Covid vax mandates over for Fed employees; time for all colleges to end them as well

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I can see why they are clinging to them.

It's a great way to weed out the nuts.

The risks to young males from repeat covid vaccinations are well-documented. Which is why much of Europe no longer vaccinates youth for covid. It is ironic that the US centers of higher learning are the holdouts in ignoring the scientific evidence with regard to this young cohort.


Actually repeated studies show that the risk of myocarditis is still significantly lower than the risk if you actually get covid. Odds are most who do not want the vax or to be boosted are not being careful and have likely had covid at least once if not multiple times. So it's not really the risk of myocarditis that you are worried about---if you were you would be more careful, mask when in public in indoor spaces, etc and do everything you can to prevent getting it. Doubt that is the case.


Honestly stfu. Scientific evidence is extremely weak in either direction. It’s a judgment call if a person esp a young person wants to get vaccinated/boosted, and it shouldn’t be forced or imposed as a condition for someone seeking an educational degree


No it's not a judgement call. Science is science. But the lack of education is apparently running high for you and your family.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Not many 18 y/o are opposed to the vaccine. Their parents may be, but that’s very different


Are you kidding me? EVERY 18 YO male I know (and that's a lot, as I have twins that age) is opposed to the vaccine. And has no plans to get one, ever again.

Young males are concerned about the risks of myocarditis post-vaccine given cases like this, particularly when they face almost no risk of serious outcome from omicron.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10126745/pdf/10.1177_02676591231170480.pdf


As they should be. Many smart people don’t think the risk/reward on boosters makes sense from the standpoint of a healthy physically fit young male (especially ones who have been infected with Covid already). Everyone should respect that.


While "many" smart people share this opinion, MOST smart people, including the scientists and medical practitioners, wholly disagree with your OPINION.


+1000


In Europe now initial vaccination of kids under 18 is prohibited without special approval, but I am not a smart person if I don’t boost my college athlete 18 year old son who has had Covid?


Yet the US is still pushing boosters for all. Hard to not be very cynical about all of this. No data to back up Fauci’s ‘boosters for all’ mantra, yet it’s seen as the final word here in the US and people are still lining up to get boosters for their 13 year old boys.


I guess the EU has gone MAGA 😂

It’s astonishing how stupid and obedient Americans have become.
I’ve lost a great deal of faith in my country past 3 years. Not just the institutions, which are corrupt, but the people themselves


It's actually incredibly scary. Even now, at this point in time, with all the data we have, our public health officials are pushing boosters for kids. Pediatricians are/were still pushing boosters on kids. There are random vaccine requirements still in place (eg. adult volunteers in MCPS needs to be vaccinated).

It's pretty clear to many of us that our public health officials are corrupt. Makes me wonder about lots of things - yearly mammograms (truly necessary?), annual flu shots (beneficial to all?).

Hard to know who to believe. But, I do know that I'll be taking what the CDC says with a grain of salt. And definitely looking at what other countries are doing to get some diversity of thought. It's clear that the US media was censoring diverse thought regarding Covid and the Covid shots. What else gets censorsed?

I followed what other countries were doing during the pandemic, and I kept settling back on Sweden as one of the few countries where the government and the people didn't go into full panic. The Swedes had a pandemic playbook they followed, and they came through the pandemic without locking down their country or destroying the educations of a generation of kids. They must have been looking at the rest of the world like it was crazy.

Yeah, it's going to be tough to believe the CDC knows what it's doing going forward.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I can see why they are clinging to them.

It's a great way to weed out the nuts.

The risks to young males from repeat covid vaccinations are well-documented. Which is why much of Europe no longer vaccinates youth for covid. It is ironic that the US centers of higher learning are the holdouts in ignoring the scientific evidence with regard to this young cohort.


Actually repeated studies show that the risk of myocarditis is still significantly lower than the risk if you actually get covid. Odds are most who do not want the vax or to be boosted are not being careful and have likely had covid at least once if not multiple times. So it's not really the risk of myocarditis that you are worried about---if you were you would be more careful, mask when in public in indoor spaces, etc and do everything you can to prevent getting it. Doubt that is the case.

For young males after the second dose, that is not the case. They face a higher risk after the second dose than they do from covid itself.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35993236/
"Associations were stronger in men younger than 40 years for all vaccines. In men younger than 40 years old, the number of excess myocarditis events per million people was higher after a second dose of mRNA-1273 than after a positive SARS-CoV-2 test (97 [95% CI, 91–99] versus 16 [95% CI, 12–18])."


That is some world class cherry picking there.
The entire conclusion: Overall, the risk of myocarditis is greater after SARS-CoV-2 infection than after COVID-19 vaccination and remains modest after sequential doses including a booster dose of BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine. However, the risk of myocarditis after vaccination is higher in younger men, particularly after a second dose of the mRNA-1273 vaccine.

Yes--if you are a young man, you are slightly more likely then women to get it after a second dose, but NOT more likely to get it then if you have had covid.


You are misreading the sentence. This sentence compares the risk of young men after the second booster with the risk of young men after covid. They find the risk is higher for the former. The sentence is not comparing men and women. Look at Table 4 to see the data.
"In men younger than 40 years old, the number of excess myocarditis events per million people was higher after a second dose of mRNA-1273 than after a positive SARS-CoV-2 test".


NP here. Your sentence is about Moderna vaccine (mRNA-1273)

Another important point: In this study 0.007% of people (13 y/o+, male and female) experienced an event of myocarditis within 28 days of (any) vax. Of that number, "associations" were stronger in males under 40, in particular after the second dose of Moderna vaccine (mRNA-1273.)


Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Not many 18 y/o are opposed to the vaccine. Their parents may be, but that’s very different


Are you kidding me? EVERY 18 YO male I know (and that's a lot, as I have twins that age) is opposed to the vaccine. And has no plans to get one, ever again.

Young males are concerned about the risks of myocarditis post-vaccine given cases like this, particularly when they face almost no risk of serious outcome from omicron.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10126745/pdf/10.1177_02676591231170480.pdf


As they should be. Many smart people don’t think the risk/reward on boosters makes sense from the standpoint of a healthy physically fit young male (especially ones who have been infected with Covid already). Everyone should respect that.


While "many" smart people share this opinion, MOST smart people, including the scientists and medical practitioners, wholly disagree with your OPINION.


+1000


In Europe now initial vaccination of kids under 18 is prohibited without special approval, but I am not a smart person if I don’t boost my college athlete 18 year old son who has had Covid?


Yet the US is still pushing boosters for all. Hard to not be very cynical about all of this. No data to back up Fauci’s ‘boosters for all’ mantra, yet it’s seen as the final word here in the US and people are still lining up to get boosters for their 13 year old boys.


I guess the EU has gone MAGA 😂

It’s astonishing how stupid and obedient Americans have become.
I’ve lost a great deal of faith in my country past 3 years. Not just the institutions, which are corrupt, but the people themselves


It's actually incredibly scary. Even now, at this point in time, with all the data we have, our public health officials are pushing boosters for kids. Pediatricians are/were still pushing boosters on kids. There are random vaccine requirements still in place (eg. adult volunteers in MCPS needs to be vaccinated).

It's pretty clear to many of us that our public health officials are corrupt. Makes me wonder about lots of things - yearly mammograms (truly necessary?), annual flu shots (beneficial to all?).

Hard to know who to believe. But, I do know that I'll be taking what the CDC says with a grain of salt. And definitely looking at what other countries are doing to get some diversity of thought. It's clear that the US media was censoring diverse thought regarding Covid and the Covid shots. What else gets censorsed?

I followed what other countries were doing during the pandemic, and I kept settling back on Sweden as one of the few countries where the government and the people didn't go into full panic. The Swedes had a pandemic playbook they followed, and they came through the pandemic without locking down their country or destroying the educations of a generation of kids. They must have been looking at the rest of the world like it was crazy.

Yeah, it's going to be tough to believe the CDC knows what it's doing going forward.


Eh. Sweden has not done as well as you seem to think. In the early days, before vaccines, they had 10x the death rate of Norway and 4x the death rate of their other neighbors.

Their relative success with keeping overall numbers under control can be attributed to their rapid vaccine rollout that had nearly 60% of the population vaxxed by March 2021.

Data do not suggest that they did remarkably well economically (no economic boom and experienced a recession like everyone else) or with respect to education or pandemic-related mental health outcomes.

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/03/30/opinion/sweden-pandemic-coronavirus.html


Anonymous
The mandates are flipping, one by one. Now 3/4 of the top 20 schools are not mandating for fall. Yale is the latest to give it up.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I can see why they are clinging to them.

It's a great way to weed out the nuts.


Am I one of the nuts?

My two sons have had 3 Covid shots (May 2021, June 2021, and May 2022). They also were sick (barely) with the Omicron variant in Dec 2021. They are no longer considered "fully vaccinated" because they have not gotten a 4th shot. But we just do not see a need to get a 4th shot -- they both felt pretty terrible the day after the second and third shots with headaches and chest pain, and the positives of getting the 4th shot do not seem to outweigh these negatives.


+1 I was just at my 17-year-old son's well-check appointment. He got his meningocaccal vaccination as needed. When I asked about whether he should get a 4th dose of the covid vaccine, the doctor said that it was up to us, but that it was not necessary. Doctors are saying that it is not necessary for this age group! Enough with the vax mandates.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I can see why they are clinging to them.

It's a great way to weed out the nuts.

The risks to young males from repeat covid vaccinations are well-documented. Which is why much of Europe no longer vaccinates youth for covid. It is ironic that the US centers of higher learning are the holdouts in ignoring the scientific evidence with regard to this young cohort.


Actually repeated studies show that the risk of myocarditis is still significantly lower than the risk if you actually get covid. Odds are most who do not want the vax or to be boosted are not being careful and have likely had covid at least once if not multiple times. So it's not really the risk of myocarditis that you are worried about---if you were you would be more careful, mask when in public in indoor spaces, etc and do everything you can to prevent getting it. Doubt that is the case.


Honestly stfu. Scientific evidence is extremely weak in either direction. It’s a judgment call if a person esp a young person wants to get vaccinated/boosted, and it shouldn’t be forced or imposed as a condition for someone seeking an educational degree


No it's not a judgement call. Science is science. But the lack of education is apparently running high for you and your family.


I’ve got two Ivy League degrees but keep calling me stupid.

Anyone who says “science is science” with respect to a medical decision is a true moron.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I can see why they are clinging to them.

It's a great way to weed out the nuts.

The risks to young males from repeat covid vaccinations are well-documented. Which is why much of Europe no longer vaccinates youth for covid. It is ironic that the US centers of higher learning are the holdouts in ignoring the scientific evidence with regard to this young cohort.


Actually repeated studies show that the risk of myocarditis is still significantly lower than the risk if you actually get covid. Odds are most who do not want the vax or to be boosted are not being careful and have likely had covid at least once if not multiple times. So it's not really the risk of myocarditis that you are worried about---if you were you would be more careful, mask when in public in indoor spaces, etc and do everything you can to prevent getting it. Doubt that is the case.

For young males after the second dose, that is not the case. They face a higher risk after the second dose than they do from covid itself.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35993236/
"Associations were stronger in men younger than 40 years for all vaccines. In men younger than 40 years old, the number of excess myocarditis events per million people was higher after a second dose of mRNA-1273 than after a positive SARS-CoV-2 test (97 [95% CI, 91–99] versus 16 [95% CI, 12–18])."


That is some world class cherry picking there.
The entire conclusion: Overall, the risk of myocarditis is greater after SARS-CoV-2 infection than after COVID-19 vaccination and remains modest after sequential doses including a booster dose of BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine. However, the risk of myocarditis after vaccination is higher in younger men, particularly after a second dose of the mRNA-1273 vaccine.

Yes--if you are a young man, you are slightly more likely then women to get it after a second dose, but NOT more likely to get it then if you have had covid.


You are misreading the sentence. This sentence compares the risk of young men after the second booster with the risk of young men after covid. They find the risk is higher for the former. The sentence is not comparing men and women. Look at Table 4 to see the data.
"In men younger than 40 years old, the number of excess myocarditis events per million people was higher after a second dose of mRNA-1273 than after a positive SARS-CoV-2 test".


NP here. Your sentence is about Moderna vaccine (mRNA-1273)

Another important point: In this study 0.007% of people (13 y/o+, male and female) experienced an event of myocarditis within 28 days of (any) vax. Of that number, "associations" were stronger in males under 40, in particular after the second dose of Moderna vaccine (mRNA-1273.)



Yes. But keep in mind, these studies skew toward inflating the incidence of post-covid myocarditis and and underestimating the incidence of post-vaccine myocarditis. The remarkable thing is that even with that skewing, the link was found for young males. Inflated incidence of post-covid myocarditis: These studies only look at recorded, diagnosed covid, excluding asymptomatic and untested symptomatic cases which inflates the incidence of post-covid myocarditis significantly since they are only looking at sicker covid patients. Some other studies even require the covid positive test to occur in a medical setting. Underestimated incidence of post-vaccine myocarditis: These studies only look for post-vaccine myocarditis within several weeks of vaccination. Thus, they miss any cases that emerge downstream from earlier undetected damage. That is important given studies showing a much higher incidence of mild and asymptomatic myocarditis post-vaccine than the figure above. One Thai study evaluated kids pre and post vaccine for cardiac markers. They found one confirmed case of myopericarditis out of 301 youths. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36006288/ That case resolved favorably but it points to a larger potential scope for impact than the figure above. Much of Europe has looked at the data and decided that the potential risks are high enough not to vaccinate youth for covid.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I can see why they are clinging to them.

It's a great way to weed out the nuts.

The risks to young males from repeat covid vaccinations are well-documented. Which is why much of Europe no longer vaccinates youth for covid. It is ironic that the US centers of higher learning are the holdouts in ignoring the scientific evidence with regard to this young cohort.


Actually repeated studies show that the risk of myocarditis is still significantly lower than the risk if you actually get covid. Odds are most who do not want the vax or to be boosted are not being careful and have likely had covid at least once if not multiple times. So it's not really the risk of myocarditis that you are worried about---if you were you would be more careful, mask when in public in indoor spaces, etc and do everything you can to prevent getting it. Doubt that is the case.


Honestly stfu. Scientific evidence is extremely weak in either direction. It’s a judgment call if a person esp a young person wants to get vaccinated/boosted, and it shouldn’t be forced or imposed as a condition for someone seeking an educational degree


No it's not a judgement call. Science is science. But the lack of education is apparently running high for you and your family.


I’ve got two Ivy League degrees but keep calling me stupid.

Anyone who says “science is science” with respect to a medical decision is a true moron.

The concept of "trust the science" goes against the underlying principles of science which are to question, debate, and explore. Remarkably, the public use of the phrase "trust the science" was amplified after Yale researchers conducted a study on how to use messaging to increase vaccine uptake and found the phrase "trust the science" was very effective in making the vaccinated think negatively of the unvaccinated. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34774363/
"In terms of judging non-vaccinators, the largest effects were for the Not Bravery and Trust in Science messages, with each effect also statistically distinguishable from the Baseline message. Notably, in this sample the Trust in Science message had large effects on beliefs and actions toward others but appeared ineffective in changing an individual’s own intended vaccination behavior."
The concept of "trust the science" never made sense from a science perspective but makes a lot of sense when trying to shape public psyche.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:The mandates are flipping, one by one. Now 3/4 of the top 20 schools are not mandating for fall. Yale is the latest to give it up.


Thanks goodness. Better late than never, I guess.

But still disturbing that it took SO long for colleges to do what is right.
Anonymous
Do colleges even enforce the mandates?
I work for a school district and at some point they started requiring a booster but I never submitted anything and no one asked
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Do colleges even enforce the mandates?
I work for a school district and at some point they started requiring a booster but I never submitted anything and no one asked

They won't let students register for classes unless their booster documentation is on file.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I can see why they are clinging to them.

It's a great way to weed out the nuts.

The risks to young males from repeat covid vaccinations are well-documented. Which is why much of Europe no longer vaccinates youth for covid. It is ironic that the US centers of higher learning are the holdouts in ignoring the scientific evidence with regard to this young cohort.


Actually repeated studies show that the risk of myocarditis is still significantly lower than the risk if you actually get covid. Odds are most who do not want the vax or to be boosted are not being careful and have likely had covid at least once if not multiple times. So it's not really the risk of myocarditis that you are worried about---if you were you would be more careful, mask when in public in indoor spaces, etc and do everything you can to prevent getting it. Doubt that is the case.

For young males after the second dose, that is not the case. They face a higher risk after the second dose than they do from covid itself.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35993236/
"Associations were stronger in men younger than 40 years for all vaccines. In men younger than 40 years old, the number of excess myocarditis events per million people was higher after a second dose of mRNA-1273 than after a positive SARS-CoV-2 test (97 [95% CI, 91–99] versus 16 [95% CI, 12–18])."


That is some world class cherry picking there.
The entire conclusion: Overall, the risk of myocarditis is greater after SARS-CoV-2 infection than after COVID-19 vaccination and remains modest after sequential doses including a booster dose of BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine. However, the risk of myocarditis after vaccination is higher in younger men, particularly after a second dose of the mRNA-1273 vaccine.

Yes--if you are a young man, you are slightly more likely then women to get it after a second dose, but NOT more likely to get it then if you have had covid.


You are misreading the sentence. This sentence compares the risk of young men after the second booster with the risk of young men after covid. They find the risk is higher for the former. The sentence is not comparing men and women. Look at Table 4 to see the data.
"In men younger than 40 years old, the number of excess myocarditis events per million people was higher after a second dose of mRNA-1273 than after a positive SARS-CoV-2 test".


NP here. Your sentence is about Moderna vaccine (mRNA-1273)

Another important point: In this study 0.007% of people (13 y/o+, male and female) experienced an event of myocarditis within 28 days of (any) vax. Of that number, "associations" were stronger in males under 40, in particular after the second dose of Moderna vaccine (mRNA-1273.)



Yes. But keep in mind, these studies skew toward inflating the incidence of post-covid myocarditis and and underestimating the incidence of post-vaccine myocarditis. The remarkable thing is that even with that skewing, the link was found for young males. Inflated incidence of post-covid myocarditis: These studies only look at recorded, diagnosed covid, excluding asymptomatic and untested symptomatic cases which inflates the incidence of post-covid myocarditis significantly since they are only looking at sicker covid patients. Some other studies even require the covid positive test to occur in a medical setting. Underestimated incidence of post-vaccine myocarditis: These studies only look for post-vaccine myocarditis within several weeks of vaccination. Thus, they miss any cases that emerge downstream from earlier undetected damage. That is important given studies showing a much higher incidence of mild and asymptomatic myocarditis post-vaccine than the figure above. One Thai study evaluated kids pre and post vaccine for cardiac markers. They found one confirmed case of myopericarditis out of 301 youths. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36006288/ That case resolved favorably but it points to a larger potential scope for impact than the figure above. Much of Europe has looked at the data and decided that the potential risks are high enough not to vaccinate youth for covid.


Your post is a lot of unrelated gibberish and most has nothing to do with the study you cited. I have neither the time nor interest in engaging with an unreasonable interlocutor.

Just going to leave this here for the people in the back - if you can follow.

The primary risk associated with the Covid vaccine is myocarditis. It is “exquisitely rare” in children.

As the vaccine has been rolled out across the world, some countries have reported that in a small number of cases, recipients developed myocarditis, that is, inflammation of the heart. According to the WHO, these cases occurred more often in men between 16 and 24 years old, after the second dose of the vaccine, and “typically within a few days after vaccination.” “The highest rate [of myocarditis] is in younger men, not the older boys,” Maldonado says. “It’s not a trivial number, but it’s on the order of a few dozen per million vaccinations.”

Anti-vaxxers have had a field day with the myocarditis talking point. But with millions of children vaccinated across the globe, the numbers don’t lie: For children in the 5-11 age group, the CDC estimates the rate of myocarditis is 2-4 cases per 1 million vaccinations. What’s more, “Over 90 percent of those confirmed cases were mild and recoverable,” Rubin says. “So it’s exquisitely rare to have a severe case of severe myocarditis induced by the vaccine.” In fact, in general, the risk of developing myocarditis as a result of the vaccine is actually lower than the risk of developing myocarditis as a result of getting Covid, according to the WHO.


https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2022/02/the-reason-sweden-isnt-vaccinating-kids-5-11-against-covid-explained/
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I can see why they are clinging to them.

It's a great way to weed out the nuts.

The risks to young males from repeat covid vaccinations are well-documented. Which is why much of Europe no longer vaccinates youth for covid. It is ironic that the US centers of higher learning are the holdouts in ignoring the scientific evidence with regard to this young cohort.


Actually repeated studies show that the risk of myocarditis is still significantly lower than the risk if you actually get covid. Odds are most who do not want the vax or to be boosted are not being careful and have likely had covid at least once if not multiple times. So it's not really the risk of myocarditis that you are worried about---if you were you would be more careful, mask when in public in indoor spaces, etc and do everything you can to prevent getting it. Doubt that is the case.

For young males after the second dose, that is not the case. They face a higher risk after the second dose than they do from covid itself.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35993236/
"Associations were stronger in men younger than 40 years for all vaccines. In men younger than 40 years old, the number of excess myocarditis events per million people was higher after a second dose of mRNA-1273 than after a positive SARS-CoV-2 test (97 [95% CI, 91–99] versus 16 [95% CI, 12–18])."


That is some world class cherry picking there.
The entire conclusion: Overall, the risk of myocarditis is greater after SARS-CoV-2 infection than after COVID-19 vaccination and remains modest after sequential doses including a booster dose of BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine. However, the risk of myocarditis after vaccination is higher in younger men, particularly after a second dose of the mRNA-1273 vaccine.

Yes--if you are a young man, you are slightly more likely then women to get it after a second dose, but NOT more likely to get it then if you have had covid.


You are misreading the sentence. This sentence compares the risk of young men after the second booster with the risk of young men after covid. They find the risk is higher for the former. The sentence is not comparing men and women. Look at Table 4 to see the data.
"In men younger than 40 years old, the number of excess myocarditis events per million people was higher after a second dose of mRNA-1273 than after a positive SARS-CoV-2 test".


NP here. Your sentence is about Moderna vaccine (mRNA-1273)

Another important point: In this study 0.007% of people (13 y/o+, male and female) experienced an event of myocarditis within 28 days of (any) vax. Of that number, "associations" were stronger in males under 40, in particular after the second dose of Moderna vaccine (mRNA-1273.)



Yes. But keep in mind, these studies skew toward inflating the incidence of post-covid myocarditis and and underestimating the incidence of post-vaccine myocarditis. The remarkable thing is that even with that skewing, the link was found for young males. Inflated incidence of post-covid myocarditis: These studies only look at recorded, diagnosed covid, excluding asymptomatic and untested symptomatic cases which inflates the incidence of post-covid myocarditis significantly since they are only looking at sicker covid patients. Some other studies even require the covid positive test to occur in a medical setting. Underestimated incidence of post-vaccine myocarditis: These studies only look for post-vaccine myocarditis within several weeks of vaccination. Thus, they miss any cases that emerge downstream from earlier undetected damage. That is important given studies showing a much higher incidence of mild and asymptomatic myocarditis post-vaccine than the figure above. One Thai study evaluated kids pre and post vaccine for cardiac markers. They found one confirmed case of myopericarditis out of 301 youths. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36006288/ That case resolved favorably but it points to a larger potential scope for impact than the figure above. Much of Europe has looked at the data and decided that the potential risks are high enough not to vaccinate youth for covid.


Your post is a lot of unrelated gibberish and most has nothing to do with the study you cited. I have neither the time nor interest in engaging with an unreasonable interlocutor.

Just going to leave this here for the people in the back - if you can follow.

The primary risk associated with the Covid vaccine is myocarditis. It is “exquisitely rare” in children.

As the vaccine has been rolled out across the world, some countries have reported that in a small number of cases, recipients developed myocarditis, that is, inflammation of the heart. According to the WHO, these cases occurred more often in men between 16 and 24 years old, after the second dose of the vaccine, and “typically within a few days after vaccination.” “The highest rate [of myocarditis] is in younger men, not the older boys,” Maldonado says. “It’s not a trivial number, but it’s on the order of a few dozen per million vaccinations.”

Anti-vaxxers have had a field day with the myocarditis talking point. But with millions of children vaccinated across the globe, the numbers don’t lie: For children in the 5-11 age group, the CDC estimates the rate of myocarditis is 2-4 cases per 1 million vaccinations. What’s more, “Over 90 percent of those confirmed cases were mild and recoverable,” Rubin says. “So it’s exquisitely rare to have a severe case of severe myocarditis induced by the vaccine.” In fact, in general, the risk of developing myocarditis as a result of the vaccine is actually lower than the risk of developing myocarditis as a result of getting Covid, according to the WHO.


https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2022/02/the-reason-sweden-isnt-vaccinating-kids-5-11-against-covid-explained/

Mother Jones? This article is from early 2022 so the information on what European countries are doing now is incorrect. Contrary to the impression given in the article, omicron poses almost no risk to healthy young people. As for myocarditis, the comments above were straightforward and related to the article. The original study has the biases noted -- it only considers documented covid cases which inflates the incidence of post-covid myocarditis and it does not account for post-vaccine myocarditis after a month.

This link provides a survey of the different studies that have been done looking at post-vaccine myocarditis. The more narrow the age bands in the study, the greater the incidence recorded, centered on young males. You or another PP like to cite all-age incidence of myocarditis which is not relevant to the question of college booster policies.
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/eci.13947
"We found 28% (eight of 29) of studies utilised four stratifiers (Table 1) and Table 2. The incidence of myocarditis ranged from 8.1 to 39 cases per 100,000 persons (or doses) when four stratifiers were examined (Figure 1). All were in men under age 40 after dose 2 of an mRNA-based vaccine." The higher end of the post-vaccine myocarditis incidence in this survey is 1 in 3,000 cases in males aged 12-17. That might seem small but the risk of a serious outcome from omicron is even smaller for healthy youth. It is the trade-off between small risks and even smaller benefits which leads much of Europe not to vaccinate youth for covid.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I can see why they are clinging to them.

It's a great way to weed out the nuts.

The risks to young males from repeat covid vaccinations are well-documented. Which is why much of Europe no longer vaccinates youth for covid. It is ironic that the US centers of higher learning are the holdouts in ignoring the scientific evidence with regard to this young cohort.


Actually repeated studies show that the risk of myocarditis is still significantly lower than the risk if you actually get covid. Odds are most who do not want the vax or to be boosted are not being careful and have likely had covid at least once if not multiple times. So it's not really the risk of myocarditis that you are worried about---if you were you would be more careful, mask when in public in indoor spaces, etc and do everything you can to prevent getting it. Doubt that is the case.


Honestly stfu. Scientific evidence is extremely weak in either direction. It’s a judgment call if a person esp a young person wants to get vaccinated/boosted, and it shouldn’t be forced or imposed as a condition for someone seeking an educational degree


No it's not a judgement call. Science is science. But the lack of education is apparently running high for you and your family.


I’ve got two Ivy League degrees but keep calling me stupid.

Anyone who says “science is science” with respect to a medical decision is a true moron.


And I have two degrees from two T10 universities. Obviously Ivy League produces morons
post reply Forum Index » College and University Discussion
Message Quick Reply
Go to: