Van Lifer couple camping in Utah national park - two weeks later fiancee arrives in FL alone

[Anonymous]

And why do the video takers bring a gorilla costume or head camping lol

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Get me up to speed:

Was the dead body in Florida Brian's?

Did the lesbian couple interact with Brian and Gabby at the store and a camp site?

Where is report about Brian striking Gabby? Video?

Responding to the part about the dead body: Do you mean the one in Alabama? No, it wasn't Brian and was not thought to be connected to him.

https://mynbc15.com/news/local/mpd-follow-sightings-of-brian-laundrie-in-tillmans-corner

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/crime/brian-laundrie-alabama-walmart-body-b1923691.html

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If someone else was a witness to Gabby and Brian’s scuffle, then they should have had their statements submitted to the police stat.

It appears this was not done, as the police were seen on their body cam footage saying that no one saw Brian strike Gabby.

However it is interesting to note that initially the police report stated that someone had seen Brian strike Gabby but it was later redacted.
Also interesting is the fact that the police discussed two witness accounts, etc.?

How could someone report to 911 that they saw a couple arguing where one person struck the other person and yet while the cops spent close to an hr and a half speaking to Gabby & Brian, this information was never properly relayed to them?
There was plenty of time to forward this piece of very important, pivotal information.
Just a thirty second call from the dispatcher.

So either the call was made and the on scene cops chose to ignore it or the info was never given - both these show shoddy police work.
And sadly Gabby was made to feel like the aggressor due to this mistake.
The non-profit should have paid for a room for her instead of the true aggressor.

I noticed the inconsistency in report from caller and the police report also.

I think it’s bc Gabby was the aggressor. They made her state that she didn’t hit to harm him, and called it a mental break to let her off. Listen to the Crime Junkies podcast from a few days ago.

[Anonymous]

I am surprised we haven’t been successful to track his location with all our digital technology. If he has indeed recently logged into his Instagram account, then I’m sure Instagram servers have logged his IP address. There are also ways for civilians to trick him with sending links such has Grabify. Law enforcement already use Spotify to track fugitives. There are also satellites and facial recognition technology. Here I thought we were in the age of Big Brother, and we still can’t find him?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I am surprised we haven’t been successful to track his location with all our digital technology. If he has indeed recently logged into his Instagram account, then I’m sure Instagram servers have logged his IP address. There are also ways for civilians to trick him with sending links such has Grabify. Law enforcement already use Spotify to track fugitives. There are also satellites and facial recognition technology. Here I thought we were in the age of Big Brother, and we still can’t find him?

Just read this article in which a PI says lots of things said here, with additional point that by wearing a mask, he could have gotten thru airports. https://www.insider.com/brian-laundrie-could-have-fled-us-private-investigator-says-2021-9

But yeah, say he still has his phone? Why don't they have him. I expect them to have him by tomorrow, because this is not a smart dude.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am surprised we haven’t been successful to track his location with all our digital technology. If he has indeed recently logged into his Instagram account, then I’m sure Instagram servers have logged his IP address. There are also ways for civilians to trick him with sending links such has Grabify. Law enforcement already use Spotify to track fugitives. There are also satellites and facial recognition technology. Here I thought we were in the age of Big Brother, and we still can’t find him?

Just read this article in which a PI says lots of things said here, with additional point that by wearing a mask, he could have gotten thru airports. https://www.insider.com/brian-laundrie-could-have-fled-us-private-investigator-says-2021-9

But yeah, say he still has his phone? Why don't they have him. I expect them to have him by tomorrow, because this is not a smart dude.

Surely his parents sent him off on his “hike” with a burner phone.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am surprised we haven’t been successful to track his location with all our digital technology. If he has indeed recently logged into his Instagram account, then I’m sure Instagram servers have logged his IP address. There are also ways for civilians to trick him with sending links such has Grabify. Law enforcement already use Spotify to track fugitives. There are also satellites and facial recognition technology. Here I thought we were in the age of Big Brother, and we still can’t find him?

Just read this article in which a PI says lots of things said here, with additional point that by wearing a mask, he could have gotten thru airports. https://www.insider.com/brian-laundrie-could-have-fled-us-private-investigator-says-2021-9

But yeah, say he still has his phone? Why don't they have him. I expect them to have him by tomorrow, because this is not a smart dude.

But I thought Floridians didn’t wear masks?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am surprised we haven’t been successful to track his location with all our digital technology. If he has indeed recently logged into his Instagram account, then I’m sure Instagram servers have logged his IP address. There are also ways for civilians to trick him with sending links such has Grabify. Law enforcement already use Spotify to track fugitives. There are also satellites and facial recognition technology. Here I thought we were in the age of Big Brother, and we still can’t find him?

Just read this article in which a PI says lots of things said here, with additional point that by wearing a mask, he could have gotten thru airports. https://www.insider.com/brian-laundrie-could-have-fled-us-private-investigator-says-2021-9

But yeah, say he still has his phone? Why don't they have him. I expect them to have him by tomorrow, because this is not a smart dude.

But I thought Floridians didn’t wear masks?

Yes, well the non-murdering ones who aren't on the run from the FBI.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It is lazy and immoral in this circumstance for a lawyer just to say “clam up.”

It is always a bad idea to talk to the police. It’s a bad idea if you’re innocent. It’s a bad idea if you’re guilty. They are never your friends and they are never on your side. It is not immoral for his attorney to advise him of such.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am surprised we haven’t been successful to track his location with all our digital technology. If he has indeed recently logged into his Instagram account, then I’m sure Instagram servers have logged his IP address. There are also ways for civilians to trick him with sending links such has Grabify. Law enforcement already use Spotify to track fugitives. There are also satellites and facial recognition technology. Here I thought we were in the age of Big Brother, and we still can’t find him?

Just read this article in which a PI says lots of things said here, with additional point that by wearing a mask, he could have gotten thru airports. https://www.insider.com/brian-laundrie-could-have-fled-us-private-investigator-says-2021-9

But yeah, say he still has his phone? Why don't they have him. I expect them to have him by tomorrow, because this is not a smart dude.

Surely his parents sent him off on his “hike” with a burner phone.

And put him on boat headed outside the country.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am surprised we haven’t been successful to track his location with all our digital technology. If he has indeed recently logged into his Instagram account, then I’m sure Instagram servers have logged his IP address. There are also ways for civilians to trick him with sending links such has Grabify. Law enforcement already use Spotify to track fugitives. There are also satellites and facial recognition technology. Here I thought we were in the age of Big Brother, and we still can’t find him?

Just read this article in which a PI says lots of things said here, with additional point that by wearing a mask, he could have gotten thru airports. https://www.insider.com/brian-laundrie-could-have-fled-us-private-investigator-says-2021-9

But yeah, say he still has his phone? Why don't they have him. I expect them to have him by tomorrow, because this is not a smart dude.

But I thought Floridians didn’t wear masks?

Yes, well the non-murdering ones who aren't on the run from the FBI.

I go to Florida regularly. Maybe half of the people wear masks- you aren't out of place with a mask on. And of course, they are required for everyone in airports.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am surprised we haven’t been successful to track his location with all our digital technology. If he has indeed recently logged into his Instagram account, then I’m sure Instagram servers have logged his IP address. There are also ways for civilians to trick him with sending links such has Grabify. Law enforcement already use Spotify to track fugitives. There are also satellites and facial recognition technology. Here I thought we were in the age of Big Brother, and we still can’t find him?

Just read this article in which a PI says lots of things said here, with additional point that by wearing a mask, he could have gotten thru airports. https://www.insider.com/brian-laundrie-could-have-fled-us-private-investigator-says-2021-9

But yeah, say he still has his phone? Why don't they have him. I expect them to have him by tomorrow, because this is not a smart dude.

Surely his parents sent him off on his “hike” with a burner phone.

And put him on boat headed outside the country.

To where? What country do you think will just let someone dock a boat with 0 questions?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If someone else was a witness to Gabby and Brian’s scuffle, then they should have had their statements submitted to the police stat.

It appears this was not done, as the police were seen on their body cam footage saying that no one saw Brian strike Gabby.

However it is interesting to note that initially the police report stated that someone had seen Brian strike Gabby but it was later redacted.
Also interesting is the fact that the police discussed two witness accounts, etc.?

How could someone report to 911 that they saw a couple arguing where one person struck the other person and yet while the cops spent close to an hr and a half speaking to Gabby & Brian, this information was never properly relayed to them?
There was plenty of time to forward this piece of very important, pivotal information.
Just a thirty second call from the dispatcher.

So either the call was made and the on scene cops chose to ignore it or the info was never given - both these show shoddy police work.
And sadly Gabby was made to feel like the aggressor due to this mistake.
The non-profit should have paid for a room for her instead of the true aggressor.

I noticed the inconsistency in report from caller and the police report also.

I think it’s bc Gabby was the aggressor. They made her state that she didn’t hit to harm him, and called it a mental break to let her off. Listen to the Crime Junkies podcast from a few days ago.

Abused women often end up taking on the aggressor label so the abusive man won’t be charged.

[Anonymous]

Somebody either made massive cash withdrawals, or he’s using a credit card. Either way, paper trail.

Or he’s dead.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The clear takeaway from the body cam video is that both of these young people were deeply troubled and mentally ill. We don’t know yet how she died. Let’s stop speculating until the facts are in, cause of death, etc. They swore they hadn’t been drinking or doing drugs, but they sure looked like the were both strung out. And both admitted to mental health issues during the traffic stop.

OMG STOPPP!! He fake texted her mom, drive home without her and told police nothing, ever.

He is mentally ill. You don’t know where his head was at, how she died, or why he responded to her death this way. You have no idea what really happened.

And you know this how? Assuming that he did murder her (and that's still an assumption at this point) he doesn't appear to have anything close to the severe mental illness required for a finding of "not guilty by reason of insanity" or even "guilty but mentally ill."

The stupidity on this thread makes me question the jury system. Let me spell it out for you. I’m the Body Cam video, both of these young people admit to the police they are mentally ill. The police remark that the issues were mental health, not DV. You cannot watch that video without seeing mental illness (unless they were on drugs, which Gabby strongly denied, also in the video). Now maybe he killed her. Or maybe she died and that amplified his mental issues, to a point where he thought he killed her. I’m just saying it’s distressing how everyone on this forum thinks they know he’s scum and a murdered. Let’s wait at least for toxicology anc time of death before we hang the guy.

I don't recall him saying that he is mentally ill anywhere on the body cam footage?? She says that she has anxiety and some OCD. Don't they both deny taking any medications? My point is that based on that body cam footage, no jury would ever find that he met the standard for "not guilty by reason of insanity" or "guilty but mentally ill." Both high standards, for good reason.

And I'm pretty sure you'd be stricken by the prosecutor as a potential juror, if you diagnosed him as mentally ill based on the body cam footage and think this should affect his culpability. Yes, this is assuming that he is eventually charged.

A great question for potential jurors would be: have you visited the dcurbanmom website in the last x months

You win the best of DCUM award for this post. LOL