Candace Owens Twitter account suspended for racist tweets, hahahaha!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:Jokes about black people and Muslims happen all the time. See the Boris Johnson thread. Yet, he will continue to be considered a very serious person and Trump will still support him and you folks will support Trump. Trump, by the way, says even worse things and isn’t joking.

Who are “you folks?” I don’t support Trump; I think his tweets are vile. So are Sarah Jeong’s. If Trump’s behavior is the new standard for liberals, only changing the object of mockery/hate, then they’ve lost.

I clearly said that Trump isn’t joking. It is sadly not surprising that you are unable to distinguish between serious statements by a president and humorous mockery by Jeong. The lack of self-awareness by many white people is extraordinary.

And would you ever have made a comment such as this against blacks or Muslims if blacks or Muslims disagreed with YOU on a point? But you are demonstrating the very thing that the NYT did by keeping the racist employed on the editorial staff - that nasty digs against white people are just dandy.

And your insistence that it is humorous mockery by Jeong is merely your opinion. You state it as if it's a fact. Most people realize that the extreme content of her remarks, and the length of time she kept up her onslaught, show it was more than a mere mockery, much as you would like to believe that.

And why did she have to take out her hatred against cops? Did you read her disgusting crap she tweeted about them?

There you go with another display of a lack of self-awareness. My statement referred to “many” white people, specifically you. Yet, you ignore that qualifier and act like you wouldn’t defend criticism of some black people or some Muslims. It is cluelessness such as yours that makes mockery such as Jeong’s both easy and biting.

What the PP is saying is the reverse: that no criticism of some Muslim folk and Black folk is tolerated here.

Yes. That's exactly what I and others are saying. It's really so simple. No criticism of Muslim or black folks would be tolerated here, and yet out-and-out venomous anti-white remarks are chalked up to be "satire." Sorry, but someone does not play the satire game for years, and with such hateful language, just to be funny.

[Anonymous]

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:Jokes about black people and Muslims happen all the time. See the Boris Johnson thread. Yet, he will continue to be considered a very serious person and Trump will still support him and you folks will support Trump. Trump, by the way, says even worse things and isn’t joking.

Who are “you folks?” I don’t support Trump; I think his tweets are vile. So are Sarah Jeong’s. If Trump’s behavior is the new standard for liberals, only changing the object of mockery/hate, then they’ve lost.

I clearly said that Trump isn’t joking. It is sadly not surprising that you are unable to distinguish between serious statements by a president and humorous mockery by Jeong. The lack of self-awareness by many white people is extraordinary.

And would you ever have made a comment such as this against blacks or Muslims if blacks or Muslims disagreed with YOU on a point? But you are demonstrating the very thing that the NYT did by keeping the racist employed on the editorial staff - that nasty digs against white people are just dandy.

And your insistence that it is humorous mockery by Jeong is merely your opinion. You state it as if it's a fact. Most people realize that the extreme content of her remarks, and the length of time she kept up her onslaught, show it was more than a mere mockery, much as you would like to believe that.

And why did she have to take out her hatred against cops? Did you read her disgusting crap she tweeted about them?

There you go with another display of a lack of self-awareness. My statement referred to “many” white people, specifically you. Yet, you ignore that qualifier and act like you wouldn’t defend criticism of some black people or some Muslims. It is cluelessness such as yours that makes mockery such as Jeong’s both easy and biting.

What the PP is saying is the reverse: that no criticism of some Muslim folk and Black folk is tolerated here.

That's not true. BLM and ISIS get criticized all the time, as just two examples. It's simply remarkable how you have internalized criticism of certain groups so that it no longer even registers with you. Then, you react to mockery of white people as if you've been scalded by boiling water.

Does any of this sound familiar?

"If blacks valued education, their schools wouldn't be so bad."

"If Muslims oppose terrorism, they should police their community better."

"Gun violence is bad, but it's mostly blacks killing blacks. They tolerate this in their community but then attack the police for doing their job."

"If blacks don't want to get shot, they shouldn't run from the police."

There are posts like that every day here with virtually no complaint. Then Jeong tweets that white people don't know how to make rice and it's a national story.

You picked the rice comment, since she was running out of more venomous tweets to spew. But there were horrible comments about Fing white people, and about their going extinct, and comparing their postings to dog shit, and how one of her regrets in life is that she'd never be able to kill a white man, and on and on. If anyone were to post those same things about blacks, you'd ban them.

[jsteele]

Anonymous wrote:
What the PP is saying is the reverse: that no criticism of some Muslim folk and Black folk is tolerated here.

Yes. That's exactly what I and others are saying. It's really so simple. No criticism of Muslim or black folks would be tolerated here, and yet out-and-out venomous anti-white remarks are chalked up to be "satire." Sorry, but someone does not play the satire game for years, and with such hateful language, just to be funny.

Again, there is all kinds of criticism of Muslims and black people here. It just doesn't register with you because you accept it as truth. Jeong just imitates the same things that are said about minorities all the time. That is new to you and you are outraged.

[Anonymous]

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:Jokes about black people and Muslims happen all the time. See the Boris Johnson thread. Yet, he will continue to be considered a very serious person and Trump will still support him and you folks will support Trump. Trump, by the way, says even worse things and isn’t joking.

Who are “you folks?” I don’t support Trump; I think his tweets are vile. So are Sarah Jeong’s. If Trump’s behavior is the new standard for liberals, only changing the object of mockery/hate, then they’ve lost.

I clearly said that Trump isn’t joking. It is sadly not surprising that you are unable to distinguish between serious statements by a president and humorous mockery by Jeong. The lack of self-awareness by many white people is extraordinary.

And would you ever have made a comment such as this against blacks or Muslims if blacks or Muslims disagreed with YOU on a point? But you are demonstrating the very thing that the NYT did by keeping the racist employed on the editorial staff - that nasty digs against white people are just dandy.

And your insistence that it is humorous mockery by Jeong is merely your opinion. You state it as if it's a fact. Most people realize that the extreme content of her remarks, and the length of time she kept up her onslaught, show it was more than a mere mockery, much as you would like to believe that.

And why did she have to take out her hatred against cops? Did you read her disgusting crap she tweeted about them?

There you go with another display of a lack of self-awareness. My statement referred to “many” white people, specifically you. Yet, you ignore that qualifier and act like you wouldn’t defend criticism of some black people or some Muslims. It is cluelessness such as yours that makes mockery such as Jeong’s both easy and biting.

What the PP is saying is the reverse: that no criticism of some Muslim folk and Black folk is tolerated here.

That's not true. BLM and ISIS get criticized all the time, as just two examples. It's simply remarkable how you have internalized criticism of certain groups so that it no longer even registers with you. Then, you react to mockery of white people as if you've been scalded by boiling water.

Does any of this sound familiar?

"If blacks valued education, their schools wouldn't be so bad."

"If Muslims oppose terrorism, they should police their community better."

"Gun violence is bad, but it's mostly blacks killing blacks. They tolerate this in their community but then attack the police for doing their job."

"If blacks don't want to get shot, they shouldn't run from the police."

There are posts like that every day here with virtually no complaint. Then Jeong tweets that white people don't know how to make rice and it's a national story.
[/quote
What??? I skipped over too quickly. Your comeback is to say that BLM and ISIS get criticized all the time?

I'm speechless.

[jsteele]

Anonymous wrote:You picked the rice comment, since she was running out of more venomous tweets to spew. But there were horrible comments about Fing white people, and about their going extinct, and comparing their postings to dog shit, and how one of her regrets in life is that she'd never be able to kill a white man, and on and on. If anyone were to post those same things about blacks, you'd ban them.

You are misstating most of what you claim she said and you are taking it all out of context. You are probably not even well enough informed to understand the context. When she tweets about white people going extinct, she is referencing right-wing claims that minorities are taking over. just yesterday, for instance, Laura Ingraham said:

"The America we know and love doesn't exist anymore. Massive demographic changes have been foisted on the American people, and they are changes that none of us ever voted for, and most of us don't like ... this is related to both illegal and legal immigration".

The alt-right constantly references white genocide which they claim will be caused by mixing between races. Jeong is mocking the entire notion that whites are endangered.

[Anonymous]

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You picked the rice comment, since she was running out of more venomous tweets to spew. But there were horrible comments about Fing white people, and about their going extinct, and comparing their postings to dog shit, and how one of her regrets in life is that she'd never be able to kill a white man, and on and on. If anyone were to post those same things about blacks, you'd ban them.

You are misstating most of what you claim she said and you are taking it all out of context. You are probably not even well enough informed to understand the context. When she tweets about white people going extinct, she is referencing right-wing claims that minorities are taking over. just yesterday, for instance, Laura Ingraham said:

"The America we know and love doesn't exist anymore. Massive demographic changes have been foisted on the American people, and they are changes that none of us ever voted for, and most of us don't like ... this is related to both illegal and legal immigration".

The alt-right constantly references white genocide which they claim will be caused by mixing between races. Jeong is mocking the entire notion that whites are endangered.

Laura Ingraham.....bleech.

I still say someone doesn't spew venom for two years (at least) simply to make a mockery. The things that Jeong came up with reveal the level of her hostility. That's my opinion.

But let's say this: There are two ways to interpret her 2-year anti-white tweet storm, and one way is your way and one way is mine.

[Anonymous]

Last time I checked Laura Ingraham had not been offered a post onthe NYT editorial board. That is the point that you seem to be missing. Jeong is free to tweet all she likes about white people, but no white person could utter even one of her tweets and expect such a job offer from one of the most prestigious papers in the country.
And I’m sure the people who are enjoying her posts most of all are the Republican speech writers who can take the rest of the summer off as their speeches before the midterms write themselves verbatim from the new face of the NY Times.

[jsteele]

Anonymous wrote:Last time I checked Laura Ingraham had not been offered a post onthe NYT editorial board. That is the point that you seem to be missing. Jeong is free to tweet all she likes about white people, but no white person could utter even one of her tweets and expect such a job offer from one of the most prestigious papers in the country.
And I’m sure the people who are enjoying her posts most of all are the Republican speech writers who can take the rest of the summer off as their speeches before the midterms write themselves verbatim from the new face of the NY Times.

Similarly, Jeong wasn't offered her own television show on Fox such as Ingraham has. Interesting that you expect Republicans to run against the New York Times, which I am pretty sure is not running for anything. Republicans are going to look pretty silly standing before crowds denouncing political correctness, praising liberal tears, and cheering on Trump, and then whining about being mocked by a NYT editorial board member. But hypocrisy comes naturally to you all.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Last time I checked Laura Ingraham had not been offered a post onthe NYT editorial board. That is the point that you seem to be missing. Jeong is free to tweet all she likes about white people, but no white person could utter even one of her tweets and expect such a job offer from one of the most prestigious papers in the country.
And I’m sure the people who are enjoying her posts most of all are the Republican speech writers who can take the rest of the summer off as their speeches before the midterms write themselves verbatim from the new face of the NY Times.

Yes, exactly. Jeff threw me off-course with his unequal comparisons and distractions (which is what people do when they're on the wrong side of an argument.)

This is not just about ONE person, and whether her extensive anti-white tweets are just a two-year-long attempt at satire, or whether she truly does subscribe to some of what she wrote. (She DID come up with some pretty horrendous stuff.) The point is that the NYT would - and did, in fact - fire a white staffer for anti-black tweets.

The extra irony in all this is that just a few days after the NYT excused Jeong for her anti-white tweets, it did an "expose" on a white baseball player who had some anti-black tweets back when he was a high school kid in an attempt to humiliate him and besmirch his reputation,

[Anonymous]

? ?
Trump runs each and every day against the “main stream media,” which has always been and continues to be a counterbalance to those in power. The NY Times just made that a whole lot easier for him to do.
I have made my arguments dispasdionately and been insulted by you each and every time so I’ll let you go back to your own vitriol.

[jsteele]

So what we have established is that writing about black people having lower IQs due to genetics is fine. Mocking people with such a belief is bad. Writing about minorities destroying the white race is fine. Mocking people with such a belief is bad. Being a racist on Fox News is fine. Having someone that mocks racists on the New York Times editorial board is bad.

Complicated rules if you ask me.

[Anonymous]

Guess what I just learned? Laura Ingraham, the Republican news anchor, Jeff just held up as a bigot, adopted a child from Guatemala! She welcomed a brown child into her own family. Isn't that wonderful?

[jsteele]

Anonymous wrote:Guess what I just learned? Laura Ingraham, the Republican news anchor, Jeff just held up as a bigot, adopted a child from Guatemala! She welcomed a brown child into her own family. Isn't that wonderful?

Wow, according to her own words, she is complicit in destroying America. I guess that shows how much of her spiel is simply an act to fool the rubes.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:? ?
Trump runs each and every day against the “main stream media,” which has always been and continues to be a counterbalance to those in power. The NY Times just made that a whole lot easier for him to do.
I have made my arguments dispasdionately and been insulted by you each and every time so I’ll let you go back to your own vitriol.

Me too, and I've pointed that out. Virtually every response of Jeff's to a person with whom he disagrees includes a personal insult.

[Anonymous]

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Guess what I just learned? Laura Ingraham, the Republican news anchor, Jeff just held up as a bigot, adopted a child from Guatemala! She welcomed a brown child into her own family. Isn't that wonderful?

Wow, according to her own words, she is complicit in destroying America. I guess that shows how much of her spiel is simply an act to fool the rubes.

Or you're misinterpreting what she means. (But I notice you couldn't make a positive comment about her adopting a brown child.)

And another insult - this time about rubes. The disdain that so many liberals feel for Americans who don't bow down at the altar of liberalism is unreal.