MAGA teen bused in from a Catholic school harasses Indigenous People's marcher. Vile.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:""Correction: Earlier versions of this story incorrectly said that Native American activist Nathan Phillips fought in the Vietnam War. Phillips served in the U.S. Marines from 1972 to 1976 but was never deployed to Vietnam." "

How does that not make him a veteran???

If he never went to Vietnam he isn't a Vietnam veteran. Actually this is more of an example of fake news because Phillips never said he was a "Vietnam veteran". He called himself a "Vietnam times veteran." It was the "fake" news outlets who changed it to Vietnam veteran without confirming.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:""Correction: Earlier versions of this story incorrectly said that Native American activist Nathan Phillips fought in the Vietnam War. Phillips served in the U.S. Marines from 1972 to 1976 but was never deployed to Vietnam." "

How does that not make him a veteran???

Nobody says he wasn't a veteran. Just that he more than likely wasn't a VN veteran because of his age. Try and keep up.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The MAGA teens should be given presidential medals of freedom. That Indian man was harassing them. Shame on him!

I generally have way more sympathy for the kids than my liberal friends, but jeez, don't get carried away.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:""Correction: Earlier versions of this story incorrectly said that Native American activist Nathan Phillips fought in the Vietnam War. Phillips served in the U.S. Marines from 1972 to 1976 but was never deployed to Vietnam." "

How does that not make him a veteran???

If he never went to Vietnam he isn't a Vietnam veteran. Actually this is more of an example of fake news because Phillips never said he was a "Vietnam veteran". He called himself a "Vietnam times veteran." It was the "fake" news outlets who changed it to Vietnam veteran without confirming.

I went to high school with many people who enlisted in the 72-75 period. Not a one calls themselves a Vietnam era veteran although they could technically.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:""Correction: Earlier versions of this story incorrectly said that Native American activist Nathan Phillips fought in the Vietnam War. Phillips served in the U.S. Marines from 1972 to 1976 but was never deployed to Vietnam." "

How does that not make him a veteran???

Nobody says he wasn't a veteran. Just that he more than likely wasn't a VN veteran because of his age. Try and keep up.

Actually some of the PR group was pushing that he was an actor hired by the radical left to trick these poor kids...

Phillips only ever said he was a veteran from the vietnam war era.

[Anonymous]

The media and twitterverse claimed he was a Vietnam veteran and Phillips did not correct it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:""Correction: Earlier versions of this story incorrectly said that Native American activist Nathan Phillips fought in the Vietnam War. Phillips served in the U.S. Marines from 1972 to 1976 but was never deployed to Vietnam." "

How does that not make him a veteran???

If he never went to Vietnam he isn't a Vietnam veteran. Actually this is more of an example of fake news because Phillips never said he was a "Vietnam veteran". He called himself a "Vietnam times veteran." It was the "fake" news outlets who changed it to Vietnam veteran without confirming.

I'm not a veteran of any kind but if I were a Vietnam veteran I'd feel pretty gross about someone going around calling themselves a "Vietnam era veteran" when they didn't serve in Vietnam at all.

[Anonymous]

Trump has invited these POS to WH - twitter reports.

Trump is President of racists entitled white Americans...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:""Correction: Earlier versions of this story incorrectly said that Native American activist Nathan Phillips fought in the Vietnam War. Phillips served in the U.S. Marines from 1972 to 1976 but was never deployed to Vietnam." "

How does that not make him a veteran???

If he never went to Vietnam he isn't a Vietnam veteran. Actually this is more of an example of fake news because Phillips never said he was a "Vietnam veteran". He called himself a "Vietnam times veteran." It was the "fake" news outlets who changed it to Vietnam veteran without confirming.

I'm not a veteran of any kind but if I were a Vietnam veteran I'd feel pretty gross about someone going around calling themselves a "Vietnam era veteran" when they didn't serve in Vietnam at all.

And now the grasping...

He was clarifying the time period when he served. There is nothing nefarious about that. Please. Give me a break. The gaslighting is horrendous.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The media and twitterverse claimed he was a Vietnam veteran and Phillips did not correct it.

Guess he should have dodged the service with fake bone spurs.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:""Correction: Earlier versions of this story incorrectly said that Native American activist Nathan Phillips fought in the Vietnam War. Phillips served in the U.S. Marines from 1972 to 1976 but was never deployed to Vietnam." "

How does that not make him a veteran???

If he never went to Vietnam he isn't a Vietnam veteran. Actually this is more of an example of fake news because Phillips never said he was a "Vietnam veteran". He called himself a "Vietnam times veteran." It was the "fake" news outlets who changed it to Vietnam veteran without confirming.

I'm not a veteran of any kind but if I were a Vietnam veteran I'd feel pretty gross about someone going around calling themselves a "Vietnam era veteran" when they didn't serve in Vietnam at all.

And now the grasping...

He was clarifying the time period when he served. There is nothing nefarious about that. Please. Give me a break. The gaslighting is horrendous.

PP here. Ok, I see that this is actually a thing. I stand corrected.

https://www.veteranstodayarchives.com/2009/07/28/the-definition-of-a-vietnam-era-veteran/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:""Correction: Earlier versions of this story incorrectly said that Native American activist Nathan Phillips fought in the Vietnam War. Phillips served in the U.S. Marines from 1972 to 1976 but was never deployed to Vietnam." "

How does that not make him a veteran???

If he never went to Vietnam he isn't a Vietnam veteran. Actually this is more of an example of fake news because Phillips never said he was a "Vietnam veteran". He called himself a "Vietnam times veteran." It was the "fake" news outlets who changed it to Vietnam veteran without confirming.

"Vietnam times veteran"

meaning he was enlisted during this time period but never fought?

eh

Those poor souls who returned and who were destroyed for fighting a war that was never supported deserve our respect.

this dude?

eh

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:""Correction: Earlier versions of this story incorrectly said that Native American activist Nathan Phillips fought in the Vietnam War. Phillips served in the U.S. Marines from 1972 to 1976 but was never deployed to Vietnam." "

How does that not make him a veteran???

If he never went to Vietnam he isn't a Vietnam veteran. Actually this is more of an example of fake news because Phillips never said he was a "Vietnam veteran". He called himself a "Vietnam times veteran." It was the "fake" news outlets who changed it to Vietnam veteran without confirming.

I'm not a veteran of any kind but if I were a Vietnam veteran I'd feel pretty gross about someone going around calling themselves a "Vietnam era veteran" when they didn't serve in Vietnam at all.

And now the grasping...

He was clarifying the time period when he served. There is nothing nefarious about that. Please. Give me a break. The gaslighting is horrendous.

PP here. Ok, I see that this is actually a thing. I stand corrected.

https://www.veteranstodayarchives.com/2009/07/28/the-definition-of-a-vietnam-era-veteran/

Thank you for this link. I didn't realize it is also a legal term and that there is a specific code. In common parlance it makes sense anyway, but under public law he is accurate described as a Vietnam era vet under section 505(B).

[Anonymous]

Heaven forbid someone takes a knee at a football game, but lets argue about a vietnam vet vs vietnam era vet.

Of course it is okay for snotty teenagers to be disrespectful to vietnam era vets.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:""Correction: Earlier versions of this story incorrectly said that Native American activist Nathan Phillips fought in the Vietnam War. Phillips served in the U.S. Marines from 1972 to 1976 but was never deployed to Vietnam." "

How does that not make him a veteran???

If he never went to Vietnam he isn't a Vietnam veteran. Actually this is more of an example of fake news because Phillips never said he was a "Vietnam veteran". He called himself a "Vietnam times veteran." It was the "fake" news outlets who changed it to Vietnam veteran without confirming.

I'm not a veteran of any kind but if I were a Vietnam veteran I'd feel pretty gross about someone going around calling themselves a "Vietnam era veteran" when they didn't serve in Vietnam at all.

And now the grasping...

He was clarifying the time period when he served. There is nothing nefarious about that. Please. Give me a break. The gaslighting is horrendous.

Now that's rich.