Candace Owens Twitter account suspended for racist tweets, hahahaha!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:Much like DCUM, a lot of Twitter's moderation is a result of user reports. If the original tweets were not reported, but Owens' were, that would account for the disparate actions on Twitter's part. I would not be surprised if Owens' own followers reported her tweets in the hope that they could provoke Twitter into exactly this response. But, sure, let's keep up the charade that Twitter and the NY Times are anti-white.

Mia the it a moderator‘s job to review the situation? That’s what moderating is. Knee jerk decision making has no place in moderation

Plus, the issue with the NYT isn't so much that it is anti.-white, but that it applies different standards to its writers depending on whether they tweet anti-white racist crap or anti-black racist crap. I really wish we could explore this fully, and without the moderator or any other liberal accusing us of being alt-right racists simoly for pointing out the discrepancy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Candace Owens and Charlie Kirk were also accosted yesterday when eating breakfast in Philadelphia. This is becoming the tactic of the left.

I love Charlie Kirk’s tweet in response to this attack:

"My favorite part of the last 24 hours has been seeing white liberals tell a black conservative @RealCandaceO she is a white supremacist because she was praising a black police force against white liberals trashing a city that is 44% black"

All you guys talk about is identity politics. Why don't you do something useful besides navel gaze about how aggrieved you are?

We'll stop talking about identity politics when the left stops turning issues into identity politics.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Candace Owens and Charlie Kirk were also accosted yesterday when eating breakfast in Philadelphia. This is becoming the tactic of the left.

I love Charlie Kirk’s tweet in response to this attack:

"My favorite part of the last 24 hours has been seeing white liberals tell a black conservative @RealCandaceO she is a white supremacist because she was praising a black police force against white liberals trashing a city that is 44% black"

All you guys talk about is identity politics. Why don't you do something useful besides navel gaze about how aggrieved you are?

We'll stop talking about identity politics when the left stops turning issues into identity politics.

No you won't, because the left doesn't do that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Candace Owens and Charlie Kirk were also accosted yesterday when eating breakfast in Philadelphia. This is becoming the tactic of the left.

I love Charlie Kirk’s tweet in response to this attack:

"My favorite part of the last 24 hours has been seeing white liberals tell a black conservative @RealCandaceO she is a white supremacist because she was praising a black police force against white liberals trashing a city that is 44% black"

All you guys talk about is identity politics. Why don't you do something useful besides navel gaze about how aggrieved you are?

We'll stop talking about identity politics when the left stops turning issues into identity politics.

No you won't, because the left doesn't do that.

The left doesn't turn everything into identity politics?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:Much like DCUM, a lot of Twitter's moderation is a result of user reports. If the original tweets were not reported, but Owens' were, that would account for the disparate actions on Twitter's part. I would not be surprised if Owens' own followers reported her tweets in the hope that they could provoke Twitter into exactly this response. But, sure, let's keep up the charade that Twitter and the NY Times are anti-white.

Mia the it a moderator‘s job to review the situation? That’s what moderating is. Knee jerk decision making has no place in moderation

Plus, the issue with the NYT isn't so much that it is anti.-white, but that it applies different standards to its writers depending on whether they tweet anti-white racist crap or anti-black racist crap. I really wish we could explore this fully, and without the moderator or any other liberal accusing us of being alt-right racists simoly for pointing out the discrepancy.

So this and all the shadow banning are just mistakes. Lol

[jsteele]

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:Much like DCUM, a lot of Twitter's moderation is a result of user reports. If the original tweets were not reported, but Owens' were, that would account for the disparate actions on Twitter's part. I would not be surprised if Owens' own followers reported her tweets in the hope that they could provoke Twitter into exactly this response. But, sure, let's keep up the charade that Twitter and the NY Times are anti-white.

Mia the it a moderator‘s job to review the situation? That’s what moderating is. Knee jerk decision making has no place in moderation

LOL! Do you think someone at Twitter is looking at every tweet? It's the same thing here. Someone posts something that nobody reports and I don't know about it. Then, someone posts something else that gets reported. I look at it and remove it and some whiny right-winger (nine out of ten times anyway) comes along and complains. That's just reality.

[Anonymous]

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:Much like DCUM, a lot of Twitter's moderation is a result of user reports. If the original tweets were not reported, but Owens' were, that would account for the disparate actions on Twitter's part. I would not be surprised if Owens' own followers reported her tweets in the hope that they could provoke Twitter into exactly this response. But, sure, let's keep up the charade that Twitter and the NY Times are anti-white.

Mia the it a moderator‘s job to review the situation? That’s what moderating is. Knee jerk decision making has no place in moderation

LOL! Do you think someone at Twitter is looking at every tweet? It's the same thing here. Someone posts something that nobody reports and I don't know about it. Then, someone posts something else that gets reported. I look at it and remove it and some whiny right-winger (nine out of ten times anyway) comes along and complains. That's just reality.

Context is everything and so is personal bias. Scripts can be written to reflect that bias

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Candace Owens and Charlie Kirk were also accosted yesterday when eating breakfast in Philadelphia. This is becoming the tactic of the left.

I love Charlie Kirk’s tweet in response to this attack:

"My favorite part of the last 24 hours has been seeing white liberals tell a black conservative @RealCandaceO she is a white supremacist because she was praising a black police force against white liberals trashing a city that is 44% black"

All you guys talk about is identity politics. Why don't you do something useful besides navel gaze about how aggrieved you are?

We'll stop talking about identity politics when the left stops turning issues into identity politics.

No you won't, because the left doesn't do that.

The left doesn't turn everything into identity politics?

Slavery, Jim Crow laws, the KKK, the Southern Strategy, and Charlottesville were all birthed by the right. The left tries to fix the mess you created.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Candace Owens and Charlie Kirk were also accosted yesterday when eating breakfast in Philadelphia. This is becoming the tactic of the left.

I love Charlie Kirk’s tweet in response to this attack:

"My favorite part of the last 24 hours has been seeing white liberals tell a black conservative @RealCandaceO she is a white supremacist because she was praising a black police force against white liberals trashing a city that is 44% black"

All you guys talk about is identity politics. Why don't you do something useful besides navel gaze about how aggrieved you are?

We'll stop talking about identity politics when the left stops turning issues into identity politics.

No you won't, because the left doesn't do that.

The left doesn't turn everything into identity politics?

Slavery, Jim Crow laws, the KKK, the Southern Strategy, and Charlottesville were all birthed by the right. The left tries to fix the mess you created.

Are you being sarcastic? A Republican president fought a war over slavery that southern Democrats fought to maintain, and they were the big racists in lots of ways back in the day - including the KKK. And keep Charlottesville out of your list. It's a one-off by some extreme fringe element, just like the extreme Antifa on the left.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Candace Owens and Charlie Kirk were also accosted yesterday when eating breakfast in Philadelphia. This is becoming the tactic of the left.

I love Charlie Kirk’s tweet in response to this attack:

"My favorite part of the last 24 hours has been seeing white liberals tell a black conservative @RealCandaceO she is a white supremacist because she was praising a black police force against white liberals trashing a city that is 44% black"

All you guys talk about is identity politics. Why don't you do something useful besides navel gaze about how aggrieved you are?

We'll stop talking about identity politics when the left stops turning issues into identity politics.

No you won't, because the left doesn't do that.

The left doesn't turn everything into identity politics?

Slavery, Jim Crow laws, the KKK, the Southern Strategy, and Charlottesville were all birthed by the right. The left tries to fix the mess you created.

Are you being sarcastic? A Republican president fought a war over slavery that southern Democrats fought to maintain, and they were the big racists in lots of ways back in the day - including the KKK. And keep Charlottesville out of your list. It's a one-off by some extreme fringe element, just like the extreme Antifa on the left.

Jim Crow, also - enacted by Democrat legislatures.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jim_Crow_laws

[Anonymous]

Except all those things were the creation of Dems.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:Much like DCUM, a lot of Twitter's moderation is a result of user reports. If the original tweets were not reported, but Owens' were, that would account for the disparate actions on Twitter's part. I would not be surprised if Owens' own followers reported her tweets in the hope that they could provoke Twitter into exactly this response. But, sure, let's keep up the charade that Twitter and the NY Times are anti-white.

Mia the it a moderator‘s job to review the situation? That’s what moderating is. Knee jerk decision making has no place in moderation

LOL! Do you think someone at Twitter is looking at every tweet? It's the same thing here. Someone posts something that nobody reports and I don't know about it. Then, someone posts something else that gets reported. I look at it and remove it and some whiny right-winger (nine out of ten times anyway) comes along and complains. That's just reality.

Context is everything and so is personal bias. Scripts can be written to reflect that bias

The key is that someone looks at it. That someone looking at Jeong's tweets chose to do nothing, and someone else looking at Owen's tweets suspended her account. Owen's actions were to prove that there is systemic bias in how Tweeter's real live actual people moderate tweets and accounts, and she was proven right.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Except all those things were the creation of Dems.

Yup. Was that PP really that stupid? I'm thinking sarcasm that didn't carry through the screen.

Here's Bill Clinton, admitting that Democrats joined the KKK in order to get elected.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=vg9BOuhC6zA

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Candace Owens and Charlie Kirk were also accosted yesterday when eating breakfast in Philadelphia. This is becoming the tactic of the left.

I love Charlie Kirk’s tweet in response to this attack:

"My favorite part of the last 24 hours has been seeing white liberals tell a black conservative @RealCandaceO she is a white supremacist because she was praising a black police force against white liberals trashing a city that is 44% black"

All you guys talk about is identity politics. Why don't you do something useful besides navel gaze about how aggrieved you are?

We'll stop talking about identity politics when the left stops turning issues into identity politics.

No you won't, because the left doesn't do that.

The left doesn't turn everything into identity politics?

Slavery, Jim Crow laws, the KKK, the Southern Strategy, and Charlottesville were all birthed by the right. The left tries to fix the mess you created.

Are you being sarcastic? A Republican president fought a war over slavery that southern Democrats fought to maintain, and they were the big racists in lots of ways back in the day - including the KKK. And keep Charlottesville out of your list. It's a one-off by some extreme fringe element, just like the extreme Antifa on the left.

Jim Crow, also - enacted by Democrat legislatures.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jim_Crow_laws

Stop it! Facts are for the weak. Ignorance is strength!

[jsteele]

Anonymous wrote:
The key is that someone looks at it. That someone looking at Jeong's tweets chose to do nothing, and someone else looking at Owen's tweets suspended her account. Owen's actions were to prove that there is systemic bias in how Tweeter's real live actual people moderate tweets and accounts, and she was proven right.

The bolded is correct and is the point that I've been making. But, what evidence do you have that someone looked at Jeong's tweets and chose to do nothing? More than likely, Jeong's tweets weren't reported because in context it was obvious that they weren't racist.