TKPK public schools vs. AUP/Tenleytown/Friendship Heights public schools

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It fascinates me how little people know or understand county politics. All incorporated areas in the county have a political advantage. Beyond that, for a good period of time 4 out of 9 council members came from Takoma Park. It is one of the reasons why there was a push to expand the council. All it took to win a council seat was to cater to 10,000 Takoma Park residents which would give you enough votes to make Top 4 in the At-Large Democratic primary which assures that you win the General. 10,000 Takoma Park voters basically controlling the government of a county with 1 million people.

Sounds to me like that's more on the rest of the county. Or perhaps Takoma Park just reflects the county as a whole the way Ohio did for presidential elections for many years.

You think the woke lunatics in TP represent Olney, Bethesda, Potomac, Poolseville, Darnestown, Clarksburg, and Damascus?

If 10,000 TP residents control MoCo, it's either TP reflects the county as a whole (not any particular neighborhood) or their mafia is really good.

But of course anyone using "woke lunatic" has an agenda more nefarious.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It fascinates me how little people know or understand county politics. All incorporated areas in the county have a political advantage. Beyond that, for a good period of time 4 out of 9 council members came from Takoma Park. It is one of the reasons why there was a push to expand the council. All it took to win a council seat was to cater to 10,000 Takoma Park residents which would give you enough votes to make Top 4 in the At-Large Democratic primary which assures that you win the General. 10,000 Takoma Park voters basically controlling the government of a county with 1 million people.

Sounds to me like that's more on the rest of the county. Or perhaps Takoma Park just reflects the county as a whole the way Ohio did for presidential elections for many years.

You think the woke lunatics in TP represent Olney, Bethesda, Potomac, Poolseville, Darnestown, Clarksburg, and Damascus?

If 10,000 TP residents control MoCo, it's either TP reflects the county as a whole (not any particular neighborhood) or their mafia is really good.

But of course anyone using "woke lunatic" has an agenda more nefarious.

It's that 2nd one. And it's called the Democrat Machine which in MoCo is controlled be progressives. Hopefully the moderate Dems in MoCo will wake up and start voting for non-socialists. How we ever let that happen is a complete mystery to me.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It fascinates me how little people know or understand county politics. All incorporated areas in the county have a political advantage. Beyond that, for a good period of time 4 out of 9 council members came from Takoma Park. It is one of the reasons why there was a push to expand the council. All it took to win a council seat was to cater to 10,000 Takoma Park residents which would give you enough votes to make Top 4 in the At-Large Democratic primary which assures that you win the General. 10,000 Takoma Park voters basically controlling the government of a county with 1 million people.

Sounds to me like that's more on the rest of the county. Or perhaps Takoma Park just reflects the county as a whole the way Ohio did for presidential elections for many years.

You think the woke lunatics in TP represent Olney, Bethesda, Potomac, Poolseville, Darnestown, Clarksburg, and Damascus?

If 10,000 TP residents control MoCo, it's either TP reflects the county as a whole (not any particular neighborhood) or their mafia is really good.

But of course anyone using "woke lunatic" has an agenda more nefarious.

It's that 2nd one. And it's called the Democrat Machine which in MoCo is controlled be progressives. Hopefully the moderate Dems in MoCo will wake up and start voting for non-socialists. How we ever let that happen is a complete mystery to me.

I think the "Democratic machine" is part of the explanation, but not in a nefarious way. Political parties are organizations, and you can't just parachute into an organization and ask to be given a leadership role. So, east county Democrats are, for whatever reason, more likely to have been involved in the party and therefore more likely to get support from the "machine."

So, if you are a moderate Democrat and you think you want to run for an at-large seat in the County Council, find out when the MoCo Dems meet and start volunteering. In 3-5 years you'll have the relationships you need to make your run.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It fascinates me how little people know or understand county politics. All incorporated areas in the county have a political advantage. Beyond that, for a good period of time 4 out of 9 council members came from Takoma Park. It is one of the reasons why there was a push to expand the council. All it took to win a council seat was to cater to 10,000 Takoma Park residents which would give you enough votes to make Top 4 in the At-Large Democratic primary which assures that you win the General. 10,000 Takoma Park voters basically controlling the government of a county with 1 million people.

Sounds to me like that's more on the rest of the county. Or perhaps Takoma Park just reflects the county as a whole the way Ohio did for presidential elections for many years.

Omertà! The Takoma Park mafia will get to you if you’re not careful.

It'll be interesting to see how effective they are against MS-13 once the schools are integrated with eastern PG county schools.

FFS, you’ve said this three times now and no one gave you any attention so you’re back. No takoma park schools are not going to be “integrated” with schools in another county so you can keep your racist “MS-13” references for another day.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It fascinates me how little people know or understand county politics. All incorporated areas in the county have a political advantage. Beyond that, for a good period of time 4 out of 9 council members came from Takoma Park. It is one of the reasons why there was a push to expand the council. All it took to win a council seat was to cater to 10,000 Takoma Park residents which would give you enough votes to make Top 4 in the At-Large Democratic primary which assures that you win the General. 10,000 Takoma Park voters basically controlling the government of a county with 1 million people.

Sounds to me like that's more on the rest of the county. Or perhaps Takoma Park just reflects the county as a whole the way Ohio did for presidential elections for many years.

Omertà! The Takoma Park mafia will get to you if you’re not careful.

It'll be interesting to see how effective they are against MS-13 once the schools are integrated with eastern PG county schools.

FFS, you’ve said this three times now and no one gave you any attention so you’re back. No takoma park schools are not going to be “integrated” with schools in another county so you can keep your racist “MS-13” references for another day.

So you support segregation. Huh.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It fascinates me how little people know or understand county politics. All incorporated areas in the county have a political advantage. Beyond that, for a good period of time 4 out of 9 council members came from Takoma Park. It is one of the reasons why there was a push to expand the council. All it took to win a council seat was to cater to 10,000 Takoma Park residents which would give you enough votes to make Top 4 in the At-Large Democratic primary which assures that you win the General. 10,000 Takoma Park voters basically controlling the government of a county with 1 million people.

Sounds to me like that's more on the rest of the county. Or perhaps Takoma Park just reflects the county as a whole the way Ohio did for presidential elections for many years.

Omertà! The Takoma Park mafia will get to you if you’re not careful.

It'll be interesting to see how effective they are against MS-13 once the schools are integrated with eastern PG county schools.

FFS, you’ve said this three times now and no one gave you any attention so you’re back. No takoma park schools are not going to be “integrated” with schools in another county so you can keep your racist “MS-13” references for another day.

p.s. do you not believe in MS-13? The MoCo and PGCo police sure do. They are already in east MoCo schools. Imagine how many more are in PGCo schools.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

True, I remember reading the post that showed Blair's SAT average was 50 points higher for the largest common cohort to it and any W. Some people argued but the magnet which was ridiculous because it's a small program in a large school that's also mostly Asian. It goes to show that Blair envy is a real thing.

Blair 1326
Walter Johnson 1275
Wootton 1262
Churchill 1257

https://www.montgomeryschoolsmd.org/departments/sharedaccountability/reports/2017/1771102HS%20Princ_SAT%20Partic_Perf%20Class%20of%202017.pdf

I had no idea. That's great!

keep replying to your self but the common cohort you claim is like 5% of Blair as a whole. The school's SAT is among the lowest in the county. You if you cherry pick your test takers and them put them up against entire schools you will get a measure that you like. But if you just look at school's student body it kind of sucks compered to the county as a whole.

#allfactsmatter

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

True, I remember reading the post that showed Blair's SAT average was 50 points higher for the largest common cohort to it and any W. Some people argued but the magnet which was ridiculous because it's a small program in a large school that's also mostly Asian. It goes to show that Blair envy is a real thing.

Blair 1326
Walter Johnson 1275
Wootton 1262
Churchill 1257

https://www.montgomeryschoolsmd.org/departments/sharedaccountability/reports/2017/1771102HS%20Princ_SAT%20Partic_Perf%20Class%20of%202017.pdf

I had no idea. That's great!

keep replying to your self but the common cohort you claim is like 5% of Blair as a whole. The school's SAT is among the lowest in the county. You if you cherry pick your test takers and them put them up against entire schools you will get a measure that you like. But if you just look at school's student body it kind of sucks compered to the county as a whole.

#allfactsmatter

Agreed. Greatschools didn't give it a 4 for nothing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

True, I remember reading the post that showed Blair's SAT average was 50 points higher for the largest common cohort to it and any W. Some people argued but the magnet which was ridiculous because it's a small program in a large school that's also mostly Asian. It goes to show that Blair envy is a real thing.

Blair 1326
Walter Johnson 1275
Wootton 1262
Churchill 1257

https://www.montgomeryschoolsmd.org/departments/sharedaccountability/reports/2017/1771102HS%20Princ_SAT%20Partic_Perf%20Class%20of%202017.pdf

I had no idea. That's great!

keep replying to your self but the common cohort you claim is like 5% of Blair as a whole. The school's SAT is among the lowest in the county. You if you cherry pick your test takers and them put them up against entire schools you will get a measure that you like. But if you just look at school's student body it kind of sucks compered to the county as a whole.

#allfactsmatter

Since you're so committed to facts, here are some mistakes in your post that you'll want to correct:

No, Blair's SAT is not "among the lowest in the county." In the linked report, the overall mean SAT for Blair is 1142, which is higher than 60% of the schools.

And no, the "common cohort" [white students] is not "like 5% of Blair as a whole." Blair's white student population in 2017 (the year the report was written) was 22.3%.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

True, I remember reading the post that showed Blair's SAT average was 50 points higher for the largest common cohort to it and any W. Some people argued but the magnet which was ridiculous because it's a small program in a large school that's also mostly Asian. It goes to show that Blair envy is a real thing.

Blair 1326
Walter Johnson 1275
Wootton 1262
Churchill 1257

https://www.montgomeryschoolsmd.org/departments/sharedaccountability/reports/2017/1771102HS%20Princ_SAT%20Partic_Perf%20Class%20of%202017.pdf

I had no idea. That's great!

keep replying to your self but the common cohort you claim is like 5% of Blair as a whole. The school's SAT is among the lowest in the county. You if you cherry pick your test takers and them put them up against entire schools you will get a measure that you like. But if you just look at school's student body it kind of sucks compered to the county as a whole.

#allfactsmatter

Since you're so committed to facts, here are some mistakes in your post that you'll want to correct:

No, Blair's SAT is not "among the lowest in the county." In the linked report, the overall mean SAT for Blair is 1142, which is higher than 60% of the schools.

And no, the "common cohort" [white students] is not "like 5% of Blair as a whole." Blair's white student population in 2017 (the year the report was written) was 22.3%.

Oh, so the chart above should have looked like:

Walter Johnson 1275
Wootton 1262
Churchill 1257
Blair 1142

That's different isn't it? Typical east county progressive dishonesty. Reminds me of the way another (or maybe it's you) corrupt east county progressive made diversity the top factor in the boundary policy. She pushed these changes through the BOE without notifying the public. She did, however, manage to tell all her Facebook friends and encouraged them to comment so it looked like there was support for changes that had were voted down hard just a few months prior. Moderate Dems better wake up to progressive dishonesty here in MoCo before they destroy the county.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

True, I remember reading the post that showed Blair's SAT average was 50 points higher for the largest common cohort to it and any W. Some people argued but the magnet which was ridiculous because it's a small program in a large school that's also mostly Asian. It goes to show that Blair envy is a real thing.

Blair 1326
Walter Johnson 1275
Wootton 1262
Churchill 1257

https://www.montgomeryschoolsmd.org/departments/sharedaccountability/reports/2017/1771102HS%20Princ_SAT%20Partic_Perf%20Class%20of%202017.pdf

I had no idea. That's great!

keep replying to your self but the common cohort you claim is like 5% of Blair as a whole. The school's SAT is among the lowest in the county. You if you cherry pick your test takers and them put them up against entire schools you will get a measure that you like. But if you just look at school's student body it kind of sucks compered to the county as a whole.

#allfactsmatter

Since you're so committed to facts, here are some mistakes in your post that you'll want to correct:

No, Blair's SAT is not "among the lowest in the county." In the linked report, the overall mean SAT for Blair is 1142, which is higher than 60% of the schools.

And no, the "common cohort" [white students] is not "like 5% of Blair as a whole." Blair's white student population in 2017 (the year the report was written) was 22.3%.

Oh, so the chart above should have looked like:

Walter Johnson 1275
Wootton 1262
Churchill 1257
Blair 1142

That's different isn't it? Typical east county progressive dishonesty. Reminds me of the way another (or maybe it's you) corrupt east county progressive made diversity the top factor in the boundary policy. She pushed these changes through the BOE without notifying the public. She did, however, manage to tell all her Facebook friends and encouraged them to comment so it looked like there was support for changes that had were voted down hard just a few months prior. Moderate Dems better wake up to progressive dishonesty here in MoCo before they destroy the county.

Sigh. No, your chart is not correct. The previous poster's chart was correct, based on the numbers for white students. Blair's 1326 number is correct for that chart.
Separately, you suggested that Blair's overall numbers were "among the lowest in the county." That was false.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

True, I remember reading the post that showed Blair's SAT average was 50 points higher for the largest common cohort to it and any W. Some people argued but the magnet which was ridiculous because it's a small program in a large school that's also mostly Asian. It goes to show that Blair envy is a real thing.

Blair 1326
Walter Johnson 1275
Wootton 1262
Churchill 1257

https://www.montgomeryschoolsmd.org/departments/sharedaccountability/reports/2017/1771102HS%20Princ_SAT%20Partic_Perf%20Class%20of%202017.pdf

I had no idea. That's great!

keep replying to your self but the common cohort you claim is like 5% of Blair as a whole. The school's SAT is among the lowest in the county. You if you cherry pick your test takers and them put them up against entire schools you will get a measure that you like. But if you just look at school's student body it kind of sucks compered to the county as a whole.

#allfactsmatter

Since you're so committed to facts, here are some mistakes in your post that you'll want to correct:

No, Blair's SAT is not "among the lowest in the county." In the linked report, the overall mean SAT for Blair is 1142, which is higher than 60% of the schools.

And no, the "common cohort" [white students] is not "like 5% of Blair as a whole." Blair's white student population in 2017 (the year the report was written) was 22.3%.

Oh, so the chart above should have looked like:

Walter Johnson 1275
Wootton 1262
Churchill 1257
Blair 1142

That's different isn't it? Typical east county progressive dishonesty. Reminds me of the way another (or maybe it's you) corrupt east county progressive made diversity the top factor in the boundary policy. She pushed these changes through the BOE without notifying the public. She did, however, manage to tell all her Facebook friends and encouraged them to comment so it looked like there was support for changes that had were voted down hard just a few months prior. Moderate Dems better wake up to progressive dishonesty here in MoCo before they destroy the county.

Sigh. No, your chart is not correct. The previous poster's chart was correct, based on the numbers for white students. Blair's 1326 number is correct for that chart.
Separately, you suggested that Blair's overall numbers were "among the lowest in the county." That was false.

Who cares about the scores of any specific race except racists? Here are the scores for ALL students:

Walter Johnson 1213
Wootton 1230
Churchill 1252
Blair 1142

And I was not the PP who said Blair had some of the lowest scores in the county. Looking at the chart, it scores 16 points above the county average. It should be noted that, as a magnet, Blair should have some of the highest scores in the county just like RM but it doesn't.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

True, I remember reading the post that showed Blair's SAT average was 50 points higher for the largest common cohort to it and any W. Some people argued but the magnet which was ridiculous because it's a small program in a large school that's also mostly Asian. It goes to show that Blair envy is a real thing.

Blair 1326
Walter Johnson 1275
Wootton 1262
Churchill 1257

https://www.montgomeryschoolsmd.org/departments/sharedaccountability/reports/2017/1771102HS%20Princ_SAT%20Partic_Perf%20Class%20of%202017.pdf

I had no idea. That's great!

keep replying to your self but the common cohort you claim is like 5% of Blair as a whole. The school's SAT is among the lowest in the county. You if you cherry pick your test takers and them put them up against entire schools you will get a measure that you like. But if you just look at school's student body it kind of sucks compered to the county as a whole.

#allfactsmatter

Since you're so committed to facts, here are some mistakes in your post that you'll want to correct:

No, Blair's SAT is not "among the lowest in the county." In the linked report, the overall mean SAT for Blair is 1142, which is higher than 60% of the schools.

And no, the "common cohort" [white students] is not "like 5% of Blair as a whole." Blair's white student population in 2017 (the year the report was written) was 22.3%.

Oh, so the chart above should have looked like:

Walter Johnson 1275
Wootton 1262
Churchill 1257
Blair 1142

That's different isn't it? Typical east county progressive dishonesty. Reminds me of the way another (or maybe it's you) corrupt east county progressive made diversity the top factor in the boundary policy. She pushed these changes through the BOE without notifying the public. She did, however, manage to tell all her Facebook friends and encouraged them to comment so it looked like there was support for changes that had were voted down hard just a few months prior. Moderate Dems better wake up to progressive dishonesty here in MoCo before they destroy the county.

Sigh. No, your chart is not correct. The previous poster's chart was correct, based on the numbers for white students. Blair's 1326 number is correct for that chart.
Separately, you suggested that Blair's overall numbers were "among the lowest in the county." That was false.

Who cares about the scores of any specific race except racists? Here are the scores for ALL students:

Walter Johnson 1213
Wootton 1230
Churchill 1252
Blair 1142

And I was not the PP who said Blair had some of the lowest scores in the county. Looking at the chart, it scores 16 points above the county average. It should be noted that, as a magnet, Blair should have some of the highest scores in the county just like RM but it doesn't.

Obviously MCPS cares--that's why the data was collected and included in the report.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

And I was not the PP who said Blair had some of the lowest scores in the county. Looking at the chart, it scores 16 points above the county average. It should be noted that, as a magnet, Blair should have some of the highest scores in the county just like RM but it doesn't.

Huh? The mean scores for the Blair magnet itself are comparable to RMIB itself.

Blair: 1531
RM: 1500

https://mbhs.edu/departments/counseling/MagnetProfile.pdf

https://www2.montgomeryschoolsmd.org/siteassets/schools/high-schools/r-w/rmhs/ib/2020-2021-ib_insert.pdf?usp=sharing

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

And I was not the PP who said Blair had some of the lowest scores in the county. Looking at the chart, it scores 16 points above the county average. It should be noted that, as a magnet, Blair should have some of the highest scores in the county just like RM but it doesn't.

Huh? The mean scores for the Blair magnet itself are comparable to RMIB itself.

Blair: 1531
RM: 1500

https://mbhs.edu/departments/counseling/MagnetProfile.pdf

https://www2.montgomeryschoolsmd.org/siteassets/schools/high-schools/r-w/rmhs/ib/2020-2021-ib_insert.pdf?usp=sharing

I meant when averaged in with the rest of the schools.