Baby Now or Wait 2 Years?

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:there is nothing wrong careers, perhaps, but it comes at a cost that you refuse to acknowledge.



OP here. I acknowledge it comes at a cost, but what's it to you or others? It doesn't affect anyone but my family. My career choices are mine alone. I worked as a retail pharmacist for 4 years, and chose to leave that profession to become a CRNA. Yeah it sucks that I had to go back to school, and I'm a little older, but I'm fine with that. I'm doing what will make me happy.


Uhh you do know you came on here and specifically asked for feedback, right?



Op here. I asked about kids, not what career choice I should choose.

Anonymous
who freezes eggs at 19?!
Anonymous
If I wanted 2-3 kids and was in a stable marriage in my 30s, I would not delay having children.
Anonymous
OP, your choices are to either wait on the baby or wait on the CRNA. You want to wait on the baby. You do so understanding the risks -- it might be more difficult to get pregnant in your mid-to-late 30s than it is now. You may get pregnant easily with #1 and then struggle with #2. Your body may not be able to easily handle back-to-back pregnancies. Or maybe everything will work out exactly as you hope it will.

Your other choice is to have a few kids now and then return to get your CRNA when you're in your late 30s. You will lose some years of higher pay by doing so, but you can get through the grind of the early baby years before taking up what you admit is a challenging program.

You've made your choice and that's fine. But I think the PPs are correct to warn you that your fertility will not necessarily last forever but that a CRNA program is always available to you.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:You went from a Pharmacist to an RN? That's a downgrade.

BTW! I'm an RN too.


Op here. Yes. I am going for my CRNA. That's an upgrade!

As an RN, I disagree. A pharmacist is higher than a CRNA.
Plus, you did downgrade, now you are working your way up.....at the expense of having kids.



Wrong. A pharmacist makes $120k and a CRNA makes $190k a year.

CRNA is blue collar.
What a waste of OPs pharmacy education


You obviously don't know what a CRNA is...hahah, be quiet. Not a waste of pharmacy education...I would love if my nurse anesthetist also had a PharmD.
Anonymous
OP, I would definitely wait. I had my two kids at 35 and 37 and got pregnant with both the first month of trying. That's not to say that will happen for you, but having a newborn while in school and working would be incredibly difficult. Two years is not a big difference. Good luck!
Anonymous
If you want multiple kids you should not wait.

But none of what we think matters if your husband disagrees. He wants 4 kids and wants to start now?? You guys need to talk.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Why not wait for school until all your kids are in school?



Op here. It's a very hard program to get into. I am eager to start my career now. I don't want to be 40 and in school. I will also have a greater salary, which means more money for childcare.


you are eager to star you career now so you can't have the baby. but in 7 years you will be eager to continue the career and will be raising three children! how do you plan to do that?


I don't understand why you are being so harsh to OP. Many, many women work while raising young children. Not all of us can be SAHMs. Op, don't post on here anymore. There is nothing but bitter women who hate career driven women, likely because they don't have the skills to have one.


ummm, thanks. i am working and raising children. the point is not that that is no possible. but the point is that this is not any easier than having a baby while going to school! if you claim that you can't go to some harsh program (puh-lease, it's nursing) and having one baby because "she doesn't like leaving the baby with the nanny and her husband works 50 hours a week while trying to become partner" how is she going to raise three (3!!) children (who are going to be born in the span of 5 years) and pursue her career with a husband who is a law firm partner?



You're incredibly rude. As someone who works among nurses, how dare you dismiss them with " puh-lease, it's nursing". Nursing is a lot harder than you thimk. CRNA is very difficult. They basically are assistants to anesthesiologists, and often stand in for anesthesiologist. Plesee do some research before you belittle a profession that helps save countless lives each year.

+1

PP certainly knows little about what nurses do. In my Level 1 trauma center, CRNAs are the ones who oversee many cases (e.g. adminster anesthesia drugs, insert arterial and central lines, intubate patients, and so on). I'm an ICU RN and just being a nurse is tough while being pregnant. You're on your feet all day long, are fielding comments from everyone about your pregnancy (for better or for worse), are at risk of coming into contact with harmful organisms and situations (I was pregnant during the height of the Ebola scare, admitted patients who had previously tested positive for TB, and was kicked by an aggressive patient while pregnant, for example), and so on. Good luck when your ignorant ass is the patient, PP.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Everyone is talking about fertility. As a doc I can tell you that there is NO WAY to do a CRNA with a newborn. And work part time?? Haha. You can have it all. Just not at the same time. Sorry, OP.


+1. Op, don't listen to half of the people on this thread. I read through the responses and I don't think they understand what a CRNA program entails. My sister is a CRNA. It is a very difficult program to go through. There in no way you can have a young baby and do it. I strongly encourage you to wait or go with the plan to get pregnant your second year and time it with graduation. You will likely fail if you have a baby now and have to raise a newborn and toddler throughout the duration of school.

+2

They tell you during CRNA orientation that those who succeed are the ones whose lives are stable in all other aspects. It's the kind of program that leads to divorces/breakups and problems in other aspects of your life if you're not prepared. The work is also not ideal for a pregnant woman (given the exposure risks from anesthesia gases and drugs, radiation, and the patients themselves [infections, moving dead weight], and so on).
Anonymous
Not having read all 10 pages -- I would say wait til you are 35. It's only two years. If you are lucky you'll get pregnant on the first try like I did with both of my kids. I had them at almost 35 and almost 38.

You don't need other stressful things while trying to figure out your career and going back to school. If you had a 1 or 2 yr old already I would say go ahead and go to school. But I think from reading the few pages I did, that you should wait.
Anonymous
You should seriously wait. I am not in the medical field, but after hearing experiences, and reading up on a CRNA program, it sounds like it would be impossible to handle with a baby. Wait either for the second year or after you graduate. I had my kids at 33, 35, and 37. It isn't impossible.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:who freezes eggs at 19?!



Op here. I found out two of my aunts had fetid it's issues. One was pregnant when they discovered ovarian cancer. The second had endometriosis at a young age. It was a preventive measure because I knew I always wanted children.
Anonymous
It took me 3 years to get pregnant with my first. School will always be there. Healthy eggs may not be.

Don't wait.
Anonymous
Op here. Thank you for all the responses. It was nice getting first hand accounts from people who know what a CRNA does, and understands how intensive the program will be. My DH I feel wants kids because of the outside pressure ( family and friend getting pregnant). I don't think he realizes how hard it will be with a baby. We talked and decided that waiting to try in a year for my second year of school is the best option. I will try and coordinate with graduation, so I won't have to take a maternity leave so quickly at a new job. I want 2, maybe 3. He said 4 but I don't think that will happen. If only 2, spreading it out 2-3 between children is a better option for our careers.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:There's never a perfect time to start a family, OP. It may not feel that way, but it's true.

If you aren't starting school for another year, why not start trying now? If nothing happens after a few months of trying, you can always reevaluate. If it happens right away, you'd have an almost-1 year old by the time the program started and an almost 3- year old by the time you graduate. That's much different than having a newborn. You won't have any spare time, but it's certainly doable.


Smart post.
post reply Forum Index » Infants, Toddlers, & Preschoolers
Message Quick Reply
Go to: