What kind of guy sees prostitutes?

Anonymous
She has something he wants, he has something she wants.
Consenting adults conduct a fair trade in a free market.
Not a problem.

Women are so threatened by losing control over men's sex drive.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:You men are really effing nasty. Are the same men here justifying paying for prostitutes the same ones who argued earlier this week that a man with morals wouldn't cheat on his wife?


If the wife puts out then no reason to cheat. Every marriage is differrent I have never cheated on my ex during marriage because of moral. Divorced her now for cheating, go figure.
Now would I hire a hooker you ask..yes absolutely if she's hot. It's harder for men to get any. We have to wine and dine do the dating game and so on. Sometimes you just want to get past that just to blow off a load. Unlike women all you have to do is show you want it and any warm blooded guy is all over you.
Sorry if you find men that does disgusting but it is what it is. But saying a guy using escort is a bad guy is going too far.
Anonymous
Guy here. The problem with prostitution is the human trafficking element.

Without it, (say in NV at a legal brothel), I have no issue.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Guy here. The problem with prostitution is the human trafficking element.

Without it, (say in NV at a legal brothel), I have no issue.


+1 from a woman
Anonymous
I'm divorced, in my 50's and see prostitutes, but never below the age of 30. I have 20 something daughters and anyone younger is just sick, so no worries about trafficking. I have a lot responsibilities and don't have the time to wine and dine, so why not? You wouldn't believe how many attractive 30 and 40 something women in the DMV are supplementing their income with either providing or being a Sugarbaby. All are divorced or single parents as well, attractive and feel more empowered after joining the profession. Nothing wrong with two consenting adults getting what they want, regardless of the moral and legal issues.
Anonymous
Lets' snot call them prostitutes. They are more like "conveniently located and economically priced sex workers."
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Guy here. The problem with prostitution is the human trafficking element.

Without it, (say in NV at a legal brothel), I have no issue.


+1 from a woman


+2
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Guy here. The problem with prostitution is the human trafficking element.

Without it, (say in NV at a legal brothel), I have no issue.


+1 from a woman


+ 2 from a woman.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:You men are really effing nasty. Are the same men here justifying paying for prostitutes the same ones who argued earlier this week that a man with morals wouldn't cheat on his wife?


If the wife puts out then no reason to cheat. Every marriage is differrent I have never cheated on my ex during marriage because of moral. Divorced her now for cheating, go figure.
Now would I hire a hooker you ask..yes absolutely if she's hot. It's harder for men to get any. We have to wine and dine do the dating game and so on. Sometimes you just want to get past that just to blow off a load. Unlike women all you have to do is show you want it and any warm blooded guy is all over you.
Sorry if you find men that does disgusting but it is what it is. But saying a guy using escort is a bad guy is going too far.


God, I wish I were a lesbian. This guy is far too common.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Guy here. The problem with prostitution is the human trafficking element.

Without it, (say in NV at a legal brothel), I have no issue.


+1 from a woman


+ 2 from a woman.


Honestly, I think this view is a bit naive and self-delusional. IMO, it looks the decision women make to engage in sex work as either a "forced" or "voluntary" decision, judging "forced" prostitution as wrong but "voluntary" prostitution as OK. It really underestimates the forces that drive women to take money in exchange for sex -- emotional abuse, economic difficulties, limited well-paying job opportunities, childcare obligations, etc. -- and underestimates the ways in which the choice to engage in sex work limits future job opportunity and perpetuates a cycle of being trapped in prostitution.

Perhaps some day far in the future, when women and men are earning equal pay and have equal access to education, job opportunities, advancement, reproductive control, paid maternity leave, equal retirement funding, quality affordable daycare, etc., maybe then one will be able to truly say women (and men) are making a purely business choice to earn money thru sex, but I really don't think we're there yet.

Personally, I think you sell yourself this argument ("she is choosing to do this voluntarily") so you can make yourself feel better about using another human being in this way.

IMO, people who use other people are not very good people, but they certainly have a lot of company.
Anonymous
what kind of guy sees pros?

We are your fathers, brothers, uncles, grandpas, husbands, boyfriends, etc....


-Jon250+
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Lets' snot call them prostitutes. They are more like "conveniently located and economically priced sex workers."



Kind of like calling Jeffrey Dahmer a chef.

No they are whores, and same with the low life's that sink that low.

Get divorced, stay single, don't have children if you have those kinds of problems.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:She has something he wants, he has something she wants.
Consenting adults conduct a fair trade in a free market.
Not a problem.

Women are so threatened by losing control over men's sex drive.



Like drug dealing it's illegal. Try to climb a little higher....
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Guy here. The problem with prostitution is the human trafficking element.

Without it, (say in NV at a legal brothel), I have no issue.


+1 from a woman


+ 2 from a woman.


Honestly, I think this view is a bit naive and self-delusional. IMO, it looks the decision women make to engage in sex work as either a "forced" or "voluntary" decision, judging "forced" prostitution as wrong but "voluntary" prostitution as OK. It really underestimates the forces that drive women to take money in exchange for sex -- emotional abuse, economic difficulties, limited well-paying job opportunities, childcare obligations, etc. -- and underestimates the ways in which the choice to engage in sex work limits future job opportunity and perpetuates a cycle of being trapped in prostitution.

Perhaps some day far in the future, when women and men are earning equal pay and have equal access to education, job opportunities, advancement, reproductive control, paid maternity leave, equal retirement funding, quality affordable daycare, etc., maybe then one will be able to truly say women (and men) are making a purely business choice to earn money thru sex, but I really don't think we're there yet.

Personally, I think you sell yourself this argument ("she is choosing to do this voluntarily") so you can make yourself feel better about using another human being in this way.

IMO, people who use other people are not very good people, but they certainly have a lot of company.


With the exception of (mandatory) paid maternity leave, woman have the list. There is minimal education discrimination today; there are abundant job opportunities, advancement, reproductive control, no difference in retirement funding....

The problem is the key issue is education. Uneducated people in either sex have limited opportunities. Besides military (who train, but require drug free), there are not a lot of options. For men, it really comes down to crime; for women, it is often prostitution. The real tragedy are the kids that run away/are thrown out and have no other options...
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Guy here. The problem with prostitution is the human trafficking element.

Without it, (say in NV at a legal brothel), I have no issue.


+1 from a woman


+ 2 from a woman.


Honestly, I think this view is a bit naive and self-delusional. IMO, it looks the decision women make to engage in sex work as either a "forced" or "voluntary" decision, judging "forced" prostitution as wrong but "voluntary" prostitution as OK. It really underestimates the forces that drive women to take money in exchange for sex -- emotional abuse, economic difficulties, limited well-paying job opportunities, childcare obligations, etc. -- and underestimates the ways in which the choice to engage in sex work limits future job opportunity and perpetuates a cycle of being trapped in prostitution.

Perhaps some day far in the future, when women and men are earning equal pay and have equal access to education, job opportunities, advancement, reproductive control, paid maternity leave, equal retirement funding, quality affordable daycare, etc., maybe then one will be able to truly say women (and men) are making a purely business choice to earn money thru sex, but I really don't think we're there yet.

Personally, I think you sell yourself this argument ("she is choosing to do this voluntarily") so you can make yourself feel better about using another human being in this way.

IMO, people who use other people are not very good people, but they certainly have a lot of company.


Well, the forces you describe drive people to take money from all kinds of sources, yet we are not about to make minimum-wage labor illegal. Prostitution pays better. In fact, I'm convinced the workers would benefit in many ways if the industry was legal and controlled. No amount of social support will ever eliminate it, because it's called the oldest trade for a reason. Have you been to Amsterdam?

I have not used any human being "in this way." (If I did, it would be a guy, because I am a straight female. I guess that kind of throws your "maternity leave" arguments out the window :lol However, I do not presume I know best what's good for other people. I despise white liberals who continuously do that! People, regardless of how poor and uneducated, have agency. Remember that. The are entitled to make their choices, and as long as those choices are not illegal or harm the innocent, it is none of your business to tell women what to take money for.
Forum Index » Relationship Discussion (non-explicit)
Go to: