Spouse A is right. Unless it’s taken to an extreme. I grew up somewhere with railroad tracks that divided our town. They were 100% freight tracks, so there wasn’t a schedule, and coal trains could easily take 20 minutes to pass. My dad hated being late and was paranoid that a train would come en route to somewhere, so he always left an extra 45 minutes or more of buffer time. I spent large chunks of my childhood sitting in a car in parking lots waiting for stuff to start. |
Cool story. But nothing to do with OPs situation. |
It’s never correct to threaten your spouse in front of your kids. |
| I think these threads are so weird because I literally don't know anyone who is habitually 15-30 minutes late. Not anyone. 5 minutes? Sure. Not 30 minutes. |
No, showing up at 12:30 is late. There is no such thing as "within the window". Would you say the same thing if someone shows up at 4pm? Isn't it still within the 12-5 window? It starts at 12 and you must be there at 12 otherwise you are late. period. |
Saying that you'll leave if the spouse is not ready is not a threat. Are you always this fragile or just trying to make a useless point online? |
|
I'm Team Spouse A. Being on time is so many things.
It is practical (so your table doesn't get given away.) It is respectful (so your friends aren't left waiting, especially at places where they won't seat a partial group.) It is objective (everyone has the exact same ability to determine 7:00pm.) Spouse A should continue to be on time even if it means leaving Spouse B behind. Trying to control someone is just wasted effort; even if it works, the other person will still feel controlled and it will backfire eventually. Once all the conditions are laid out, Spouse A is within their rights to adhere to those conditions. |
What threat? Telling them you're leaving in 5 minutes (with or without them) so that you can be on time?? |
I know one-- she's one of my best friends. I know this about her, and have decided she's worth it, even though generally speaking, it would make me grind my teeth. |
But why do you assume a fight? It’s really fascinating to me - my husband and I once arrived to a New Year party separately, and there was quite a bit of back and forth between me and the hosts. Yes, he is coming later, no, we are OK, really. Something came up, he left work much later than he thought he would and I didn’t feel like sitting there twiddling my thumbs fully dressed while I could be partying. |
It depends on what kind of party we are talking about. If it’s a sit down luncheon, you’d better be there at 12:15 the latest. If it’s the sort of mingling thing where people come and go, be my guest and show up at 4. As long as you leave by 5, it’s great. |
I have one of those friends too. I love her, but I have a rule for doing anything with her. We either have to have independent tickets or the place has to be close to my home and I am not leaving my home until she texts me that she has arrived. She has to be the one to wait. |
Because they’ve made reservations at a restaurant for a particular time. Many restaurants won’t seat you without the full party and have limits on how long they’ll hold a table. Also if we’ve gotten a babysitter based on an evening out with friends I don’t want to waste half the time standing around in a crowded restaurant lobby because another adult couldn’t pull it together to be on time. |
This has nothing to do with spending time with your spouse. When my spouse and I have an evening out together we absolutely enjoy the time. We also arrive in time for our reservation. But waiting for someone else means the entire evening is on hold until they arrive. It’s rude for one person to waste the time of the rest of the party. Context matters, but in OP’s case it was meeting at a restaurant at a specified time. |
+1000 i can't believe this is still being discussed. It's just rude. |