Prince Harry’s Latest Private Struggle: Hollywood or Home?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote: No Emmy noms for the Netflix doc.

Unsurprising to anyone who actually watched it, but Netflix must be disappointed.

They were not surprised either.

Must be embarrassing for Markle, that she can't out-do her twice Emmy-winner dad.

Are they still estranged?

Probably. If I were her dad, I wouldn't talk to her. He paid for her to attend Northwestern under the agreement that she would pay him back later once she was financially settled. Markle turns that into complaining about how her dad kept asking her for money when she was working on "Suits". She's like an endless bottom hole of vampirism and deceptive half-truths.

What dad makes their child pay back their college tuition?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I never understood why he would marry this super ambitious B-list actress when he wanted to step out of the limelight. She clearly married him so she could get name recognition (most people didn't watch Suits and had no idea who she was until she started dating him), and if he was smart, he should've been able to figure out that she wanted more publicity, not less. They may love each other, but the celebrity lifestyle issue was a major mismatch.

She was super hot when they met.

She still is.

Ehh.. she’s still pretty, but it’s not the same..

Then:

Gorgeous!!!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote: No Emmy noms for the Netflix doc.

Unsurprising to anyone who actually watched it, but Netflix must be disappointed.

They were not surprised either.

Must be embarrassing for Markle, that she can't out-do her twice Emmy-winner dad.

Are they still estranged?

Probably. If I were her dad, I wouldn't talk to her. He paid for her to attend Northwestern under the agreement that she would pay him back later once she was financially settled. Markle turns that into complaining about how her dad kept asking her for money when she was working on "Suits". She's like an endless bottom hole of vampirism and deceptive half-truths.

What dad makes their child pay back their college tuition?

She wasn't a child, she was in her 30s. And my ex-boyfriend paid back his (land-rich, Southern plantation owner) parents after graduating from an expensive Southern school that he wanted to attend instead of the local state university.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote: No Emmy noms for the Netflix doc.

Unsurprising to anyone who actually watched it, but Netflix must be disappointed.

They were not surprised either.

Must be embarrassing for Markle, that she can't out-do her twice Emmy-winner dad.

Are they still estranged?

Probably. If I were her dad, I wouldn't talk to her. He paid for her to attend Northwestern under the agreement that she would pay him back later once she was financially settled. Markle turns that into complaining about how her dad kept asking her for money when she was working on "Suits". She's like an endless bottom hole of vampirism and deceptive half-truths.

What dad makes their child pay back their college tuition?

A dad who couldn’t afford it but borrowed from his home equity or retirement because her heart was set on attending a high-priced school?

[Anonymous]

Whew, child….the crazy is strong in this thread.

/backs out

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Lol I bet the same people who hate Harry and Meghan are in the other thread talking about how great Sound of Freedom was.

Why does it have to be political? Not I to sound of freedom and Jim Caviezel, not into Trump, not into Kamala Harris, not into gross narcissists Harry and Meghan. Just say NO to professional victims and whiners and they are chiefs among them! No and get out.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote: No Emmy noms for the Netflix doc.

Unsurprising to anyone who actually watched it, but Netflix must be disappointed.

They were not surprised either.

Must be embarrassing for Markle, that she can't out-do her twice Emmy-winner dad.

That’s the thing about her dad. Obviously he knew how the business works, he was an award-winning technician and worked for a variety of projects. He knew Hollywood. But we’re supposed to believe he didn’t know what he was doing and he was manipulated by the tabloids in giving repeated tell-all interviews/photo ops? He was on camera even as recently as a couple months ago.

IMHO his other daughter is the one in his ear.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Whew, child ….the crazy is strong in this thread.

/backs out

Yeah again…, why is it crazy to dislike Meghan Markle? Why is it crazy to hear their wild lies (the racist allegations against a family member, who made who cry, paying the dad back the tuition money, the pilot who traded up thanking Markle for living in the UK while half black (sob), the wild high speed chase in Manhattan) and to find them repellent? It’s not weird to dislike a public figure that is so overexposed. She’s gagging for approval and attention and validation and not everyone is going to bite!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Whew, child ….the crazy is strong in this thread.

/backs out

Yeah again…, why is it crazy to dislike Meghan Markle? Why is it crazy to hear their wild lies (the racist allegations against a family member, who made who cry, paying the dad back the tuition money, the pilot who traded up thanking Markle for living in the UK while half black (sob), the wild high speed chase in Manhattan) and to find them repellent? It’s not weird to dislike a public figure that is so overexposed. She’s gagging for approval and attention and validation and not everyone is going to bite!

Honestly, the Meghan Markle stans are trying to gaslight us. Notice the PP who just HAD to post about how she won't post in this thread: [judgmental comment] + [backs out slowly]. That's a pretty heavy investment into our conversation, especially when you try so hard to pretend that you're above it. And that's even assuming it's a new poster and not someone's sock puppet trying to psychologically attack people.

It's not crazy to believe the evidence of our eyes and ears. It's not crazy to have discernment, when we've all likely experienced female predators in one shape or form. If Meghan is narcissistic and thirsty enough to put her entire family drama and personal opinions out there, the rest of us are going to use discernment and judgment. Know who has a problem with that? Wannabe cult leaders. Because cult leaders want robots who are brainwashed into praising them, not a critically thinking, discerning audience.

There's a reason why Meghan titled her (failed, half-assed, not fully produced) podcast "Archetypes". She knew that public figures such as royal family members are archetypes in the public's eye. She just figured that she could cast herself as the Disney Princess, not the Evil Witch.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote: No Emmy noms for the Netflix doc.

Unsurprising to anyone who actually watched it, but Netflix must be disappointed.

They were not surprised either.

Must be embarrassing for Markle, that she can't out-do her twice Emmy-winner dad.

That’s the thing about her dad. Obviously he knew how the business works, he was an award-winning technician and worked for a variety of projects. He knew Hollywood. But we’re supposed to believe he didn’t know what he was doing and he was manipulated by the tabloids in giving repeated tell-all interviews/photo ops? He was on camera even as recently as a couple months ago.

IMHO his other daughter is the one in his ear.

Oh, I'm sure her dad is toxic in his own way. But after all of her antics, you have to admit it's kind of funny that her reviled dad has like 8 Emmy nominations and 2 Emmy wins, and she's got 0.

[Anonymous]

Keep it up- Jeff is going lock the thread if it turns into another MM bash.

[Anonymous]

Sorry, I don’t think Meghan is a complete monster, No doubt she’s self-centered, ambitious, and has a high opinion of herself. But every time I see an unverified outlandish claim here (most recently that accusation about stealing from veterans), it pushes me further to their side. Why make up lies? Isn’t it enough that they’re just ordinary obnoxious people?

These threads could be fun if we kept it surface level like with most other celebrity gossip posts, but the same tired tropes come out page after page.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Keep it up- Jeff is going lock the thread if it turns into another MM bash.

Good for him though I’m really fascinated by the unhinged Megan haters. I really wonder what type of weirdo falls into this category. Basement dwelling racist dude, old cat lady with collection of BRF souvenirs who’s just learned how to use the Internet, paid troll, or something else.

[Anonymous]

California’s paparazzi laws forbid publishing children’s faces. The 4th of July photos of Harry carrying Lilibet show her face. These were published in the NY Post. Does the NY Post not have to follow CA laws? Just curious how that works.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Sorry, I don’t think Meghan is a complete monster, No doubt she’s self-centered, ambitious, and has a high opinion of herself. But every time I see an unverified outlandish claim here (most recently that accusation about stealing from veterans), it pushes me further to their side. Why make up lies? Isn’t it enough that they’re just ordinary obnoxious people?

These threads could be fun if we kept it surface level like with most other celebrity gossip posts, but the same tired tropes come out page after page.

This! I'm in no way shape or form a fan but the bonkers haters make me more sympathetic.