior day…

YOU CAN'T BASE A HS TEAM'S TALENT ON NUMBER OF CLUB PLAYERS!!! That was the only point. Good Grief! You definitely have an ax to grind! My comment was simply refuting that just because girls play club doesn't mean they are highly skilled players and thus the HS teams they play for must be better than others with less club players.

Your lame ass excuse that the game was close because it was senior night just doesn’t hold water the bench is deep at every grade level as the GC parents have claimed. Just wake up and realize you got caught off guard and you way under estimated the talent at SJC.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I can only imagine how insufferable MH’s yelling was during tonight’s game, one he surely expected to dominate on home soil. Shows GC is vulnerable. This gives SJC a huge tailwind going into the post season. HF is a legit coach and she stared down her haters tonight - in a debut match v GC with inherited talent. WCAC playoffs are gonna be awesome.

Well he was not there. He’s very sick.

It was also senior night so some senior night lineups were out there.

ok, just stop with the senior night BS excuse. OLGC has 12 seniors listed on the roster; 10 of the 12 were club players, and 9 of those 12 are committed to play in college. 7 are going D1 they have 1 going D2 and one D3... 1 of the senior commits is injured and did not play.

This is not just for GC but for all HS teams. Just because players play club does not mean they are good. A lot of club players can’t catch or throw cause they play on b level teams. Or an “A” team that isn’t even in the top 100.

Ok did you say that to yourself first? No? Maybe you should have. Do you really want any of us to believe that GC would have a club player who can’t catch or throw seriously. MH has been known to cut club players from his own club teams because they couldn’t hack that level of play…

Exactly my point. Girls can play club but that doesn’t mean they are any good. So saying a HS team is made up of club players doesn’t make that team great. MH’s Rebels skills overall aren’t even close to a M&D Black/Cap Blue/Heros Green. Such different level of players. All club. That’s all.

At GC girls that play club and who according to you may not be any good get cut they don’t get the chance to see the field on senior day…

YOU CAN'T BASE A HS TEAM'S TALENT ON NUMBER OF CLUB PLAYERS!!! That was the only point. Good Grief! You definitely have an ax to grind! My comment was simply refuting that just because girls play club doesn't mean they are highly skilled players and thus the HS teams they play for must be better than others with less club players.

You can probably make an argument if Team A has say 10 players from M&D Black/Cap Blue/Heros Green and Team B has 5, Team A will likely win. If you add other clubs into the mix, not sure it really matters that much.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I can only imagine how insufferable MH’s yelling was during tonight’s game, one he surely expected to dominate on home soil. Shows GC is vulnerable. This gives SJC a huge tailwind going into the post season. HF is a legit coach and she stared down her haters tonight - in a debut match v GC with inherited talent. WCAC playoffs are gonna be awesome.

Well he was not there. He’s very sick.

It was also senior night so some senior night lineups were out there.

ok, just stop with the senior night BS excuse. OLGC has 12 seniors listed on the roster; 10 of the 12 were club players, and 9 of those 12 are committed to play in college. 7 are going D1 they have 1 going D2 and one D3... 1 of the senior commits is injured and did not play.

This is not just for GC but for all HS teams. Just because players play club does not mean they are good. A lot of club players can’t catch or throw cause they play on b level teams. Or an “A” team that isn’t even in the top 100.

Ok did you say that to yourself first? No? Maybe you should have. Do you really want any of us to believe that GC would have a club player who can’t catch or throw seriously. MH has been known to cut club players from his own club teams because they couldn’t hack that level of play…

Exactly my point. Girls can play club but that doesn’t mean they are any good. So saying a HS team is made up of club players doesn’t make that team great. MH’s Rebels skills overall aren’t even close to a M&D Black/Cap Blue/Heros Green. Such different level of players. All club. That’s all.

At GC girls that play club and who according to you may not be any good get cut they don’t get the chance to see the field on senior day…

YOU CAN'T BASE A HS TEAM'S TALENT ON NUMBER OF CLUB PLAYERS!!! That was the only point. Good Grief! You definitely have an ax to grind! My comment was simply refuting that just because girls play club doesn't mean they are highly skilled players and thus the HS teams they play for must be better than others with less club players.

Your lame ass excuse that the game was close because it was senior night just doesn’t hold water the bench is deep at every grade level as the GC parents have claimed. Just wake up and realize you got caught off guard and you way under estimated the talent at SJC.

My comment has zero to do with the GC-SJC game! My kids don't even attend either school! I don't care about it. It refers to all teams and how you rate them.

Get over yourself!

[Anonymous]

SJC lost to GC, once again.
Visi beat the whole SSSAS team, not the defense.

End of story.

[Anonymous]

I feel like you all need the parents of other school to agree with your opinion. I don't think that's likely.

[Anonymous]

Any updates from today’s games?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I can only imagine how insufferable MH’s yelling was during tonight’s game, one he surely expected to dominate on home soil. Shows GC is vulnerable. This gives SJC a huge tailwind going into the post season. HF is a legit coach and she stared down her haters tonight - in a debut match v GC with inherited talent. WCAC playoffs are gonna be awesome.

Well he was not there. He’s very sick.

It was also senior night so some senior night lineups were out there.

ok, just stop with the senior night BS excuse. OLGC has 12 seniors listed on the roster; 10 of the 12 were club players, and 9 of those 12 are committed to play in college. 7 are going D1 they have 1 going D2 and one D3... 1 of the senior commits is injured and did not play.

This is not just for GC but for all HS teams. Just because players play club does not mean they are good. A lot of club players can’t catch or throw cause they play on b level teams. Or an “A” team that isn’t even in the top 100.

Ok did you say that to yourself first? No? Maybe you should have. Do you really want any of us to believe that GC would have a club player who can’t catch or throw seriously. MH has been known to cut club players from his own club teams because they couldn’t hack that level of play…

Exactly my point. Girls can play club but that doesn’t mean they are any good. So saying a HS team is made up of club players doesn’t make that team great. MH’s Rebels skills overall aren’t even close to a M&D Black/Cap Blue/Heros Green. Such different level of players. All club. That’s all.

At GC girls that play club and who according to you may not be any good get cut they don’t get the chance to see the field on senior day…

YOU CAN'T BASE A HS TEAM'S TALENT ON NUMBER OF CLUB PLAYERS!!! That was the only point. Good Grief! You definitely have an ax to grind! My comment was simply refuting that just because girls play club doesn't mean they are highly skilled players and thus the HS teams they play for must be better than others with less club players.

Your lame ass excuse that the game was close because it was senior night just doesn’t hold water the bench is deep at every grade level as the GC parents have claimed. Just wake up and realize you got caught off guard and you way under estimated the talent at SJC.

My comment has zero to do with the GC-SJC game! My kids don't even attend either school! I don't care about it. It refers to all teams and how you rate them.

Get over yourself!

Now it all make sense I’m sorry to hear you’ve been paying for those club fees all these years just to have your DD be one of those club girls who can’t catch or throw…

[Anonymous]

Big game to set playoff seedings in ISL. Visi or Potomac?

[Anonymous]

Visi- Potomac results?

[Anonymous]

Potomac won 12-8

[Anonymous]

Potomac won 12-8

[Anonymous]

Potomac with a huge win. They looked talented and athletic at every position

[Anonymous]

Big win. I believe that means the seeding looks like:

1. SSSAS 6-1
2. Potomac 6-1 (lost head to head to SSSAS)
3. SR 6-2
4. Visi 6-2 (lost head to head to SR)

Apologies for ignoring the quarterfinal round, but...SSSAS has to contend in the semis with the only team to beat them since their California trip in Visi. Potomac looks to beat SR for a second time this year--no easy feat--on their side of the bracket.

Predicting an SSSAS vs Potomac final, but could be any combination of the 4. They are that close.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:SJC lost to GC, once again.
Visi beat the whole SSSAS team, not the defense.

End of story.

GC expected to beat SJC by 10 and won by only two.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:SJC lost to GC, once again.
Visi beat the whole SSSAS team, not the defense.

End of story.

GC expected to beat SJC by 10 and won by only two.

Vegas had it at GC -6