No. You’ve apparently never seen women at a widows/widowers club. There are many fewer men because they have died off and it is a total aggressive feeding frenzy of women wooing men. If you’re a man you are not getting out alive. |
I suggest you title your book "How I'm Right and Statistics on Second Marriage Success are Total Lies." |
Why? I share an observation, not a judgment. Total assets are better than one half, all the time with the kids is better than part of it. |
It's a statement of fact, not a judgment, that divorced parents lose uninterrupted access to children and control over them. |
Plenty of men are happy enough with their main relationship not to want to leave, but want sexual variety badly enough to cheat. Men don't really want to leave their marriages over every woman they sleep with. The wive/non-wife line is very bright in the minds of most men. |
Why didn't he win their affection while he was married to their mother? |
What a breath of fresh air, someone who gets it. |
Do you mean guys who think they can upgrade? Kind of like Donald Trump? People like that, male or female, don't tend to regret much. |
Reread the bolded. You think you are God's great gift to men. What, exactly, do you get from your marriage to DH? And why, if you divorced, would he not get "uninterrupted access to his children?" Why assume that you would have primary custody? Enter the 21st century, please. |
So, with this understanding, why make sexual fidelity the seeming be all and end all of marriage? Why not be monogomish? Are you really going to upend a lifelong marriage where you have kids, assets, etc. over one partner parking his car in another garage or allowing someone else to park in that garage? |
Hard to imagine anybody divorcing this gem. Hard to know what’s worse: the blatant racism, misogyny, or the narcissism that leads him to think he doesn’t have any flaws and it’s always the women who are flawed. Submit, ladies, and be “loving and respectful” no matter how abusive/cheating/lazy your DH is. Totally gross. |
The bolded is the reflection of fact, not of my belief in my value. Divorce divides assets and time with children - exactly what in this do you find questionable? Since the thread contemplates the scenario when men initiates divorces, it's fair to examine the costs to men. I do not intend to divorce, therefore the costs to me are irrelevant for the purposes of this thread. He will not get uninterrupted access to children because his best scenario is shared custody. Marriage is a societal construct, not a romantic one. Its purpose is to accumulate shared assets and raise children. When you exit this contract, you incur costs in the assets and children line items. Again, not sure why you find it so objectionable to see this fact spelled out. |
I didn't. |
Make sure you point this out to all the women in the world who think they should get all the money and full custody of the children. |
Statistically, women are much more likely than men to initiate divorces.
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/08/150822154900.htm |