SCOTUS: oral arguments for Dobbs v. Jackson (MS abortion case)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is the results of the dems playing by outdated rules. Where is the reform of the court dems? What about passing laws like Texas did but for guns? The 2nd amendment is only viable if republicans have a majority on the Supreme Court. Come on dems don’t let the “moderates” continue to sell you bridges to nowhere.

“Outdated rules” like rule of law. I get it. It’s annoying af that we keep getting out classed by a pack of feral pit bulls, but I think that’s the Democrats’ big concern - regretfully we only have one political party right now and it’s the Democrats, and they want to keep the US from becoming the Christo-fascist state the GOP has been trying to install.

That said I agree they should be doing more. Just say the effing truth FFS. The GOP cheats. The GOP has abandoned any and all principles of the Constitution (except that Second Amendment, but they ignore the clause they don’t like and take it to mean that kindergartners should have rocket launchers because SeCoNd AmEnDmEnT). The GOP hates women. Talk about what’s going to happen to women - poor women, that is. Middle class and wealthy women will find a way to New York or wherever stands as a beacon of liberty against the tyranny of the “Christian.” Poor women are going to be forced to give birth to children with handicaps they can’t afford to pay for. To children who will die shortly after birth. Poor women are going to be killed, leaving their existing children motherless.

I do not have enough words to express what scum I think forced birthers are.

Agree 100%.

So disgusting.

You can't beat gutter trash without getting into the gutter. Do you associate with anyone who associates with Trump supporters? You should have cut them out the day he was elected and used everything you knew to destroy them. Not surprisingly, only POC were willing to do that.

If you're not willing to do that, you're part of problem. When Trump won, democracy failed. Our only hope now is to be a more powerful authoritarian state that actually cares about human rights. Or secede, and if we happen to win a Civil War, ffs do not reconstruct the red states.

What about Joe Manchin? Is this type of democrat the problem? We have no doubt where the “progressives” stand. Will Manchin step up? Do not do count on the “moderates”.

Hell yes he is the problem. Same with Sinema. Susan Collins. Mitt Romney. The list goes on. Anyone who doesn't step in line to pack the court is the enemy. But none of them give a shit, so you need to make life a living hell for anyone they care about (children, grandchildren, SOs) unless they openly and publicly renounce him (think Mary Trump). Go after Manchin's children's and grandchildren's livelihoods. All's fair in war, and Dems have the money.

Hey look who’s on the train now that it already ran over the woman tied to the tracks:

[Anonymous]

Susan Collins is an enemy of women.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Susan Collins is an enemy of women.

That’s how she should be remembered forever.

[Anonymous]

I’m surprised no one’s mentioned it, but in-demand abortion doctors and IVF experts are not required to serve all comers. They discriminate against people who can’t pay all the time. Why not discriminate against those who would fight to put the provider out of business in public but run there at the first sign of trouble? It’s easy enough to figure out how a person votes from public records. NY, Maryland, and other beacons for abortion access could easily legalize political viewpoint discrimination for OB/GYN doctors under the guise of conscience.

[Anonymous]

Get ready to vote in 2022. The only way to solve this problem is to vote these religious freaks out of power.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I’m surprised no one’s mentioned it, but in-demand abortion doctors and IVF experts are not required to serve all comers. They discriminate against people who can’t pay all the time. Why not discriminate against those who would fight to put the provider out of business in public but run there at the first sign of trouble? It’s easy enough to figure out how a person votes from public records. NY, Maryland, and other beacons for abortion access could easily legalize political viewpoint discrimination for OB/GYN doctors under the guise of conscience.

Honestly, I think that’s only fair.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Susan Collins is an enemy of women.

She’s the lightning rod, for sure, but every Stein voter, every “how bad can Trump be?” voter, every “they’re both the same” voter… they’re all on the hook.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Susan Collins is an enemy of women.

She’s the lightning rod, for sure, but every Stein voter, every “how bad can Trump be?” voter, every “they’re both the same” voter… they’re all on the hook.

Collins is worse. She knows better. She’s pretends to support women. And yet when faced with voting for Boof OKavanagh and Gorsuch and Aunt Lydia, she promised us all they’d respect the Roe precedent. Collins is a liar and an enemy of women.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Susan Collins is an enemy of women.

Yup here she is two months ago. Does she think people forget? That no one writes this stuff down anywhere?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Susan Collins is an enemy of women.

She’s the lightning rod, for sure, but every Stein voter, every “how bad can Trump be?” voter, every “they’re both the same” voter… they’re all on the hook.

Agree!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Susan Collins is an enemy of women.

She’s the lightning rod, for sure, but every Stein voter, every “how bad can Trump be?” voter, every “they’re both the same” voter… they’re all on the hook.

Agree!

Yup.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I’m so disgusted that a medical procedure has others involved besides a woman and her doctor. It’s nobody else’s business.

Yes, this is it for me!

Who decides or should be in charge of what happens inside an organ in my body?
Supreme court? No.
Congress? No.
Federal government? No.
State government? No.
My pastor/clergyman? No.

Me and my doctor? Unquestionably yes.
End of story.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m so disgusted that a medical procedure has others involved besides a woman and her doctor. It’s nobody else’s business.

Yes, this is it for me!

Who decides or should be in charge of what happens inside an organ in my body?
Supreme court? No.
Congress? No.
Federal government? No.
State government? No.
My pastor/clergyman? No.

Me and my doctor? Unquestionably yes.
End of story.

In your worldview, you’re a human being with all the rights that entails. The GOP disagrees with that and would like to remind you that you’re worth half what a man is and due none of the consideration.

[Anonymous]

Overturning Roe v. Wade will cause the GOP more problems. Most Americans are for Roe v. Wade. There aren’t enough crazy Christians to vote them into office, esp when their reason to vote is gone.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This is the results of the dems playing by outdated rules. Where is the reform of the court dems? What about passing laws like Texas did but for guns? The 2nd amendment is only viable if republicans have a majority on the Supreme Court. Come on dems don’t let the “moderates” continue to sell you bridges to nowhere.

Nope, don’t blame Dems. It’s all on GOP, all of it.